More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sam Sommers

GET UPDATES FROM Sam Sommers
 

Context, Gender, and Why Riley's Right to Be Pissed Off About Toys

Posted: 01/05/12 12:35 PM ET

By now millions have watched and shared the Youtube video of Riley, the spirited 4-year-old who's sick of pink and wants toy companies everywhere to know that girls can like superheroes too:

Why has this clip spread like wildfire? Well, our viral videos almost always have something to tell us about who we are as a society:

We're a people that enjoys a good dancing baby or animal. We -- or at least those Americans among us -- think anything said by a child with a British accent is adorable. We recognize that there are norms that govern the expression of emotion, and we're intrigued by those who fly right by these norms, even when the double rainbow does, indeed, surprisingly go all the way.

And Riley? Well, we like Riley for an even simpler reason: because she's right. And because she has the proverbial cojones to point out to the rest of us how things really are.

Riley's rant isn't just about colors or toys. It's also about books, fairy tales, and TV shows. Halloween costumes. Birthday party themes. Baby shower gifts. The different adjectives that parents use to describe their newborns just minutes after birth.

If you have a daughter and you're paying attention, you have your own stories to add. In my case, a 5-year-old telling me that she wanted to be either Peter Pan or a knight for Halloween because the female protagonists from the movies she watches "don't do anything interesting." One viewing of the original Star Wars DVD, a Princess Leia wig, and some plastic-light-saber-inflicted damage to my desk lamp later, and I can testify that the purported relationship between testosterone and swordplay is tenuous at best.

And that's just the thing: our gendered consumer culture is but the tip of the iceberg. For every website with separate links for Boys' Toys and Girls' Toys, there's a corresponding assumption made regarding sex and aptitude. For every fast-food drive-thru attendant that needs to know the sex of my kids in order to pick the "right" Happy Meal toy, there's an underlying belief in some sort of immutable gender difference.

Don't minimize Riley's point by writing her off as "spunky" or "cute." Don't dismiss her trenchant social analysis as making a mountain out of a molehill simply because it was recorded at a toystore. It is a mountain she's railing against.

Because behavioral science has now shown us that many of the gender differences we habitually chalk up to biology or evolution aren't as set in stone as we assume. That men being from Mars and women from Venus makes for good book copy, but doesn't do justice to just how context-dependent gender differences are when it comes to aptitude, preference, and social behavior.

Men are inherently more aggressive than women? Sure, when male and female research participants play a violent video game, the men play more aggressively. But convince them that no one is recording their performance -- that is, let them play anonymously -- and the women become just as aggressive.

Women are hard-wired to be pickier when screening potential mates? Yep, in speed dating studies where a circle of men rotates around a circle of women, the women find fewer prospective dating partners to whom they're attracted. But switch things up so that the women rotate instead? That is, turn the traditional dating paradigm on its head and make women the approachers and men the approachees? Suddenly, men are just as picky.

Males have more natural aptitude for math? Indeed, give even high-achieving men and women a standardized math test and the women tend to underperform. But that gender difference goes away in a single-sex testing room. Or with assurances that the test has been found to be free from gender bias.

This is why Riley's pissed off. And why you should be too. As my new book (and its title) spell out: situations matter and context transforms us. So it goes with matters of sex and gender. Even if it sometimes takes the tiniest of pundits to remind us.

Like this post? Interested in the book (and how context shapes not only gender difference, but a wide range of aspects of daily life)? Then check out the website for "Situations Matter: Understanding How Context Transforms Your World" (now available!). You can also follow Sam on Facebook here and on Twitter here. Book trailer video below:

 
 
 

Follow Sam Sommers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/samsommers

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:38 PM on 01/11/2012
Gender dividers go way deeper than people realize. Consider the 'school uniform'; boys are free to chase their science experiments under the table, leap to catch a fly ball, and roll over with each other in a tackle. What do girls get to do? Keep their hands down and stand up straight to keep their skirts down.
09:07 PM on 01/09/2012
My granddaughter, not yet three, is into robots, firefighters, climbing and swimming, basketball, building towers and robots, Woody and Buzz from Toy Story, drawing, and cooking. She does not like pink. She has a variety of dress-up costumes, and her little friend Ben usually wears the fairy tutu and wings while she is the firefighter or T-Rex. He is also more intrigued with her dolls and the magic disappearing milk bottles.

