iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sadakat Kadri

GET UPDATES FROM Sadakat Kadri
 

Sharia History: A Timeline of 1,400 Years of Islamic Jurisprudence

Posted: 06/01/2012 7:30 am

At a time when efforts to ban sharia law have been tabled in some two dozen states, it would be interesting to know what precisely their sponsors are hoping to prohibit -- because their target has a 1,400-year history that extends deep into the realms of faith.

When the Quran was first enunciated to the Arabs, the word sharia conveyed the idea of a direct path to water -- a route of considerable importance to a desert people -- and Islamic scholars would always think of it as a spiritual concept. A 14th-century Syrian jurist named Ibn Qayyim set out the vision well:

It is the absolute cure for all ills. ... It is life and nutrition, the medicine, the light, the cure and the safeguard. Every good in this life is derived from it and achieved through it, and every deficiency in existence results from its dissipation. ... If God wished to destroy the world and dissolve existence, He would void whatever remains of its injunctions. For the sharia ... is the pillar of existence and the key to success in this world and the Hereafter.

As befits so awesome a phenomenon, the science of studying law -- jurisprudence, or fiqh -- came to be considered a duty akin to prayer. No aspect of creation fell outside its scope, and jurists pronounced on questions from the lawfulness of logic to the legal meaning of the moon. They hypothesized fantastically unfortunate dilemmas: what Muslims should do on a desert island, for example, if they ever found themselves pining away alongside a dead shipmate, a pig and a flask of wine (clue: avoid the pork and alcohol until desperate). While some would always focus on big issues such as criminal justice and holy war, others explored far more specialized aspects of the cosmic order -- the calculation of inheritance shares, say, or the jurisprudence of ablutions -- and no problem was ever too personal to escape their collective gaze. A thousand years ago, al-Ghazali, arguably the greatest of all Sunni theologians, subjected the intimacies of marriage to rigorous legal scrutiny, and attributed to Muhammad himself a commandment on the importance of foreplay. Sex was unholy unless preceded by "kisses and sweet words," the Prophet had reportedly warned. "Let none of you come upon his wife like an animal."

It is course possible that America's anti-sharia activists are hoping to ban such advice. It is a lot more likely, however, that they have no clue it even exists, and are confusing sharia with violent extremism. Something similar could be said about the Muslim hardliners whose harsh legal interpretations are ascendant in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran. And one thing is for sure. All those people inclined nowadays to pronounce on the eternal meaning of Islamic law could do a lot worse than think about its history first.

Loading Slideshow...
  • 610

    Muhammad experiences a vision in a cave, which he and his followers will attribute to divine intervention. The communications from God, which continue for two more decades, are thought to delineate a path toward salvation -- "the sharia." (Photo: A Muslim pilgrim prays at the Hiraa cave on Noor mountain late on Nov. 13, 2010 as some 2.5 million Muslim pilgrims descend on the holy city of Mecca for the annual hajj or pilgrimage. According to tradition, Islam's Prophet Mohammed received his first message to preach Islam while praying in the cave.)

  • 632

    Muhammad's death sets off a succession crisis. The dispute will eventually widen into a full-blown schism between groups known as Sunnis and Shiites. (Photo: A Muslim woman prays in the courtyard of the Prophet Muhammad Mosque in the Saudi holy city of Medina on Nov. 13, 2009. Muhammad is buried in Medina's landmark mosque, which is Islam's second holiest shrine after Mecca.)

  • 632-51

    The revelations voiced by Muhammad are systematically written down for the first time. Several supposedly aberrant versions of the Quran are then incinerated on the orders of Caliph Uthman. (Photo: A Pakistani girl reads verses from the Quran while attending her daily madrassa, or Islamic school, set up in a local mosque on the outskirts of Islamabad, Pakistan, April 11, 2012.)

