More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

Robert Reich

Posted: November 6, 2010 11:50 AM

Next time you hear an economist or denizen of Wall Street talk about how the "American economy" is doing these days, watch your wallet.

There are two American economies. One is on the mend. The other is still coming apart.

The one that's mending is America's Big Money economy. It's comprised of Wall Street traders, big investors, and top professionals and corporate executives.

The Big Money economy is doing well these days. That's partly thanks to Ben Bernanke, whose Fed is keeping interest rates near zero by printing money as fast as it dare. It's essentially free money to America's Big Money economy.

Free money can almost always be put to uses that create more of it. Big corporations are buying back their shares of stock, thereby boosting corporate earnings. They're merging and acquiring other companies.

And they're going abroad in search of customers.

Thanks to fast-growing China, India, and Brazil, giant American corporations are racking up sales. They're selling Asian and Latin American consumers everything from cars and cell phones to fancy Internet software and iPads. Forty percent of the S&P 500 biggest corporations are now doing more than 60 percent of their business abroad. And America's biggest investors are also going abroad to get a nice return on their money.

So don't worry about America's Big Money economy. According to a Wall Street Journal survey
released Thursday, overall compensation in financial services will rise 5 percent this year, and employees in some businesses like asset management will get increases of 15 percent.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average is back to where it was before the Lehman bankruptcy filing triggered the financial collapse. And profits at America's largest corporations are heading upward.

But there's another American economy, and it's not on the mend. Call it the Average Worker economy.

Last Friday's jobs report showed 159,000 new private-sector jobs in October. That's better than previous months. But 125,000 net new jobs are needed just to keep up with the growth of the American labor force. So another way of expressing what happened to jobs in October is to say 24,000 were added over what we need just to stay even.

Yet the American economy has lost 15 million jobs since the start of the Great Recession. And if you add in the growth of the labor force -- including everyone too discouraged to look for a job -- we're down about 22 million.

Or to put it another way, we're still getting nowhere on jobs.

One out of eight breadwinners is still out of work. Most families in the Average Worker economy rely on two breadwinners. So if one out of eight isn't working, chances are high that family incomes are down compared to what they were three years ago.

And that means the bills aren't getting paid.

According to a recent Washington Post poll, more than half of all Americans -- 53 percent -- are worried about making their mortgage payments. This is many more than were worried two years ago, when the Great Recession hit bottom. Then, 37 percent expressed worry.

Delinquency rates on home loans are rising. Distressed sales are up as a percent of total sales.

Most people in the Average Worker economy own few shares of stock, if any. Their equity is in their homes. But with all the delinquencies and distressed sales, the housing market has a glut of homes for sale. As a result, home prices are still dropping. So the net worth of most Americans is still dropping.

And even though interest rates are falling, most people in the Average Worker economy can't refinance their homes. They can't get home equity loans. Banks don't want to lend to the Average Worker economy because people in it are considered bad credit risks. They still owe lots of money, their family incomes are down, and their net worth has fallen.

And according to the Reuters/University of Michigan survey of American consumers, expectations about personal finances are at an all time low.

Inhabitants of the Big Money economy are celebrating Republican wins last week. They figure financial regulations will be rolled back, environmental regulations will be canned, the Bush tax cut will be extended to the top 1 percent, and it will be harder for workers to form unions.

Inhabitants of the Average Worker economy aren't so sure. The economy has been so bad they're angry at politicians. They showed their anger at the ballot box. They took it out on incumbents.

But if nothing changes in the Average Worker economy, there will be hell to pay.

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 524
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
12:01 PM on 11/09/2010
It's funny, but I see so many comments that are wise and forward-looking. Folks I am proud to call peers who are looking at the big economic picture. Focused on solving the problems for a new generation of Americans and easing the pain of this one. It occurred to me, though, that the folks who are at the levers these days are focused much more short term. They see what will make them a boatload of cash right now and never stop to ask whether their actions will precipitate a collapse that will leave their pile of cash useless amid the wreckage of a dead economy. Until they get to that point, they don't care. Even then; they figure they'll have a bigger cash-fire to keep warm by than you. It would be smart to stop them before that happens...More...but I can't tell you how.
02:54 PM on 11/08/2010
I don't believe there will be hell to pay because both parties have the same BIG ticket interests and we the voters accept it whether it's from the junk the media feeds us to the BS our politicians continue to spew. Take money out of politics and reduce term limits and that could be a great start but it's up to the voters to demand it. If we're not going to acknowledge the 700lb gorilla in the room then we deserve what we get. Are we going to accept politics as usual or acknowledge the gorilla?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:20 AM on 11/08/2010
http://noi­r.bloomber­g.com/apps­/news?pid=­newsarchiv­e&sid=aZ9R­3banWEgY
Six Reasons for U.S. to Abandon Free-Trade Myth: Ian Fletcher - Bloomberg,com

"Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) -- The price of living in the fantasy world of free-trade economics continues to rise for America.

