iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Reich

Robert Reich

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Reich

The Secret Big-Money Takeover of America

Posted: 10/ 7/10 05:55 PM ET

Not only is income and wealth in America more concentrated in fewer hands than it's been in 80 years, but those hands are buying our democracy as never before -- and they're doing it behind closed doors.

Hundreds of millions of secret dollars are pouring into congressional and state races in this election cycle. The Koch brothers (whose personal fortunes grew by $5 billion last year) appear to be behind some of it, Karl Rove has rounded up other multimillionaires to fund right-wing candidates, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is funneling corporate dollars from around the world into congressional races, and Rupert Murdoch is evidently spending heavily.

No one knows for sure where this flood of money is coming from because it's all secret.

But you can safely assume its purpose is not to help America's stranded middle class, working class, and poor. It's to pad the nests of the rich, stop all reform, and deregulate big corporations and Wall Street -- already more powerful than since the late 19th century when the lackeys of robber barons literally deposited sacks of cash on the desks of friendly legislators.

Credit the Supreme Court's grotesque decision in Citizens United vs. the Federal Election Commission, which opened the floodgates. (Even though 8 of 9 members of the Court also held disclosure laws constitutional, the decision invited the creation of shadowy "nonprofits" that don't have to reveal anything.)

According to FEC data, only 32 percent of groups paying for election ads are disclosing the names of their donors. By comparison, in the 2006 midterm, 97 percent disclosed; in 2008, almost half disclosed.

Last week, when the Senate considered a bill to force such disclosure, every single Republican voted against it -- thereby revealing the GOP's true colors, and presumed benefactors. (To understand how far the GOP has come, nearly ten years ago campaign disclosure was supported by 48 of 54 Republican senators.)

Maybe the Disclose Bill can get passed in lame-duck session. Maybe the IRS will make sure Karl Rove's and other supposed nonprofits aren't sham political units. Maybe pigs will learn to fly.

In the meantime we face an election that marks an even sharper turn toward plutocratic capitalism than before -- a government by and for the rich and big corporations -- and away from democratic capitalism.

As income and wealth has moved to the top, so has political power. That's why, for example, it's been impossible to close the absurd tax loophole that allows hedge-fund and private-equity managers to treat much of their income as capital gains, subject to a 15 percent tax (even though they're earning tens or hundreds of millions a year, and the top 15 hedge-fund managers earned an average of $1 billion last year). Why it proved impossible to fund expanded health care by limiting the tax deductions of the very rich. Why it's so difficult even to extend George Bush's tax cuts for the bottom 98 percent of Americans without also extending them for the top 2 percent - even though the top won't spend the money and create jobs, but will blow a $36 billion hole in the federal budget next year.

The good news is average Americans are beginning to understand that when the rich secretly flood our democracy with money, the rest of us drown. Wall Street executives and top CEOs get bailed out while under-water homeowners and jobless workers sink.

A Quinnipiac poll earlier this year found overwhelming support for a millionaire tax.

But what the public wants means nothing if our democracy is secretly corrupted by big money.

Right now we're headed for a perfect storm: An unprecedented concentration of income and wealth at the top, a record amount of secret money flooding our democracy, and a public in the aftershock of the Great Recession becoming increasingly angry and cynical about government. The three are obviously related.

We must act. We need a movement to take back our democracy. (If tea partiers were true to their principles, they'd join it.) As Martin Luther King once said, the greatest tragedy is "not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people."

What can you do?

1. Read Justice Steven's dissent in the Citizens United case, so you're fully informed about the majority's pernicious illogic.

2. Use every opportunity to speak out against this decision, and embarrass and condemn the right-wing Justices who supported it.

3. In this and subsequent elections, back candidates for congress and president who vow to put Justices on the Court who will reverse it.

4. Demand that the IRS enforce the law and pull the plug on Karl Rove and other sham nonprofits.

5. If you have a Republican senator, insist that he or she support the Disclose Act. If they won't, campaign against them.

6. Support public financing of elections.

7. Join an organization like Common Cause, that's committed to doing all this and getting big money out of politics. (Personal note: I'm so outraged at what's happening that I just became chairman of Common Cause.)

