iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sam Chaltain

Sam Chaltain

GET UPDATES FROM Sam Chaltain

Let's End the Battle of the Edu-Tribes

Posted: 02/ 1/11 11:31 AM ET

There's a revolution underway -- and no, I don't mean in Egypt or Tunisia.

I mean the growing, hopeful, tech-savvy and solution-oriented tribe of educators who attended last weekend's EduCon 2.3 in Philadelphia, an annual event that bills itself as "both a conversation and a conference" and a place where people come together "both in person and virtually, to discuss the future of schools."

Hosted by the Science Leadership Academy -- an inquiry-driven, project-based high school focused on 21st century learning (what a concept!) -- EduCon was as much a revival meeting as it was a conference. To spend time there was to bear witness to the development of a different sort of tribe: A confederacy of educators from across the country united by inquiry, connected by social media and committed to solving the intractable riddle of public education.

See for yourself -- scroll through the #EduCon tweets -- and you'll find two things in abundance: a communal language of potential and partnership and a rapid-fire establishing of new relationships based on possibility and hope.

This is, in short, the essential recipe for bringing about a paradigm shift in any profession or organization -- and it's painfully rare in contemporary conversations about public education. As Dave Logan explains in his must-read book "Tribal Leadership: Leveraging Natural Groups to Build a Thriving Organization":

"Tribes emerge from the language people use to describe themselves, their jobs and others."
When a person looks out at the world, he sees it filtered through a screen of his words and this process is as invisible to him as water is to a fish... Instead of people using their words, they are used by their words and this fact is unrecognized."

Logan goes on to characterize five tribal "stages" -- informal groupings in society, a field and/or an organization -- based on an individual's predominant worldview (as constructed through the language s/he uses and the types of relationships s/he forms). The extreme stages range from a complete sense of hopelessness about the world and its possibilities ("life sucks"), to a transcendent space of endless possibility and collaboration ("life is great"). And, of course, the bulk of us fall somewhere in between.

I share this because I was struck by the clear contrast in tone between tweets from EduCon attendees and tweets from the leading voices of the two main Edu-Tribes when I returned from EduCon -- also known as the "reformers" and the "status quo-ers," although I tend to think of them more as the Old and the New Guard.

As Logan would explain it, the EduCon Tribe is operating at the crossroads of Stages Four and Five. While its members pay almost no attention to organizational or regional boundaries, the only thing that matters is that people contribute meaningfully to the discussion. The language of this tribe is hopeful, solution-oriented and obsessed with things like collaboration and communication. And its members are all aligned around EduCon's five guiding principles:

  1. Our schools must be inquiry-driven, thoughtful and empowering for all members.
  2. Our schools must be about co-creating -- together with our students -- the 21st Century Citizen.
  3. Technology must serve pedagogy, not the other way around.
  4. Technology must enable students to research, create, communicate and collaborate.
  5. Learning can -- and must -- be networked.

The power of these principles is key. A high-functioning tribe always identifies and leverages a core set of values and uses them as guideposts to align around a noble cause. That clarity, however, is a contrast with the Old & New Guards, still engaged in bitter warfare to influence the mainstream media and shape the Obama administration's federal education policy priorities -- albeit at slightly different cultural stages.

To borrow Logan's terminology, the Old Guard is operating at a Stage Two level -- most simply described as a "My Life Sucks" worldview. Logan describes people in this cultural stage as:

"Passively antagonistic; they cross their arms in judgment yet never really get interested enough to spark any passion. Their laughter is quietly sarcastic and resigned. The Stage Two talk is that they've seen it all before and watched it fail. The mood that results is a cluster of apathetic victims, united in their belief that someone or something is holding them down and standing in their way."

Any of us who live and work in education have seen (or been in) this stage throughout our careers. On Twitter, it's reflected in a lot of negative, oppositional language: words like "skewer," "dupe" and "debunk." And in articles and Op-Eds, it's reflected in pieces that are primarily about what the other side is doing wrong -- and only secondarily about what its own side is doing right.

Meanwhile, the New Guard is primarily made up of people operating at Stage Three -- most simply described as the "I'm great and you're not" worldview. As Logan explains:

"The gravity that holds people at Stage Three is the addictive 'hit' from winning, besting others, being the smartest and most successful."

Not surprisingly, the New Guard uses words like "innovation," "scalable" and "results." Its members love the spirit of programs like "Race to the Top" and because they over rely on intellect and the technocratic answer, their characterizations of schools and schooling can come to sound dehumanizing for adults and children alike.

To be sure, these descriptions cannot provide full accounts of any individual or tribe. All of us defy such efforts at easy explanation and the current debates about public education cannot simply be reduced to whether we're pro- or anti-union, reform or status quo or old guard and new guard. Still, in Logan's descriptions I see sufficient echoes of the world I inhabit and the conversations I observe, and I've become even more aware of the words I use and the types of relationships I form. For me, that means refusing to contribute to the cynicism and hopelessness of Stage Two and insisting on an expansion of the "coldly cognitive" worldview of Stage Three.

I want more inquiry. I want less demonizing of those I disagree with. I want more community. In short, I want my EduCon and I want it all the time! Who's with me?

