According to the latest ABC New/Washington Post poll, 77 percent of Americans say they "feel things have gotten pretty seriously off on the wrong track" in this country. That's the highest percentage since January, 2009.
No surprise. The economy is almost as rotten now as it was two years ago. And, yes, this poses a huge risk to President Obama's reelection, as it does to congressional Democrats.
But the truly remarkable thing is how little faith Americans have in government to set things right. This cynicism poses an even bigger challenge to Obama and the Democrats -- and perhaps to all of us.
When I worked in Robert Kennedy's senate office in the summer of 1967, America also seemed off track. Our inner cities were burning. The Vietnam War was escalating.
Yet most Americans still held government in high regard. A whopping 66 percent of the public told pollsters that year that they trusted government to do the right thing all or most of the time.
Now 30 percent of Americans say they trust government to do the right thing.
What's responsible for this erosion? Not the Great Recession or the government's response to it. Most of the decline in public trust occurred years before.
While 66 percent trusted government in 1967, by 1973 that percent had eroded to only 52 percent. By 1976, barely 32 percent of Americans said they trusted government to do the right thing. By 1992, 28 percent. Trust bounced up during the Clinton administration (I'm happy to report) but cratered again during the George W. Bush's presidency, ending at 30 percent, and hasn't recovered since.
Call it the Republican Weapon of Mass Cynicism.
That weapon is now reaching full-throated fury in the form of Texas Governor Rick Perry. (It's echoed by Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann, but Perry has emerged as the major spokesperson.)
Republicans didn't accomplish this alone, of course. They had plenty of help from a Democratic Party too often insensitive to the importance of building public trust. But look at the history of the past four decades and you can't help conclude that the overall decline in trust and concomitant rise in cynicism about government has been a Republican masterwork.
Decades of Republican rhetorical scorn -- Reagan's repeated admonition, for example, that government is the problem rather than the solution - have contributed. But the most powerful sources of cynicism have been actions rather than words.
One has been the misuse of public authority. Consider Nixon's Watergate, the Reagan White House's secret sale of arms to Iran while it was subject to an arms embargo and illegal slush fund for the Nicaraguan Contras, Tom DeLay's extensive system of bribery, and the Republican House's audacious impeachment of Bill Clinton. To the extent these abuses generated public scandal and outrage, so much the better for the Weapon. The scandals fueled even more public cynicism.
Another source has been a flood of money pouring into government from big corporations, Wall Street, and the super rich -- in return for public subsidies, bailouts, tax breaks, and a steady lowering of tax rates. Democrats aren't innocent, but Republicans have been in the forefront. (As governor, Rick Perry has raised more money than any politician in Texas history, rewarding his major funders with generous grants, contracts, and appointments.)
The GOP has pioneered new ways to circumvent campaign finance laws, blocked all attempts at reform, and appointed and confirmed Supreme Court justices who believe corporations have First Amendment rights to spend whatever they want to corrupt our politics.
A third source has been regulatory agencies staffed by industry cronies more interested in protecting their industries than the public. Here again Republican administrations have led the way: the failure of financial regulators to prevent the Savings & Loans implosion; corporate looting at Enron, WorldCom, Adelphia other big companies; and then the biggest speculative bubble since 1929, bursting in ways that hurt almost everyone except the financiers who created it. A Mineral's Management Service that turned a blind eye to disastrous oil spills from the Exxon-Valdez to BP; mine Safety regulators whose nonfeasance lead to the Massey mine disaster; an FDA that allowed in tainted meds from China.
Democrats have had their share of political hacks and cronies, but Republicans have made an art of cashing in on government service through sweetheart deals for their former companies (think of Dick Cheney's stock options with Halliburton), and cushy jobs and lobbying gigs when they leave office. And the GOP has taken the lead in resisting all attempts to prevent such conflicts of interest.
The cynicism has been fueled, finally, by repeated Republican threats to bring the whole government to a grinding halt -- from Newt Gingrich and fellow House Republicans' shutdowns in the 1990s to John Boehner and company's near assault on the full faith and credit of the United States government months ago. When the whole process of governing becomes bitterly partisan and rancorous -- when common ground is unreachable because one side won't budge -- government looks like a cruel game.
By mid-August, 2011, the public's view of Congress had reached an all-time low of barely 13 percent, and disapproval at an historic high of 84 percent. Viewed in narrow terms, this is bad news for all incumbents, Republican as well as Democrat. But viewed more broadly in terms of the larger Republican strategy of mass cynicism, it advances the right-wing agenda.
