iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rocky Kistner

GET UPDATES FROM Rocky Kistner
 

On the Carbon Pollution Front Lines, There's No Normal Anymore

Posted: 01/01/2013 12:29 pm

As Congress stumbles through an embarrassing year-end game of fiscal brinkmanship, the world continues its slow burn toward unchartered and dangerous territory. It’s a future that threatens us all with more cataclysmic storms, punishing drought, mind-boggling Arctic ice melts, and more ferocious fires and floods. Scientists say future years to come will only get worse as we continue to spew billions of tons of climate-altering carbon pollution into the air.  

Unfortunately, our legislators have done little to slow a perilously warming planet and protect the people they represent. That needs to change. After another year of deadly extreme weather events, led by the devastation caused by Superstorm Sandy, now more than ever we need our political leaders to listen to the people who sent them there -- and not to the polluters who line their pockets with campaign contributions. It's time for politicians to listen to people living along the climate pollution front lines, where average Americans are increasingly aware of the fast-growing hazards around them. 

New York region post Superstorm Sandy.                                Photo: NRDC

Over the past year, I traveled throughout America’s heartland where farmers, ranchers, Native Americans and people of all political stripes are battling a myriad of environmental threats, from a record tar sands pipeline spill in Michigan and the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to a brutal agricultural drought in the Midwest and ongoing oil and refinery pollution in the Gulf. People in these communities are demanding that their voices be heard in Washington and their state capitals, where powerful fossil fuel interests wield huge political contributions and public relations campaigns. But last year's election shows most people are rejecting at the ballot box the onslaught of dirty energy misinformation. They care more about the health of their families than the corporate interests that threaten them with pollution. 

Take Deb Miller, for example. A resident of Ceresco, Mich., Miller says her carpet business was devastated when an Enbridge pipeline ruptured and poured a million gallons of thick Canadian tar sands crude into the Kalamazoo River in July 2010. The record-setting spill closed more than 30 miles of the river for almost two years. Authorities are still cleaning up portions of the river today. But Miller and other residents of the area say they are still fighting for information about impacts from the spill, and they will not allow their children or grandchildren to go near the waters they once swam and fished in. Take a rake to the river bottom, Miller showed me last fall, and an oil sheen bubbles to the surface.   

Watch this video of Deb Miller talking about the ongoing cleanup of the Kalamazoo River.

 

Miller is worried about pipeline expansion plans Enbridge, TransCanada  and other companies have in the U.S., plans that will pump increasing amounts of carbon-rich tar sands oil to U.S. refineries in the Midwest and to the Gulf, where much of it will be exported. Not only do tar sands pipelines pose greater safety threats to residents living near them, as NRDC’s Anthony Swift has blogged, but mining and processing tar sands oil from the boreal forests of Canada boost carbon emissions due to the high levels of energy needed to extract and process the dirty oil. As climate scientist James Hansen famously wrote last year, developing the vast tar sands oil fields in Canada would be “game over for the climate.”

That’s bad news for everyone, especially for Midwest corn farmers already battling drier and hotter conditions. Kansas farmer Rod Berning says in recent years his corn crop has been battered by higher temperatures and a lack of cooling rain that normally blows in from the west. “The climate is changing, the storms aren’t coming as frequent as they did,” he explained to my colleague Bob Deans and me as he stood in a sweltering Kansas corn field last summer. “There’s no normal anymore.”

That makes sense to climate scientists like Kevin Trenberth, who we interviewed at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, CO. Trenberth and other experts say the drought that plagued America’s agricultural regions this summer -- and continues to slow barge traffic along the shriveled Mississippi River -- is directly related to human greenhouse gas emissions. “This is certainly a symptom of climate change,” Trenberth told us. “…the magnitude of the drought, the intensity of it, the duration of it is apt to be greater because of the human influence.”

Check out this video of Kansas farmer Rod Berning talking about the drought.

 

Hotter temperatures also mean more dangerous conditions for children and the elderly, especially for vulnerable populations suffering from respiratory ailments and chronic diseases. Last year I visited residents in Port Arthur, TX, where locals live near huge oil refineries that spit plumes of carbon pollution and other toxins into the air. That’s where I met long-time resident Erma Lee Smith, who blames her bronchitis on refinery pollution and has to take daily medication from her “breathing machine.”  

