iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich

The Republicans' Double-Dip, and What Must Be Done

Posted: 08/05/11 10:01 AM ET

John Boehner said Tuesday the Republicans got "90 percent of what we wanted" from the budget deal. So presumably he and his colleagues are willing to take responsibility for some 450 points of Thursday's mammoth 513-point drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

I'm being a bit facetious -- but only a bit. It's always dangerous to read too much into one day's move in the stock market.

Yet the stock sell-off -- not just today's, but that of the last days -- cannot be easily dismissed. It marks Wall Street's largest losing streak since 2008.

Republicans repeatedly assured the nation that once the debt-limit deal was done -- capping spending, cutting the budget deficit, and getting "90 percent" of what they wanted -- the economy would bounce back.

Just the opposite seems to be happening.

Call it the Republican's double-dip recession.

Wall Street investors aren't ideologues. They don't obsess about budget deficits ten years from now, or the size of the government. One day doesn't make a trend, but a giant sell-off like this is motivated by hard, cold realities.

Here are the two hard, cold realities investors are most worried about:

First, the economy looks like it's dead in the water. The Commerce Department reports almost no growth in the first half of the year. And job growth is just about at a standstill. Far fewer jobs were generated in May and June than necessary just to keep up with the growth in the potential labor force -- meaning the employment picture is actually worsening. Investors fear Friday's jobs report for July will show more of the same.

Secondly, investors now know the federal government's hands are tied. The original stimulus is over; the Fed's "quantitative easing" is over.

This week's deal over the debt ceiling cinches it. The market is now on its own -- without enough rocket power get out of the continuing gravitational pull of the Great Recession.

Now that the deal is done, Obama and the Democrats will have a much harder time passing anything close to the stimulus necessary to breach the gap between what consumers (who are 70 percent of the economy) are willing to spend and what the economy can produce at or near full-employment.

Not incidentally, the Commerce Department's revised data for what happened to the economy in 2008 and 2009 shows the drop to have been far greater than had been supposed. The economy plunged 8.9 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008 -- the steepest quarterly decline in more than half a century. And in 2009 household buying declined almost 2 percent (compared with a previous estimate of 1.2 percent). That's the biggest contraction in almost sixty years.

This means the original stimulus should have been much larger in order to offset the drop. With cash-starved state and local governments simultaneously scaling back their own spending, the federal stimulus needed to be even bigger.

So much for Republican claims that the original stimulus "didn't work." Of course it didn't, given the size of the slide.

It was never a debt crisis. The debt crisis was manufactured. It's been a jobs, wages, and growth crisis all along. And that reality has finally caught up with us.

Now that we're slouching toward a double-dip recession, the only hope is voters will tell their members of Congress -- who are now on recess back home -- to stop obsessing about future budget deficits and get to work on the real crisis of unemployment, falling wages, and no growth.

We need a bold jobs bill to restart the economy. Eliminate payroll taxes on the first $20,000 of income for two years. Recreate the WPA and the Civilian Conservation Corps. The federal government should lend money to cash-strapped states and local governments. Give employers tax credits for net new jobs. Amend the bankruptcy laws to allow distressed homeowners to declare bankruptcy on their primary residence. Extend unemployment insurance. Provide partial unemployment benefits to people who have lost part-time jobs. Start an infrastructure bank.

And more.

The jobs bill should be number one on the nation's agenda. It should have been all along.

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 

Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich

 
 
  • Comments
  • 931
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:48 PM on 08/06/2011
We have squandered many opportunities over the last 30 years to build new enterprise through stronger private and public R&D. For example, every dollar we spent on trophy houses we did not need, was a dollar we did not spend to get enterprise leadership in next generation health care, automotive, space research, fusion, infrastructure… the list goes on. And now the R&D silo is empty – we eat our seed corn. This a problem “in the large” and the “in the small” resolutions that Dr. Reich are not going to get the job done. I have come to realize there is no such thing as a “jobs fairy,” – as Dr. Reich seems to think. As much as I generally agree with Dr. Reich, there are no magic job fairies. Jobs do not come from the ether. They are created through Enterprise – private and public. And that is where the real discussion needs to be – how do we create and encourage new enterprise; how do we create new entrepreneurs- on a massive scale - fast? I think we are talking an Apollo type of effort – very in the large.

