iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert P. Jones, Ph.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Robert P. Jones, Ph.D.
 

Retiring Old Assumptions About Religious People and Same-Sex Marriage

Posted: 02/ 8/2012 10:20 am

Recently, Democratic Washington State Senator Mary Margaret Haugen offered evidence that the same-sex marriage debate has moved past the old battle lines between secular proponents and religious foes. Sen. Haugen tipped the scales for supporters of a same-sex marriage bill in the Washington legislature when she announced that she would support the measure. Her decision, she explained, was grounded in her "strong Christian beliefs" and her desire to "live by the Golden Rule." Sen. Haugen's distinctly religious logic echoed Washington Governor Chris Gregoire, who is a practicing Catholic. Gregoire strongly endorsed her state's same-sex marriage bill after opposing marriage equality for most of her time as governor.

Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional, a debate where there religious voices were also raised on both sides. If the issue passes in Washington State, it will join five other states and the District of Columbia as jurisdictions where gay and lesbian Americans are legally able to marry. Five other states are also debating the issue this year.

Recent analysis of 2011 polling on same-sex marriage reveals that the changing landscape challenges some common stereotypes about religion and the issue of same-sex marriage. Notably, 2011 was the first year on record where supporting same-sex marriage was not a minority position. At mid-year, several polls from different organizations (including one from Public Religion Research Institute) found slim majority support for allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. Polling later in the year continued to find plurality or even support for same-sex marriage.

More significantly, a new exploration of 2011 polling by Public Religion Research Institute offers decisive evidence that the old assumptions about battle lines between secular proponents and religious foes no longer hold. Majorities of five major religious groups and the religiously unaffiliated favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry, compared to three major religious groups who oppose same-sex marriage. On the side supporting same-sex marriage, the religiously unaffiliated (72 percent) are joined by majorities of Jews (76 percent), Americans affiliated with a non-Judeo-Christian religion (63 percent), white Catholics (56 percent), Hispanic Catholics (53 percent) and white mainline Protestants (52 percent). Together, these religious groups make up approximately 45 percent of the general population.

On the other hand, large majorities of white evangelical Protestants (75 percent), Mormons (75 percent) and black Protestants (63 percent) continue to oppose same-sex marriage. Opposition to same-sex marriage among these groups is intense: near-majorities of Mormons (48 percent) and evangelicals (46 percent) strongly oppose allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally. Together, these groups comprise approximately 32 percent of the general population.

Within these opposition groups, however, a generational gap signals that with the passage of time, this intense resistance may ebb. Even among white evangelical Protestants -- the group most opposed to same-sex marriage -- nearly 4-in-10 (39 percent) white evangelical Protestant Millennials favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally, a rate that is more than 20 points higher than that of white evangelicals ages 30 and older (18 percent). The same is true of Catholics: 66 percent of Catholic Millennials favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry, 15 points higher than Catholics ages 30 and above (51 percent).

The quirks of specific constituencies and cultures may drive individual statewide legislative and ballot initiative battles this year. But the prominent testimonies of religious elected officials, alongside the perspectives from the people in the pews, certainly demand that the media retire the archaic assumption that religious people oppose same-sex marriage.

 
 
 

Follow Robert P. Jones, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/publicreligion

 
 
  • Comments
  • 57
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlesrfd2003
Proud American who believes in the Bill of Rights
02:36 AM on 02/27/2012
Fear must be the dominant emotion of the far right. They know that they are losing and are attempting to gain control to keep change from happening. That is why they refuse to compromise and let live.on so many issues. Refuting the lies and attempts to demonize peoples will work against the old thinking.. Refusing to let them drive wedges between people will in the end result in the total demise of the Republican as we know it. They will end up like the old Federalist party.

