How evil is this? At a time when two-thirds of U.S. homeowners are drowning in mortgage debt and the American dream has crashed for tens of millions more, Sanford Weill, the banker most responsible for the nation's economic collapse, has been elected to the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.
So much for the academy's proclaimed "230-plus year history of recognizing some of the world's most accomplished scholars, scientists, writers, artists, and civic, corporate, and philanthropic leaders." George Washington, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Albert Einstein must be rolling in their graves at the news that Weill, "philanthropist and retired Citigroup Chairman," has joined their ranks.
Weill is the Wall Street hustler who led the successful lobbying to reverse the Glass-Steagall law, which long had been a barrier between investment and commercial banks. That 1999 reversal permitted the merger of Travelers and Citibank, thereby creating Citigroup as the largest of the "too big to fail" banks eventually bailed out by taxpayers. Weill was instrumental in getting then-President Bill Clinton to sign off on the Republican-sponsored legislation that upended the sensible restraints on finance capital that had worked splendidly since the Great Depression.
Those restrictions were initially flouted when Weill, then CEO of Travelers, which contained a major investment banking division, decided to merge the company with Citibank, a commercial bank headed by John S. Reed. The merger had actually been arranged before the enabling legislation became law, and it was granted a temporary waiver by Alan Greenspan's Federal Reserve. The night before the announcement of the merger, as Wall Street Journal reporter Monica Langley writes in her book Tearing Down the Walls: How Sandy Weill Fought His Way to the Top of the Financial World ... and Then Nearly Lost It All, a buoyant Weill suggested to Reed, "We should call Clinton." On a Sunday night Weill had no trouble getting through to the president and informed him of the merger, which violated existing law. After hanging up, Weill boasted to Reed, "We just made the president of the United States an insider."
The fix was in to repeal Glass-Steagall, as The New York Times celebrated in a 1998 article: "... the announcement on Monday of a giant merger of Citicorp and Travelers Group not only altered the financial landscape of banking, it also changed the political landscape in Washington. ... Indeed, within 24 hours of the deal's announcement, lobbyists for insurers, banks and Wall Street firms were huddling with Congressional banking committee staff members to fine-tune a measure that would update the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act separating commercial banking from Wall Street and insurance, to make it more politically acceptable to more members of Congress."
At the signing ceremony Clinton presented Weill with one of the pens he used to "fine-tune" Glass-Steagall out of existence, proclaiming, "Today what we are doing is modernizing the financial services industry, tearing down those antiquated laws and granting banks significant new authority." What a jerk.
Although Weill has shown not the slightest remorse, Reed has had the honesty to acknowledge that the elimination of Glass-Steagall was a disaster: "I would compartmentalize the industry for the same reason you compartmentalize ships," he told Bloomberg News. "If you have a leak, the leak doesn't spread and sink the whole vessel. So generally speaking, you'd have consumer banking separate from trading bonds and equity."
Instead, all such compartmentalization was ended when Clinton signed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in late 1999. In his memoir Weill brags that he and Republican Sen. Phil Gramm joked that it should have been called the Weill-Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Informally, some dubbed it "the Citigroup Authorization Act."
Gramm left the Senate to become a top executive at the Swiss-based UBS bank, which like Citigroup ran into deep trouble. Leach -- former Republican Rep. James Leach -- was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2009 to head the National Endowment for the Humanities, where his banking skills could serve the needs of intellectuals. Robert Rubin, the Clinton administration treasury secretary who helped push through the Citigroup Authorization Act, was the most blatant double dealer of all: He accepted a $15-million-a-year offer from Weill to join Citigroup, where he eventually helped run the corporation into the ground.
Citigroup went on to be a major purveyor of toxic mortgage-based securities that required $45 billion in direct government investment and a $300 billion guarantee of its bad assets in order to avoid bankruptcy.
Weill himself bailed out shortly before the crash. His retirement from what was then the world's largest financial conglomerate was chronicled in The New York Times under the headline "Laughing All the Way From the Bank." The article told of "an enormous wooden plaque" in the bank's headquarters that featured a likeness of Weill with the inscription "The Man Who Shattered Glass-Steagall."
That's the man the American Academy of Arts & Sciences now honors, among others, for "extraordinary accomplishment and a call to serve." Disgusting.
Richard (RJ) Eskow: The White House And Mortgage Fraud: All Talk, No Action
Jane White: Once Again, Academics Get an F When It Comes to Retirement Math
Money madness has ruined our democracy.
But considering the guy sold his Central Park West condo for $88 million and gave the proceeds to charity, you have to think that maybe the "philanthropy" portion of the academy's criteria was met.
I don't care who you are, $88 million is quite a bit of money. PR stunt? Probably but that is a lot of money that can be put to good use.
Either way, who really cares?
If the practice is evidently to cover for bad behavior, if those people do more harm than good, then it is everybody's business to "care". We get what we deserve when we suffer predators for the sake of the coins they throw back at our feet.
I can't see any reason for empathy for this individual whatsoever. Robert's right. To "honor" this person in any sense of the word after all this country's lost as a result of his proudest personal accomplishments, and after all is said and done, is truly disgusting.
At one point this institution had merit, but nobody cares anymore. They would rather see who won and academy award and a grammy.
So in the big scheme of things it really is not that big of a deal.
How low can we sink? Liberals and conservatives alike should be ashamed by this new humiliation for American society and culture. But then, what is it they say about not studying history?
American exceptionalism? Exceptionally greedy and shameless, you betcha!
Have absolutely nothing to do with someone actually doing something or merit - but who the awardee knows (or gave money to) in the past.
Very well, shame on all of us for what we tolerate.