 
 
 

Follow Sam Chaltain on Twitter: www.twitter.com/samchaltain

 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:48 PM on 02/06/2011
From the short video I found on the Tribal Leadership site (haven't read the book yet) - Logan makes the argument that within companies we can move people through the stages by getting them to change their language and work towards bigger and bolder goals. I don't know how the book relates this to something like the ed reform debate - but assuming there's a similar line of thought what can we do to create that shift? EduCon sounds wonderful - perhaps a model to aspire to, but your post is the first time I've learned about it. How do we get the other "tribes" to listen and move?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sam Chaltain
Democracy. Learning. Voice.
08:34 AM on 02/22/2011
Jenna! Thanks for responding. The only way we can get others to listen and move is by demonstrating a different way ourselves, banding with others, and letting people follow the meaning. Next month, we'll have another resource at our collective disposal -- a national grassroots effort to refocus on learning, and a focal point for people in different communities to come together around and either seed or leverage relevant ongoing work that will improve the learning conditions for kids. And, in the meantime, and for every day of our working lives, we seek to be the change we wish to see in the world. What else is there?
11:08 PM on 02/03/2011
Great program.
12:24 PM on 02/02/2011
Thanks, Sam. Most teachers I know want to get to Stage Five; that's their natural state. But the system is designed around Stage Two principles. We have a mismatch between aspirations and structure right now--which gives rise to the endless debates and various tribal fractions. These will resolve themselves, and posts like yours will help. So I'm with you. Thom Markham. www.thommarkham.com/blog.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Debater60660
12:51 AM on 02/02/2011
Is a teacher who collaborates with peers and administrators to improve academic and social achievement of students a great teacher? If I am a great teacher and I know I am a great teacher, can I really collaborate for the greater good? If reformers or Stage 3'ers beleive that the answer to both is yes, is there a difference between them or should we care.

I see education reform as including all these things . . . and I see folks who fight against these things as a common enemy of teachers, administrators and students. I do sometimes see it as a war and I am prone to smug verbal smack downs. But there is are real enemies of public education in schools -- the do nothings and the miscreants and those who fight to preserve their right to be there - who harm students as well as thier teacher-colleagues. They need to be driven out from among us.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sam Chaltain
Democracy. Learning. Voice.
09:26 AM on 02/02/2011
Hey Debater, I'm definitely not suggesting we stop disagreeing or fighting the good fight. I am suggesting the spirit of EduCon doesn't preclude that, but its strength and energy comes from the hopeful, solution-oriented collaborative spirit. An excessive focus on the latter will help address the former along the way; but an excessive focus on the former will only lead to a lot of conversation about what's wrong, and not enough about what's right or what's next. Don't you think?
02:23 PM on 02/03/2011
Unless they state that you are too aggressive about implementing change or collaboration, or stop them from dumbing down the curriculum along with no cooperation on forming a united front required of all students in that grade level. I had high expectations of my students, strict discipline, required homework, reading and writing, along with other things that raised the level of academics of my students. For this I was written up and then later fired, one accusation on the 33 pages of accusations was that I was too aggressive with my teaching peers. They hid some of the grade level meetings so I would not be there, and spoke negatively behind my back. They had problems with teaching minorities, class management and collaboration. Yet I was fired, for wanting all that, and with each summer break I took online classes, read or learned on my own and was anxious to use my new skills, but was prohibited because i was not deemed professional enough to implement said programs. such as basic academic language, behavior or reading practice. When I was escorted off the campus the school was enduring the worst year of discipline, students that were 3-4 years behind and had not read or wrote anything since third grade or fourth grade. Even told by fourth grade that they don't teach writing. My reading program did not raise the reading scores, or that they don't assign homework because the students can't do it. How Sad. I miss it.
10:26 PM on 02/01/2011
Dancallahan --
Sam says that the folks at Educon "transcend" the old and new guard. The new guard is stuck at level 3 -- and loves Race to the Top. The "tribe" represented by Educon (and a much broader community than just the 600 at the conference) is closing in on level 5.

[Stage Five: Tribes that attain this rare level are characterized by a sense of "innocent wonderment." They apply themselves to the creation of things no one has dreamed of and are frequently incredibly successful. These tribes say that "Life is great."]

I can say that I agree almost completely with the author...of course, I would - I was there. My only disagreement is that he forgot about the large contingent of Canadians!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sam Chaltain
Democracy. Learning. Voice.
09:21 AM on 02/02/2011
Thanks for the clarification, ebruns -- and you're exactly right. And a belated shout out to the Canadians that were in the house!!
10:16 PM on 02/01/2011
I'm pretty sure that you're mischaracterizing the people at EduCon when you say that most of us love Race to the Top. Talk to most of the people there, and I'm quite sure you'd find the exact opposite.
08:57 AM on 02/02/2011
One could almost use RTTT as a litmus test for whether someone is qualified to speak intelligently about education. If they support it, they're probably not.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sam Chaltain
Democracy. Learning. Voice.
09:22 AM on 02/02/2011
Hey Dan, See the comment above; I am definitely not saying the majority of EduCon folks are RTTT fans -- quite the opposite. The EduCon crew is, quite simply, the edu-tribe I have placed my greatest faith in.
08:44 PM on 02/01/2011
I am proud to speak the common language of the Educon tribe. I am thrilled that Sam Chaltrain understands what Educon is about.
One minor disagreement: we aren't necessarily talking public education; we are simply talking education.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sam Chaltain
Democracy. Learning. Voice.
09:24 AM on 02/02/2011
Thanks lrphils! I'm thrilled to have found you (plural) too. And I'm all for your modification -- I believe our focus must be on learning, and on creating a world where people both demand and expect that high quality learning environments be made available to them throughout their lives -- in school, out of school, as kids, as adults, etc.
12:08 PM on 02/02/2011
Great point! "Public education" is an institution, a bureaucracy. The profession is simply "education," something that transcends and outlives any particular public institution.