Failure to recognize the pitfalls will probably mean a continuing struggle to emerge from recession, as much U.S. domestic demand leaks abroad due to the trade deficit, rather than being recycled at home. And America will continue to lose key industries: not just the primitive ones a developed nation should shed, but the high-tech jobs of the future.

Any serious discussion of free trade must confront David Ricardo’s celebrated 1817 theory of comparative advantage, whose tale of English cloth and Portuguese wine is familiar to generations of economics students. According to a myth accepted by both laypeople and far too many professional economists, this theory proves that free trade is best, always and everywhere, regardless of whether a nation’s trading partners reciprocate.

Unfortunately for free traders, it is riddled with holes, some of which even Ricardo acknowledged. If they held true, the hypothesis would hold water. But because they often don’t, it is largely inapplicable in the real world.

[snip]

The longer we do nothing, on the assumption that the world trading system will rebalance itself, the more likely that it will break down in unpredictable and counterproductive ways."
06:16 PM on 11/08/2010
There is a big, asymmetric advantage in favor of free trade - it lowers the costs to the consumer.

That is a big advantage especially in an economy that is suffering.

Protectionists like Morici are now arguing the absurd - to impose a 40% surtax on all foreign currency transactions for buying imports. Well, WHO is going to pay for that instantaneous 40% rise in consumer product prices?
09:27 AM on 11/09/2010
Lower prices is one of the most unintelligent reasons to engage in free trade when the result of free trade is the loss of my job here in America. I don't care how cheap an item is if I can't buy it because my job has been outsourced!!!

The protectionists are our trading partners! Can u look me in the eye and tell me the communist Chinese aren't protectionists? They manipulate their currency!!! They still haven't opened their markets. Same with the Koreans.
05:36 AM on 11/08/2010
This midterm election was a first good step despite the fact that both major political parties have misread the results. The Democrats believe they must move to the center (right) because they were too progressive and the Republicans believe that they have received a mandate to implement more of their right wing policies that shift wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich. Both are wrong. What was expressed by the midterms was dissatisfaction with both parties and their policies that have decimated the American worker both poor and middle class. With both of them along with mainstream pundits refusing to acknowledge the real reason for the election results the only other alternative is to do what dissatisfied Republicans did. Band together, we are the majority, and form a party designed to influence elections and where we can field candidates. Usurp the Democratic party leadership and challenge primaries with candidates that espouse our values and goals rather than the goals of the rich and the corporations. Successful challenges can be mounted as was proven by the Tea Party and by selecting intelligent, knowledgeable candidates we can far surpass their success. All it takes is for "We the People" to acknowledge that neither the Democrats nor Republicans serve us, our needs, ambitions, and goals and band together to achieve the goals we aim for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
11:00 AM on 11/08/2010
Ahmen brother. I read the other day that the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS ARE NON-VOTEING LIBERALS! If we get off the couch and organize we can take this corrupt government down. Now there are enough right wingers in government to really gum up the works. Maybe if they transfere even more wealth into fewer hands, the rest off us will take action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
02:06 AM on 11/08/2010
Many would like to think that if we just elect the correct progressive candidates this will turn around.

It will not change unless we band together in enough numbers to worry the powers that be and take matters into our own hands. This will involve a series of well organized boycotts of corporations and strikes such as many of us did about 40 years ago. We need to do this SOON, while we non-rich still have enough monetary clout to carry off a boycott.
09:58 PM on 11/07/2010
A resource based economy....The Venus Project/The Zeitgeist Movement
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randolph Greer
I am a Poet .
08:54 PM on 11/07/2010
Reich , of course , is correct as far as he goes . It all began when we pernitted our businesses to leave this country without putting a tax on the goods they transferred back here and sold . Had we had that tax , it would not have been profitable for our businesses to move out of the country with slave wages in other countries . And we would have kept the jobs here . We could have also forced them to pay the workers abroad more than slave wages which would have made them middle class consumers for our goods produced here . Instead , U.S. Presidents since Nixon have all pursued the opposite policy . And I don't even have to mention the environmental and safety regulations that are non existant in other countries and which have been under assault here for thirty years . All I ask any of you to do is just visit the GREEN PARTY site and read its principles and platform . It will open your eyes .
09:34 AM on 11/08/2010
Neither the Dems nor the media tells us what's going on; the former is inept and the latter co-opted. Sen. Byron Dorgan again tried to get a bill to the floor that would take away tax credits from companies that outsource. The Republicans blocked it. I bet none of the voters who voted Republican even know this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim McCown
07:36 PM on 11/07/2010
There is no sense pretending either party is going to come around and the Tea Party are little more than unfortunate Corporate puppets because they refuse to look and see who is financially supporting them and why. It is high time to start an American Labor Party that works for us and can and will resist the Big Money to put this nation back into workers hands. There is no sense choosing which poison kills us workers slower it is time to stop drinking the Corporate Party kool aid. I think the next two years will really make us angry so let us begin. Where do we start?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 AM on 11/08/2010
It's almost impossible to get third-parties on the ballot:

