More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ronnie Cummins

Ronnie Cummins

Posted: December 22, 2010 12:50 PM

TAKE ACTION: Stop GMO Contamination of Organic! http://capwiz.com/grassrootsnetroots/issues/alert/?alertid=14469696

"If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it."
Norman Braksick, president of Asgrow Seed Co., a subsidiary of Monsanto, quoted in the Kansas City Star, March 7, 1994

"Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA's job."
Phil Angell, Monsanto's director of corporate communications, quoted in the New York Times, October 25, 1998

After 16 years of non-stop biotech bullying and force-feeding Genetically Engineered or Modified (GE or GM) crops to farm animals and "Frankenfoods" to unwitting consumers, Monsanto has a big problem, or rather several big problems. A growing number of published scientific studies indicate that GE foods pose serious human health threats. The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) recently stated that "Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food," including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system. The AAEM advises consumers to avoid GM foods. Before the FDA arbitrarily decided to allow Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) into food products in 1994, FDA scientists had repeatedly warned that GM foods can set off serious, hard-to-detect side effects, including allergies, toxins, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged long-term safety studies, but were ignored.

Federal judges are finally starting to acknowledge what organic farmers and consumers have said all along: uncontrollable and unpredictable GMO crops such as alfalfa and sugar beets spread their mutant genes onto organic farms and into non-GMO varieties and plant relatives, and should be halted.

An appeals court recently ruled that consumers have the right to know whether the dairy products they are purchasing are derived from cows injected with Monsanto's (now Elanco's) controversial recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH), linked to serious animal health problems and increased cancer risk for humans.

Monsanto's Roundup, the agro-toxic companion herbicide for millions of acres of GM soybeans, corn, cotton, alfalfa, canola, and sugar beets, is losing market share. Its overuse has spawned a new generation of superweeds that can only be killed with super-toxic herbicides such as 2,4, D and paraquat. Moreover, patented "Roundup Ready" crops require massive amounts of climate destabilizing nitrate fertilizer. Compounding Monsanto's damage to the environment and climate, rampant Roundup use is literally killing the soil, destroying essential soil microorganisms, degrading the living soil's ability to capture and sequester CO2, and spreading deadly plant diseases.

In just one year, Monsanto has moved from being Forbes' "Company of the Year" to the Worst Stock of the Year. The Biotech Bully of St. Louis has become one of the most hated corporations on Earth.

Monsanto and their agro-toxic allies are now turning to Obama's pro-biotech USDA for assistance. They want the organic community to stop suing them and boycotting their products. They want food activists and the OCA to mute our criticisms and stop tarnishing the image of their brands, their seeds, and companies. They want us to resign ourselves to the fact that one-third of U.S. croplands, and one-tenth of global cultivated acreage, are already contaminated with GMOs. That's why Monsanto recently hired the notorious mercenary firm, Blackwater, to spy on us. That's why Monsanto has teamed up with the Gates Foundation to bribe government officials and scientists and spread GMOs throughout Africa and the developing world. That's why the biotech bullies and the Farm Bureau have joined hands with the Obama Administration to preach their new doctrine of "coexistence."


"Coexistence" or Cooptation?

The Agriculture Department is dutifully drafting a comprehensive "coexistence policy" that supposedly will diffuse tensions between conventional (chemical but non-GMO), biotech, and organic farmers. Earlier this week industry and Administration officials met in Washington, D.C. to talk about coexistence. Even though the Organic Consumers Association tried to get into the meeting, we were told we weren't welcome. The powers that be claim that the OCA doesn't meet their criteria of being "stakeholders." The unifying theme in these closed-door meetings is apparently that Monsanto and the other biotech companies will set aside a "compensation" fund to reimburse organic farmers whose crops or fields get contaminated. That way we'll all be happy. Monsanto, Bayer, Syngenta, Dow, and Dupont will continue planting their hazardous crops and force-feeding animals and consumers with GMOs. Organic farmers and companies willing to cooperate will get a little compensation or "hush money." But of course our response to Monsanto and the USDA's plan, as you might have guessed, is hell no!

