- BIG NEWS:
- GOP
- |
- Sarah Palin
- |
- Bobby Jindal
- |
- Barack Obama
- |
The appeals process for Social Security claims is taking as long as three years, reports The New York Times' Erik Eckholm. The average time between an appeals filing and a hearing is 500 days.
The toll can be visualized in terms of foreclosures, bankruptcies, and even deaths.
Although two-thirds of appealed cases result in overturned decisions of benefit to litigants, the delays are said to be endemic. If you want to put a number on these delayed hearings, try 755,000.
At the heart of this issue is purported lack of money to hire at least 150 new appeals judges to hear these cases.
The new judges, as well as the infrastructure to support them, would require $100 million more than President Bush has requested for this item in next year's budget.
OK, let's crunch the numbers. $100 million is about 12 hours spending on the unnecessary, $6 billion -a -month war in Iraq.
A war where well-connected military contractors such as Halliburton and Blackwater are getting even richer while many of our most vulnerable citizens are going without the money they need to navigate their already difficult lives.
Putting a human face on the issue, Eckholm mentions the plight of Belinda Virgil of Fayetteville, North Carolina:
"Belinda Virgil of Fayetteville, N.C., has worried about her future since her initial application was turned down.
"Tethered to an oxygen tank 24 hours a day because of emphysema and life-threatening sleep apnea, Ms. Virgil lost her apartment and has alternated between a sofa in her daughter's crowded house and a friend's place as she waits for an answer to her appeal.
"It's been hell," said Ms. Virgil, 44, who finally got her hearing in November and is awaiting the outcome. "I've got no money for Christmas, I move from house to house, and I'm getting really depressed."
Gee, do you suppose a Halliburton or Blackwater contractor could take Ms. Virgil in? I'm sure there would be room in their mansion.
Hmm. Our disabled borthers and sisters suffer while our military contractors get rich.
Does that sound like "compassionate conservatism" to you?
Not to me.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
This is what happens when government runs things, its terribly inefficient. Think about how your health care will be run if you liberals finally get the "single payer" system you so desire.
After reading about the Halliburton/KBR "alleged" gang rape case, do you really think asking one of them to take in a person with a disability would be such a good idea?
Thank you. The hideous inhumanity of this entire Bush/Neocon regime, their client corporations and "christian" supporters is beyond all bounds of decency. The concept of "Nationhood" of the founders and the words of our cherished papers to "provide for the common good" and "promote the general welfare" is stood on it's head, while these despicable mealey-mouthed creatures scheme how to make even more money from war and suffering and lie through their teeth. We are truly sleepwalking to allow such greed and purposful incompetance.
Translated for you English-language people out there: "Why I Am Angrier Than Ever at Bush Today."
Lets make sure that this does not happen again;
Bush ,cheney ,rumfeld all proped up the war in vietnam while avoiding service, they have been kept in the government all these years by the faith based bribe and the mindless christian vote
The man's anger is just. W has a legion of articulate, angry enemies. It's doubtful if the GOP be able to get more than a minority for the GOP's candidate for POTUS in '08 because of these enemies.
"Compassionate conservatism" was always a lie. What it really meant was "Screw the poor with a smarmy salesman's smile". We are FINALLY beginning to understand that.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with