Also, it has been my experience that too much entrepreneurial energy is locked up and locked down in behemoths like IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, HP, Wal-Mart, Boeing, etc. Breaking up these entrepreneurial prisons would create jobs, unlock innovation and enable more competition and product creation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
09:59 PM on 08/06/2011
It's time to stop talking about a stimulus or jump starting the economy. Those are terms used to start a car or to get plants to grow.
When people use those terms when speaking about the economy,. it just tells other people that they don't know that much about economics.
11:33 PM on 08/06/2011
Actually, everyone one ought to stop talking about The Economy. There is no such thing. I have asked for an operational definition of The Economy repeatedly; no one can supply one. (An operational definition requires an operation that can be applied to determine if something is or is not within the set of things supposedly delineated by the definition. Using another word to define something defines nothing. An operation that everyone can agree on is required. A simple example most people can understand is square root: the operation is multiplication.) If one cannot supply such an operational definition, then the term is a syntactically correct string of symbols without semantic content. Listening to talk about The Economy is like listening to talk about The Market or God. Superstition.

Listening carefully to people using the term The Economy repeatedly one finds them referring to different things by the term.

But you are wrong when you say that talk about a stimulus refers to a car or getting plants to grow. Stimulus is actually quite carefully defined when applied to national finances. Stimulus is defined operationally when implemented.

This tells me you don't know much about economics. Keynes gave an operational definition for its use in his work (think of liquidity traps). Bernanke defined it quite carefully when speaking to Congress.
Joel Smithis
Small business owner
09:52 PM on 08/06/2011
Unfortunately Obama has mostly used conservative policies, even in his stimulus tax cuts were 40%, and the real job creator - public works, a mere 20%.

Now that even this meager 20% expired, economy slowed down despite the tax cuts being continued, or even further tax cuts instituted.

Tax cuts never produced any job. This money is sitting on the sidelines or is spent on Chinese goods. They may produce some jobs in China though.
08:25 PM on 08/06/2011
One of the realities of the current political world is no matter how many people call, email or write their congress members, they don't listen. Mitch McConnell has made it clear what to expect when he stated the Republicans have one agenda - to make Obama a one term President. The Republicans have proven they are willing to do anything to get their way. So I ask Mr. Reich, what is left for us to do?
08:52 PM on 08/06/2011
I don't know if you're correct Karen.Still,a thing I'd like explaianed is why the republican governed states are doing so much better than the Dem. I received a recruiting letter from a SOuth Dakota clinic with a 250 k salary and performance bonus.and ,one from a Chicago clinic with an offer about a third that.Why such a difference?
photo
sixchair
Always left, usually right
09:38 PM on 08/06/2011
great - so you're the one job the gop created?
Joel Smithis
Small business owner
09:47 PM on 08/06/2011
Anecdotical example? What is your point?

Nationwide statistics last couple of decades shown clearly red states leading in relying on federal support. That's not anecdotical!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigwave48
10:20 PM on 08/06/2011
educate your friends, and stand fast against the right
photo
Minolta321
Photographer
06:03 PM on 08/06/2011
So Obama rings up more debt faster than any president in history, takes us to the brink, loses our credit rating. And your answer is to blame the republicans and borrow a lot more money?

And when we collapse the US currency and the life savings of generations becomes worthless.....will you pay them all back in gold?

Obama OWNS his Deficits, Obama OWNS his economy, and now Obama owns this downgrade, and he got it following whose advice?.......!!!!!
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
07:36 PM on 08/06/2011
I can agree with a great deal of what you say. The problem though, is that rather then taking the actions needed to fix the bleak economy he inherited from bush (the lessor), he chose to continue on with the insanely stupid unneeded counterproductive wars (even increasing one of them), the bank bail outs with no controls, and did mot permit the bush (the lessor) tax cuts to expire.. He compounded these faults by providing a too meager and wholly miss targeted stimulus.

Deficit spending is not, in and of itself, a bad thing. I deficit spent to purchase my home, ans someday, if I make all of the payments, I will own it outright. In the meantime, I am provided shelter for myself and family. Recently, my son, who also has a mortgage, had to go deeper in debt to finance some much needed repairs to his home.

This is where our country finds itself. We do not need to be the world's policemen. We do not need to be at war with countries that pose no threat to us. However, we do need to invest in our country and rebuild the infrastructure crumbling around us.

