Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Russell Simmons

Russell Simmons

Posted: March 4, 2011 03:32 PM

The Hypocrisy of Peter King


There's a lot not to like about next week's Congressional hearings into "Islamic Radicalization," but one of its most appalling aspects is the naked hypocrisy of the hearing's chairman, Republican Peter King of New York.

Until now, Rep. King has been best known for his very public support of the Irish Republican Army, which of course was internationally recognized as a terrorist organization. Despite the IRA's long history of murder, violence and intimidation, King argued (until breaking with the group over it's failure to support the US invasion of Iraq) that the IRA represented the "the legitimate voice of occupied Ireland."

And frankly, we're not mad at Rep. King for that. By relentlessly lobbying for the IRA in Washington, Rep. King created an environment where it was possible for the British government to finally sit down and talk with the IRA's political wing, Sin Féin. Negotiations that ultimately led to a peaceful end to a decades old war and undoubtedly saved many lives.

Instead, our beef with Rep. King is that while he was happy to operate within the gray areas of the IRA debate, when the conversation turned to Muslim Americans, his world view become black and white. To Rep. King, a Muslim seems to equal terrorist (or at least terrorist sympathizer), no matter what a person's background, political leanings or actions.

When pressing for the rights of the Irish people, King was careful to make a distinction between the violent extremists in the IRA and those in Sin Féin who were for legitimate political reform. But when it comes to Muslim Americans, some of whom are his own constituents, Rep. King has no problem lumping everyday, hardworking, peace loving Muslims in with the terrorists.

Having witnessed first hand how conversation between Sinn Féin and the British directly led to peace, Rep King more than anyone should know that the best resolutions are always reached through honest dialogue, not demonization and divisiveness.

The deep irony is that Rep. King has begun polluting our national conversation with his hypocritical hate mongering at just the moment that the Arab world's secular revolution has created a unique opportunity for strengthened cultural ties. Maybe that's not a coincidence. Politicians like Rep. King make a living playing on people's fears and misconceptions. It makes their job easier when we view all Muslims as terrorists out for blood, instead of possible partners in a shared future.

Let's not let Rep. King get away with it. We need to hear from politicians who are looking to bring people together, not needlessly push them apart. If we're truly worried about America's future, we need to look at hate mongering politicians like Rep King, not our Muslim fellow citizens who reject violence and extremism and simply look to be part of this great American fabric.

On Sunday, March 6th at 2pm in Times Square, NYC, I will thousands of people in support of Muslim Americans, in a rally called "Today, I Am A Muslim Too!" Please join me on Sunday in NYC or on Facebook as a show of support.


 

Follow Russell Simmons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/unclerush

 
 
  • Comments
  • 253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:03 AM on 03/10/2011
biabouman41 just wrote : "Can we please have hearings on the radicalisa­tion (sic) of Christians­", which, in point of fact,is a false MORAL equivalence many American, particularly Atheists, draw between America's radical civil religion passing as Christianity and theocratic radical Islam. The notion that genuine Christianity and Islam are both equally radical, agrressive and violent.

And its the same historical error Russel (not Richard) Simmons makes in not seeing that there was another radical civil religion, Catholicism, passing as genuine Christianity, pitted as it was against Protestanism, that was the origin and cause of centuries of internecine violence in the Irish republic.

Ironically, there is much to be said about the dark terror and persecution seen throughout the bloody histories of both Islamic and Catholic authoritarian and theocratic rule in the Middle East and Europe respectively.

But, the violence and killing of those who dared to read the Bible in their own language, clearly the Prelates and bishops they defied were not obeying Jesus Christ, certainly not as Muslims are enjoined to obey the Prophet's command to "cut off the infidel's heads, nor is Jesus' teaching anything like the spirit of the Republican's Evangelical agenda to replace the constitution with their brand of religious law.

In all these cases, what we have is nothing less than an extremely dangerous, often bloody and radical religious extremism in the 21st centuries masquerading as Godliness, and all of it diametrically oppose the message of His Son, Jesus Christ.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:52 AM on 03/10/2011
I'm not sure what the Hip hop mogul Richard Simmon's real agenda here is ( or of his involvement with the blood diamonds fiasco years back) but apparently he doesn't share the Christian "faith" of his brother Run's 'Reverend' MTV reality show nonsense. Its seems extremely rare to hear of any celebrity in the Black community supporting Islamic causes of any sort.