  • 750-62

    Revolutionaries overthrow the dynasty that has come to control the Muslim world, in the hope of restoring perfect Islamic justice on earth. Another dynasty assumes power instead. The caliphate's center of gravity shifts from Damascus to a purpose-built capital known as 'the City of Peace' - or Baghdad. (Photo: Iraqi worshippers perform their Friday prayers in a mosque in Baghdad's Shiite suburb of Sadr City on May 4, 2012.)

  • 760s-800s

    Caliphs in search of political legitimacy encourage scholars based around Medina and Baghdad to develop legal principles to supplement the Quran's very limited number of rules. The scholars oblige, drawing on sources ranging from Arab tradition and Persian custom to Greek philosophy. (Photo: An Indonesian Muslim student reads from an academic religious book in an Islamic course at Al-Azhar mosque in the old city of Cairo on Dec. 4, 2011. Al-Azhar mosque, which was developed into one of the oldest Islamic universities, pays special attention to the Quranic sciences and traditions of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and all the modern fields of science.)

  • 840s-900s

    Iraqi scholars attempt for the first time to establish and document precisely which oral traditions about Muhammad (<em>hadiths</em>) are authentic. Jurists use the resulting compilations to re-interpret the sharia. (Photo: Tilings of a hadith on a wall in Nishapur, Iran.)

  • 1000s -1100s

    Five distinct bodies of legal thought become dominant, and alternative ways of understanding the sharia are sidelined. (Photo: A masked and hooded person canes Indonesian food seller Murni Amris for violating Islamic sharia law outside a mosque in Jantho, Aceh province, on Oct. 1, 2010. Two women were caned in Indonesia's staunchly Muslim Aceh province for selling food during the fasting hour of Ramadan, an official said.)

  • 1218-58

    An army led by Genghis Khan invades the Muslim world through what is now northern Pakistan, and one of his grandsons renews the onslaught four decades later. Baghdad falls into Mongol hands, and the city's last caliph is rolled into a carpet and trampled to death. Despair and chaos ensue.

  • Early 1300s

    In response to the ongoing Mongol threat, new ideas about the sharia proliferate. Some are defensive and others are aggressive, but most concern themselves more with the mystical search for God than with questions of compulsion and force. (Photo: Mongol army.)

  • 1453

    The Ottomans capture Constantinople. Successive sultans assert control over their expanding empire by trying to summarize God's law in statutory form - an innovation that early Muslims would have considered heretical. (Photo: Mehmed II entering Constantinople.)

  • 1857-8

    The British suppress a major rebellion against their rule over India, intensifying the imperialist ambitions of several European powers. In response, Muslims increasingly associate the sharia with self-determination, as national and religious identities fuse. (Photo: Captain William Hodson captured the King of Delhi during the "Indian Mutiny" or First war of Indian Independence.)

  • 1920s

    A clan known as the Saudis seize control of the Arabian peninsula after a brutal civil war. Its leaders allow religious scholars to enforce a particularly harsh brand of Islamic law. (Photo: Saudi women stand outside a gift shop on Feb. 14, 2012 in the capital Riyadh, where open celebration of Valentine's Day is officially banned along with the desert kingdom's strict Islamic laws.)

  • 1970s

    Colonel Gaddafi becomes the first ruler since Ottoman times to enact statutes authorizing the punishment of Islamic crimes. A coup in Pakistan, a revolution in Iran, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan kick off an era of radicalization that will mean he is not the last. (Photo: President Gamal Abdal Nasser of Egypt (right) with the Leader of the Libyan Revolution, Muammar al-Gaddafi in 1969.)

  • 1981

    Extremists assassinate Egyptian President Anwar al-Sadat. They object to his willingness to make peace with Israel, and justify the killing by citing 14th century legal opinions about the Mongol invasions. (Photo: An undated picture shows late Egyptian President Anwar Sadat (L) waving to a crowd as Vice-President Hosni Mubarak (R) laughs beside him standing in a convertible vehicle. Mubarak came to office as Egypts fourth president after late President Anwar Sadat was slained by a group of military Islamist fundamentalists with allegiance to the Al-Jihad during a military parade Oct. 6, 1981.)