This is what Obama was supposed to have done. Invest here. Create jobs here. strengthen the economy here. Not use our tax dollars to blow up and then build roads, bridges, hospitals and schools in Iraq and Afghanistan and now, Libya.
12:19 AM on 08/13/2011
Fully agree with you!
photo
TREKMIND
To go where no politics has gone before.
08:05 PM on 08/06/2011
Obama is a conservative that is following conservative advice so this credit down grade is exactly what he deserves. I'm sorry to break your reality but we never had a liberal president in our life times and were not gonna have one any time soon. Will simple keep going in this conservative centrist ideology from both sides until we reach the complete failure of this country.
05:57 PM on 08/06/2011
I agree with Robert Reich on most accounts and he’s one of the few that’s guided by common sense, however why does he not say more about 'free trade'?–there actually is no such thing as free trade and never has been. What is called free trade today is actually just a process of avaricious corporate leaders chasing the cheapest means of production regardless of the long term implications to the US. The so-called free trade that came about as a result of our one-way relationship with China has been an unprecedented-in-world-history disaster for our nation! There are now fewer computer jobs in the US than there were when the PC was fist introduced. Entire swaths of the industrial landscape have been burned away and thousands of companies employing millions of workers have been either destroyed or severely decimated by this most unfree trade, while the few have profited due to the irresponsible aquiescence of our incompetent and corrupt political *leaders*. America must regain its industrial base or it will definitely become a third world nation. Many world class American managers such as Andy Grove of Intel have debunked the myth of our mutual benefit relationship with India and espcially China. Please consider:

http://www.amazon.com/Death-China-Confronting-Dragon-Global/dp/0132180235/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1312627184&sr=1-1

Also: http://www.amazon.com/Free-Trade-Doesnt-Work-Replace/dp/0578082667/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1312627271&sr=1-1
05:24 PM on 08/06/2011
Robert, you're a likable guy and I generally respect what you have to say. But this partsian bickering has just trashed our credit rating. I respectfully suggest that you can it.
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
08:26 PM on 08/06/2011
I believe you are somewhat incorrect. The overall thrust of this piece is the need for increased investment in this country. We need jobs. We need tax payers. We need consumers. We need to grow. Unfortunately, the republican stance is just the opposite. They believe we need to return to unregulated banking, provide increased tax cuts for the wealthy and major corporations. They believe we need to continue the wars, and expand them into Syria and Iran. They have no problem spending for these things, especially if they can kill Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in the process. The fact that we have paid for these things is not germane to their argument.

It's like the corporation that contractually obligates itself to provide retirement for it's employees, then allows it's CEO and corporate officers to increase their salaries from 40 times what the average employee makes to over 400 times it, then claims it has no money for the retirement program and must "reorganize" to divest itself of its contractual obligations. You'll note, the CEO's and officers never pay back any of their salaries or their benefits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
10:34 AM on 08/09/2011
There comes a point at which a corporation can only pour so much money into bonuses and salaries and lay off so many workers that the corporation will have no place to go but down. The money the conservatives manage to save by not having taxes will only go so far, so many yachts, so many third homes, so many wonder cars. If this country continues to go for increasing the wealth of the rich and decreasing that of the consumer, the United States will deserve the third world status that will come. What is the value of money if you have it all and there are many more people in the bottom category with no employment, no education, no skills except soldiering? Those at the bottom will understand that there is no improvement in their situation and nothing to lose if they try. That should be scary enough for those who like to accumulate wealth.
12:27 AM on 08/13/2011
"68Namvet" you are onto something. You are on another wavelength. I've been saying the same thing and it's scary to think that the next wars might be Syria and Iran. Syria before Iran because we will use "humanitarian" reasons and let NATO ("international coalition") help us out. It will open up the area for mass movement of land troops coming from Europe, for the impeding assault of Iran. Look forward to reading more of your comments in the future.
photo
wmnorton
Moderate where moderate used to be
04:57 PM on 08/06/2011
For corrporate taxes Democrats should propose that we change the dividend special treatment back to be ordinary income, then use that along with ending sprcial tax loopholes to lower the corporate tax rate. Also corporate tax rates should have a sliding scale just like personal taxes do. Could probably drop the corporate tax rate to about 20%. This should include the overseas exemeption ending. Savings for the corporations that are paying taxes should result, loss of loopholes for those paying nothing, sound fair to me.
For indvidual taxes Democrats should propose that we increase the tax on the wealthy back to 50%, use all of that increased revenue to raise the standard deuction from $5800 to at least $14500 (full time yearly minimum wage). Should at the same time get rid of Earned Income Credit. The people on the right see this as a welfare program and they do have a point.
Funny thing about all this is that these proposals would not be a violation of the Republicans no new taxes pledge. If they blocked it the Democrats could legitamately scream Upper Class Warfare.
photo
ArchbishopBenevolent
Pre-Approved Saint, Beatific but not Canonical
04:43 PM on 08/06/2011
It is important that the government remove tax-payer funded welfare schemes for Wall Street. This include free money from the Federal Reserve to banks supposedly for loans. Banks ought to lend their own money. The government guarantees on on home mortgages has to stop. The mortgages are turned into derivatives in opaque markets.
04:39 PM on 08/06/2011
It's been a "spending crisis" ever since Bush took office.
photo
SteveM39
That's how dad did it, that's how America does it
04:32 PM on 08/06/2011
Now with the downgrade it will be all the harder to get any investment in the American economy. Even S&P wants in on the political posturing.