Back to that summer more than four decades ago when I worked in Robert Kennedy's senate office. There was no doubt in my mind I'd devote part of my adult life to public service. It wasn't so much that I trusted government - the Vietnam War had already tapped a cynical vein -- as that I looked to government as the major instrument of positive social change in America.
I was not alone. The Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, Medicare, an American landing on the moon -- and before that an interstate highway system, expansion of higher education, GI Bill -- and before that, The New Deal and World War II -- all had engraved in the public's mind the sense that government was something to be proud of, an entity that we could rely on when times got tough.
Times are tough again, but the Weapon of Mass Cynicism has convinced most Americans they can't rely on government to help them out now. The nation is even entertaining the possibility of cutting Medicare and Medicaid, college aid, food stamps, Head Start. Perry calls Social Security a Ponzi scheme, and many are ready to believe him.
But if we can't trust government at a time like this, whom can we trust? Corporations? Wall Street? Bill Gates and Warren Buffett?
Or is each of us now simply on our own?
Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.
Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich
Robert Kuttner: Muddled Class Warfare
Carl Gibson: Texas Republicans Should Read the Bible
Ami Fields-Meyer: Flake In Chief: Why Rick Perry's "Executive Experience" Is A Relative Term
Is this what we want to scrap? Is this what we don't want to spend federal tax dollars on? Is this why Reagan thought firing all the controllers was such a good idea? Do we want experienced and capable people watching our skies?
The GOP are completely out of control now - I expect hourly that they will mandate the sun to rise in the west if Pres. Obama states that it rises in the east.
If you want to influence the right wing zeroes who are pushing hard for America's destruction, you're going to have to simplify your terminology and your rhetorical logic. Boil it down to half a dozen words (bumpersticker sized) and you have half a chance.
So the answer to the Republicans is so simple. Just compare the growth and ease of life between the two periods -- post WWII>2000 and 2000>present -- then tell us how horrible government is.
While I am not a Tea Partier, many people now have first hand evidence of the pernicious effect of arbitrary governmental incursions into our personal freedoms and are witnessing a new revolution against the movement which for over seventy years has subverted the principles of original American Revolution in favor of a new autocratic society advanced by a group of elitists who believe that they not the people are the "elect" the Constitution notwithstanding.
I fine it easy to believe that people feel better about government when the economy is booming, even if it's a destructive bubble and to feel bad about the economy when it's a bust.
Consumer confidence just hit a 30 year low, 2.5 years into the OBAMA watch!
The 50's and 60's were great because after WWII the world with it's bombed out factories bought their goods from America. Come the 70's and 80's global competition started eating our lunch.
But when I hear people wishing we could go back to the Clinton years.....why? So we could have another tech bubble that destroys so much wealth for so many little people and communities?
4 years of Obama may have done nothing but extend a recession. The public will hold him accountable for his economy, right or wrong.
I agree!
Clinton was not a liberal, but a neoliberal, to the detriment of us all.
Why else would he sign the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which repealed Glass-Steagall?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act
Yeah, Obama may come to regret the decisions he made - the total failure to even attempt to clean up Wall Street, what Carville said this week (said as a political hack), has been said by others - but with non-partisan sincerity for several years:
http://neweconomicperspectives.blogspot.com/search/label/William%20K.%20Black
Housing bubble: nothing.
Speculative commodities bubble: nothing, and higher prices.
Debt bubble: very little - and it all has to be paid back, + interest.
If wealth was destroyed in the tech bubble, it was their wealth to invest. Yes, risk is part of capitalism; thus it was socialism showered on the banks Too Big to Fail.
Then Bush started war in Afghanistan instead of using black ops. Then the Congress, rightly I thought at the time, voted to support Bush re Iraq. I expected him to use the support as a diplomatic maneuver. Instead, he refused Hanz Blix 3 more months to finish the Iraq inspections and went to war. I knew when he refused Hanz Blix he was hell bent on going to war no matter what. He opened Pandora's box and it will never be closed again. He swaggered around and declared Halliburton would get all the contracts.
We are still in the unfunded wars 10 years later and paying for them and unfunded tax cuts for the rich and TARP.
I made phone calls for Harry Reid's re-election and one lady was 70 years old. I asked her what was the most important issue to her she said "Social Security". I asked her if she had decided who she would be voting for she said "Mrs. Angle". Mrs. Angle had called Social Security "welfare" and her father refused it and she wanted to do away with it!!
I don't know what to think.
We used to vote in legislators who had their beliefs and voiced them then when voting they compromised for the good of the country. I don't see that any more. What happened?