  • 1983

    A year on from an Israeli invasion of Lebanon, Shiite fighters kill hundreds of foreign soldiers with the first ever suicide bomb. Some scholars formulate new legal theories to validate the tactic retrospectively. (Photo: Hezbollah fighters parade during a ceremony organized by the militant Shiite Muslim group on the occasion of Martyr's Day in the southern suburbs of Beirut Nov. 11, 2009.)

  • 1989

    Ayatollah Khomeini demands that "The Satanic Verses" author Salman Rushdie be killed for blasphemy -- a sin for which the Quran itself mandates no penalty. (Photo: A veiled Iranian woman walks past a mural depicting Iranian late revolutionary founder Ayatollah Khomeini, painted on the wall of the former US Embassy, in Tehran, Iran, where Iranian militant students seized in November 1979.)

  • Today

    In the aftermath of 9/11, hardliners continue to insist that Islamic jurisprudence is timeless. History continues to prove them wrong. (Photo: In this Friday, May 25, 2012 photo, Muslim hardliners of Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) hold banners during a protest against Lady Gaga in Jakarta, Indonesia. As the U.S. pop star canceled her sold out concert in Jakarta over security concerns after Muslim hardliners threatened to use violence against her, many started to question the extremists' double standard towards the raunchy <em>dangdut</em> shows performed almost every night by young Indonesian women who turn up everywhere from smokey bars and ritzy nightclubs to weddings and even circumcisions. Dangdut is the most popular music among lower class people in Indonesia.)

 
 
 
FOLLOW RELIGION
At a time when efforts to ban sharia law have been tabled in some two dozen states, it would be interesting to know what precisely their sponsors are hoping to prohibit -- because their target has a 1...
At a time when efforts to ban sharia law have been tabled in some two dozen states, it would be interesting to know what precisely their sponsors are hoping to prohibit -- because their target has a 1...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 577
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
10:58 PM on 07/05/2012
Sharia law is horrible, and it oppresses spiritualist like myself they think we are devil worshippers, an djust sorcerers which is all lies that is just a fear tactic used by muslims I recommend that you all go to Amazon and read "How to overcome fear, and start living fearless" it will open you up an dstop the fear mongering attitude
08:12 PM on 07/03/2012
Watched The Stoning of Soraya M. I'll take a pass on Sharia Law. Thank you very much for offering, though.
03:49 AM on 06/06/2012
For those who were asking about the punishment of the grave, I am posting two videos:

