iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sara Haile-Mariam

Sara Haile-Mariam

Posted: September 3, 2010 04:26 PM

But We're Progressive!

What's Your Reaction:

Another election cycle, another spiraling narrative about the persistently fickle youth vote, another misleading piece that mischaracterizes an entire generation before a single poll opens. We're not as shallow as the now infamous New York Times piece on the youth vote would allow you to believe were are.

We're nuanced. Poll after poll indicates that the vast majority of us aren't overtly partisan -- yet we care about issues and in that department, we're progressive. The Pew poll referenced in the times shows barely any statistical change in party affiliation. Moreover, the very same poll shows that regardless of party affiliation young people are strongly progressive on the issues. From the poll:

The political leanings of this youngest group of voters may be linked to their outlook on politics and society. Analysis of long-term political values finds that Millennials are far more liberal in a number of areas than are older Americans. This is reflected in Millennials' views on contemporary policy issues as well, from their widespread belief that gays should be allowed to openly serve in the military to their reservations over the use of U.S. military forces in Afghanistan and Iraq and their continued preference for a more expansive role for government.


Moreover, Millennials are far more likely than older people to describe themselves as liberals. In the fourth quarter of 2009, as many Millennial voters identified themselves as liberals (29%) as conservatives (28%), while 40% said they are moderates. In every other age group, far more voters described their views as conservative than liberal. Among voters in Gen X, 38% described their political views as moderate and 38% said they were conservative; only 20% described themselves as liberal.


So that's that. There's certainly reason to be cynical. Our political process is broken and ridiculous. Only in Congress could a majority of votes ...not really count as a majority. We're weary. There are reasons to believe that our votes mattered in not only 2008 but in the years before it (after all, youth turnout has been increasing since 2000). Yet those reasons are often overshadowed by, say, the insincerity of politicians who claim to be standing up "for future generations" only to then vote against unemployment benefits for a generation facing 20% unemployment.

Yet, therein lies the beauty of midterm elections. Members of Congress may have the power to vote for or against legislation, but we have the power to vote for or against every one of them.

That mentality may not translate into political allegiances -- but that actually says more about the candidates than it does about young voters. What this article would suggest is that candidates, from both parties, would be wise to fight for our votes. The youth vote is always up for grabs, and contrary to what the New York Times might suggest, the youth vote isn't synonymous with "the college vote." We're not a monolith. We're a diverse generation that comes from different backgrounds, armed with different stories, still united in a shared belief that the issues matter.

What is true is that midterm elections often see a decrease in turnout from every demographic. What is true is that it's harder to turn out voters in an off year, and that it's hard to draw a correlation between those issues and the midterm elections. What is true is that youth organizations are acting accordingly -- finding new and creative ways to reach a wider audience and to go around.

It is the recognition of how challenging this cycle is that's inspired over 30 youth organizations and media partners to create http://www.voteagain2010.com

Check out the launch video for Vote Again 2010 here:

The media may continue to dismiss us as a legitimate voting cohort. Reporters may continue to insist that we're unreliable, fickle and superficial.

Well, I think they're wrong. I think we're powerful.

Fundamentally, while members of Congress may have the power to vote for or against legislation -- we have the power to vote for or against every one of them.

Why wouldn't we vote again?


 

Follow Sara Haile-Mariam on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Sarahailemariam

 
 
  • Comments
  • 294
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
01:12 PM on 09/08/2010
voting is for wimps. destroy the state.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
11:50 AM on 09/06/2010
For young people who are progressive/liberal don't be coerced into joining or identifying yourselves as Democrats. There may be good reasons why you are not.

Your generation is the largest in the nation- yes bigger than the Baby Boomers. Your elders are about to hand you a ticking time bomb.

While there are many good people who are Democrats - The Party is not about to solve the problems that our nation faces. They just want your vote- they are in league with the rich and powerful in this nation - just like the Republicans and they have no intention of solving the problems our nation confronts.

If you want a future for yourselves and possible children - you are going to have to reject both Parties and what they stand for... because they are not going to help solve your problems.

You are going to have to organize and build your own political party. Then you are going to have to dismantle what your parents generation has built politically in this nation. It is really your only hope.

Be brave and ignore pleas of Democrats to join their ranks - they are co-dependents who need your to help for them continue their addiction to selfishness, greed, and reckless behavior.
02:33 AM on 09/06/2010
FIRST they break our hearts
THEN they make us MAD
THEN WE VOTE
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-8/1210139/MOSQUE.jpg
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-8/1210139/laugh.jpg
07:28 PM on 09/05/2010
I remember being pretty peeved by how the media characterized the "young vote" last election cycle. I remember all that stuff about how "they don't know what they are doing! It's just the cult of personality!"

And then those people turn around and watch Glenn Beck. Hypocrisy much?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schaef
05:38 PM on 09/05/2010
Oh, I'm sorry, are people mischaracterizing your political intentions and using fallacious arguments to marginalize your relevant and reasoned contributions to the national discourse?

Man, that must be frustrating.
photo
kennethhdeome
Why can't both sides be wrong?
05:19 PM on 09/05/2010
I'm sorry, but aren't the same people who are saying our youth is out of touch with the "grown up world (or my personal favorite, the "real world") the same people complaining that these youth are "addicted" to instantaneous information?