Does Mr. Simmons imagine that in any Muslim country he would be offered the immense opppurtunties and respect he's enjoyed here as a black man in the West..things that Black Americans have struggled for centuries to achieve? What Muslim country would even allow him to speak his mind or chastise the host country so aggressively?

Leaving aside entirely the question of Muslim terrorists, the fact is that many (if not all) forms of Islam teach doctrines that deeply upset westerners-doctrines that may destabalise our society or threaten the best aspects of western culture.

That's why the word Islamophobia is so infuriating!

Its become a tool with which to bully people and silence them, and is insidiously conflated by the race relations industry..those caught up in the new drive for UNIVERSALISM and extended to mean any.
To be wary of Islam is to fear the centrality and inescapability of Religion, the loss of freedom, the harshness of Sharia, the violence and anti-Semitism of many sacred texts, its disinclination to integrate with the host culture...and finally, the incompatibility of theocratic Islam with democracy.
02:54 PM on 03/07/2011
Can we please have hearings on the radicalisation of Christians. If the Republicans will not allow us to use the Capitol for this purpose, can we use the Murrow Building in Oklahoma City?
01:10 PM on 03/09/2011
Sigh... Timothy McVeigh was not a radical Christian. He was raised Catholic but by the time he bombed the federal building in OK city he considered himself agnostic.
02:45 PM on 03/07/2011
I would bet the Obama team would shout with glee if Geb Bush gets in the Republican race.

Even Republicans are tired of the Bushes
01:03 PM on 03/07/2011
Censors are working overtime.
11:26 AM on 03/07/2011
CAIR Employees And Officials Support Terror

Senior CAIR employee Randall Todd Royer, a/k/a “Ismail” Royer, pled guilty and was sentenced to twenty years in prison
for participating in a network of militant jihadists centered in Northern Virginia.
Royer’s illegal actions occurred while he was employed with CAIR

CAIR's Director of Community Relations, Bassem Khafagi , was arrested by the United States due to his ties with a
terror-financing front group. Khafagi pled guilty to charges of visa and bank fraud, and agreed to be deported to Egypt.
Khafagi’s illegal actions occurred while he was employed by CAIR.

On December 18, 2002, Ghassan Elashi, founding board member of CAIR-Texas, a founder of the Holy Land Foundation,
and a brother-in-law of Musa Abu Marzook , was arrested by the United States and charged with, among other things,
making false statements on export declarations, dealing in the property of a designated terrorist organization, conspiracy
and money laundering. Ghassan Elashi committed his crimes while working at CAIR, and was found Guilty.

CAIR Board Member Imam Siraj Wahaj, an un-indicted co-conspirator in the first World Trade Center bombing,
has called for replacing the American government with an Islamic caliphate.

Rabih Haddad served as a CAIR Fundraiser. Haddad was co-founder of the Global Relief Foundation (“GRF”).
GRF was designated by the US Treasury Department for financing the Al Qaida and other terrorist organizations.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Suntio
Amat victoria curam.
08:46 PM on 03/06/2011
Mr. King, WHERE ARE THE JOBS?
05:55 PM on 03/06/2011
muslim extremism is a problem in this country and in the world. what is wrong with having hearings. pragmatism over political correctness will save more lives in the long run.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coyotefe
06:46 PM on 03/06/2011
I think the concern is more about a hate-mongering than hearings.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swabby01
07:04 PM on 03/06/2011
there is some but the response is overkill just like we did to the japanese americans in wwII. it isn't about the religion and that isn't political correctness. hearings are totally stupid in my opinion. american muslims can be our best sourse of information if we just had some respect for them. they are a resource, not our enemy; they are our citizens. that doesn't mean diddly any more. now it is about winning your way, not about citizenship. i'm glad i resigned my commission. i didn't serve for this lack of respect for anyone at all. when i hear 'political correctness' all i hear is ' i have no intention of showing you any respect or consideration and i am passing judgement on you.'
05:09 PM on 03/06/2011
The problem is that we are zeroing in on "Islamic" radicalization and nothing else. The topic of these hearing should be to discuss the issues revolving around religious radicalization. Christian, Islamic, Judaism, etc...