"Martha have you finished stocking the bunker yet?"
photo
castlerider
"A man's home is his castle"
03:56 PM on 08/06/2011
Robert, thanks for calling it a "Republican" double dip, because that's exactly what it is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duke of Abq
07:04 PM on 08/06/2011
No, this belongs to OBAMA! Bush started it with his compassionate conservative crap and Obama doubled down on it. What a sell out!
11:31 PM on 08/06/2011
but mr. Reich is still right, since Obama is implementing Republican economic policies its Republican Double Dip indeed.
02:38 PM on 08/06/2011
"REPUBLICAN'S DOUBLE DIP"? Get real -- the Dems control 2/3rds of the govt. and Obama and his bunch are solely responsible for the fix we are in. GOP Congressmen and Tea Party members are just the messengers! Just like the sign in the china shop says: "You break it, you own it!"
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
06:12 PM on 08/06/2011
So - when Bush (the lessor) and his republican congress and senate started unfunded wars, gave $100's of billions to big pharmaceuticals, big oil, and nearly $2 trillion to the wealthy in tax cuts and "broke" the economy - they did not "own it"?

Obama may not have done the right things to fix the mess - but, it remains the mess of bush (the lessor). And GOP Congressmen and Tea Party members are not "messengers" - unless, of course, you believe the message of going back to bush (the lessor) policies that gave us the "Great Recession" is something we should strive for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duke of Abq
07:05 PM on 08/06/2011
Bush owned it in 2008, but its Obama's now, for sure.
photo
Greyfox01
My shoe knows more than THEY do.
07:16 PM on 08/06/2011
A voice of reason, and truth.
photo
AZDave2
Truth is rare...protect it!
02:35 PM on 08/06/2011
Here are some more MUST be done:
Take the entire issue OUT of politics.
1) Make it a simple Presidential order to pass debt ceiling increases.
2) Put programs like Medicare and Social Security under a commission that has ability to increase pay in, age requirements, etc to assure total security of the programs forever.
3) Make congress pay for ALL budget items up front except for wars, recession, and national disaster issues and then require tax increases on ALL Americans to pay for any of these events.
4) When the jobless rate goes above a set point (5%) programs would automatically kick in to repair and upgrade the infrastructure of the US and put people back to work within 45 days of their unemployment. Universal employment with the same pay rate they got before they were laid off as long as them demonstrate that they are working to get other jobs or going back to school for new degrees, skill sets, certificates in demand occupations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
illegalneocon
04:03 PM on 08/06/2011
1) Required to be called a king.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duke of Abq
07:10 PM on 08/06/2011
Get the Federal Government out of our Lives and Out of our pockets. We can govern our-self and take care of our families, friends and social groups through charity, not Federal Government Controlling every aspect of our lives. Freedom and Power to the People!
12:45 AM on 08/13/2011
You want anarchy? Government is like an archive, a library if you will. It has the history of brilliant thinkers, but the rotten apples shouldn't mean "burn the library down!" AZDave2 has some BRILLIANT points. Points I don't think should generally be argued in politics. Some of these things are the things politicians did to save this country during the great depression. Keynesian economics would state similar actions should be done. We only reason this is being debated is become the rich want a bigger slice of cake because their obesity requires it. Their appetite has grown and they realize that material wealth doesn't actually buy them happiness, but they are trying to drown out a suppressed reality that hurting people in need is actually evil, by buying themselves more stuff to make themselves feel better.

I don't really know if they are capable of feeling these feelings, because they might suffer from a highly functional form of "anti-social" disorder, but I do wish they are slowly having their suppressed feelings of guilt eat them from the inside out like catching the flesh eating disease...
01:47 PM on 08/06/2011
For the Middle Class the economy has been dipping for most of 30 years. For the upper income earners, things are better than ever.
So whatever we are in - a recession, a double dip recession, a depression - it makes no difference what you call it for most of us.
12:47 AM on 08/13/2011
Exactly. I've been saying its a "depression" for a while now, but the media is owned by the rich, so why would they care to let us disgruntled peons feel even worst? If the media hasn't coined it or called it, everybody believes the "official" word.