iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sandy Goodman

GET UPDATES FROM Sandy Goodman
 

Who Is Saul Alinsky and Why is Newt Demonizing Him?

Posted: 02/02/2012 12:47 pm


Now that Newt Gingrich, badly beaten in three of four Republican primaries, has vowed to exact revenge by pressing his sick, pathetic, lie-filled candidacy all the way to the GOP national convention next August, we may expect to hear a lot more about one of Newt's favorite targets, Saul Alinsky.

Few Republican voters or other Americans have any idea who Saul Alinsky was. Nor does Newt tell them. Which hasn't prevented him from cussing out Alinsky almost daily -- and no less than three times in his South Carolina victory speech.

"Saul Alinsky radicalism is at the heart of Obama," Gingrich declares. And to make doubly sure they know the good guy from the baddie, he proclaims: "I believe in the Constitution; I believe in the Federalist Papers. Obama believes in Saul Alinsky and secular European socialist bureaucracy."

Newt Gingrich, the Constitution, the Federalist Papers. Yay! Saul Alinsky, radicalism, secularism, Europe, socialism, and bureaucracy. Boo!

Just who was Saul Alinsky? And why is Newt demonizing him? Alinsky was the founder of modern community organizing, who worked to improve the lot of poor people in cities from New York to California, especially including Chicago, his birthplace, and the city where Obama later did his own community organizing. Alinsky once described his work as "the banding together of large numbers of men and women to fight for those rights which insure a decent way of life."

Was Alinsky Obama's mentor? Certainly not personally. He died in 1972, when Obama was ten and living in Hawaii. But as a man whose methods have been used and praised by those on the right-- including Dick Armey and the late William F. Buckley Jr. -- as well as the left, Alinsky's influence was strongly felt by the president-to-be in Obama's organizing work in Chicago.

Why is Alinsky to Newt like the matador's cape to the bull? For one thing he was a Jew, which may not trouble Gingrich, who never needs to mention it. Alinsky's name is enough, a red flag to many of Newt's bigoted followers (as columnist Clarence Page put it: "[I]t is not what the Republican presidential candidate says that counts; it is what his audiences feel when he says it.") For another, Alinsky was a longtime battler for the poor -- including the black poor.

Alinsky was born to Russian Jewish parents. Although an acknowledged radical (his last book was entitled Rules For Radicals), he never joined political or other movements. Not a Communist, Socialist or Marxist.


A secular Jew, he nonetheless worked closely with Catholic clergy developing community organizations in Chicago's slums with the strong support of the Archdiocese. He also won praise from Catholic philosopher Jaques Maritain, a scholar of the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas, who told him "You are a Thomist, dear Saul, a practical Thomist." Gingrich, a recent Catholic convert, has curiously managed to ignore those facts.

Alinsky's son, David, agrees that the best explanation for Gingrich's attacks on his father is his name, as he told Michael Miner in the online Chicago Reader:

David Alinsky thinks one reason why the right believes it can tar Obama with Saul Alinsky's name is the name itself. "It's foreign sounding, Russian or Polish or something Middle European," says David. "That kind of folks could never be trusted anyway. He's probably Jewish, and we know all about how those Jews are. We're all for Israel, but we don't like the Jews."

In David's view, it's "almost immaterial" whether Gingrich has any idea what Saul Alinsky actually thought and did. The point is, he serves Gingrich's purposes--which are "to set him up as a sort of Willy Horton/swift boat kind of individual, some boogieman..."


Gal Beckerman has a similar reaction, in an article in The Jewish Daily Forward newspaper, headlined "Gingrich's Anti-Semitic Dog Whistle: Saul Alinsky:"

[J]ust think about what his name sounds like spit out of the mouth of Gingrich with not a small measure of disdain. It sounds like a Jewish name... the effect is something like this: Obama's ideological mentor is a Jew and somehow foreign.

One southern reader commented on Beckerman's article:

Trust me, there's plenty of racism left in the South, in particular, plenty of anti-Semitism. White, conservative Christians may profess to love Israel, but a lot of them still have problems with Jews. Once Gingrich started using Saul Alinsky as a mantra, I asked people I know what they knew about Alinsky. Very few could place him -- one an American history major, the other poli sci -- but everyone else guessed he was Jewish.