I am so glad that their mothers do not "correct" them as to the appropriate costumes, colors, toys, and activities "appropriate" for boys and girls.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HarlowGal1960
activists are made, not born
11:03 PM on 01/08/2012
when i was 12 years old, my grandmother took me to see "godspell" off broadway in new york city. the company was offering an improv workshop based on the story and my grandmother had gotten me into the program. when i was asked what part i wanted, i replied "judas." silence. "that part is usually played by a man," said the director. "okay," i replied. "how about jesus?"
08:57 PM on 01/09/2012
Good for you! I always wanted to play Tevye in "Fiddler on the Roof". Parts written for men are almost always the better parts--more interesting, more dramatic, more stage (or screen) time. . .

Why should we NOT want the best?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Despyria
Promoting positive change and innovation
11:26 AM on 01/06/2012
Hated the Pink stage with my oldest. And yes Riley! Girls do like superheroes! Shout it from the rooftops!
08:07 PM on 01/05/2012
Thanks for this great blog. I'll never forget my daughter's baby shower. I had registered for all kinds of things, in a variety of colors, but committed the cardinal sin of letting the shower-goers know I was having a girl. The result was a sea of pink gifts (most of which I hadn't registered for) and the lingering feeling that a bottle of pepto bismol had exploded all over my shower. If I could do it over again, I would tell all but my closest, most understanding friends that we were waiting until the birth to find out if we were having a girl or boy...and I make sure to tell my friends who are expecting all about my experience.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sam Sommers
Professor, Tufts University; Author
11:26 AM on 01/06/2012
I'm with ya. Actually, there's a whole chapter on this very issue in my new book, and the chapter ends with the recommendation (unpopular though I know it will be) for everyone to stop finding out their baby's sex beforehand. I know, I know... people don't want to be surprised. But parenting is all about being surprised, and all you learn when you find out your baby's sex ahead of time is what your own expectations are regarding sex.
11:36 PM on 01/06/2012
On the one hand, I agree, but I wonder if finding out can be a way of preparing yourself for the expectations society will have for that child. The expectations are there whether the parents buy into them or not. I have to believe that some parents are smart enough to try to overcome those expectations. My shower taught us an important lesson my husband and I took to heart. We did what we could to make sure no one showed up at hospital with pink princesses. I know my argument presupposes that even parents who are doing what they can to insulate their kids from the repressive expectations need to know the gender to combat the expectations that come with that particular gender. Maybe that's wrong and regardless of gender, the message should be the same (be who you are not who our society tells you should be) but at the same time, the nuance is very different simply because what society defines as feminine and masculine are so different. I don't have a son. Maybe my perspective would be different if I did, but it seems that, for example, we have to teach our daughter that she is not an object whose worth is defined by how others view her appearance whereas if I had a son I would be teaching him that society is wrong when they tell him that men can't be nurturers. Just a thought. I look forward to reading the whole chapter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
05:23 PM on 01/05/2012
"Men are inherently more aggressive than women? " You respond with "sure" and then proceed to offer research that proves women are just as aggressive as men. Aggression may be inherent but hardly gender-based. "Humans are inherently aggressive but women are taught to suppress it" would be a more accurate statement.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sam Sommers
Professor, Tufts University; Author
08:49 PM on 01/05/2012
No, I agree with you wholeheartedly and sorry if the post didn't convey that. The "sure" referred to the finding to follow, not the previous claim that, as you noted, I went on to disagree with. It was more of a sarcastic "sure" that maybe didn't translate clearly in print, so thanks for allowing me to clarify.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
11:08 AM on 01/06/2012
Then I apologize. After I posted and re-read the article, I realized you were being sarcastic with that. In the initial reading it seemed strange and I should have re-read, then commented. At least it's clarified now and we agree on this point. Thanks for the article.
06:14 AM on 01/08/2012
I think it's true that a lot of these superficial gender separations are just that - superficial (colors, toys, costumes, etc). But it seems you are implying that because these superficial differences are silly, there really are no differences between the genders. Males and females may play video games the same, but it's hard to believe that there is no difference in aggression when 4 out of 5 assaults and 9 out of 10 homicides are committed by men. Who are dictators and leaders in war? Is our culture holding back more women from killing? Or is it the color pink? Denying there is any difference between males and females can be just as harmful and confusing as reinforcing false stereotypes and can make for extreme difficulty in relating to people. If someone is heterosexual and approaches relationships thinking the opposite sex is exactly like them and need and want the same things, they are in for a lot of pain and confusion. Perhaps colors and costumes are superficial, but it seems like they perhaps are simplistic visual signifiers that sprang up to speak to deeper differences. Children learn to refine signifiers in their own way over time. Look at transgendered children - they definitely have more than a difference in color or clothing preference, but use outward appearances to help define what's going on inside.

I agree context influences behavior, but gender concepts are much bigger than that and develop more deeply and over a large span of time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
05:17 PM on 01/05/2012
"And because she has the proverbial cojones to point out to the rest of us how things really are"

And I hope she never loses that.