In the "electronic age" and amidst an environment where The Press is under pressure to provide primary if not exclusive coverage of everything now considered "newsworthy," am I really supposed to believe anyone between the ages of 15-25 has to wait for the evening news, the next newspaper, or the latest gossip edition to know what's happening in the world?

And don't think these young, still reasonably functional minds can't put 2 and 2 together several thousand times over. All those precursory images of the grown up world are more than adequate for figuring out just how much grown ups have screwed up the world. Not that any of these youngsters can't look further into a story or issue at their convenience--one needn't necessarily go to the library to gain knowledge.

I'm 49; I was born right after JFK took office, and I haven't much interest in all the stuff available to our youth via electronics. In my day we still had to make friends face to face, we still had to find a public phone and pull over to make a phone call, and we could not have conceived getting in trouble because our cell phone "talked" during class.

Youthful disinterest? Maybe. Youthful ignorance? Not any more.
04:42 PM on 09/05/2010
The NYT piece was simply an emotional response to numbers that show the youth vote is shifting a little right this November. The response - blame the kids!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
magrace
Vote NO on MN marriage amendment
03:55 PM on 09/05/2010
Is it true what they say, you become more conservative as you age? I don't know, but this is one GenXer that is liberal, and surprised to see the data. 20% really?
04:51 PM on 09/05/2010
Ditto here. Then, too, I grew up seeing firsthand the effect of Reaganomics on a blue-collar, middle-class city (Pittsburgh). I learned that lesson very well.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
onedivasinger
A creative girl in a limited world!
03:48 PM on 09/05/2010
Sara, with a son fresh out of college...it is fabulous to hear from you! Stay involved and engaged. This is about the present, but especially about the future! Keep informing, educating and activating the legions of young people that they continue to underestimate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:16 PM on 09/05/2010
Yeah, I get sick of boomers complaining about young people. The boomers are the ones that took the world's largest creditor nation and turned it into the world's largest debtor. That said I think its too bad most young people consider themselves progressive. They are making the same fundamental mistake as the boomers in placing their trust in big government. I've never understood why libertarianism isn't more popular in light of the failure of establishment programs like the war on terror, war on drugs, welfare state, fractional reserve banking.
03:28 PM on 09/05/2010
The problem is not government. The problem is how it's used. It has done way too much good to make a sweeping comment that it's the problem (especially when the guy who said government is the problem - Reagan - then used it to make things worse for regular people, so that we end up where we are now). Government is not evil, some of the people running it are. Government is just a tool (insert joke here).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:07 PM on 09/05/2010
The need for government only arises out of the evils of human nature, according to guys like Thomas Paine and John Locke. Governments are inevitably corrupted, as history has shown. Why? Because governments wield power and power always corrupt. There's nothing we can do about that, except keep the government strictly limited. So I don't buy the idea that all we need to do is make some minor tweaks, or just get the right politicians in office. A drastic reduction in the size of government is the only way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Militant Leftist
American seditionist
03:31 PM on 09/05/2010
Why isn't libertarianism more popular? Because the free market, left to its own devices, creates wealth disparity that undermines and contradicts our system of representative democracy. The increased concentration of wealth is an unsustainable model, leading to recessions and depressions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:57 PM on 09/05/2010
I think its more the central bank that creates the recessions. The central bank is a creation of government, not the free market. And I think you have the others backwards. Wealth disparity is natural state of mankind, the free market model does more to correct that disparity than any other system we have. And as for democracy, it is overrated. Freedom is more important. Democracy sometimes interferes in the free market system. That is what creates most of the economic problems and stunts the natural progression.
photo
progressivestance84
The Right is Wrong.
02:29 PM on 09/05/2010
The older generations sure are dumb. The ruling elite promised them houses, land, and a dishwasher and all they had to do was sell their economic freedom to do it. How does it feel to be snookered?

All you had to do was:

Weaken labor laws.

Weaken pollution controls.

Weaken standards of elected leaders.

Weaken laws that kept banks from magically turning debt into assets.

Have abject racism dividing the nation, just as it needed to be brought to together to fight these threats.

Obviously I can't blame all of the people in the older generations, but clearly their majority either helped all this come to pass or did nothing to stop it.

I mean seriously you voted for Ronald Reagan. We would have been better off with Ronald MacDonald. "Put a smile on!"

Everybody is down on young people, but why? We are looking at the world with the last bit of our idealism fading away. It ain't a pretty place.

I know life is hard, but when your own government policies and businesses are against you, what do you suppose you do about it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shaddup
02:14 PM on 09/05/2010
The baby boomers ruined the air, water, financial and spiritual worlds, and now don't want anybody else to have the keys.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
judibluiz
There is no planet B
04:27 PM on 09/05/2010
I understand your anger, but you cannot paint all baby boomers with a wide brush. Speaking for myself I was out in the streets demonstrating for peace and strong environmental laws. I, and many of my friends still walk the walk. We live almost off the grid, raise our own veggies and continue to fight for the environment, and we've raised politically aware children who continue to fight the good fight.

The same holds true for the young people, you simply cannot paint everyone with a wide brush.
02:07 PM on 09/05/2010
One youth here who will DEFINITELY be at the polls.
photo
progressivestance84
The Right is Wrong.
02:21 PM on 09/05/2010
Same here.
01:58 PM on 09/05/2010
Thank you, thank you for your response to that superficially written and misleading article in the New York Times. I appreciate your alternative, and more comprehensive and intelligible analysis.