Gingrich gets a twofer here. Obama is a black foreigner, a "Kenyan anti-colonial," as Gingrich has called him. And his spiritual mentor is a different type foreigner, a Jew, which is almost as bad to many in Newt's audiences.

Ironically, as David Margolick has pointed out, about the only thing keeping Gingrich in the GOP race is $10 million from Jewish casino tycoon Sheldon Adelson and his wife (plus $1 million more from other family members). Apparently, for all their generosity toward Israel and other Jewish causes, the Adelsons don't mind some anti-Semitism encouraged by their favorite politician.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:14 PM on 03/06/2012
This sound like what is happening in America?? "There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoyevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. Alinsky
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jim Jaffe
03:04 PM on 02/05/2012
although Newt hasn't claimed to be Jewish -- yet, there are some interesting parallels between him and Alinsky. both saw themselves as transformative figures. and each was a populist running against the regular order or power structure. Alinsky's credentials are a bit stronger insofar as he was never part of the power structure and it is odd that Gingrich spends so much time attacking someone who appears to be his role model. perhaps he's protesting too much.
08:32 PM on 02/04/2012
And, Gingrich is NOT foreign sounding?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
srheard
Life is full of a number of things.
10:39 AM on 02/04/2012
Good article. It would be a good question for a journalist to ask Speaker Gingrich ... why is he so against one (Saul Alinsky) who is held in such high esteme by his own church? It makes you wonder if his vows to the Catholic Church are any stronger that other vows he made during his life. Lord knows the Catholic Church is the "Cadillac" of churches ...
11:32 AM on 02/03/2012
This article is a very good description of Gingrich's strategy and motivations. The attacks against him for the "food stamp" comment didn't bother to explain what he was up to. Obvious as his motives were, they just seemed to focus on raising hell with no clear purpose.
08:13 AM on 02/03/2012
I really wonder what Newt's Jewish backers think about him attacking another Jew. If Alinski
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
srheard
Life is full of a number of things.
10:40 AM on 02/04/2012
What will his own church think?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ORAXX
Free lance philisopher and unicorn rancher.
08:01 AM on 02/03/2012
Newt has a long history of blurting out what ever pops into his mind, and saying with enough gravity to pass his absurdity's off as well thought out positions.
10:39 PM on 02/02/2012
If Newtie believed in the constitution and the Federalist Papers, he'd stop threatening the judiciary for performing judicial review. One of the few things that the Federalists and Anti-Federalists agreed on about the Constitution was the judicial review was vital to rein in an out-of-control, despotic congress. kind of like the House of Representatives we're suffering through right now.

Newt sucks as a historian, but he's a hell of a demagogue.
Peabodies
We are the Many. They are the Few.
08:51 PM on 02/02/2012
Newt Gingrich is not living in the 21st century. For him to think he can sway voters by demonizing Saul Alinsky is loony. If anything, people will be drawn to read what Saul Alinsky wrote JUST BECAUSE Newt Gingrich "had a problem with it"!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Romeover
Civilization is for weaklings.
08:04 AM on 02/03/2012
You are giving Mr. Gingrich's constituency far too much credit for the capacity for critical thought.
Peabodies
We are the Many. They are the Few.
07:24 PM on 02/03/2012
Good point, Romeover. Chuckle.
01:00 PM on 03/01/2012
That's exactly what I did actually (purchased Rules for Radicals). Incredibly inspiring. I was vaguely familiar with Alinsky's name before reading the book, but thanks to Gingrich, I am now a student of Saul Alinsky's methods.
07:49 PM on 02/02/2012
For a life group where ignorance is celebrated, Newt makes perfect sense-- he speaks to the regressive, reactionary region of the brain where the lower impulses thrive, and where today's conservative cradles the hungry ghosts of fear, loathing, and contempt.
06:32 PM on 02/02/2012
Ahhhh, Mr. Goodman, I have missed your wise and insightful posts. This is one of your best. Please keep them coming. This campaign is so full of lies and bombast that we need truth tellers like you.
photo
dreux62
The GOP - Now 100% Fact Free!
02:43 PM on 02/02/2012
To set something straight here. Southern fundamentalists do not "love Isreal" in the sense of having any positive emotional feeling for the State of Isreal. Most Christian fundamentalists see Isreal as a necessity for the biblical end of the world and their visions of the Rapture occuring. If you took that away there would be nothing favorable in their minds.