There can be no such thing as "coexistence" with a reckless and monopolistic industry that harms human health, destroys biodiversity, damages the environment, tortures and poisons animals, destabilizes the climate, and economically devastates the world's 1.5 billion seed-saving small farmers. Enough talk of coexistence. We need a new regime that empowers consumers, small farmers, and the organic community. We need a new set of rules, based on "truth-in-labeling" and the "precautionary principle" --
consumer and farmer-friendly regulations that are basically already in place in the European Union--so that "we the people" can regain control over Monsanto, indentured politicians, and the presently out-of-control technology of genetic engineering.

Truth-in-Labeling: Monsanto and the Biotech Industry's Greatest Fear

In practical terms coexistence between GMOs and organics in the European Union, the largest agricultural market in the world, is a non-issue. Why? Because there are almost no GMO crops under cultivation, nor consumer food products on supermarket shelves, in the EU, period. And why is this? There are almost no GMOs in Europe, because under EU law, as demanded by consumers, all foods containing GMOs or GMO ingredients must be labeled. Consumers have the freedom to choose or not to consume GMOs, while farmers, food processors, and retailers have (at least legally) the right to lace foods with GMOs, as long as they are labeled. Of course consumers, for the most part, do not want to consume GM Frankenfoods. European farmers and food companies, even junk food purveyors like McDonald's and Wal-Mart, understand quite well the axiom expressed by the Monsanto executive at the beginning of this article: "If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it."

The biotech industry and Food Inc. are acutely aware of the fact that North American consumers, like their European counterparts, are wary and suspicious of GMO foods. Even without a PhD, consumers understand you don't want to be part of an involuntary food safety experiment. You don't want your food safety or environmental sustainability decisions to be made by profit-at-any-cost chemical companies like Monsanto, Dow, or Dupont--the same people who brought you toxic pesticides, Agent Orange, PCBs, and now global warming. Industry leaders are acutely aware of the fact that every single industry or government poll over the last 16 years has shown that 85-95% of American consumers want mandatory labels on GMO foods. Why? So that we can avoid buying them. GMO foods have absolutely no benefits for consumers or the environment, only hazards. This is why Monsanto and their friends in the Bush, Clinton, and Obama administrations have prevented consumer GMO truth-in-labeling laws from getting a public discussion in Congress, much less allowing such legislation to be put up for a vote. Obama (and Hilary Clinton) campaign operatives in 2008 claimed that Obama supported mandatory labels for GMOs, but we haven't heard a word from the White House on this topic since Inauguration Day.

Although Congressman Dennis Kucinich (Democrat, Ohio) introduces a bill in every Congress calling for mandatory labeling and safety testing for GMOs, don't hold your breath for Congress to take a stand for truth-in-labeling and consumers' right to know what's in their food. Especially since the 2010 Supreme Court decision in the so-called "Citizens United" case gave big corporations and billionaires the right to spend unlimited amounts of money (and remain anonymous, as they do so) to buy elections, our chances of passing federal GMO labeling laws against the wishes of Monsanto and Food Inc. are all but non-existent.

Therefore we need to shift our focus and go local. We've got to concentrate our forces where our leverage and power lie, in the marketplace, at the retail level; pressuring retail food stores to voluntarily label their products; while on the legislative front we must organize a broad coalition to pass mandatory GMO (and CAFO) labeling laws, at the city, county, and state levels.

Millions Against Monsanto: Launching a Nationwide Truth-in-Labeling Campaign, Starting with Local City Council Ordinances or Ballot Initiatives

Early in 2011 the Organic Consumers Association, joined by our consumer, farmer, environmental, and labor allies, plans to launch a nationwide campaign to stop Monsanto and the Biotech Bullies from force-feeding unlabeled GMOs to animals and humans. Utilizing scientific data, legal precedent, and consumer power the OCA and our local coalitions will educate and mobilize at the grassroots level to pressure retailers to implement "truth-in-labeling" practices; while simultaneously organizing a critical mass to pass mandatory local and state truth-in-labeling ordinances or ballot initiatives similar to labeling laws already in effect for country of origin, irradiated food, allergens, and carcinogens. If local government bodies refuse to take action, wherever possible we will gather petition signatures and place these truth-in-labeling initiatives directly on the ballot in 2011 or 2012. Stay tuned for details, but please send an email to: information@organicconsumers.org if you're interesting in helping organize a truth-in-labeling campaign in your local community. Millions Against Monsanto. Power to the people!
___________________________________________________________________

Ronnie Cummins is the International Director of the Organic Consumers Association.