http://www.thelibertyvoice.com/ralph-nader-ron-paul-agree-ballot-access-laws-are-rigged-against-independent-third-party-candidates
Ralph Nader & Ron Paul Agree: Ballot Access Laws are Rigged Against Independent & Third Party Candidates | The Liberty Voice

The ballot access laws would have to be changed:

http://www.amazon.com/Progressives-Guide-Raising-Hell-Grassroots/dp/1603582932
Amazon.com: The Progressive's Guide to Raising Hell: How to Win Grassroots Campaigns, Pass Ballot Box Laws, and Get the Change We Voted For-- A Direct Democracy Toolkit (9781603582933): Jamie Court: Books

"Change is no simple matter in American politics-a fact that Americans have recently learned well. Elections rarely produce the change they promise. After the vote, power vacuums fill with familiar values, if not faces. Promises give way to fiscal realities, hope succumbs to pragmatism, and ambition concedes to inertia. The old tricks of interest groups - confuse, diffuse, scare - prevail over the better angels of American nature.

But populist energy can get change making and change-makers back on the right track..."

The Federal Absentee ballot allows write-ins:

http://www.fvap.gov/resources/media/fwab.pdf
FEDERAL WRITE-IN ABSENTEE BALLOT INSTRUCTIONS

It would NOT be easy, but it's possible that a slate of independent or third-party candidates could be elected to Congress and the White House, bypassing the Democrats and Republicans, both beholding to corporations.

President William K. Black sounds good right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrMainstreet
07:17 PM on 11/07/2010
What party is going to step up on behalf of American workers? Is either party interested in American workers or is it just pandering to a part of the electorate that is becoming more desperate and disadvantaged with each election cycle? Who will step up and decry the offshoring of American jobs as both unpatriotic and unamerican? Republicans did a very effective job of coloring anyone that was against the Iraq War as unpatriotic and unamerican and Democrats afraid that this view would resonate with voters caved in time after time and supported a war based on insufficient and unreliable inteligence.

Progressives should employ a similar strategy. Shipping jobs overseas is destroying the American economy and yet there is no public outcry of any consequence.There is no discussion about American corporations choosing profits over patriotism. There is no concerted effort on the part of either party to staunch the flow of American jobs being shipped overseas.
Progressives must come together and move the Democratic party in a direction that will clearly define it as the party that protects American workers and business from unfair overseas competition.
A party that will not allow products sold in the United States to be made with slave labor, in plants that have no envoirmental regulations, from countries that have histories as human rights violators.
If Democrats fail to position themselves in this way then the Amercan worker will be forced not by law or decree but rather by economic necessity to enslave themselves
07:27 PM on 11/07/2010
Maximizing profit IS being American. The rich (Ayn Rand in hand) will argue vociferously that it is unAmerican to try to deprive them of the right to deal with private property (THEIR own private property, no less) any way they see fit.
07:44 PM on 11/07/2010
Ayn Rand also pointed out, I believe, that if the Workers withdrew their labor and expertise, the Rich would collapse. That the Rich have lived like leeches on the bodies of the Workers by conning the Workers into thinking they had a chance for success. "Atlas shrugged." He stopped holding up the world by the sweat of his brow. And the Rich collapsed. Those with actual expertise -- not the banksters and politicians -- survived, began again, and returned to a moral life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim McCown
05:14 PM on 11/07/2010
Robert Reich just figured this out now. This will date me but some of you will remember an original Star Trek Episode where part of the population lived high up on Stratos and most of the population down on the planet and were called Trogs and they worked for almost nothing down in the mines to keep Stratos going while getting nothing but an early death due to inhaling a gas down in the mines. I have said for almost ten yers the Stock Market has no bearing on the lives of most of America. It goes up or down while our employment prospects and wages just go down. Bush's policies effectively disengaged the Rich from the economic prospects of you and I. This is why they say Out sourcing is good for America because our loss of wages is there gain in tax deferred annuities. We are forclosing on the MIddle Class and starving out the needy. We are the Republican Party , the party of the filthy rich, the wannabe's, the selfish and the greedy.
05:24 PM on 11/07/2010
Tim, F and F. Great analogy. We are in a self-destruct mode. Our trade agreements are unsustainable. When are Americans going to wake up and realize, they've been had bad. Sanford and Son, 1973.
photo
angry in ct
we are the progressive liberals who say "nee"
06:22 PM on 11/07/2010
The better analogy would be the Elois and Morlocks from the novel and the two films called The Time Traveler:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Time_Machine
photo
angry in ct
we are the progressive liberals who say "nee"
06:32 PM on 11/07/2010
Sorry, I meant The Time MACHINE.
02:49 PM on 11/07/2010
Reich doesn't mention that the effect of wealth concentration at the top is inflationary within the "wealth management" marketplace: with too much money chasing too few opportunities for genuine growth-based returns on investment, the prices of all faintly positive investments rise (so the Dow rises due to wealth-management inflation, not increased corporate intrinsic value), and worse, the incentives rise dramatically for creating casino-style financial instruments that promise good ROI while hiding, disguising and minimizing risks. Another boom and bust is already underway. As long as the middle class cannot buy what the country produces because not enough of the gross is returned to it in wages and benefits, even the trust fund wealthy will increasingly become victims of the vampire squids. Reich's premise in Aftershock is clear and convincing, but it doesn't go far enough in its analysis. It seems like it would be straightforward economics Ph.D. thesis material to delineate the equations that predict optimum levels of payback to workers to generate optimum value to passive investors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
07:54 PM on 11/07/2010
The problem right now is that, while the middle class cannot buy what the country produces due to decreases in wages and benefits, people in third world locations now can. The trust fund wealthy don't need the U.S. middle class anymore. That's the biggest problem. "Optimum levels of payback to workers" doesn't mean workers here; it means workers in China, India and Brazil.

