More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich
 

Are Mitt and Newt Channeling Their Inner Progressives?

Posted: 12/12/11 05:31 PM ET

Two important reforms are stopping the revolving door between Washington and the nation's financial giants, and preventing financiers from flipping companies (making short-term profits by borrowing big sums to buy them, then squeezing payrolls and firing employees, and reselling the stripped-down companies at a profit -- unless the debt-laden firms fall into bankruptcy first).

Remarkably, the frontrunners for the Republican nomination for president seem to agree. At least, that's the clear implication from what they've said today.

During a morning appearance on Fox News, Mitt Romney said Newt Gingrich should return the $1.6 million in payments he received from mortgage financial giant Freddy Mac.

Gingrich has tried to defend himself by saying Freddy paid him as a "historian," but anyone with half a brain knows Freddy wasn't interested in history. It coughed up the money because they wanted Newt to influence his former House colleagues, so they wouldn't take steps to reduce Freddy's financial risk or reach.

In effect, Romney is taking a swipe not only at Gingrich but at the well-oiled revolving door linking financial giants to former congressional leaders, Treasury officials, and their staffs. That revolving door is one of the reasons the Street and its auxiliaries (like Fannie and Freddie) took the risks that caused the financial crisis, and have still never paid the price.

What's Gingrich's response? He said this morning "if Governor Romney would like to give back all the money he's earned from bankrupting companies and laying off employees over his years at Bain than I would be glad to then listen to him."

Newt is criticizing not only Romney but also the pump and dump practices of Wall Street that have caused hundreds of thousands of Americans to lose their jobs, put countless companies in jeopardy, and earned a fortune for private-equity managers and others.

If this goes on much longer, the Mitt and Newt Show will get a slot on MSNBC.

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 

Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich

Two important reforms are stopping the revolving door between Washington and the nation's financial giants, and preventing financiers from flipping companies (making short-term profits by borrowing bi...
Two important reforms are stopping the revolving door between Washington and the nation's financial giants, and preventing financiers from flipping companies (making short-term profits by borrowing bi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 125
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:14 PM on 12/13/2011
No, to be a progressive, it means to move forward not backwards. Improve things and do better than this. They have the same old ideas as Bush Jr. did, no more old ideas, its time to create new ideas, and things back order. Its going take two Democratic Presidents to clean Bush Jr's mess up, it took one Democrat to clean up Bush Sr's mess up, and we don't Baby Bush in White House.
06:57 PM on 12/13/2011
Robert when watching the elite, apologizes are never an issue. When we let the rich craft our future you can bet that their future will be rosier. Save for Ron Paul who ever he is, no republican candidate is worthy of their self adulation.
Our future is ours the rich will either give it back or find some safe haven, their is no such place for the rich.
Class warfare, no we wage war on the rich. We win.

Got sulfur?
06:37 PM on 12/13/2011
Ron Paul, Michelle Bachmann and Santorum are the only 3 conservatives currently on the Republican Ticket. That is why my vote goes to Ron Paul, and if the majority of Americans were not so ignorant after having been dumbed down and brainwashed for so long, most others would support Ron Paul and Constitutional Government, in general.
01:19 PM on 12/13/2011
A question for you Dr Reich; Why would Fannie Mae pay a Republican (who, if we are to believe what so many Democrats are saying, was reviled not only by Democrats, but also by his own party & ridden out of Washington on a rail) to lobby a Congress controlled by Democrats???
photo
roberttsf
Preconceived notions don't count as facts
11:48 AM on 12/13/2011
A DEMOCRACY CANNOT EXIST as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.

Great nations rise and fall. The people go from bondage to spiritual truth, to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence, from dependence back again to bondage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rontheking
Everyone is behaving splendidly! splendidly!
12:21 PM on 12/13/2011
Interesting theory...what's your theory on plutocracies voting themselves largesse through co-opting and corrupting the government, then raiding the Treasury for themselves...oh wait! That's already happened....
photo
roberttsf
Preconceived notions don't count as facts
02:56 PM on 12/13/2011
Plutocracy can be defined as a consolidation of power by the affluent, however in the context of the statement above both parties by virtue of their election to a position are in place to as you say "vote themselves largesse through co-opting and corrupting the government, then raiding the treasury."
Possibly the best example of this was the recent stimulus that was spent in part on cherry picked liberal projects that supported union labor, "green" energy, or infrastructure "investment" which are liberal mainstays. In the case of the GM bailout which was seperate from the stimulus, you need look no futher than campaign contributions from the United Auto Workers for the justification.

In short, I absolutely agree with your assertion, but the framing of the issue as some sort of valiant example of class warfare is tenuous.
03:02 PM on 12/13/2011
A large centralized representative democracy like the US is unwieldy. Too big to fail equals bound to fail. However, modern technology enables a more diversified and network style of government. It looks to me like a world government is becoming a necessity of globalization. Note the loosely connected uprisings taking place all over the world. I suspect that Occupy and similar movements are beginning the creation of a new, networked democracy right before our eyes.