8. Send this post to your friends (including any tea partiers you may know).

Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

 
 
 
Not only is income and wealth in America more concentrated in fewer hands than it's been in 80 years, but those hands are buying our democracy as never before -- and they're doing it behind closed doo...
Not only is income and wealth in America more concentrated in fewer hands than it's been in 80 years, but those hands are buying our democracy as never before -- and they're doing it behind closed doo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,343
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
01:49 PM on 10/17/2010
I heard a rumor in Mr Reich's article here, that we ought to put pressure on SUPREME COURT JUSTICES. Hmmm, are ANY judges supposed to bow to public pressure or obey in all good conscience the truth of the law. Even the most extreme liberal judges, I believe, feel they serve this purpose. But who doesn't believe that suggesting to sabatoge the third balancing part of our governement isn't dangerous? How can such a brilliant man suggest such a dangerous unethical unconstitutional thing? And i mean this whether you are liberal or conservative. It is one thing to mount a campagne to ELECT congressman and presidents you feel will put the jugde you like in office, but quite a different thing to suggest we ought to use public opinion directly to threaten, coerce or embarass a judge at any level when they are acting in all good conscience and I stress, I mean this whether liberal or democrat.
05:43 PM on 10/13/2010
Robert you are such a nice guy. But seriously the problem is not secret money, it certainly wasn't in the 08 election. The money is coming from everywhere large and small donors. The direction Bush and Obama were taking the country is not what the majority of people and business in this country want. Sorry, but it is over, the begining of the end of big government is here.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:22 PM on 10/20/2010
The era of big multinational Plutocratic is here, the Republic has fallen. All political contributions are bribery, not free speech. Millions of American serfs will die, homeless, starving and without health care if the GOP get in power again. The only problem with Obama is he is not liberal enough.
05:12 PM on 10/13/2010
It doesn't seem like much of a secret to me. Most of the American public, liberal and conservative, know that the fix has been in for some time now.
04:13 PM on 10/13/2010
If someone is going to own the politicians, shouldn't it be the American people?" It's pretty clear the word should is no help. The American people cannot, just as Robert Reich used the word plutocracy.
As a former Secretary of Labor it is about time Mr. Reich studies and sponsors the only way toward helping the American people and its government, which is with new Labor Standards of a nature that
emasculates money of its pit-bull characteristics. There is enough wealth to establish a Life-Style where health, education, and welfare become an open sesame to economic abundance. And then the political representatives will not have to bow and scrape to their now masters of the universe.
11:29 AM on 10/13/2010
Those with nothing to hide will hide nothing. That is the simplest way to say that transparency is key to our democracy. That's why the organization I work for--Common Cause, which just welcomed Robert Reich as our new chairman--has been working hard to make a larger point: whether it's the Chamber of Commerce or foreign entities or big oil or Wall Street, no one should be in the business of buying representation in our government. The system that currently supports this activity *must* be fundamentally altered, or else our democracy is at risk. As Arianna Huffington herself said at our conference last week, "If someone is going to own the politicians, shouldn't it be the American people?"

Common Cause would welcome each and every one of you to become part of this critical fight.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:30 AM on 10/12/2010
Exc article -- what we largely already knew-- but Reich breaks it down for the average reader. My question is: Isn't this Big-Money Takeover really going after a global takeover? It's not just America; it's the whole enchilada. It's being done via multi-nationals working in tandem w/ Shadow Non Prof's ... and where does Bilderberg fit in?

I'd like to hear Richard R's thoughts on this topic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MPAndonee
Well yes, now that you ask, I am Indiana Jones
03:23 AM on 10/12/2010
Brilliant as always.

The problem is not the political system, as many people seem to believe. The problem is the people themselves. If you won't even take the time to vote, to get involved, how do you expect to get anything to happen the way you want it to, or expect it to?

No political system is perfect, but not voting as someone has suggested, would be even worse. The reality is that the only way that people get the message is by seeing a vote. I am a "Serial Voter". I never miss an election, local or otherwise. And I keep involved. Why? Because that's what matters.

Alas, if the political system was to be corrupted, it would be because of Apathy....And that, would be a shame.
02:38 AM on 10/12/2010
There are 7 states in the Union that have fewer U.S. House representatives (1 rep.) than U.S. Senators (2 Senators). Philip Morris could privately own all of Tennessee, and could field a single (1) U.S. house Representative and two (2) U.S. Senators. Technically, a state doesn't even require a voting population or democratic constituency in order to aggressively wield Senatorial power.

Ted Stevens was the senior U.S. Senator of a state that boasts only 1 US House representative. Yet, his state receives $1.84 in spending for every $1.00 paid by Alaskans in federal taxes. Obama's Illinois has 29 U.S. House representatives for its 2 US Senators. This state receives only $0.75 in federal spending for ever $1.00 residents pay to the IRS.

The Senate represents the State. And the State is the LAND, the geography, topography...property.
The physical land/territory has potential to grow, drill, colonize, preserve, bomb, entertain, produce, and be converted from material into money. It is the Senate that ensures the continuing exploitation and degradation of our state/national territory. All of this is done in opposition to the public.

Corporations become attached to our state, not our people. The disproportionate power of the State/Senate (i.e. filibuster) over the House provides a pathway for corporations to exert disproportionate power over the citizen.