Erma Lee Smith with her "breathing machine."            Photo: Rocky Kistner/NRDC

If the Keystone XL pipeline is built, Port Arthur community activist Hilton Kelley says he expects more health problems as the Gulf coast refineries expand to accept a constant stream of tar sands crude from Canada. “What we're going to get is a continuous flow of this tar sands that is heavy in mercury heavy in metals and heavy in sulfur and what it’s going to do is increase the negative air quality that we presently have,” Kelley told me last spring while standing outside an apartment complex and playground less than a mile from the refineries. 

Watch this video of Hilton Kelley talking about pollution problems in Port Arthur.

 

Meanwhile, out in the oil-rich Gulf, massive drilling rigs pump out record amounts of crude from the depths of the ocean floor to feed the world’s insatiable oil habit, a habit every president since Nixon has tried to kick. The 2010 BP oil disaster is now a distant memory for many Americans exposed to BP’s relentlessly rosy commercials touting recovery in the Gulf. But the perils of the oil disaster are still very real for the fishermen trying to eke out a living along the oil-damaged Gulf coast.

That’s particularly true for oil-soaked communities like Grand Isle, LA, a once-thriving beach resort and fishing community at the tip of bayou -- and ground zero for much of the 4.9 million barrels of oil that spewed from BP’s Deepwater Horizon well 40 miles offshore. Local fishermen report catches have been cut dramatically in some areas since the spill, forcing many to wonder if it will ever return to normal. Meanwhile oily residue and tar balls continue wash in on local beaches after every storm. As Grand Isle Mayor David Camardelle told me last November, “We feel like we’re forgotten sometimes.”

But we must not forget them. Like society’s sentries, they are at the forefront of our carbon pollution assault. They are the ones warning us about the dangers ahead if we continue along a dirty energy business-as-usual path. If we don’t transition to carbon-cutting renewable and energy efficient technologies, there will be more farmers standing in corn fields burnt to a crisp like over-cooked popcorn, and more elderly neighbors forced to inhale medications from breathing machines.

These are the voices politicians need to hear because these are the voices that speak for us all. We have the tools to make crucial clean energy choices necessary to build a sustainable future. Now -- for all our sakes -- we just need to get to work.

Check out this video about NRDC’s  groundbreaking plan to quickly cut power plant carbon pollution.

 

 

Follow Rocky Kistner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rockyatnrdc

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 149
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidc Smith
Montani Sempre Liberi
03:02 PM on 01/02/2013
It is sadly obvious that green house gas emissions will only be brought under control when the climate changes to the point that the infrastructure necessary to burn carbon will be rendered useless by the changes wrought and the earth itself fixes the problem by essentially wiping us out. Even if America pulls together the political will to change....India and China will make up the difference. Our grand children are going to have a tough time of it, and will curse us....from their underground hobbit houses....
11:40 AM on 01/02/2013
I remember as a child loving the rain...the neighborhood children running around in the gentle raindrops, stamping our feet in the innocent puddles but not anymore...it never just rains, it storms. It seems to be either feast or famine and how our politicians can push this issue aside boggles the mind. They say they are worried about the economy, I'm worried about my sump pump stopping, farmers in the south are worried about water for their crops and their livestock. The climate affects us all and we can no longer afford to ignore the fact that we have polluted this planet to a crisis point. Drilling everywhere, fracking, dumping..it is all a huge problem, but one with healthy solutions..solutions that will change our lives for the better and bringing with them a plethora of green jobs. We need to change our ways or things like Katrina, Sandy, Dustbowls, droughts and floods will be continue to be our new normal and a horrible legacy to leave our children. We can start small, each of us doing our share and begin to turn back the tide of mother natures wrath.
11:19 AM on 01/02/2013
At the end of the day, the American people really don't give a s*** about anything else besides the economy. The facts and solutions are out there, but either people don't "believe" in it (which is absolutely stupid because there is nothing to prove), or we don't have the funding to fix it (because of an imbalenced checkbook). The truth is, our ancestors came to our country to make a better place for the offspring, by getting jobs and grinding their teeth for their grandkids or great-grandkids who they may never see. How can we not try to address this problem that will be DISASTROUS. SMH
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
01:53 PM on 01/02/2013
Climate change, if left unmitigated, will eventually lead to the extinction of the human species. Would that be inconvenient for you?
09:17 AM on 01/02/2013
When it all goes down in smoke and flames, members of Congress and world leaders will be pointing fingers at each other shouting, "It's your fault," while the rich take off in their multi-billion dollar space ships to live on their milti-billion dollar space station where, of course, they will kill each other in a few months fighting over who gets how much of what.
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
09:03 AM on 01/02/2013
"As Congress stumbles through an embarrassing year-end game of fiscal brinkmanship, the world continues its slow burn toward unchartered and dangerous territory. It’s a future that threatens us all with more cataclysmic storms, punishing drought, mind-boggling Arctic ice melts, and more ferocious fires and floods."