Your second paragraph is about human nature, not about government. Government is our attempt to deal with the conflicting urges in human nature. We'll just have to keep trying until we get it right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rontheking
Everyone is behaving splendidly! splendidly!
03:45 PM on 12/13/2011
I agree...I see the global appeal and synchronicity of OWS as a possible worldwide workers' union emerging...which is also the rational and expected response to what we've already seen emerge in recent years: a worldwide plutocracy which has no allegiance to any country or ideology, other than to other plutocrats, with the accumulation of wealth and the consolidation of power their respective god and overriding goal....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
10:53 AM on 12/13/2011
Can you imagine how much richer Newtie and Mittie would be if they were elected President? Their personal wealth today will be considered chump's change.
03:58 PM on 12/13/2011
As is possible for any modern president. Don't think our current leader has pocketed some nice cash over the past few years, or will do so in the future thanks to his position?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Frank
My last name is FRANK so thats what I am..
10:32 AM on 12/13/2011
blah blah blah...more useless rhetoric to get votes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
10:04 AM on 12/13/2011
"What's Gingrich's response? He said this morning "if Governor Romney would like to give back all the money he's earned from bankrupting companies and laying off employees over his years at Bain than I would be glad to then listen to him."

Funny how, when it suits them, they can't tell the difference between private and public funds.

I thought taxes couldn't create a single job? Obviously taxes created one sweet job for Gingrich.
photo
roberttsf
Preconceived notions don't count as facts
11:33 AM on 12/13/2011
Uh, you might look into Fannie and Freddie's revenue sources and understand that while these companies enjoy federal garauntees on their loans they still have share holders and board that makes their consulting decisions. I think the connection you are making here is a bit fallacious which for a lawyer should be easy to discern.

http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Fannie_Mae_(FNMA)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
12:16 PM on 12/13/2011
I'm sorry but acknowledging a continuum of government control that includes Fannie and Freddie is hardly fallacious. Pretending there is a clear binary that distinguishes public and private like black and white is certainly fallacious.

Particularly given the conservative fondness for painting both as socialist creatures of big government responsible for the 2008 crash, pointing out the problem these particular Republicans have discerning between private and public funds is not fallacious, rather, it's my whole point.
03:59 PM on 12/13/2011
No, no, taxes CAN create jobs. By and large, they're just not very sustainable ones.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
04:31 PM on 12/13/2011
On the contrary, it's much harder to send taxpayer funded public service jobs to China, so from that perspective they're much more sustainable. Clean water, safe streets, efficient power, good schools and hospitals, those are all extremely sustainable investments the government can do very well and very sustainably.
10:01 AM on 12/13/2011
Republicans don't get irony, unfortunately. Nor do they get satire. They still think Colbert is one of their's.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:10 AM on 12/13/2011
some thought "all in the family" to be dead serious....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
10:00 AM on 12/13/2011
well if this channeling thing fails i am sure Mrs. Bachmann has an extra crystal ball for them to use
photo
CapitalismIsCancer
We live under fascism. RIP America.
09:57 AM on 12/13/2011
According to Capitalists, holding bankers accountable and empowering America to fend off China is "Socialism"

Well,..it appears Socialism is the greatest system EVER.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob O
There is no freedom without responsibility.
09:18 AM on 12/13/2011
Historians do typically make $1.6 million, right?

Uh, no.
photo
Sybil Disobedience
if you want the american dream move to denmark
09:08 AM on 12/13/2011
they both are channeling their inner sociopath first and foremost...
with newt it is mixed with over the top flaming narcissism...
these 2 are void of integrity, morality and human connection...

if newt were a muslim he would be reviled and seen as a grave threat to democracy if not humanity by those who now sit at his feet
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dch58
To think is to differ.
09:06 AM on 12/13/2011
Of course, neither are serious. Give up their ill gotten gains??? That would make them pariah among their demographic groups, wouldn't it?


As for this,

"If this goes on much longer, the Mitt and Newt Show will get a slot on MSNBC."



I'm not going to hold my breath.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rontheking
Everyone is behaving splendidly! splendidly!
12:25 PM on 12/13/2011
Well, they're never going to get a show on faux news if they keep telling the truth about each other!
photo
angry in ct
we are the progressive liberals who say "nee"
09:06 AM on 12/13/2011
Coming to a theatre near you:

Newt Gingrich in "Despicable Me, Part 2"
photo
cyclone70
if there was a time to reach for the pitchfork
09:19 AM on 12/13/2011
except that gru turned out to be a good guy in the end

don't see that with the newtster
photo
angry in ct
we are the progressive liberals who say "nee"
01:01 PM on 12/13/2011
Nope. You're right. But I'm going to keep referring to ol "hey poor kid, you missed a spot on that school cafeteria floor" as Despicable Me. Until he gets defeated or loses the nomination.