Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Weissman

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Weissman
 

Corporate Profits or Healthy Babies?

Posted: 04/13/2012 10:51 pm

Fact Number One: Exclusive breastfeeding for at least six months is best for infants and new mothers.

Fact Number Two: Hospital giveaways of infant formula samples to new mothers reduce the amount and length of breastfeeding.

Given these two facts, why would hospitals serve as marketing agents for infant formula companies by giving away free samples of infant formula? Why do the formula companies -- Nestle, Abbott and Mead Johnson -- think they can get away with practices that undermine public health?

The first of these two questions is more mystifying. There is unanimity among health professionals on the key importance of breastfeeding. Many hospitals that encourage breastfeeding by new mothers simultaneously subvert their own health messaging by giving away formula samples, as well as discount coupons and other formula advertising.

If hospitals started out with the simple proposition that they shouldn't be marketing commercial products, the infant formula giveaway problem wouldn't exist. In the absence of a commercial-free hospital culture, hospitals take on a duty to be very self-conscious about the ways that they market or tout commercial products. When it comes to infant formula, most are failing to fulfill this duty.

The good news is that hospitals can be persuaded to do better. A Centers for Disease Control study finds that in 2009, 34.9 percent of hospitals had stopped distributing infant formula samples, up from 27.4 percent in 2007. The change follows advocacy campaigns from groups like the Boston-based Ban the Bags campaign and a stronger push for breastfeeding support from national public health agencies.

Now a new initiative by Public Citizen and more than 100 health and consumer organizations aims to up the pressure. The groups have sent letters to 2600 hospitals urging them to end giveaways, and more advocacy will follow. There's just no excuse for hospitals to market infant formula.

Despite recent gains, American society is not sufficiently supportive of breastfeeding, and the everyday realities of many new mothers' lives make exclusive breastfeeding very challenging. Giveaways of free samples directly undercut hospital efforts to support breastfeeding and sends exactly the wrong message to new mothers.

Mitzi Rose, a new mother from Rochester, New York, explains the issue perfectly: "By the time I had my second child, I was adamantly determined to breastfeed. I was not influenced to purchase formula by the bags, but I do see how the presence of a "sample" of formula can be appealing to an exhausted and discouraged new mom. I could understand how a mother could feel driven to try it as just another way to appease a baby. The act of a hospital handing a new mom a sample of formula is the same as the hospital telling the mom that she can't breastfeed exclusively, or that she shouldn't breastfeed exclusively. The choice of formula, if it is necessary, should be made in consultation with a baby's pediatrician, not determined by a contract with a formula company."

One possible explanation for the persistence of hospital formula giveaways is the power of "free." But the samples aren't really free. Not only do they undermine a healthier means of nourishing infants -- breastfeeding -- they end up costing new parents in strictly monetary terms. Using formula is expensive. Samples are costly even for formula-feeding parents. Mothers who receive a particular brand in the hospital are likely to stick with it, costing them up to $700 extra per year as against cheaper alternative brands.

Now as to that second question -- why do the infant formula makers think it's OK to pursue unhealthy practices? -- the answer is more straightforward: They are looking for profits, and they'll do what they can get away with.

This is an industry with a record of employing horribly aggressive and deceptive marketing practices in poor countries -- where breastfeeding is even more important than rich countries, because formula may be mixed with contaminated water, and because the economic costs of formula can overwhelm family budgets (or where mothers may use nutritionally inadequate amounts of powder, because they can't afford enough). The infant formula companies still violate the terms of the World Health Organization's formula marketing guidelines, but abuses are less severe than they once were, thanks to global campaigning by groups like the International Baby Food Action Network.

The World Health Organization guidelines plainly forbid giveaways of infant formula, but the companies have taken the view that the rules don't apply in rich countries.

So, a last question: Are we going to let the formula makers get away with dangerous marketing practices that harm babies?

It's time to tell formula makers to stop using hospitals as marketing tools, and stop endangering moms and babies with their quest for profits.