Indeed.

Meanwhile the folly of drilling in the Arctic is made more clear with the running aground of the drill rig that had to flee the Arctic waters for safety reasons.

Now it is abandoned and aground near Kodiak Island in Alaska.

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2013/01/barry-oil-qaeda-vs-arctic-wilderness.html
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
08:05 AM on 01/02/2013
The Arctic is warming.
The jet stream is controlled by the temperature of the Arctic.
Kiss normal weather good bye.
As population grows, the chance of widespread disaster from centralized power production and vulnerable agricultural practices grows with it.
We who understand this need to constantly push against the inertia of ignorance and idiocy and do what we can to change what we can, as long as we can, to get people to wake up and understand the need to replace fossil fuels.
12:29 PM on 01/03/2013
Eventually fossil fuels might be replaced but really?? Call Alaska say hello to the ice age, again. Its not ignorance its common sense that protects us from people like you. Take a chill pill.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
07:07 AM on 01/04/2013
Haldron, like most folks, you aren't grasping how dire the future will be. StephenBP is actually understating the situation.

Do you understand that Alaska is only one region, not global? Overall, the global temperature still rises. And it will continue to rise. The ice on Greenland and even on Antarctica is starting to release it's ice lock grip and is beginning to descend into the sea.
10:13 PM on 01/06/2013
Haldron. Yes, really. Coal was adopted quickly , and we can undo that reliance in the same time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Networkdigits
Insanity= Voting Dem or Rep and expecting change
07:06 AM on 01/02/2013
The Environment is not a popular Political Ideology in America. If it where, some of the 97% of the people that voted for Republicans or Democrats would have voted for the Green Party Candidate. Not that I am a Green Party supporter myself, but this one issue is where I break away from the Libertarian Platform, believing that in this case.... Federal Government involvement on this one issue is warranted.

Voting Democrat or Republican over Green, Libertarian, or Constitution Party Platforms is not going to get us anywhere. There will be no change, no moving forward, and it will be all pure politics and all about funding, power, and money.

The Democratic and Republican Political Ideologies and Platforms are an idea that this Country no longer needs and could sorely do without...

""On the Carbon Pollution Front Lines, There's No Normal Anymore"""
09:20 AM on 01/02/2013
Right. However, this year we had to make sure Romney didn't get in the White House. He is just too unbalanced and dangerous. Next time it will be Green for me -- if we aren't already fried by then. People won't take the time to find out the facts, learn about ecosystem dependencies, and become informed to the point of outrage. We will pay for our crimes against the planet, so those of you who are too comfortable to care, beware.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Networkdigits
Insanity= Voting Dem or Rep and expecting change
12:20 PM on 01/02/2013
and next election.. they will have you all thinking that its the lesser of two evils again....   It will always be played out as one or the other between the two parties.  They will not even debate the 4 other Major Political parties because they know if they did... they would have their rear ends handed too them handily.  Being a political observer... I can honestly say that the Libertarian and Constitution Parties had better viewpoints than the Republicans and the Green Party had better viewpoints than the Democrats.
04:20 PM on 01/02/2013
My Democrat congressman and Senators support legislation to limit green house gases. All you accomplish by voting for a fringe party Presidential candidate is hand the election over to the worst possible person. We don't live in a parliamentarian country, In America that is just the way it is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Networkdigits
Insanity= Voting Dem or Rep and expecting change
06:32 PM on 01/02/2013
Until.. people stop that way of thinking....  a lot of us already have.
03:24 AM on 01/02/2013
We don't even take into account the tremendous health cost to us and our planet, when we burn oil, coal, and natural gas, which would make them more expensive than Solar or Wind. We need a National Feed in Tariff, for Solar and Wind, with laws that level the playing field, this petition starts with homeowners in California. Japan, Germany, and our state of Hawaii, will pay residents between 21- 54 cents per kilowatt hour, here in California they will pay us 5 cents per kilowatt hour, and they wont let us oversize our Solar systems, want to change our Feed in Tariff? Campaign to allow Californian residents to sell electricity obtained by renewable energy for a fair pro-business market price. Will you read, sign, and share this petition?
http://signon.org/sign/let-california-home-owners
09:24 AM on 01/02/2013
You are talking about money. It's much worse if you look at the ecology. Our children will bear the burden of our laziness and ignorance. Join 350.org or some other group that is taking action. Maybe we can get just one Senator or one committee to propose a bill that would provoke the kind of discussion that would open people's eyes. We must stop oil and coal company control of our energy policy.
12:17 AM on 01/02/2013
If we all want a less polluted earth then we all need to have a hard look at the current economic system that encourages waste, consume, throw away society, etc.To make it do use it up fix it wear it out etc
. More community gardens, local stores selling items not as cheap but lasting or healthy . Sharing
(going to grocery store can you take a neighbor with you ?) think about it respectfully
10:36 PM on 01/01/2013
The carbon hoax has lost traction. The world will survive.
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
11:45 PM on 01/01/2013
Carbon is real, it's not a hoax.
Carbon dioxide is also real, and so is it's heat trapping properties.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ramblingmaggot
09:04 AM on 01/02/2013
And the CO2 in the atmosphere now is not as high as it has been previously. Plants breath CO2 to generate oxygen. It is a required element of our atmosphere. Why dont we talk about the real areas of man made issues: sodium flouride in drinking water, the strict defenition of what is normal in thought and emotion to ensure a medicated society, genetically modified food that causes tumors (do you really believe californians voted against GMO labeling?).
01:19 AM on 01/02/2013
Dean, you are clearly in the back pocket o f the billionaire Koch Brothers. HOw much are you paid to go around disrupting the conversation?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ramblingmaggot
09:09 AM on 01/02/2013
How much are you paid to do the opposite?
10:18 PM on 01/01/2013
There is no such thing as "carbon pollution" except from coal !
01:22 AM on 01/02/2013
Correction. All fossil fuels are heavy on the carbon. Animals and plants after all, are made of carbon and depend on it to live
09:26 AM on 01/02/2013
I take it you read sci fi comics? There won't be any kestrels left by 2050 unless people begin to take the threat of climate change and carbon pollution seriously. Deniers are just plain wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Demitasse
Ars longa, vita brevis
09:48 PM on 01/01/2013
The annual PwC Low Carbon Economy Index centres on one core statistic: the rate of change of global carbon intensity. This year we estimated that the required improvement in global carbon intensity to meet a 2ºC warming target has risen to 5.1% a year, from now to 2050.

This means the global economy now needs to cut carbon intensity by 5.1% every year from now to 2050 to achieve this carbon budget. This required rate of decarbonisation has not been seen even in a single year since the mid-20th century when these records began. Keeping the 2ºC carbon budget will require unprecedented and sustained reductions over four decades. Governments' ambitions to limit warming to 2ºC appear highly unrealistic.

The 2011 rate of improvement in carbon intensity was 0.8%. Even doubling our rate of decarbonisation, would still lead to emissions consistent with six degrees of warming. To give ourselves a more than 50% chance of avoiding two degrees will require a six-fold improvement in our rate of decarbonisation.