The first is the video of the 18 year old boy from Oman, whose body was dug up after 3 hours of being buried. The second video is an audio clip from the Art Bell show. He mistankingly refers to the punishment of the grave as sounds from hell, but it appears to be the sound of tortured souls. I remember listening to tape recordings in the 1980's of cassette recorders placed in coffins.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZFAAzKDUO8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw27uok6hYc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
webbandit
USAF Veteran
10:34 PM on 06/05/2012
The move to legislate against Sharia law in the US is not based on any real concern or real threat from Islam,no one in this country ever tried to implement Sharia,its just hateful anti Muslim sentiment I,Iike the fact that this country for the most part is supposed to be a secular nation.To make my point clear people in this country are so ignorant they dont really know who the Muslims are around them.Muslims dont all wear beards and skull caps ,they dont all have dark skin,brown eyes and not speak english.
07:58 PM on 06/05/2012
Many hadith collections have been translated and I would advise people interested in the subject to pick up a good tafsir you can even find some online.Also there are some factual mistakes in the slides i notice.Maybe it's due to some ideological bias on the part of the writer but it's quite clear that the hadith are fundamental to understanding the Qu'ran. It's not that the Qu'ran has too few rules. It's that the hadith the words and deeds of the prophet Muhammad are needed to understand the context in which Qu'ranic verses were "revelealed" and why. Say if the Qu'ran says perform salat prayer, then you need to know how.Muslims have long unresolved debates over this , should you do it standing with your left hand on your chest or both and stuff like that.
07:47 PM on 06/05/2012
Ok i came at the end of the page and i wanted to flip to the next one but there is no other page.Then there is a slide show that has nothing about Sharia in it but gives a extremely broad and selective view of Islamic history and some events in it the purpose or logic in it escaping me completely.It even deals with the most important part of Islamic jurisprudence with one single slide. He (the Islamic prophet) lived and he died. Thats just not very informative. I'm not sure what people interested in this should take away from it.It's good to debate this but then it needs to be treated in a way that people actually have something to debate over.And yes i'm well aware of the hadith about foreplay but it's also countered by hadith that a woman baking a bread needs to stop what she's doing right away if the husband wants sex and that the houri's and the angels will curse the woman that refuses her husband sex.So we have one hadith very much open to interpretation and others that clearly indicate a less then romantic view of sex. Islam also treats sex as a condition for divorce.There is a long story about a woman in the hadith who wants to divorce her husband who has beaten her green but Muhammad forbids it until they had sex with each other.But the man cannot because he is impotent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
05:07 AM on 06/05/2012
"...al-Ghazali, arguably the greatest of all Sunni theologians,"

He also rejected the law of cause and affect...think about it.
04:36 AM on 06/18/2012
No one is perfect in thinking, even you... think about this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
03:08 PM on 06/18/2012
Not even anyone but what goes up must come down, gravity, not the direct involvement of God, which is what THEY believe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
05:05 AM on 06/05/2012
The sponsors are trying to prohibit an alien construct that contravenes Western Civilization. Like the Saudis would even allow a Bible in their country, much less a crucifix. They don't even allow non-Muslim public worship.

We've done fine without sharia.

http://napoleonlive.info/did-you-know/sharia-in-america-not/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
03:38 AM on 06/05/2012
No one finds fault with nationalism. Nationalism is an essential characteristic of our contemporary world,

But a thorough understanding of the dynamics of ethnic politics is missing in countries which have a diverse groups of minorities. How do we go about on majority-minority relations is a big issue.

Nation States must aim at answering questions of justice in ethnic relations, questions that are often overlooked in the relevant political discourse.

Pluralism should be willing to weigh the importance of universal laws against the importance of cultural survival, which is a collective goal for all communities.

Ethnic relations are characterized both as intra- and inter-state relations, it involves not only domestic arrangements but also different international instruments of minority rights in order to see whether these fall short of the prescriptions of multicultural pluralism.

An emphasis on minority rights need not occur at the expense of national unity or loyalty because instead of being mutually exclusive, group and national loyalties can be mutually reinforcing. The most important promise of today’s increased emphasis on pluralism and divided sovereignty is that it provides for a fair and equitable solution for minority rights.
08:19 PM on 06/04/2012
Isn't a young girl going to be stoned to death under Sharia edicts in Sudan for 'adultery'......ANY RELIGIOUS LAW that seeks to make women 'property' and to rule with fear must be fought and fought and fought...
01:34 AM on 06/05/2012
No,,, both MEN and WOMEN are punished, equally. The punishment is not for women, alone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics
03:05 AM on 06/07/2012
Please see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_rights_of_women_in_history#Islamic_law

Women gained equal status (Right to vote) in light of the law in the US in 1919...
03:07 PM on 06/04/2012
The writer of this article talks of accepting "advice" from Sharia because in its long existence it has been useful. Furthermore, it has been adapted over the years to apply to more recent concerns.