The fact that these hearing target one specific group is the problem. The fact that these hearings are just an extension of people like King's inability to separate peace loving Muslims from the extremest while seeming to be perfectly oblivious to the Christian extremism that exists in this country while, at the same time, being the same man as Russell points out who went to great lengths to separate the violent radical IRA members from the rest, is the hypocrisy.

We need to have conversations in this country about religion, race, sexual orientation, the media, the governments place in our lives etc.... but we need to have those conversations correctly. We can't use the facade and the language of civil discourse to mask bigotry and fear mongering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barbara Hill Bissonnette
05:23 PM on 03/06/2011
I get where you're coming from, I really do but having hearings is a terrible idea, even if it is multi-faith in scope. Why don't we leave it to the FBI, CIA etc, as it seems to me that all of these elements are law enforcement issues and not religious issues. Radicals, of any ideology, potential criminals. Domestic terrorism is an equal opportunity offender.
09:15 PM on 03/10/2011
not having hearings at all would be fine with me too. My comment is just "if we are going to have hearings at all they should be..."
04:23 PM on 03/06/2011
Just wanted to make sure Russell understands - King isn't asking to have a hearing on Muslims or even Islamic radicals. He is asking to have a hearing on Islamic radicalization, which is a serious, serious problem. It isn't nearly as serious a problem in the US as it is in Europe - yet. But the people (and Congress) need to be able to talk about this if they're going to do anything about it. Progressives can't have it both ways: complaining that the government is too secretive and not transparent enough when dealing with terrorism and then also complaining when people want to have civil discourse about it. Unless you prefer that the government does nothing about Islamic radicalization, then you have to pick one or the other.

Also, if this hearing turns into a gigantic anti-Muslim thing, people will recognize that and King will look terrible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myhomeo
My micro-bio is empty
06:30 PM on 03/06/2011
People already recognize what this is and King already looks terrible. But that isn't stopping him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shoosh09
Its time for a PALESTINE!
03:52 PM on 03/06/2011
Just wondering why Peter King won't have a hearing on crime in general.
12:37 PM on 03/06/2011
I think it is a reasonable approach to an unsavory problem. Have the hearings to elevate our dialog and our understanding of the subject of radicalism, which is a cancer on the Muslim religion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godwithin
01:11 PM on 03/06/2011
Only if you also have hearings for the cancerous radicalism on Judaism and Christianity. Unsavory problem fear mongering. We need hearings for profiteers disguised as patriots.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barbara Hill Bissonnette
05:31 PM on 03/06/2011
F&F
11:41 AM on 03/06/2011
Shoot, I thought he was talking about the S.I. writer.
04:22 PM on 03/06/2011
He is the more well-known of the two.
10:54 AM on 03/06/2011
Today, perhaps more than ever before, we must look below the surface and evaluate analytically what may appear to be obvious. Rep. King's two-faced approach to terrorism must be seen for what it is.

In the case of Muslims his hearings appear to be hate mongering, not investigation. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, however,we will see how he conducts them. If the hearings are not objective and all-encompassing of the Muslim community, let us, a multicultural American community, condemn his hearings strongly.

If King is allowed to crucify law-abiding normal-living loyal American Muslims, who will be next? The Jews? Then who? Your community? This is not a potential problem of Muslims only; hate-mongering in any form threatens all Americans, and we must all stand together against it.
04:29 PM on 03/06/2011
I agree - give him the benfit if the doubt. Why do you say the hearings appear to be hate mongering? Just because he's a Republican? What evidence is there that he's going to crucify law-abiding loyal American Muslims? I see none.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barbara Hill Bissonnette
05:25 PM on 03/06/2011
We say that because of history, greg. Public hearings along these lines have always been hate mongering.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swabby01
07:11 PM on 03/06/2011
find some hearing that turned out great for those investigated. base your opinion on what has already been done in the past. i give no politican the benefit of the doubt as they don't have a history of ethical behavior. king is targeting innocent people and that is scary. as a gay person i understand what it is like to be targeted and to have to watch where i go. it sucks and doesn't endear you to your own government. it kills my patriotism. heck i lost that a long time ago. i don't trust my own government.