More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Scheer

Robert Scheer

Posted: November 24, 2010 04:31 AM

Welcome to the brave new world of post-bailout capitalism. The Commerce Department announced Tuesday that corporate profits are at their highest level in U.S. history, and the Fed released minutes of an early November meeting in which officials predicted a stagnant economy and continued high unemployment.

The lead on the New York Times story read like a line from a Dickens novel: "The nation's workers may be struggling, but American companies just had their best quarter ever." What the Times story neglected to mention is that the bulk of the increase in corporate profits was nabbed by the financial industry rather than manufacturing and other productive sectors. A whopping $33.3 billion out of the total corporate profits increase of $44.4 billion went to the banks and investment houses that those same workers had bailed out with their tax dollars.

Much of the rest of the corporate profit, in the non-financial sector, was also taken out of the hides of workers through increased "productivity" growth -- meaning they had produced more for less personal income. Case in point: the plant that GM is reopening in Orion Township, Mich., where, under a deal negotiated with the beleaguered UAW union, 40 percent of the workers crawling through cars on the assembly line will be paid 15 bucks an hour. That's about half the traditional UAW wage.

The Obama administration now feels totally vindicated for bailing out GM. Such a deal. Let's offer up half a clap for the news that GM came back from bankruptcy to mount a successful IPO and pay something back to the taxpayers, which is better than nothing. Some jobs were saved, and that prospect was why folks like me supported this bailout in the first place.

Don't call it a success story: The government unloaded some of its GM stock holdings at a $10.67 loss over the average per-share price it paid for its $49.5 billion investment. As the Bloomberg news service noted, "The Treasury, which is taking a loss on its portion of the sale, will break even only if the shares climb more than 60%," referring to the GM shares the Treasury still holds.

Nor should we ignore the fact that GM is a shadow of its former self and its rosier prospects for long-term survival depend primarily on job creation in China, where GM is already a major presence. Or that GMAC, the car maker's former credit operation, is still majority-owned by the U.S. government and is busily foreclosing on the homes of people they hustled into subprime and otherwise dubious mortgages.

GMAC was no different from others in the financial industry in securitizing mortgages that it should have known were toxic. Restructured as Ally Financial, the company was split off from GM, taking along its burdened debt obligations and benefiting from $17.2 billion in bailout money. Like the other financial outfits, Ally has enjoyed a range of government support through the Federal Reserve and Treasury. Not so the folks to whom GMAC sold crappy mortgages that are being foreclosed at an alarming rate.

The assumption of both the Bush and Obama administrations was that what was good for the banks would be good for the general economy, but just the opposite has happened. While the financial sector flourishes, the economy stagnates. As The Wall Street Journal reported in its story on the release of the Fed minutes: "Federal Reserve officials downgraded their outlook for the U.S. economy ... projecting that the jobless rate could exceed 8% for two more years and that it won't return to its former vitality for five years or more."

Guess what? The financial benefits are not trickling down. Throwing money at the banks has been as effective as pushing on a string, and the result has been what former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker has excoriated as a "liquidity trap." No serious government pressure has been brought to bear on the banks to help homeowners stay in their homes through mortgage payment adjustments.

What has occurred is what former International Monetary Fund chief economist Simon Johnson referred in The Atlantic back in May of 2009 as "The Quiet Coup," in which the financial industry is fully in charge of the government's response to our economic problems. The result, he noted, is "the reemergence of an American financial oligarchy" that had been broken by the banking regulations imposed during the New Deal in response to the Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt's sensible regulations were gutted by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, and tragically Obama has failed to restore them. The Wall Street lobbyists got their way and unfettered greed prevails. How else to explain last quarter's outrageous profit figures?

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
maxfax
Taa - dah!
11:38 AM on 11/25/2010
the financial industry is fully in charge of the government's response to our economic problems
 
When will the Tea Party followers wake up?  And what about the rest of us, what are we going to do about it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
09:06 AM on 11/25/2010
The claim that jobs offshoring by US corporations increases domestic employment in the US is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated. As I demonstrated in my syndicated column at the time and again in my book, How The Economy Was Lost (2010), Slaughter reached his erroneous conclusion by counting the growth in multinational jobs in the U.S. without adjusting the data to reflect the acquisition of existing firms by multinationals and for existing firms turning themselves into multinationals by establishing foreign operations for the first time. There was no new multinational employment in the U.S. Existing employment simply moved into the multinational category from a change in the status of firms to multinational.

