More

Sal Nunziato

Sal Nunziato

Posted: January 22, 2008 10:51 AM

Elvis Costello: This Week's Reissue


With CD sales at an all time low, and downloading at an all time high, I would like to know, what is Elvis Costello and the Universal Music Group thinking by reissuing yet another version of Costello's classic "This Year's Model," at the retail cost of $24.98? I asked the same question just a few months ago, when El and the Big Boys did the same for the 30th anniversary of the brilliant debut, "My Aim Is True." Who are these reissues for?

As a diehard Costello fan, or should I say, sucker, I will buy anything this man releases. His foray into classical, "Il Sogno," remains sealed on my shelf, but I bought it. His love letter to Diana Krall, "North," was a painful listen for me upon its release. I have now grown to like it. Very much, actually. But that's not the point. I didn't want it at the time, but I bought it. The "live big band" CD, "My Flame Burns Blue," was no more welcome in my home than "Benny Goodman Plays The Replacements." (Unfortunately, if that existed, I'd buy it, too. I think I may be answering my own question, but let me continue.)

If my math is correct, this will be the 5th version of "This Year's Model," as it was for "My Aim Is True." Each release promised more. The first was simply "better sound than your old scratchy LP." The next was "even better sound thanks to new remastering," AND it included bonus tracks -- pertinent b-sides and rare cuts from the same recording sessions." At this point, Elvis switched labels, so he had to bring us along with him. The third version, on the new label, was offering "better sound" yet again, as well as a bonus CD that included the same bonus tracks as version two, but even more.

At this point, I think every fan was thinking, "Why not just release one CD and call it "The My Aim Is True Sessions." I think I asked a few record label big shots at the time why that wasn't going to be the case. I don't remember the answer, that's how unsatisfying it was.

OK, Elvis switches labels again. (I still haven't unpacked my books from the last move.) So here comes version 4. No bonus tracks, just dandy new packaging. BUT, inside this dandy new packaging was a code so you can access unreleased music off of a website. Very sneaky indeed.

Now we are caught up. Number 5. The bonus CDs included with the recently released 'My Aim Is True" and the forthcoming "This Year's Model" are live concerts from the day. Doesn't it make sense to just release the live shows? Wasn't that a huge success for the Grateful Dead with the "Dick's Picks" series?

As more and more people get fired from the major labels, and more and more artists are going the indie route, it makes little sense that these Costello packages were approved in this form. The industry needs to be saved. This does not seem like the way to go.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:22 PM on 01/27/2008
If my mother calls tell her I have a sweater
08:57 PM on 01/23/2008
As a 53 y.o. who makes his living on the net, I myself am a downloading fool. I DL such archaic no longer relevant stuff as Bach, Weezer, Brahms, Billie Holiday, Creed and Green Day el al. Guess I don't fit the norm. BTW, after 40 years of playing live, the remastered stuff doesnt do much for me as I cant hear shit anymore anyway. I really do agree that the labels are dinosores in suits who will do anything for a buck. Costello however,is an artist whose music forever altered my conceptions of what is possible for an artist.
06:04 PM on 01/23/2008
Hey! I'm over 40 and I get most of my music online. Why, I was on the 'net when you were still in shorts pants! Why, I oughta... come back here!

I don't think the record companies bank on 40-year-old males buying reissues of Elvis Costello CDs at Best Buy. There aren't that many Elvis Costello fans out there. Sorry. On the other hand, someone keeps buying Bob Marley's "Legend" over and over and over again. Not to mention The Wall, Led Zeppelin IV, Bob Seger's Greatest Hits, blah blah blah. There's your cash cow. An increasingly smaller cow, granted, but a cow none the less.

But it's all academic at this point, wouldn't you agree?
The CD is dying faster than the MiniDisc, and that's no
small accomplishment. It's a download world now, my friends. But, you say, I miss the liner notes and the lyrics and the pictures. Wanna read or look at pictures? Buy a book. Or -wait a sec - go online! Lots of words and pictures relating to your favorite artists there.

iTunes, Amazon, and the iPod will be, in the long run, a bigger boon to the music industry than CDs and contract-fulfilling double live albums combined. It's painful to watch record stores close, that's for sure.
But there's a major shift going on here. Folks should stop wringing their hands and just get onboard.

You know, I bet a lot people got real upset when their
neighborhood music store stopped selling piano rolls.
See what I mean?
11:33 AM on 01/23/2008
I wouldn't call it panic or stupidity. This is the basic approach of the media industry. If you buy an album on LP for $8, why not buy it on CD for $15? Then why not buy it in a deluxe package for $25? And why not buy it on SACD or some other "super audio" format for $30? Then they can keep raising prices AND get everyone to keep buying their entire catalog over and over again. Same thing with movies. They tried to charge $90 for VHS. Oddly, few people bought them. Then they made a bizarre, one-time only tragic error. They introduced the DVD which basically cost the same or LESS than VHS and yet offered far superior quality and loads of extras AND they made them available for sale as soon as they came out for sale to people at home, rather than six months or a year after making them available for rent. Naturally, people bought DVDs by the truckload, building a home library of movies and TV shows the same way they have a library of books and music. Suddenly, the movie industry was grossing $20 billion from DVD sales and rentals, more than double what they gross at the US box office. Was this a lesson? Offer better value for less money? Apparently not. They're back to their old ways with Blu-Ray and HD-DVD, trying to charge a lot more money and trick people into buying $1500 TV flat screen, a new player and discs that cost more. Bizarrely, it isn't working. And I stopped buying the Elvis Costello reissue after the third repackaging.
10:38 PM on 01/22/2008
Well I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused.
jhNY
Mercy.
02:19 PM on 01/22/2008
These reissues are for 40 year olds who don't download music on the internets. They are the most dependable purchasers of cd's sold at retail outlets. Years ago, they were mostly taken for granted by the majors. Now, they're the main guys still buying. And for the most part, they don't care for modern pop like hip hop and whatever noisy guitar music that passes for 'rock' these days. So yet another reissue of 30 year-old lp's.