NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

Robert Reich

Posted: September 15, 2010 06:45 AM

In the 1930s and 1940s, we restructured our economy to widen prosperity. The result was the Great Prosperity -- a period running from 1947 to 1975, in which the American economy boomed. Almost everyone shared those gains. But after 1980, the pendulum swung backward. Instead of helping the middle class prosper in the new global, high-tech economy, government did just the opposite. It narrowed prosperity. The result was stagnant wages. The middle class steadily lost ground, while more and more of the benefits of economic growth flowed to the top.

1930s and 40s: We're All In It Together
1 of 18
Here's what we did during and after the Great Depression to widen prosperity ...
Total comments: 141 | Post a Comment
1 of 18

 
 
 
In the 1930s and 1940s, we restructured our economy to widen prosperity. The result was the Great Prosperity -- a period running from 1947 to 1975, in which the American economy boomed. Almost everyon...
In the 1930s and 1940s, we restructured our economy to widen prosperity. The result was the Great Prosperity -- a period running from 1947 to 1975, in which the American economy boomed. Almost everyon...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
09:46 AM on 10/10/2010
Reich portrays A nation that needs reforms badly- from the all too powerful private sector, low taxes among the corporations and well off, and a nation that will see these problems become more acute this decade.

The Age of Regan lives on- for now at least- but after 30 years it has become long in the tooth- its false promises have come home to roost.

The current far right fringe element may have short term political gains- but their inability to change with the society of today- and make reforms that will cost all; Government cuts- from the Federal to local level- (With public employees not getting such rich retirements funded by the tax payers) much higher taxes for the wealthy (taxes when JFK was President are far lower today-around 65% lower- taxes for upper wage earners will need to be risen as well.

Health care- the bill passed in march is not a good bill- it does not address access or costs- what is needed is single payer for all- in Europe single payer health care sees 50% cost savings compared to here.

The problems we have will not be solved by creating more of the same kind of Reagen Ideology of the last 3 decades- if so capitalism could collapse - Reich is very smart- too bad many Americans seek simplistic answers for complex issues they will soon learn will hurt them further.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
afgail
Wise and strong.
03:08 PM on 09/20/2010
The underlying betrayal of the middle class is the canard that business knows best and that government is the enemy. The evidence of the wrong headedness of this notion is every where. Starting with Savings and Loan debacle, ENRON, BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, Wall Street meltdown, Haliburton looting the pentagon budget, smoking created cancer epidemic and whole lot more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bchosmer
10:01 AM on 09/20/2010
Pretty much tells you what you need to know. Too bad the tea timers hate history.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptianTom
11:46 PM on 09/19/2010
Yes, that pictorial nailed it right.
10:06 AM on 09/19/2010
Thank you, Mr. Reich. I don't know how you can make it more plain. The rich have practiced class warfare for the last 30 years. A lot of Americans don't really seem to get that -- they buy into this egalitarian myth along with Washington refusing to lie about chopping down his daddy's cherry tree. Today Europe and Japan are more egalitarian than the U.S.

Of course, 1947 to 1975 is less than 30 years. If you consider history, the rich are almost always in the position they are now. Too bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acudoc
10:34 PM on 09/18/2010
None of our "experts" ever ascribes our decline to a built-in defect in the nature of our money. The left decries the lack (!) of proper government regulation while the right decries the glut of improper government regulation, and both sides worship the State.

Meanwhile, the puppetmasters who issue our money ex nihilo through the promissory notes by which WE THE PEOPLE SIGN OUR LIVES AWAY, continue their lucrative march into Neo-Feudalism.

Repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which has made us and our government indentured servants to a banking class, and which distorts every aspect of our individual and collective lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
afgail
Wise and strong.
02:39 PM on 09/20/2010
Huh? acuduc you really wiffed that one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acudoc
07:44 PM on 09/22/2010
Are you so sure? Do you even know how money is created in the modern world? Without that knowledge you are re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

The greatest threat is from those who passionately believe themselves to be right, all the while clinging to a theory that ensures their disaster.

http://www.plata.com.mx/mplata/articulos/articlesFilt.asp?fiidarticulo=161
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shane Nahumko
Let them eat iPads!
09:34 PM on 09/18/2010
Keep fighting the good fight Mr. Reich. Someone has to keep the spotlight on the heart of the problem with the economy. Income inequality caused a depression last century and this time around it's got a similar feeling!
http://theendisalwaysnear.blogspot.com/2010/09/lessons-on-killing-golden-goose.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acudoc
08:39 PM on 09/22/2010
But what causes income inequality?

