Russ Baker

Russ Baker

Posted January 9, 2009 | 11:35 AM (EST)

USS George H.W. Bush: A Ship With a History

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The father of the outgoing president likes to note that "we Bushes cry a lot." Well, here's cause for crying out loud.

On Saturday, January 10, the Navy will commission the aircraft carrier CVN-77, to be named USS George H.W. Bush. In a departure from tradition, the ship will be christened before it is finished. They seem in a hurry to burnish the reputation of the elder Bush while his son is still in office. But the truth is that this is not a case of an honorable man being honored, but of a continued cover-up of a shocking career. The former President calls the upcoming ceremony "the last big thing in my life," but he should not be allowed to shuffle quietly out of the limelight on the heels of this noble valedictory.

As I reveal in my new book, Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put it in the White House and What Their Influence Means for America, there are two George H.W. Bushes: the public one and the private one.

The public Bush 41 was acclaimed a war hero as a Navy pilot in World War II. The private Bush 41, against all Navy tradition, bailed out of the plane he was piloting while one or more of his crew remained on board to perish.

The public Bush 41 was an oilman and congressman who entered politics and then served in a wide variety of posts, from UN ambassador to Republican Party Chairman to director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The private Bush 41 was a deeply secretive man living a double life as an intelligence asset two decades before he was appointed CIA director as a purported "intelligence virgin." Though he served as director for just a single year, the Agency named its headquarters after him.

The public Bush 41 was a genial patrician who got along with everybody. The private Bush 41 was deeply connected to operations that damaged, removed or destroyed several American presidents. Bush 41, who has famously claimed not to recall where he was on November 22, 1963, the day JFK was shot, was a longtime friend of the man who mentored Lee Harvey Oswald. That Bush 41 placed a suspicious call to the FBI at the time of JFK's death to establish himself as being outside Dallas. He was connected to many figures surrounding Kennedy's motorcade and the events of that tragic day.

Naming this military vessel after George HW Bush is problematic, given the disrespect the Bush family has shown for the American constitution. And given the hatred unleashed the world over by the Bush name, asking US military personnel to serve on a carrier so named is surely exposing them to extra unnecessary risk. All around, this is one ship with a history before it ever sets sail.

 
Comments
51
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I wish they would go back to the tradition of not naming naval vessels after living people. Gets around a lot of the nastiness. Put a couple of decades behind you before you decide you want to name your submarine the "USS Larry Craig"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 01/27/2009

This entire aircraft carrier naming exercise is just the latest in the Bush family spinmeisters' attempts to manipulate the public's perception of them and manufacture "evidence" in support of favorable legacy reporting. George H.W. Bush's nagging problem began when Newsweek published his picture on its cover entitled "The Wimp Factor". Poppy has been attempting to distance himself from this ever since. Jumping out of airplanes [tethered to an expert parachutist] and arranging for his Presidential son Dubya to name an aircraft carrier after him are all part and parcel of this subtrefuge. It makes one wonder where Lloyd Bentsen is at a time like this. One can just hear him say: "George, I knew him well and can unequivocally say that you are no John Wayne".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 01/26/2009
- Skepticat I'm a Fan of Skepticat 60 fans permalink
photo

Perhaps expensive warships should be named for the citizens who pay for them instead of politicians
consider the following:
USS Taxpayers of Ashtabula Ohio
USS Citizens without Affordable Health Care
USS Boondoggle
USS Billion Dollar Baby
USS Underfunded Infrastructure
USS Overcharged by Contractors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 01/11/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 159 fans permalink
photo

They should have named it:

The USS New World Order..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 01/11/2009
- phinney I'm a Fan of phinney 10 fans permalink
photo

I just saw this book at Border's this evening, and you know what I did...I hid it behind a stack of other books. I do that to Gore's books also.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 01/10/2009

The other day I found copies of Coulter's books under stacks of other books as well!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 AM on 01/11/2009
- phinney I'm a Fan of phinney 10 fans permalink
photo

I probably did that one also...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 01/12/2009

Why don't they call it good ship mission accomplished.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 01/10/2009
- Decipherer I'm a Fan of Decipherer 94 fans permalink

I am no student of much less expert in military procurement, naval or otherwise, but would someone please tell me why in God's name we need yet another aircraft carrier now, with all the current and hideous long-term costs associated with building, operating, staffing, and maintaining this equipment?