Business leaders have been asking for clarity in political ambition on climate change. Now one thing is clear: businesses, governments and communities across the world need to plan for a warming world – not just 2ºC, but 4ºC and, at our current rates, 6ºC.
http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/sustainability/publications/low-carbon-economy-index/index.jhtml
http://www.pwc.com/en_GX/gx/low-carbon-economy-index/assets/pwc-low-carbon-economy-index-2012.pdf
09:31 AM on 01/02/2013
Unfortunately, people who are armed with the facts annoy those who aren't. It's much easier to blow the whole thing off and get another beer. You'd think common sense and observation of what's already happening would make a difference. Nope. Three people on the House of Representatives Science Committee are climate change deniers. Instead of respecting science and learning, people somehow are becoming anti-science and would rather go with any random idea that makes them feel safe and comfortable. Too bad. But that doesn't mean you should stop informing those willing to learn. We're at 390 ppm last I knew, so it's a long way back to the sustainable 350 we need to survive. Thanks for the posting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
08:50 PM on 01/01/2013
The fight against coal, fracking, etc. is, sadly, the only thing that can truly ruin what should be a Democratic demographic stranglehold on the White House in the coming years. Remember that the Presidential race comes down to Ohio and Pennsylvania--both epicenters of both coal mining and, more importantly, fracking, and all the huge profits for individuals and local communities fracking will bring. If Dems hug environmental activists to their breasts too closely, they could easily lose the White House by shifting the politics of Ohio and Pennsylvania against them. There's no way Dems can win the White House if that ever happens. The climate fight is, sadly, totally hopeless anyway, since there is NOTHING we can do to slow the pollution of China and India, which already dwarfs that of North America and Europe put together, and will simply get worse and worse for the rest of the century. Given that tragic fact, is it worth it to progressives to hand the White House to the Koch Bros. on a silver platter --guaranteeing the elimination of the ERA outright--simply to be "true to one's principles" by committing Democratic suicide by loudly fighting both coal and fracking in Ohio and Pennsylvania? If Dems could WIN with these issues, I'd be all for them, as, on principle, I am. But it is never good for progressivism to give power to our bitterest enemies to remain "pure." Better, like Clinton, to shrewdly compromise and retain some power for progressives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
08:32 PM on 01/01/2013
We will get much more movement if we give alert to the far more pressing issue of the acidification of the world's oceans rather than speaking of warming.

Imagine a sea with no fish!!!
10:19 PM on 01/01/2013
That is silly because the ancestors of present corals and fish survived a far less basic ocean !
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
11:47 PM on 01/01/2013
The facts of paleontology show that most of them didn't survive. At least the corals and other things with shells. Fish aren't affected as much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
04:08 AM on 01/02/2013
There have been many sea extinctions. This is seen from the fact that the origin of most of the world's fish have a fresh water origin. There is also the paleontological record that shows many varieties and families of fish that used to dwell in the ocean that no longer do today. Completely vanished. Shell fish particularly are affected by the acidification. Already, some species of shell fish are having a hard time producing shells.
09:38 AM on 01/02/2013
Even the Great Barrier Reef, one of the most sturdy and self-rejuvenating reefs is in danger. Acidification is one problem, but ocean warming is equally serious. If the temperature of the ocean increases by 2 degrees, the ocean will begin to die. It has already increased 1/2 degree in the last 50 years. Do the math. It's all related to carbon pollution, so our focus needs to be on stopping the stranglehold Big Oil and Coal have on the world's energy policies. They say they are going green, but they are not. Like every other predatory corporation, they will buy up whatever new energy technologies they can and sit on them until their precious oil and coal run out. By that time, we will be out of time.
08:29 PM on 01/01/2013
Great news is the USA has reduced its carbon footprint more than any other country
All because of the super clean natural gas that fracking gives us
Time to end the useless green energy subsidies and give tax breaks to the productive fracking industry
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
09:09 PM on 01/01/2013
Fracking has received a quarter-century of DOE support, and while methane only produces 50% of the CO2 produced by coal, it still produces 1000%+ of the CO2 produced by renewable energy sources. Our carbon footprint is largely reduced by the recession.
09:53 AM on 01/02/2013
 reduced by the recession.?but there was a summer of recovery tour back in 2009. What happened?
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
10:36 PM on 01/01/2013
What about the super dirty and poisonous ground water that FRACKING produces?

No good news there.