Must be scary to be a right winger to see neighbors as enemies. They only way these folks can win is of the rest of us fail to vote.
photo
roy brophy
Dyslexic F. O. "Sorry!"
01:45 PM on 02/17/2012
May I suggest a study for the Public Religion Research Institute ?

examine the difference in opinion between laypeople (workers) lower clergy (supervisors) and leaders/higher clergy (management) on a wide range of social topics.
I think the results would be enlightening.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsttho557949
What is Job's Crucible?
06:33 PM on 02/16/2012
The same sees issue is a scheme to overide tradition and use civil ruling to validate it as normal. Using the old propaganda tactic of saying something long and often enough, a person gives in to the annoyance. The annoyance manipulates the people to vote to quiet the annoyance; in the process the vote to end the annoyance accomplishes the goal. Once a thing is law, there is little debate if something is right wrong because the people ( though manipulated) apparently welcomed the issue with open arms with their vote. Once a controversial issue is made law, it's protected by the legal system and those who challenge it's legality will be punished. Very clever.
There, however, will never be marriage equality in same sex marriages because it will always be met with a similiar tup resentment as forced integration or bussing.
01:57 PM on 02/15/2012
There is a distinction between giving legal recognition to same sex marriage and giving canonical recognition to same sex marriage. You can believe that same-sex marriage should be recognized by the state but be opposed to it being recognized by your church. I don't want to tell people they can't marry at all. Just NOT IN MY CHURCH!
11:05 AM on 02/10/2012
Poll 100 people in New York, 100 people in California and 25 in the heartland and What do you get?
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
10:30 PM on 02/09/2012
rick newt rick mitt rick benedict bernie etc.......

but keep up the fight anyway
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
10:58 AM on 02/09/2012
How small is the percentage of "religious people" who actually care enough about what Our Creator thinks enough of them to seek His advice and follow it?
06:23 PM on 02/11/2012
The more I follow God the smaller the number seems to get. I have my own sins to deal with and same sex marriage is a sin so why would I try to make my "sin" ok and parade it around in a church?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
09:35 PM on 02/11/2012
Good point. When I get a chance I like to encourage those who want Our Creator's approval to learn the Bible well enough so they can clearly see where any denomination is wrong, then see if they can find a way to encourage others to appreciate the same opportunity. Having recorded copies of the whole Bible has helped me a lot. It can be downloaded free from the net or acquired for $10 on DVD or $33 to $50 from ChristianBook,Com, about $4-$6 postage. Strong's and or Young's Concordance can help too, about $15.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:33 AM on 02/09/2012
Little did I know, only the atheists are now against gay marriage...?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
10:06 AM on 02/09/2012
Its fair to say that some members of all of those religious groups are more open to the notion that in a non-theocratic society even Christians cannot expect non-Christians and others to live by their views. That is different however than stating that they no longer oppose such actions WITHIN their religion. Obviously most right-wing evangelicals and even democratic African-American denominations beg to differ. General support is increasing as it should by Constitutional definitions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michele Belin Beulah
It's all good, it's all God.
10:01 AM on 02/09/2012
Christians trip me out living by the "Golden Rule". You are a Christian, which means you choose to live by the example and beliefs of Jesus Christ. What about His rule or the rules of the bible? Wow. Folk will do anything now a days to please the world and keep themselves looking good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel1999
Microbiologist & Historian
12:28 PM on 02/10/2012
And of course since Jesus never said anything at all about homosexuality or same sex marriage, then it seems the governor is doing just that.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
Dogmatic Dictators, believers or not, not welcome
04:31 AM on 02/09/2012
Could we also retire some of the old assumptions religious people make about gays? Gossip from the pulpit is not very pretty. Nor is it in the pews.
08:31 PM on 02/09/2012
True, but the reason for this article is that there is much larger acceptance in mainstream religions than either some gays or religious conservatives want to admit. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of churches and synagogues that accept and affirm gays and gay relationships. That's where the real battle should take place--between the intolerant "Christians" and the accepting ones.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BOBinPS
Really?
08:47 PM on 02/08/2012
So are Catholics who ignore the official teachings of the RCC really practicing Catholics? Are the few Mormons who support universal civil rights really Mormons? Seems to be that the title of this piece would more correctly be "American attitudes towards gay civil rights become more positive despite religion's best efforts".
photo
Kimberly Knight
Silence is consent
09:57 AM on 02/09/2012
The point of the article is that not all religious people oppose gay civil rights. There are millions of religious people who do in fact believe and are indeed working for LGBT rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M A Ross
Salvation through slavery is worthless.
02:54 PM on 02/09/2012
And a lot of us appreacate the effort.
Please keep fighting the good fight.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BOBinPS
Really?
07:59 PM on 02/09/2012
i believe you are correct on both counts. But what the article ignores is that religion remains the primary obstacle to universal human rights. I understand that not all members of any group completely agree with the goals of the organizations they support. But, women's right and gay rights are not trivial issues. It is difficult for me to understand why someone would continue to support any organization that actively attempts to curtail those rights. If they do, they either have minimal regard for human rights, or far more regard for archaic superstitions.
08:32 PM on 02/09/2012
Religion is more nuanced than that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BOBinPS
Really?
07:09 PM on 02/10/2012
The religious may be more nuanced, but theology preached by the RCC, the Mormons, and the evangelicals are not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diana Scrimger
07:49 PM on 02/08/2012
We feel that it is morally wrong to have anthing other than marriage between a man and a woman. The Yes on Prop 8 side should win in the Supreme Court. We think that the Ninth Circuit court is just plain stupid. We think that it is stupid to have morals for more than one issue and igonore them for another. I am talking about birth control, abortion, and gay marriage! Why does the Bible apply to one issue and not the other?
11:21 PM on 02/08/2012
I am looking forward to your petition for exiling women while they have their periods, banning all blended fibres, outlawing the Bubba Gump shrimp co., and executing adulterers.

