More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rory O'Connor

Rory O'Connor

Posted: October 8, 2010 09:17 AM

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows that the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows

- Leonard Cohen and Sharon Robinson

Everybody knows Op-Ed columns in the New York Times are, for all the obvious reasons, considered prime editorial real estate. But how many are aware they are apparently also unedited, poorly managed sinecures for lazy thinkers proffering unsupported assertions and analysis on both the left and the right side of the political opinion aisle?

Two cases in point: recent entries by conservative wunderkind Ross Douthat and liberal favorite Frank Rich - each of which backed up the authors' wrongheaded point of view by claiming simply that "everybody knows" it to be true.

Douthat, makes his god-awful predecessor William Kristol look better everyday, opined last week on the topic of the Pledge to America recently unveiled by House Republicans. His piece, entitled "The Seduction of the Tea Partiers," noted that "House Republicans have adopted the atmospherics of the Tea Party movement, but they've evaded its most admirable substance." As Douthat explained, "their fiscal vision practices the same kind of free-lunchism that the Tea Party supposedly abhors: it promotes low taxes without coming close to identifying the spending cuts required to pay for them."

Reducing spending is always difficult, Douthat reasoned - and then offered the kicker: "And as everybody knows, (italics mine) the only way to really bring the budget into balance is to reform (i.e., cut) Medicare and Social Security..."

"Everybody knows no such thing!" as I jokingly wrote in a letter to the Times editor. "I just spoke to everybody, and they suggested we start instead by slashing the defense budget."

Sure, "reporting" that his unsupported argument was unopposed (after all, "everybody knows" it's true!) was lazy in the extreme, but it did enable the putative Paper of Record's House Conservative to conclude, "a little more extremism in the defense of fiscal responsibility is exactly what the Republican Party needs."

And everybody knows that it's now or never
Everybody knows that it's me or you
Everybody knows, everybody knows
That's how it goes
Everybody knows

Douthat's pipeline to everyone and everybody is apparently not unique to Times bloviators, however. A few days later his Op-Ed mirror image Frank Rich compounded Douthat's error while also relying on "everyone" to buttress his equally unsupported assertions. In a piece entitled "The Very Useful Idiocy of Christine O'Donnell," Rich too weighed in on the new "Pledge to America," which he said "promises the $3.8 trillion addition to the deficit and says nothing about serious budget cuts or governmental reforms that might remotely offset it."

Why mar it with the same lazy and untrue assertion that Douthat made? Nonetheless, here's Rich: "Everyone knows that tax cuts for the G.O.P.'s wealthiest patrons must come out of Social Security and Medicare payments for everybody else."

Everybody knows that you love me baby
Everybody knows that you really do
Everybody knows that you've been faithful
Ah give or take a night or two

Is anybody editing the Times columnists - or is that just a silly question? Am I the only one who thinks that it's bad enough to pollute America's top editorial real estate with lazy thinking, reporting and writing -- but even worse to do so in support on unsubstantiated conclusions with large implications for the lives of millions of Americans?

Doesn't "everybody" know that?

Everybody knows it's coming apart
Take one last look at this Sacred Heart
Before it blows
And everybody knows

Everybody knows, everybody knows
That's how it goes
Everybody knows

 

Follow Rory O'Connor on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rocglobal