 
Fact Number One: Exclusive breastfeeding for at least six months is best for infants and new mothers. Fact Number Two: Hospital giveaways of infant formula samples to new mothers reduce the amount an...
Fact Number One: Exclusive breastfeeding for at least six months is best for infants and new mothers. Fact Number Two: Hospital giveaways of infant formula samples to new mothers reduce the amount an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:49 AM on 04/17/2012
I see many posters saying that hospitals should support breastfeeding moms,
yet those same posters want to take support away from formula feeding moms.
11:06 PM on 04/17/2012
They want to take support away from hospitals promoting formula to breastfeeding moms. People who choose to formula feed need to figure out a year's supply of the stuff and give over on whining about their right to a free packet that makes 3 bottles worth of formula, from the hospital. If that small sample pack is so essential to their first year's budget maybe they should rethink whether or not they can afford to formula feed. Or have a baby. The outrage over losing the free formula is misplaced. The company makes their profit from the sales of formula for the WHOLE YEAR, made by those mothers they gave the tiny sample to. The price of the hospital sample is covered by the overall profit; the price of purchased formula, needed for the other 364 days of baby's first year, covers it. The price of purchased formula also covers the discounted price of formula that is given to the WIC program. If you aren't on WIC and buy your formula with your own money, you are paying for the formula of those who ARE on the program. Many thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Law101
My micro-bio is now full.
12:17 PM on 04/16/2012
If corporations cared about the well-being of kids, they wouldn't employ an army of "health care specialists" whose job is to try to kick moms who give birth out of the hospital as soon as possible, but we all know that profits over patients is the best health care system in the world...right?
11:26 AM on 04/16/2012
A hospital is not an appropriate place to be advertised to especially when the product brings with it health risks and the potential buyers are in an altered mental state as comes with delivering a baby and lack of sleep

Handing out a can of formula is like saying, "You're gonna need this! This is essential otherwise the hospital would not provide it for free to everyone."
10:48 AM on 04/16/2012
Breastmilk not not a mother's choice. It is a baby's birthright.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bethab
05:07 PM on 04/16/2012
Ugh...go home.
10:23 AM on 04/16/2012
I am exclusively breast feeding my 4 month old. When a hospital handed out samples to me it only affected my breast feeding relationship with my first child. Simply because the formula was at hand so when I was frustrated I used it. I do think it is ridiculous the amount of formula coupons and free samples that I recieve in the mail and even recieved when registering for my baby shower. Even now I recieve these surveys that I assume help marketers of formula. I love to fill them out and put that my baby only has breastmilk. I think it is wrong of our society to think that formula feeding is more normal and accepted than for a women to breastfeed. And honestly I think formula should only be used when a woman can't breastfeed. And I am not someone who never formula fed. I switched to formula with my first son when he was only 6 weeks. But if formula wasn't so accessible and acceptable I would have had to breastfeed him which would have been better for us both.
07:30 AM on 04/16/2012
I was very thankful for the formula samples that allowed me to stay home and focus on my adopted daughter for the first few weeks of her life instead of running to the grocery store with a newborn baby.
01:14 PM on 04/16/2012
So the two of you ate nothing but formula? For weeks? Couldn't someone else have stopped in the store for you and got in some needed groceries such as formula and mama food? That's just terrible! I however gave birth, breastfed, and also managed to go grocery shopping, but that's just me I guess, tough as nails.
11:45 AM on 04/15/2012
I have exclusively breastfed both of my children and plan to exclusively breastfeed my third one as well. However I refuse to get into a war about the superiority of breastfeeding versus formula feeding. The bottom line is each mother needs to make the choice that is best for not only her baby but for her as well. Children thrive on breast milk and children thrive on formula. There is entirely too much judgement among women about the choices we make in regards to how our children are fed. I think it's ridiculous for breastfeeding mothers to look down on those who formula feed, and it's just as hurtful for formula feeding mothers to comment on women who breastfeed "too long." I do agree that hospitals should not give out routine samples to mothers, however if a mother asks for formula when she leaves or if she is using formula in the hospital the hospital should support that choice and provide samples.
12:44 PM on 04/16/2012
They should be charged for the formula the same as they are charged for their own meals in the hospital. If the mother is formula feeding the "Baby Friendly" hospitals don't refuse to give formula to those that are not or will not breastfeed. They just don't give free formula they same way as they don't give you free McDonald's food or coupons on your way out.
01:22 PM on 04/16/2012
If a woman chooses to breastfeed, FULLY INTENDS to breastfeed, and then breastfeeding fails for her because she fell into the formula supplementation trap during the newborn period, then she did NOT choose formula feeding. She chose breastfeeding. And that choice was taken away from her by aggressive marketing of formula through the hospital and pediatrician's office. If you support a woman's decision to choose how to feed her baby, then support policies that allow her to succeed if she CHOOSES breastfeeding.
07:43 AM on 04/17/2012
So leave the free formula at the hospital
and stop trying to take away my CHOICE.
08:42 AM on 04/15/2012
While I believe that breastfeeding may be most beneficial to babies, according to research, unfortunately not all women are able to successfully lactate, nor are all infants able to latch on properly and have a good enough suck pattern to retrieve milk. There is always pumping, you might say, so that the child can have the milk from the bottle, but again, if the mother is not lactating at all (and no, not all women are able to breastfeed, contrary to popular belief) or enough, the child would still need some amount of formula - full or supplemental.
Hospitals aren't telling parents to use formula. They are giving samples, letting them know that if they choose to do so that there is a CHOICE. The fact is, parents may or may not end up using formula, and may or may not end up trying that brand. What parents are going to do, though, is make the choice that is best for their child and family. Likely, that will have been discussed prior to birth, and then tweaked as the child starts to feed - getting enough, allergic, latching on etc. I'm pretty sure that choice won't be based on what sample is given upon leaving the hospital.
photo
Taterhead McGobstopper
Paddle faster, I hear banjos ...
11:49 AM on 04/15/2012
It's extremely rare for a women to be unable to lactate, and infants who have problems latching on initially can usually learn.
06:11 PM on 04/15/2012
Again, not all women produce enough to sustain the child, and therefore supplementing may be necessary, whether you like it or not. Some mothers may have to do this, even if they didn't want to originally.
12:21 PM on 04/15/2012
Giving free samples to mothers who have chosen to breastfeed can sabotage their efforts and take away their choice. This blog post has a great analogy to help you understand this. What if a man attempting his first sexual encounter was given a free sample of a artificial penis "just in case" he wasn't able to do it naturally. That might affect his confidence, you think? See the post here http://www.thealphaparent.com/2011/10/breastfeeding-is-like-sex.html
06:18 PM on 04/15/2012
I have no interest in understanding the analogy. I have been given samples of many things in my life and have chosen to throw them away or give them away. I think women who have chosen to breastfeed would do the same. If they have already made the choice, being handed a sample is not necessarily going to sway them. The could also say they aren't interested in the sample. If a mother so easily changes her mind because of being handed a sample of formula, then maybe she wasn't so sure of breastfeeding anyhow. Women/families make the decisions that make the most sense for them and that they feel will work best. It's not anyone's place to judge.
photo
Taterhead McGobstopper
Paddle faster, I hear banjos ...
07:14 PM on 04/15/2012
"While natural pen!s is best, some men just can't make them work as nature intended. For those who just find it too difficult and need a little something extra, research has shown ACME Brand Insta-Pen!s to satisfy women just as well as your own equipment."