If Slaughter (or Cohen) had consulted the Bureau of Labor Statistics nonfarm payroll jobs data, he would have been unable to locate the 5.5 million jobs that were allegedly created. In my columns I have reported for about a decade the details of new jobs creation in the U.S. as revealed by the BLS data, as has Washington economist Charles McMillion. Over the last decade, the net new jobs created in the U.S. have nothing to do with multinational corporations. The jobs consist of waitresses and bartenders, health care and social services (largely ambulatory health care), retail clerks, and while the bubble lasted, construction.

http://www­.counterpu­nch.org/ro­berts10282­010.html”
03:35 AM on 11/25/2010
Growing up in I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine good ole boy Texas, I was always amazed that precisely those who lost everyone's money were those who were able to make a comeback and have millions again...

Bankruptcy was not humiliating to these guys, it was just a way to wipe the slate clean and start again! Too bad for you if you invested with them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DustyMills
A liberal tree-hugging Oregonian...
11:29 PM on 11/24/2010
The injustice in todays government is astounding.....our elected officials only seem intent on satisfying their true employers....Wall St. and corporate America. Our politicians prance around like a cock in the chicken pen, so full of importance and stock soundbites.....but what have they done for the people? Have they admitted that the foreign trade policies they so grandly pimped, have taken jobs from Americans all the while making us buy a tomato from halfway around the world, while paying our farmers to let their land lie fallow. Have these politicians admitted that NAFTA was a roaring failure? Have they figured out that giving big corporations huge tax breaks to take their operations oversea's, only worked out for the corporations?

The one question we should be forcing them to answer is 'NOW WHAT"? Where will millions of jobs come from, how will families eat and keep a roof over their heads until those jobs come back?

How many millions of hungry children will be added to the rolls next week?

Seems as though the only people who haven't any worries are those upper 2%......you know, the ones that need that huge tax cut.....
05:28 PM on 11/24/2010
Let's see if the Devil's Advocate can ruffle some cynical feathers, eh? How about those 401k's that are in a significant upward trend? How about those pensions that have regained their "funded" status? How about the Middle Class that would bear the brunt of an economic meltdown? And what really would have happened with a liquidation of GM and the collapsed supplier chain that could no longer provide parts for Ford Motor Company? Millions of unemployed Americans hit the streets chanting "Hooray for Capitalism! A market correction! WooHOO!". I might be reading an article today lamenting the simplicity of avoiding a Great Depression by injecting some cash into the economy. In fact, I guarantee the majority of articles would be suggesting just that. And I'd be reading the articles on flyers because the internet would be too expensive to buy and too expensive to operate, unless you owned 80% of the nation's wealth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
03:25 PM on 11/24/2010
We're all Austrians now! http://www.cnbc.com/id/40340227
02:49 PM on 11/24/2010
While Americans stuff themselves with turkey this Thanksgiving, the bankers and other oligarchs stuff themselves with the dollars they ripped off from the taxpayers and small investors.
02:36 PM on 11/24/2010
"A whopping $33.3 billion out of the total corporate profits increase of $44.4 billion went to the banks and investment houses that those same workers had bailed out with their tax dollars."

This sort of statement fails to recognize where the bulk of tax dollars actually come from in the first place. Google: "Distribution of Federal Taxes by Cash Income Percentiles". The top 20% of 2008 earners generated 69 cents of every dollar of tax revenue (87 cents of each income tax dollar, 40 cents of each payroll tax dollar, 85 cents of each corporate income tax dollar, and 93 cents of each estate tax dollar). The rest of the population doesn't even generate enough tax revenue to pay for the government services that it consumes itself - let alone bailouts. The average US per capita Federal tax revenue is over $8,500 - that would be $36k Federal taxes for a family of four just to pay the average amount of taxes. The median US family income is about $45k (however that family size is less than 4).
03:22 PM on 11/24/2010
So we should just keep the party going?? What exactly does this have to do with the banking oligarcy? What does it have to do with the failed institutions that were propped up by tax payer dollars now making huge profits?

Everyone pays taxes- everyone. Sales taxes, gas taxes, and many other taxes. The same people you say pay most of the taxes also own most of the resources and earn the vast majority of the wages in this country. The top 20% of earners own more than 80% of the resources.

Your point is moot.
02:44 PM on 11/30/2010
When it comes to funding a huge bailout, it is not the number of different taxes that you pay or the rate of taxes that you pay. The dollar amount of taxes that you pay is what is significant. The article's author referred to banks that the "workers had bailed out with their tax dollars"; but the workers do not generate anywhere near the quantity of money to pay for the bailouts. Actually, the bailouts were financed with borrowed money available because the government has a huge revenue stream from the highest paying taxpayers.
02:29 PM on 11/24/2010
They say America loves the underdog. I guess this is just another manifestation of that phenomenon. Here's an entire industry that stood on the brink of destruction, having already destroyed millions of lives around the world. But, in a daring last minute rescue, they are saved and go on to live very very very happily ever after.