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:52 PM on 10/11/2010
Agreed. "Everyone knows" is a lazy locution, even if your assertion is true. A good high-school teacher wouldn't let a kid get away with "everyone knows" instead of reliable data to support the claim that follows. Hard to believe the editors of the nation's most influential opinion page would let it slide by twice in the same week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neutralino
Opposing pseudoscience 24/7
07:37 AM on 10/11/2010
It seems to me that this blogger is making the same mistake as the folks he criticizes.
12:55 PM on 10/10/2010
Well said, all be it Opinion is Opinion, the penchant to entertain has overwhelmed logic and reason; the appeal of intelligent discourse has been discarded, responsibility is neglected to the point of absurdity and accountability is non existent.
Personally I just want to be entertained and don't really want to think about it; my indignation gets my juices flowing and that reassures me that I know what I am talking about.
My Opinions are based on personal bias, conjecture, and supposition but they are very entertaining, at least to myself.
Well founded Opinion is a thing of the past, everybody knows it.
photo
srivers
"Honesty is the best politics." - Stan Laurel
05:28 PM on 10/09/2010
To paraphrase Groucho Marx, "The New York Times is a pale shadow of its former self which no one can deny!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leadsled
Love-child of the ghosts of FDR and Napoleon
11:54 PM on 10/08/2010
Your attack on Mr. Rich was wrongly thought out. His assertion that was presented in this column is entirely accurate. Everyone with any sense knows that republicans adhere to a "starve the beast" conception of killing medicare and social security through cutting revenue and causing the debt to balloon until such time as people demand the debt/deficit be "fixed" at which point the only politically available option will be slashing social security/medicare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
08:11 PM on 10/09/2010
Ah, Everyone with any sense knows that. I see.

To be honest, I find that slightly implausible. The reason is that it would imply that

either: not a single republican has any sense at all
or: it's not true that ALL republicans think that.

Why? Because it's a self-destructive mode of thinking. Yes, of course, loads of republicans really ARE that dumb. But not all of them.

However, all of this is minor. That's because Frank Rich didn't use the phrase 'everybody knows' in a logical sense of the terms. It was mere rhetoric, and perfectly in place as such.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leadsled
Love-child of the ghosts of FDR and Napoleon
04:34 PM on 10/11/2010
Yes, anyone who has any knowledge of the world around them, hasnt lived under a rock for 30 years or is even remotely capable of analyzing basic patters knows that. I mean GOP people literally are the ones who popularized the term and idea of "starve the beast". They admit it. Reagan certainly did.

Wait, you really think there is a single person with any sense whatsoever who still considers themselves a Republican? What country have you been living in?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rory O'Connor
Author, Friends, Followers and the Future
10:00 AM on 10/10/2010
Do you really feel that anyone who doesn't agree with you has no sense? After all, you say, "Everyone with any sense knows that republicans adhere to a "starve the beast" conception of killing medicare and social security through cutting revenue."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leadsled
Love-child of the ghosts of FDR and Napoleon
04:32 PM on 10/11/2010
No not everyone who disagrees with me, just anyone who doesnt recognize readily apparent reality. This isnt a difficult thing to know, they literally say so.
10:25 PM on 10/08/2010
You didn't even mention Maureen Dowd. Her pathetic column resembles Andy Rooney more with each passing year. No point, no thesis, just a bunch of rambling observations strung out until it reaches it's 300 word minimum length. Even sadder, Gail Collins wants to be her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
08:46 PM on 10/08/2010
Thank You Mr. O'Connor,

Sadly, intelligent discourse is lacking in our 24/7 news cycle.

In a world of Twittering, volume wins over substance.

And He who shouts loudest must be in the right. Everybody knows it.
04:20 PM on 10/08/2010
The New York Times editorial page is never edited for fact. The writers there are not just lazy, but often times back their opinions up using unsubstantiated or factually incorrect claims. What makes the NY Times so insidious is that their editorial page is not where their point of view journalism ends. It is carried on in their so called hard news pages where you can find out of context statements, editorial opinions mingled with the news stories, and one sided stories. It is why their circulation continues to fall.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rory O'Connor
Author, Friends, Followers and the Future
04:49 PM on 10/08/2010
You say, "The New York Times editorial page is never edited for fact." I thought Op-Ed writers were entitled to their own opinion -- not their own facts as well!
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
01:42 PM on 10/08/2010
I don't know, you are trying to equate Armed Robbery with going 35mph in a 30 zone.

Maybe it is because I agree with Frank Rich that I am part of that everybody that does believe that the GOP is trying to get rid of SS so the rich can have that money.

But then again who and I? I don't even have my own website.