However, the legislators that have banned Sharia law are not banning individuals going to it for advice. They are banning it being accepted as the legal basis for government designated crime and punishment. In America, government is a secular power that sets its standards of crime and punishment according to the generally accepted morality of the people.
12:49 PM on 06/04/2012
Which interpretation of Sharia law are we talking about. And when you implement Sharia law you have to implement it all, not just the parts you like. There is no bending of the sharia or modern interpretations of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We See The World Not As It Is But As We Are
08:11 PM on 06/04/2012
Where did you get your misinformation on Shariah?

There's no single Shariah law --- the term Shariah refers to the underlying principles used to determine the laws (fiqh) and punishments (hudud). Since this has been done for 1400 years, in over 50 Muslim-majority countries ... there's a lot of variety.

The 6 Principles of Shariah

1. The right to the protection of life.
2. The right to the protection of family.
3. The right to the protection of education.
4. The right to the protection of religion.
5. The right to the protection of property (access to resources).
6. The right to the protection of human dignity.

Source: http://asqfish.wordpress.com/2010/09/21/the-six-principles-of-shariah/

I realize that messes severely with the anti-Islam conspiracy theory ... but there you have it.
02:57 PM on 06/05/2012
As you stated there is a lot of variety when it comes to Islamic laws. There seems to be
some variety when it come to punishment also. I apologize for my grammatical errors,
maybe it should have been sharia laws.
12:21 PM on 06/19/2012
Where does women fit in... item 2 or item 5 ?
11:37 AM on 06/06/2012
But doesn't the same principle supposedly apply to the Christian Bible?
05:26 AM on 06/04/2012
It is important to look at the de-facto situation of countries that in a greater or lesser degree seek to implement/be faithful to Sharia and the Koran. From what I can tell (I am open to be corrected) the more civil law is linked to Sharia, the more human rights are curtailed (for example, the numerous open cases of "blasphemy law" violations in Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, etc.). Everything de facto seems to indicate that Sharia when guiding civil law is incompatible with Western societies that put human rights and dignity at the center of their legislation - or at least strive to. A private path of spiritual perfection and virtue, is no man's business to interfere with. Law and parallel courts are another matter.
photo
Holymolly
Emotionally intellingent
01:54 PM on 06/04/2012
Well, it's not a correction that I'm about to do, it's the positive that I will exentuate without the negative aspect that it has on women, well, maby not. With that type of law, no one will even think of raping, robbing or assalting a woman, it's the total right of the man, praise be to G od. :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:51 PM on 06/04/2012
...say what now?
photo
LoyalBob
God is more vast than the Bible.
10:51 PM on 06/03/2012
We already have enough Biblical nonsense in this country. We don't need to add these nuggets of desert misogyny and intolerance into the mix.

The Constitution is all we need for the courts. Religion belongs in the church, temple, and mosque.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people taste like crap!
10:22 AM on 06/04/2012
But LoyalBob.. being that this is supposed to be an inclusive country, they do have a right to insert their insanity into the mix....don't they?
photo
Tolerant
See perfection in every situation
07:59 PM on 06/03/2012
We Muslims have by and large failed to understand that the Islamic Law was not meant to be static.

It was meant to be developed in every age based on the changing circumstances and evolution of the human beings, with proper checks and balance and the infrastructure to ensure a fair and fluid application of it.

The Qur'an was meant to provide timeless "principles" and not static injunctions forever, and it, along with the Sunnah and Hadith, were meant to be properly contextualized when interpreting and applying.
photo
Damn Damien
Naturally!
09:29 PM on 06/03/2012
The Qur'an does not provide timeless "principles." If early Islamic scholars--and most to the present day--are to be trusted, it enjoined hostility toward the rest of the world, and authoritarianism within. There is some message of brotherhood among Muslims in the Sunnah and Hadith, the rest is filled with indescribable horrors.
01:37 AM on 06/05/2012
I posted the wrong clip. I meant for this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhcu0INxqRw
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people taste like crap!
10:25 AM on 06/04/2012
Religion and legal are opposites.... it is impossible for them to be compatible except arbitrarily regardless of any arguments one might have..