...Senate Reform?...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
03:50 PM on 10/11/2010
The Chamber has become the all too cooperative tool of America's corporate traitors. It's becoming increasingly clear that they will take US jobs out of this country in a heartbeat.

The Justice Department, and the FBI in particular, need to investigate all aspects of American corporate power for possible acts of collusion with the enemies of this country. Such collusion constitutes high treason.

Those who sell out the America for a profit must be ready to mount the gibbet. Just as anyone in uniform must be prepared to face a similar fate for selling out his country.
mhellie
90% of all statistics are made up
10:07 AM on 10/11/2010
I don't think people care about your concerns. Why didn't you write about ACORN and all the money flowing in from the Unions for the dems? All of a sudden fairness comes into play now that republicans have contributions that can keep up with the democrats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USLabor
This is going into Skinner's coffee.
06:39 PM on 10/11/2010
Where do I begin with this one? Are you (seriously) saying that the Democrats have historically out spent Republicans for the last 70 years? I guess it's possible, but i doubt it's true. Also, the Unions can never match Corporate America when it comes to potential campaign contributions. Are you still scared of the ACORN boogey man?
10:05 AM on 10/12/2010
You can visit this site http://www.helium.com/items/186311-the-politics-big-money-comparing-democratic-republican-candidates-campaign to read about the history of dem vs. repub spending. It cites information from The Sunlight Foundation (?). You'll get a more factual outlook. It took me less than two minutes to find this page. If more of us did this before we posted our comments, we'd all get a little smarter and less likely to be swayed by the "opinionators" in the media.
08:04 AM on 10/11/2010
My belief and many others I speak to are that there will be an exodus out of America when the far and extreme right wing take over America.

We have $1,000,000 for you or against you and this is what we want if you decide to take out funding for your campaign.

We will no longer be the Democracy that we thrive for in the past but a dictatorship run by big business interest will no regard for what is best for Americans.

More wars will be focused on business decisions and our justice department will be owned by big business which is very dangerous.

I like to deal with reality after 30 years of being in business in know we will go down hill unless people will rise.
10:14 AM on 10/12/2010
The far right wing, or far left wing, would not cause an exodus. If that were true, it would have happened by now because there have been some pretty extreme actions from our administrations over the past 25 years! And where would you go that you think it would be better for you? We can still be run as a dictatorship, dangerously close as a matter of fact, but it won't be a corporation - it will be the government itself. Your scenario has been and still is being played out. We have let it happen. Mass exodus won't help. Electing free-thinking, moral people with integrity and a moderate agenda would help. Where do we find them? We need to be as free as possible to live our lives.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
04:13 PM on 10/12/2010
Oh, yeah.

"Radical problems require moderate solutions."
Il Professore

That's the ticket. Just sort of some kind of vague middling mediocre kind of thing will do the trick. You betcha.
07:42 AM on 10/11/2010
I agree with your observations, but I do not agree with your tactics. It is a little late in the game to play "politics as usual". I think that it is time for a voter revolution, that makes the media pay attention. Thinking Americans should pledge to withhold their vote. We've followed the axiom "make your voice heard" sporadically and with little enthusiasm for too long.

America's voting numbers are ridiculously low and the political pundits view this as apathy, but, in reality it is resignation. The majority of Americans are resigned to candidates that are hand picked, fed and groomed by a select few.

The select few have their hands in many pies. For example, a NJ county Democratic leader is a lawyer. He has a strong base, after all, NJ is a Dem state (of course only 30 +/-percent of the state votes and maybe, 20% actually follow his lead). But, he has a very strong say in political appointments in his area and, because of this, anyone wanting the local government to do something, hires this guy as their attorney and gets things done… at least for a while.

This is politics. You know how it works. I’d like thinking Americans to boycott all elections and pledge to not vote. The two parties have made a mockery of Democracy and it is time for Americans to stand up and fight. What would America look like in the eyes of the world if Americans actively boycott elections?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SWalkerTTU
02:58 AM on 10/12/2010
That would be fantastically counter-productive. If the thinking people didn't vote, then the only voting would be done by people who don't think. That's not a way to ensure effective representation for anybody or anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:38 AM on 10/12/2010
Great comment-- have you every witnessed how a large part of the population votes? They have no idea of what hole they are punching... they know about 2 names... after that they just start punching holes along a party line. Pathetic.
02:03 PM on 10/12/2010
So, Voter, what are your choices if you decide to exercise your right to vote? Along party lines? Lotsa thinking there... candidates are chosen by party bosses, not you... your vote affirms or denies, it does and has done nothing else. Because if it has, you are at least partially responsible for the state of affairs, or you have done nothing to get this democracy back on track. Think about it. I voted for Obama, but I believed John McCain would have been a good president, because I believed in "Yes we can" a whole lot more. I really believed in the "we"... Well, what I got is a trial lawyer that thinks defending his client is to cop a plea. It would not have mattered who won. Think about it and don’t vote!
04:57 AM on 10/11/2010
Its not so secret Mr Reich, its been obvious for years. The difficulty has been getting the message through to ordinary Americans, even then when the message gets through they seem to be in a state of denial about the extent of lies and corruption they have been subjected to, especially in the last decade.