What an inspirational story!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:17 PM on 11/24/2010
The Obama DLC presidency are still Reagan trickle down, deregulation conservatives. Ya should have voted for the true founder type liberals: Kucinich, Dean, Grayson. The DLC web site is not a secret, you can go verify what I claim.
03:23 PM on 11/24/2010
Yep then we'd be stuck with McCain Palin- much better choice.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:00 PM on 11/24/2010
Maybe. Maybe it needs to crash more with the GOP at the helm before you will wake up. Because now, we are going to get Palin in 2012, with a GOP congress, and "liberalism" discredited by Obama's fake liberalism. Now the democrats are afraid to even back a true liberal. Does it matter the name of the conservative who enslave you? Will you never even risk trying to get a true citizens liberal in office? Isn't it obvious that this strategy is driving people away from the democrats? It's the whole wimp, surrender problem the DLC democrats have. Big money hated FDR too.
photo
Geegs
Question everything!
01:15 PM on 11/24/2010
Spot on. The "trickle down" theory is just that -- A THEORY. Has never worked, and will never work. It's simply a wish/concept/hope upon which Repubs and tea-partiers base their phoney-baloney strategies. Greed is a much stronger force, and trumps trickle down!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonlives
05:03 PM on 11/24/2010
Bush\Obomba bailout was "trickle down" economics in the most flagrant sense, and most liberals and Democrats supported it because it increased gov't power and size and threw money at the problem, liberals favorite solutions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowfiron
09:29 PM on 11/24/2010
The liberals are a problem because they do not tackle the problem of unemployment. We need jobs and Obama could have made jobs building and repairing infrastructure and creating a WPA like program. He owed that to the people that elected him. To bad he's bought off by the corporations who are sabotaging him anyway. We are giving banks and corporations free money to invest overseas. They are not interested in creating jobs for Americans!
We don't need liberals they are bankrupt; we need a resurgence of the left!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Swiftlearner
12:27 PM on 11/24/2010
The wellfare of the citizen of USA is bondage to the big financial and industrial institutions. Both political parties are powerless to truly represent the interest of the people without first satisfy the greed of the big boys. Greed by definition can never be satisfy.
Our last hope is effective education of these facts to the people and a third grass root party by the so educated to take control, before a blood revolution become inevitable.
11:53 AM on 11/24/2010
Mr. Scheer, your articles are always spot-on.

Now let's see some leadership from bloggers, like yourself, to help the American public to DISENGAGE the system.

- Go local
- Bank local
- Support only local retailers and grocers
- Take out your 401(k) and pensions early; use the business to start a local handmade manufacturing operation
- Travel local or go by car, bus or sea vessel (refuse air-travel)
- Refuse to watch commercials on television (turn volume down)
- Refuse to go to the cinema on the first weekend.
- Google search only topics relating to bank bail out fraud and TSA pat-downs (to drive media)

Whatever we can to DISENGAGE the system we must do in order to brind down this bankrupt system ourselves.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bellanova
I'm nobody. Who are you?
12:34 PM on 11/24/2010
"Refuse to watch commercials on television (turn volume down)
Refuse to go to the cinema on the first weekend."

Whoa...! That's, like, totally radical, WM! I can see the system crumbling already. ;)

No wonder America is in such a big trouble if this is the best our revolutionaries can come up with. We don't even realize the extent of our enslavement, do we.

(Forgive my sarcasm. Your first three ideas are pretty decent, but the remaining ones, well... somewhat less so.)
03:48 AM on 11/25/2010
I like your comment a lot because you do not content yourself with complaining about how the system works but develop a very affirmative and active attitude towards it. Keep up the good work!
Rgds, beebee-Z
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deminmo
just looking for answers
11:50 AM on 11/24/2010
I am thankful that on Thanksgiving my family can have a nice dinner and
enjoy football or whatever. I hope that Congress sees the need for regulating
the financial industry. And I hope all of you have a wonderful holiday.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamenta
There are other human values besides greed.
01:50 PM on 11/24/2010
enjoy your turkey while you can. who knows who they will be coming for next
11:17 AM on 11/24/2010
The failure of the financial industry to invest in the economy so that there is job growth seems to be the majaor problem. It seems like the financial industry can create wealth via trading and stock and bond
market control rather than via investments in the other industries. How long this can continue remains to be seen but it certainly does not bode well for the economy in the long run. The general economy is dependent on the financial industry but not the other way around. And yet, if the financial industry is nothing more than
a huge casino, sooner or later it will collapse and drag the entire conntry down with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamenta
There are other human values besides greed.
02:04 PM on 11/24/2010
The major problem is the right-wing in this country being fueled by Wallstreet, the utlra-rich and Fox News propaganda.