There will always be income inequality because of varying conditions of opportunity and talent, but in our debt-based monetary system it is inherent from the very foundation. A privileged elite is given the power to ISSUE money.
photo
INDIVIDUALTERRY
Occupy this!
01:24 PM on 09/17/2010
Maybe the one biggest factor in all this is the atmosphere of "globalization " . All this "one world " spirit as lead many corporations to see no problem moving our jobs over seas.
photo
INDIVIDUALTERRY
Occupy this!
01:22 PM on 09/17/2010
Im trying to figure out how we" allowed employers to destroy unions."
By giving workers the right to vote a secret ballot without intimidation? By not making unions mandatory?
04:14 PM on 09/18/2010
It began in those famous Reagan years when Union protesters were arrested for not going back to work. Being forced to work at gun point kind'dah stifles human rights. It's like locking in the women and children who work in sweat shops. It takes their burning alive, before anyone starts noticing the real cost of their clothing.
photo
Kache
Toodlum, wake up, I hear a prowler downstairs
11:18 PM on 09/19/2010
The Landrum-Griffin Act, 1959 prohibits employers from threatening employees engaged in union promotion. By the mid 1970 the Chamber of Commerce was advising members to blatantly violate the law, simply because the act contained no provisions for punishing an employer.
photo
INDIVIDUALTERRY
Occupy this!
09:45 AM on 09/20/2010
And you have some kind of proof of that ?
Sounds like the old union told boogeyman story to me.
12:12 PM on 09/17/2010
I've read many comments here to the effect that if the economy fails here in the US, the rich will suffer as well as the poor. Not true. Concurrent with offshoring labor, killing unions, and suppressing wages, the wealthiest of the wealthy have diversified their portfolios. They, like the corporations, are now multinational. And remember this: someone always knows how make money in a down market. Millionaires will be created precisely because families are slipping into poverty. You just have to know what to bet on.

Because we've systematically destroyed public education, we've created generations of folks who don't have the slightest idea how to think critically about any issue. We're trained to respond on the basis of emotion rather than fact to the news of the day. That's why it was so easy for the Tea Party to convince middle and lower income citizens that it was in their best interest to support the corporatist, deregulating, anti-labor, anti-Social Security and anti-Medicare candidates propped up by the REAL backers of this so-called "grass roots" movement. They are wildly enamored of people who are openly and directly working against their interests. It's genius: a massive anti-populist movement that has co-opted the tactics and rhetoric of populism while furthering the goals of economic totalitarianism. If we don't wake up soon, we'll all end up in Paladino's prison "dorms" learning "personal hygeine".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
06:32 PM on 09/16/2010
All true. Good slide show.
04:43 PM on 09/16/2010
I heard it explained that once Reagan radically reduced the income tax rate on the wealthy their focus changed from reinvesting in their firms, their employees and the U.S. economy to the pursuit of outrageous wealth. This led to moving factories and jobs to countries that not only paid miserably low wages, but also have no environmental regulations, no minimum wage, etc. CEO's and their ilk took huge salaries and benefits because wage expenses, environmental contraints, etc. crashed throught the floor and profits soared. The chickens are now coming home to roost, because if American's don't have jobs we can't buy the crap that is made in China even if it is cheap.
photo
Erdgeist
per omnia extrema
02:20 PM on 09/16/2010
While we are helping those who are the victims of this bad economy we need to go after the causes of this bad economy which lie in the direction of free-trade.

Ronald Reagan took us from the reciprocal trade of Bretton Woods--GATT/WTO, which had some major defects, to the even more defective myth of laissez-faire free-trade which hollowed out the middle-class creating the giant sucking sound H. Ross Perot warned about with NAFTA that cost 879,280 jobs according to EPI. Need proof or Reagan's free-trade voodoo?

It was Reagan who was four square behind the notion of free trade. We had a hell of a time getting Canadian free trade, but we did. Reagan really did that with the force of his personality. That was expanded later to Mexican free trade and what we now call NAFTA. It was Reagan who floated the notion of hemispheric free trade, the notion that at some point in the future Canada, the United States, Mexico, and all of Latin America would be linked into a free trading zone. ~ Larry Kudlow (July 15, 1997)

President Clinton extened Reagan's voodoo legacy with regard to free-trade which was a stupid idea. Bush followed Reagan's voodoo drums, and to an extent, President Obama, still marches to their sound while the Chinese laugh at how stupid we are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tdpubs
Content publisher for small business marketing
05:26 PM on 09/23/2010
The Chinese? Those folks that are experiencing double digit growth? The same ones that protect their trade deals and unfairly devalue their currency to influence commerce? Oh, you mean our masters.
photo
humanbeing-rick
Born in the USA 1947
01:04 PM on 09/16/2010
This is a very telling slide show, like they say, a picture is worth a million words.
Somehow we have allowed the criminals to hi-jack our corporate boards and financial institutions.
The well known revolving door between government and the business elite has established corporate cronyism as the rule of the day. We allowed these fascists to hi-jack the people's government.
We have met the enemy, and it is us!
photo
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
11:56 AM on 09/16/2010
All I can say in reply to this article is "We know". 

We know where we went wrong, we know how to limit the damage (I'm not at all sure we know how to "fix" this mess), and we know the terrible price we're paying for continuing to make the same errors over and over again.

And "We know" that neither major party has ANY INTENTION of allowing anyone to change any of this.
12:44 PM on 09/16/2010
That's a fact! The only reason change was possible in the 40's was because corporate money was as depleted as everyone else's. They couldn't afford to market/buy their way to political outcomes that were more advantageous for them.
This time, corporate money has been insulated somewhat, and their marketing machine is fully funded and engaged in making sure they get what they want-no matter how long it extends our current malaise. The Tea Parties are the result of a great, long-term marketing program. If you try hard enough, you can get ordinary citizens to support their own destruction. Cool trick, but what the folks with money don't get is that as the economy fails, so do they. It's just a bit slower.
photo
humanbeing-rick
Born in the USA 1947
01:06 PM on 09/16/2010
Vote Green Party