 

Follow Ronnie Cummins on Twitter: www.twitter.com/OrganicConsumer

 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:14 AM on 02/02/2011
For those who support Monsanto (GMOs), you are either ignorant or financially benefiting from them. People need to do their research about what Monsanto is really all about. This is why corporations like Monsanto are winning because most Americans are too lazy, don't care, or both, about what is going on with the world. Too wrapped up in their miserable stinkin' lives going nowhere which could be traced back to corporations like Monsanto.
01:57 AM on 01/11/2011
Hey for everyone who feels the need to voice your opinion, let it out!!! i do all the time...cause its time to fight for our rights however we can. Here is most of the emails of the FDA's main people we can shout at, let them know how you feel:

mike.taylor@fda.hhs.gov
joshua.sharfstein@fda.hhs.gov
jeanne.ireland@fda.hhs.gov
john.taylor2@fda.hhs.gov
stephen.sundlof@fda.hhs.gov
jesse.goodman@fda.hhs.gov
01:41 AM on 01/11/2011
gotta love that quote cause its so true...

"If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it."
Norman Braksick, president of Asgrow Seed Co., a subsidiary of Monsanto, quoted in the Kansas City Star, March 7, 1994
03:02 PM on 01/06/2011
Shared on---this has to stop.
02:52 AM on 12/31/2010
The farmer who mentions the starving people in Africa, forgets it's all about money in Monsanto's pocket. There is enough food produced, distribution is one problem, people in Africa and other poor countries can't afford food on a regular basis, force feeding them GMO's benefits Monsanto and their ilk, mean while the people fed GMO's are the lab rats. Teaching the poor to grow their own food has already begun and needs to be addressed from that point, they need to be empowered with their own seeds and organic techniques so they can become more self sufficient, but this is what Monsanto and Co. don't want unless it's their GMO franken seeds that they would have to buy from Monsanto every year along with their pesticides and herbicides, it's all a scam to fatten Monsanto's bank account, the GMO's can feed the world is a big myth, GMO's have been around for about 14 years now and there are still starving people which puts a big hole in that theory. The environmental contamination of organic and even conventional crops from GMO strains has to be stopped, our genetic diversity is steadily shrinking, 90% of the varieties grown in 1900 are gone, GMO's will erode that further, which is the goal of Monsanto and Co. co existence has not worked and will not work, co existence is just Monsanto's password to keep control of the majority of the seed crops. Anyone who can't see that is willfully blind.
Heirloom farmer, Wyoming.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WYHKTai-Tai
Wyoming, Hong Kong, Tai-Tai
11:10 AM on 12/31/2010
fanned & faved, very well put, my fellow Wyomingan.:))
01:54 PM on 12/30/2010
I agree with this post!!!! USDA, DO YOUR JOBS AND SHUT THEM DOWN IF THEY CAN'T PRODUCE FOODS THAT ARE FIT FOR US TO EAT. WHY IS OUR OWN USDA ASKING US TO EAT FOODS THAT ARE UNFIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTIO­N??? SHUT MONSANTO DOWN!!!
03:10 PM on 12/27/2010
First off, I am a farmer. My job is to feed not only my family and neighbors, but also the world. I do grow GM Sugar Beets, but all of my other crops are conventional. I don't drink the Monsanto kool aid, but certain crops in certain regions need the help of Monsanto. Their protection will run out one day and then we will have more companies yet pushing GMO.
GMO labeling is a unnecessary expense to everyone. Just about every product in a conventional grocery store other than organic products will have some sort of GMO ingredient.
Coexistence is necessary wether you like it or not and there needs to be policies in place for this ASAP. Even though Mr. Cummings wasn't invited into these meetings, the organic community was well represented and hopefully some mutual understanding develops among these different groups.
09:24 PM on 01/03/2011
Please, before you start with this ignorant kind of speech, inform yourself. READ: SEEDS OF DECEPTION. This sounds like it comes directly from Monsanto, one of the worst companies on the face of the earth. Someday when you and all like you wake up, you will regret what you have said, but it will most likely be too late for all of us humans.
11:46 AM on 12/26/2010
For more information on Genetically Engineered Foods, check out my website http://www.slsnovel.com . For a fast-paced action thriller about the dangers of Genetically Engineered Foods, check out the novel "Sex, Lies, and Soybeans" available at most onm-line bookstores
02:32 PM on 12/24/2010
http://current.com/technology/92883575_monsanto-to-fight-gm-contaminated-organic-farmer.htm