Insta-Pen!s. The choice is yours.
03:29 AM on 04/15/2012
Why are so may people trying to force their beliefs upon the bodies of women? Every woman should maintain the right to control her body. If she needs an abortion, that is her decision. If she needs birth control pills, she should be able to do so without mandatory pap smears. If she chooses to breastfeed or not, that is her decision. After my daughter was born, I was shocked at how many strangers - upon seeing Enfamil in my shopping cart - recited the "breast is best" speech to me, as if I was abusing my child. Do I really owe the world an explanation? Frankly, the thought of a baby sucking on my breast freaks me out, because (1) I associate touch of that part of my body as purely sexual, and (2) I am not a damn cow.
Yes, my perfectly healthy daughter was bottle-fed and wore disposable diapers. Breastfeed your own kids and leave everyone else to their own decisions, please!
photo
Taterhead McGobstopper
Paddle faster, I hear banjos ...
11:51 AM on 04/15/2012
Yes, it's acceptable for society to attempt to educate the woefully ignorant ... especially those who believe the purpose of breasts is solely sexual.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bethab
05:15 PM on 04/16/2012
She doesn't believe that all women's breasts are solely sexual...she believes hers are. Her breasts...her decision. Just because it is different from yours doesn't mean it is ignorant.
12:24 PM on 04/15/2012
You ask," Why are so may people trying to force their beliefs upon the bodies of women?" The formula companies try to force their product on new mothers simply because of the profit motive. They know that using formula will probably result in breastfeeding failure and then formula will be necessary and they will make their money - simple.
02:31 AM on 04/15/2012
I had an abusive ex-husband that shoved it down my throat I would breastfeed. I already wanted to, it was just his way to make sure he was in control of it. I tried. For 2 weeks I fed her constantly. She would not stop, and she was losing weight. My pediatrician made me bottle feed her. My child, my ex, and I were in the office. My ex was insisting I continue to breastfeed. The doctor took her out of my arms, glared at my ex, then gave her a bottle of formula. He then told me, as he looked at him, that I was ordered to switch to formula. I was so relieved I cried.