Oh, no. These "Christians" ONLY hate gay people and poor women.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
10:31 PM on 02/09/2012
don't forget killng your children who sass their parents and punishment for cream sauce on your beef stroganoff..
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
Dogmatic Dictators, believers or not, not welcome
11:36 PM on 02/08/2012
And what of the beliefs of those who do do believe as you do? Don't you think we might like our beliefs respected as much as you want yours?

That's why there's a separation between church and state. The beliefs are just too varied to cover all of them.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EspritDeVoltaire
K Street PR firm board member
06:27 PM on 02/08/2012
I would support anyone vs a group which promotes hate in the name of Jesus in direct opposition to his teachings.
09:15 PM on 02/20/2012
So, while you garner support for anyone that promotes what God hates, you might find that you are also fighting God who will win in the end. The love of Jesus does not carry in it a permission to love what God hates or to support what Jesus in fact died to redeem us from. Rebellion in the form of pious words are what the false prophets used to deceive Israel.
photo
ProofRequired
Taking back the human race, one believer at a time
02:58 PM on 02/08/2012
The religious always come around when they realize a battle cannot be won. This has been the pattern for all of history. The final battle will be over the necessity of religion and the existence of god. I can only imagine the joy that will spread through to world when that day comes. I certainly hope for our future generation's sake it comes before a fanatical group lays their hands on weapons of mass destruction. Right here at home in America, it is terrifying to realize that large groups of the religious are not heartbroken over the vision of a an entire city exploding in a mushroom cloud. That moment could augur the greatest thing possible, the arrival of their savior. Nothing should scare us more.
08:01 PM on 02/08/2012
Militant atheism is just about as attractive as religious fundamentalism.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:35 AM on 02/09/2012
Yah, arguing for rationality is so dogmatic!
photo
ProofRequired
Taking back the human race, one believer at a time
11:35 AM on 02/09/2012
If religion weren't so scary, the word "atheism" wouldn't even exist. Now that we have weapons of mass destruction, religion and all fantacism is that much more scary. You cannot be a fanatical atheist anymore than you can be a fanatical non-collector of stamps.