They just don't get it.

"We have a constitution, right?" We have laws, right? We have elections, right?".... Wrong

* Constitution bypassed, ignored, unenforced.

* Laws politicized and selectively enforced proportional to wealth

* Elected representatives ignoring their electorate when they get to Washington, bought out by the wealthy bank and corporate lobby.

Americans know this is happening and yet are not seriously moved to change things, it is not bad enough yet. The illusion of democracy is still close, keeping it vibrant is somebody else's problem. Representatives and senators unaccountable to the people that elected them is a sham. It is the reality. The two parties are are really only one both sponsored by the same individual, corporate and foreign sources of wealth.

Witnessing a great nation decline into feudalism, kleptocracy, plutocracy, war mongering and poverty with the tacit acceptance of its own population is a tragedy.

In the end it is the people who are to blame for allowing this to happen.

It is no secret Mr Reich, the American people have ignored it and continue to do so.
07:46 AM on 10/11/2010
Phil... I agree with you and I'll bet that a majority of Americans feel the same. I am hearby boycotting all elections. Only 30% of us vote anyway, so why not use the other 70% as the true majority and creat a real revolution. Don't vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SWalkerTTU
03:00 AM on 10/12/2010
You're forgetting that we've only ever paid attention to the votes that have been cast. If the elections required majority support, period, then it would have already had some effect. As it always has been, winning only requires the support of the majority of those who cast a ballot.

As an aside, your argument might be a tad more compelling were it spelled and punctuated correctly.
10:22 AM on 10/12/2010
If the "vote boycotting" idea out is proposed to everyone, they might agree to do it initially; but it would never be effective unless every single person boycotted voting. What would happen is opportunists would run out and write in votes for their wackiest candidates, others would see them doing that, and then everyone would start running out to vote anyway to keep the wacky people out. The issue is to make sure people understand who they are voting for. That is what has been sadly lacking for decades, and look where it has led us. We may not like the extreme pundits on radio on TV, but at least they get people thinking. When John Stossel shows pictures of Nancy Pelosi, third in line to the presidency, to young people and they don't know who she is, then we have a serious issue. I think even one person didn't know who the vice president was. That is not acceptable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:42 AM on 10/12/2010
So what do We The People do to stand up against gazillion dollar payoffs?
02:53 PM on 10/12/2010
Vote with your feet... do not vote on someone elses choices. It's like being offered either sand or mud for dinner. Understand what a boycott can do, and what it does.... Get other people to proclaim their boycott.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard in CO
09:08 PM on 10/10/2010
Get ready for massive VOTE FRAUD, to tilt things in favor of Republican candidates. The past two elections were just test-flights for the Main Event. Those PC - touchscreen - monitor voting machines are rigged to shunt a lot of Democratic votes to the Republican side. There will be a lot of "too close to call" races on Election Night, and this is all carefully orchestrated to excite the citizens, who THINK they are witnessing a real election process on the TV news. What a shame.
10:12 PM on 10/10/2010
Obama has repeatedly been going on vacations these past few months and actually found time to write a children's book. The time for him to take meaningful action is now past.

Within a few election cycles we could see a de facto Caesar dynasty like Berlusconi or Putin.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard in CO
11:20 PM on 10/10/2010
Agreed (sigh). For the past 20 months, Obama could have, and should have, kicked A** and taken names....he had the bully pulpit with which to advance his agenda, while discrediting the Republican Senate.....but he has spent it playing Pattycake, it seems. I have seen him speak against Republican incumbents recently, but again, it seems like shadowboxing.
12:45 AM on 10/11/2010
Actually, he wrote the book before he took over the Presidency.
Keeping the facts straight cuts down the cynicism.
10:25 AM on 10/12/2010
Yeah, and that's what the Republicans say too. If you have actual proof that voting machines are rigged in the way you say they are, then provide that actual proof! Otherwise, please don't make posts like this. It advances the whole conspiracy theory kind of thinking and it takes away credibility from those who post it.
airmikee99
I can has micro-bio?
08:14 PM on 10/10/2010
In the land of the bought, and the home of the paid.