I am sick of people guilting moms into believing it's a failure to bottle feed. Why is my uterus my body and not my breasts? Leave this a decision a woman makes for herself.
02:06 PM on 04/15/2012
The article is about hospitals promoting a commercial product that is not in the best interest of newborns. It is not about forcing mothers of newborns to only breast feed. It is obviously a choice for the mother to make. Any woman who is feeling guilty by reading this article and personalizing it has her own issues to work through. No hospital should be promoting a commercial product. By doing so the are endorsing, coercing and encouraging a practice that may sabotage a woman's choice.
02:27 AM on 04/15/2012
"Now as to that second question -- why do the infant formula makers think it's OK to pursue unhealthy practices? -- the answer is more straightforward: They are looking for profits, and they'll do what they can get away with." This quote is actually still a part of the first question. Hospitals are in it for the profit as well. Sick babies are a profit maker for hospitals. Why promote the baby's best health when it's in the best financial interest for the hospital to have a sick child return to the hospital? All aspects of promoting formula is more profitable for the companies that make formula and the hospitals that treat unwell infants and children.
12:55 AM on 04/15/2012
Not much of a story. Of course companies want you to use their products, and of course they want to make a profit. All Mothers do not choose to breastfeed. Really, isn't it the Mother's choice? If a mother does choose to breastfeed, sending formula home with her is not going to change her mind. Ridiculous.
12:27 PM on 04/15/2012
Actually, when a mother needs information and encouragement and support - giving her formula, the use of which can sabotage her breastfeeding - takes away her choice and leaves her having to resort to formula whether she want to use it or not to the formula's company's benefit and to the baby's detriment.
12:54 PM on 04/16/2012
Oh yes it can change their minds, and does. There are numerous studies proving the fact that even if a mother has decided to breastfeed having that free formula can change their minds very quickly when they hit a small or large difficulty. This is why the formula companies continue the practice and are fighting very hard to continue doing so. They are behind many of the blogs and media articles and news stories about a mother's "right to choose". The general public is so gullible and mothers with new babies are very vulnerable. And formula feeding mothers are very quick to see the stories as personal attacks. Corporate marketing is not to be shoved down our throats in the hospital.
10:27 PM on 04/14/2012
Fact 1 isn't much of a fact. The benifits of breastfeeding has been WILDY EXAGERATED. When you remove other factors like income level or education the only different between breastfeeding and formula is a less then 5% reduction in the incidence of diarhhea. The reason is the antibodies in breast milk ARE DIGESTED into amino acids in the baby's gut and thus do not enter the blood stream, so these antibodies are only available to fight infections of the gut (hence the less diarhhea). Formula is made to have the same nutrients as Breast Milk. As for the bonding, I like the idea of childern bonding with DADS too. Childern can even have allegric reactions to the food mom eats though the milk, the the content of formula KNOWN exactly. Breastfeed if you can and/or enjoy the connection with you child but don't stress over it.
12:28 PM on 04/15/2012
This poster is giving totally incorrect information - why?
photo
camanokat
Outta this world
06:43 PM on 04/15/2012
Breastfeeding is just a lot EASIER than bottles. No need to carry formula, water, clean bottles etc. I could go anywhere with little fuss.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
08:20 PM on 04/14/2012
Why can't formula be given by post natal follow up to mothers who are not able to produce sufficient breast milk.
09:02 AM on 04/14/2012
Public Citizen's campaign to eliminate formula company discharge bags from hospitals is a wonderful addition to the efforts to reduce commercial barriers to breastfeeding. It builds on the work done by the Ban the Bags campaign which has been working on eliminating this unethical practice since 2006. The bags are a marketing technique, and a very successful one, to dupe mothers into thinking that the formula is a gift and sanctioned by the hospital and health care providers who give these out. This type of gift giving is not seen anywhere else in a hospital. You don't see the cardiac unit giving out coupons for Big Macs. Hospitals have become one of the marketing arms for infant formula. Hospitals should market health and nothing else.

Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC
Ban the Bags
www.banthebags.org