Is this "coexistence?" They need to be SHUT DOWN. It is time for a seed satyagraha.
11:49 AM on 12/26/2010
Check out http://www.slsnovel.com
01:12 AM on 12/24/2010
What this article fails to mention is the MILLIONS of people starving in Africa for whom these crops benefit. While I grow my gardens organically, they don't have this luxury because they're more focused on crop yields rather than quality and nutrient content. If growing GMO crops can extend their life expectancy by 20-30 years (because they don't starve to death) then I don't see why GMOs have been vilified. I do, however, support the labeling of GMOs by the USDA on products sold in the US.
02:28 PM on 12/24/2010
Who benefits? They benefit from their land being stolen from them to be deforested to grow ethanol and animal feed for export markets? What propaganda. If what you stated without sources was true there wouldn't be over a billion starving people in the first place! I agree with this post... "Coexistence" with these environmental terrorists killing biodiversity? HELL NO. It is not possible. They want nothing more than to own all seeds through patents and transgenic contamination of organic crops that put small farmers out of business. That isn't coexistence, that is slavery.
07:58 AM on 02/02/2011
Are you serious, extending life in Africa to 20-30 more years? Have you seen the quality of life there? Would you want to live 20-30 more years if you lived in Africa? Eating GMOs isn't going to extend lives in any degree, if anything it's going to cut years from said life. Like you said, they are more concerned with crop yields than quality and nutrients, so what exactly is food without any substantia­l nutritiona­l value and quality? You might as well be eating paper.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 AM on 12/24/2010
Monsanto was Obama's second largest campaign contributor. He has repaid them lavishly - Kagan is an ex-Monsanto employee and joins Thomas in the Supreme Court, and he has made an ex-Monsanto exec the head of the FDA. http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-08-monsanto-FDA-taylor

I expect we will be hearing a lot of love towards Monsanto from our government.

And voting for Hilary won't get us out of this, she was once a Monsanto atty!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Treehuggindirtworshiper
Steward of God's Creation
12:39 AM on 12/23/2010
Eat Fresh! Eat Local! Eat Organic! Say no to poisoning our Earth! And yet there will be some uninformed person posting that GMO's are not in the food chain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RMankovitz
Researcher, inventor, entrepreneur, author
04:22 PM on 12/22/2010
Great article. While waiting for labeling laws, one can proactively avoid buying GMO foods. Here is a link to a handy shopping guide:

http://www.nongmoshoppingguide.com/Non-GMO-Shopping-Guide.pdf

Roy Mankovitz, Director
http://www.MontecitoWellness.com
A research organization
05:35 PM on 12/22/2010
Exactly, if you want to avoid gmo just buy organic, the thought of adding another layer of labeling regulations and expensive enforcement is ridiculous and redundant. Buy organic only to avoid gmos.
photo
Welib
Peace on Earth!
01:53 PM on 12/22/2010
Let Monsanto eat their own poisoned food.  They should be out of the food business period and shut down.  Tell the USDA to get stuffed and quit trying to make excuses for companies that produce poisonous foods filled with chemicals and GMO foods.
 
Why is the USDA suggesting co-existence with a company that poisons our food supply?
 
Why are we even having this conversation???  USDA, DO YOUR JOBS AND SHUT THEM DOWN IF THEY CAN'T PRODUCE FOODS THAT ARE FIT FOR US TO EAT.  WHY IS OUR OWN USDA ASKING US TO EAT FOODS THAT ARE UNFIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION???  SHUT MONSANTO DOWN!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Treehuggindirtworshiper
Steward of God's Creation
12:41 AM on 12/23/2010
Because Big AG has a lot of money to give to people who will push poison and franken food through the process.
photo
Welib
Peace on Earth!
09:36 AM on 12/23/2010
They do.   No different I guess than the drug industry and the FDA who puts drugs on the shelves before they are tested properly and don't recall them until they start killing people.  Do we have any agencies that work anymore?  Probably not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
01:48 PM on 12/22/2010
Clearly it is past the time to push our State lawmakers to act. Of course Monsanto fears this labeling. NOBODY will willingly participate in this lab rat experiment, especially those with children.