We, the American working class, are coming down to the standard of living of the Indians, Chinese, etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:13 PM on 11/08/2010
It's called the Iron Law of Wages:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/iron+law+of+wages
Iron law of wages | Define Iron law of wages at Dictionary.com

"the doctrine or theory that wages tend toward a level sufficient only to maintain a subsistence standard of living. "

People living at that level don't buy much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antiplutocrat
01:41 AM on 11/09/2010
"...and worse, the incentives rise dramatically for creating casino-style financial instruments that promise good ROI while hiding, disguising and minimizing risks..."

Amen.
Giordano Bruno
Flaming Librul
02:26 PM on 11/07/2010
Sadly, despite the compelling nature of this article, and similar warnings from economists of equal stature and expertise, the congress is hell bent on preserving the Bush tax cuts. They argue that we have lots of potential savings, by rolling back Health Care, by limiting the size of government, etc. Meanwhile they want to continue to fund wars of Imperial Hubris. It should not come as a surprise to anyone that our Congress very much mirrors our average voter: completely devoid of introspection and intellectual curiousity, minds distorted by manipulative oversimplified propaganda from the corporate media, reacting not with their frontal cortex, but instead their hippocampuses. Congress being representatives of the people, can hardly be expected to do better. The ones to pay of course, are exactly the same ones who put them there. As our taxable citizens become lower compensated, and less employed, what will happen to tax revenues? What nonsense Reagan started, and Bush perpetuated. Neither one of them did much to cut federal spending, incidentally. Just taxes. Even Barry Goldwater would be disgusted, methinks. Giordy
07:47 PM on 11/07/2010
But neither the WH nor the Dems fought for anything different.
12:41 PM on 11/07/2010
Most people think this country will crash in a day because they listen to Celente, Schiff, Beck, and other doomsayer media darlings who boost ratings every time they appear. The reality is America will descend into oblivion over a period of 50-100 years, much as Europe took 300 years to descend into the Dark Ages after the fall of the Roman empire. If 10,000 Americans become homeless every month, that's still only 1 million people every 5 or so years---a blip by statistical standards. Our descent will be so imperceptible that we'll hardly recognize the new faces digging through trash dumpsters and wandering the streets until it's our turn to start digging and wandering. There's no recovery coming, only more misery ands poverty for the lower 95%. We are like a hemophiliac with a small cut who bleeds to death over a period of weeks. And, like a hemophiliac, the end won't be painless, but by then it will be too late.
11:26 AM on 11/07/2010
Free market economy has historically proven to be paramount in creating wealth.However, as any human construct, free market system is not perfect, and therefore requires regulation.

Read the entire post at http://unorthodoxthoughs.wordpress.com/
10:05 AM on 11/07/2010
If the DEMS had concentrated on Wall st instead of forcing us to buy Health Insurance from these demons - they might still be in power.

Not that they would do anything about their friends on Wall St...

The 'other' economy has no advocates in a system that is purchased by Corporate money.

A pox on both parties. We just don't matter.

If the Dems had prevailed - the difference would have been amnesty for Illegals sharing a smaller piece of the pie.