Knowing how much this carrier is going to cost is perhaps more relevant to the country now than getting JFK assassination factoids about GHWB. If we're talking factoids, how about something new and substantive to connect the Bush family with the Nazi takeover of Germany in the 1930s, and Sen. Prescott Bush's reluctance to go to war against the Axis?

But, I digress. I'm not saying that huge aircraft carriers and the flotilla of vessels needed to protect them on and under water are not necessary to project U.S. power around the world when required, but when is enough enough?

When are we going to do something about the proliferating military-industrial complex that is strangling our country and economy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 01/10/2009

While no fan of the Bush family and an ardent supporter of Obama, I can justify constructing a new aircraft carrier. In order to maintain the industrial capability of building ships in the US, we always have to have at least one aircraft carrier in some stage of production. Unfortunately, the latest one has been named after the father of the worst President in US History, GW Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 01/11/2009

I heard it was built without a rudder since it nevers need to change its course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 01/10/2009
- SimJack I'm a Fan of SimJack 65 fans permalink
photo

I find this move by the USN outrageous and disgusting. To the real heroes and honorable warriors that have defended this nation you have my apologies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 01/10/2009

Amen. At one time our Nation's aircraft carriers were more appropriately named after famous wartime engagements such as Midway and Coral Sea. These names honored both the Naval Service and the men who flew into battle from our carriers during time of war. Now the PR wags are attempting to use our carriers - Top Gun style - to recreate more favorable public images for otherwise undeserving politicians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 01/23/2009
photo

JUST KNOW IT IS A CURSED SHIP WITH THAT NAME......­......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 01/10/2009

How did GHW spend time on a submarine?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 AM on 01/10/2009
- phinney I'm a Fan of phinney 10 fans permalink
photo

It was a sub that rescued him from the ocen after his plane was shot down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 01/10/2009

The Bush family connections are eye-openingly nefarious. Those who criticize any investigative journalist who exposes these connections is enabling the Bush family to keep its hands around America's neck.

Tim Fleming
www.eloquentbooks.com/MurderOfAnAmericanNazi.html
http://leftlooking.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 01/09/2009
- Karma7 I'm a Fan of Karma7 5 fans permalink

I hope that ship isn't destroyed like Bush destroyed our economy, or sink like his administration, which caused the deaths of millions, including many brave American Navy soldiers.

Naming this military vessel after George HW Bush is a disgrace and insult to our country.

The Bush name will live in infamy in our history, and I believe it may be a curse on that ship.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 01/09/2009
- randyjet I'm a Fan of randyjet 26 fans permalink

Virtually ALL politicians were connected in one way or another to all the people around JFKs motorcade since he was a politician TOO! This is stupid stuff. As for his disregards for the Constitution, while it is true of his son, I cannot think of an instance with his presidency. Maybe you could provide SPECIFICS instead of innuendo and guilt by association.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 01/09/2009
- quadman I'm a Fan of quadman 7 fans permalink
photo

Russ sold his 'authoritativie' book based upon innuendo and guilt by association. All he is doing here is trying to get some attention for his book. I guess that the sales have not been all that good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 01/09/2009
- bujeeboo I'm a Fan of bujeeboo 6 fans permalink

Well, he sold me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 01/09/2009

I just ordered it. It is exhaustively researched. Read it and let the 'veil fall from your eyes'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 01/10/2009
- quadman I'm a Fan of quadman 7 fans permalink
photo

"In a departure from tradition, the ship will be christened before it is finished."

Apparently, Russ knows little about naval tradition. Ships are christened when they are launched, not when they are commissioned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 01/09/2009

Oh, I get it. You are part of the "Bush Legacy Project", aren't you? You're sent to this site to throw any inane comment into the mix. OK, fine. But, really you should read the piece before commenting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 01/10/2009

Is 'quadman' right or wrong? Or does it matter to you just becasue he is bring up a point where the author might be wrong?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 01/12/2009
- quadman I'm a Fan of quadman 7 fans permalink
photo

LOL! Just because I call Russ on an inaccuracy in his knowledge makes me part of the "Bush Legacy Project". Being the son of a sailor (a plank owner for that matter), I believe I know a bit on the subject. This has nothing to do with Bush's 'legacy'. Grow up and do some of your own research instead of marching in lock-step with your ideological brothers!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 01/12/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect