iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sarah A. W. Fitts

GET UPDATES FROM Sarah A. W. Fitts
 

It's Time to Occupy Our Symbols

Posted: 02/12/2012 2:36 pm

Last week's CPAC speeches made me angry. Somehow, the keynote speakers talk as if they alone know what it means to be a true American. But CPAC attendees do not reflect the American values we should cherish most. I am a patriotic American and I love America. And I think it's time for the rest of us to speak up and stop letting right wing media and media-loving right wing politicians put words in our mouths. It's time to take back our American symbols. It's time to wave our American flag, admire our Constitution, and it's time to protect our purple mountains majesty and our amber waves of grain. This land is our land and we love it.

I am not sure how we let the right steal the narrative on patriotism and love of country. For me, whenever I did happen to tune into a Palin, an O'Reilly or a Hannity asserting that the left hates America, I'd roll my eyes, but otherwise the statement seemed too stupid to merit a response. That, I realize, was our mistake. As with most big lies, they seem more true with each retelling.

So, it's time to take our symbols back.

It's time to remind ourselves how much we love America.

It's time to defend and protect our core American values.

I challenge my fellow liberals to say what we believe in our hearts and to never let others smear our intentions with their lies again. Make your list and say it out loud. Here is mine.

  • I believe in respecting the office of president, even if I disagree in fundamental ways with the person in office. I respect him because he is the president of the United States, elected by the American people. A patriotic American would never hope that the president fails.
  • I believe in the Constitution's vision of an independent judiciary and three co-equal branches of government. The power of the jury to weigh the evidence and the power of judges to restrain the acts of the most powerful is amazing and wonderful. Threats to an independent judiciary, jokes about sending away or arresting judges, especially by people running for president, show a frightening disregard for the rule of law and our traditions. Could I even call such statements "un-American"?
  • I believe in government of the people, by the people and for the people, and I want to ensure that it does not perish from this earth. Government should not serve the pleasure just of those people who can pay to be heard.
  • I believe in separation of church and state. I believe freedom of religion also means freedom from religion, and that each American may make an individual choice to practice or not practice as he or she may choose. There is no evidence that people who talk about God in public are better people, except when their words are accompanied by genuine acts of kindness.
  • I believe the Oath of Office requires members of Congress to protect and defend the Constitution, and if that is inconsistent with the oath given to unelected anti-tax lobbyists, then the Oath of Office should prevail.
  • I believe that an elected official's duties require that the interests of all Americans be served, not just the party with which he or she is affiliated. A refusal to do what needs to be done because it might also help the other political party should not be considered politics-as-usual; it should be considered reprehensible.
  • I believe in amber waves of grain, and I think supporting environmental policies that protect our air and water so we continue to be the bread basket of the world, so that the air we breathe is clean and we can drink the water we need, and supporting policies ensure that the costs of resource development are paid by those who benefit instead of those who live nearby, makes me a patriotic American, not an environmental radical.
  • I believe the freedom to assemble is a critical feature of American democracy. And I think that when people assemble in public parks, they should bring brooms and trash bags and clean up their own messes, since the parks belong to everyone.
  • I believe that while I may not agree with what you say, I should fight for your right to say it. And I believe I am entitled to the same level of respect from those who disagree with me.
  • I believe that believing America could be a better place than it is and acknowledging that America does not always meet the ideals set for us in the founding documents is simply an acknowledgement of reality, not evidence of lack of patriotism.

So I say to my fellow liberals: Take back our symbols. It's our flag. It's our Constitution. It's our way of life. We are the descendants, whether by DNA or ideals, of people who wanted to change the world and make it better, and who embraced science, technology, knowledge, good deeds and good will. If the founding fathers were conservative we would still be an English colony. Liberals love America, and we love liberty and justice for all.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
sedc72
4th Gen. Vet., DC Native
02:42 AM on 02/14/2012
TOO MANY CONservative posters on this issue LOVE to claim superiority on patriotism. When I said that IT IS PATRIOTIC to burn the flag; that's called dissent, and that is the 'Freedom of Expression' right that some seem to forget we have. They feel that, if YOU don't agree with THEIR version of patriotism, then you're not patriotic. One even had the nerve to say that, because of my comment, that I was dishonorable in my service to this country. Let's get this straight....
Point 1 - At least I SERVED (4th Generation, from WWI to Iraq), along with others liberals, in this country's defense. The others just give lip service.
Point 2 - If you DID NOT SERVE, you have NO RIGHT to judge me or any other progressive who put on the uniform of the Armed Services.
Point 3 - If you DID SERVE, but don't agree with MY OPINION, then just agree to disagree, but you cannot claim patriotic superiority because of.
We liberals HAVE allowed the CONservatives to label US as UN-Patriotic, because some of US did not want to have that fight. WRONG DECISION! I say, from now on, you BETTER BE on the CORRECT SIDE of the argument if you're to challenge someone over this - that means, IF you can claim someone was dishonorable because YOU don not agree with their P.O.V., YOU BETTER HAD served FIRST!
aretoo
My micro-bio only appears to be empty
05:36 PM on 02/13/2012
Right on, right on, right on.
10:24 AM on 02/13/2012
Second Amendment Issues conveniently omitted.

Duly noted.
photo
sedc72
4th Gen. Vet., DC Native
09:48 AM on 02/13/2012
To our conservative posters, here's what makes US Liberals Patriotic - WE tend to fight for ALL AMERICANS' RIGHTS, including YOURS. Your side ONLY seems to fight for those who agree with YOUR P.O.V., because your side ALWAYS seems to say, ' YOUR way or the Highway!' Or, as YOUR Rep. west stated a while ago, 'To liberals...get the HELL out of MY COUNTRY!'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Superjew
small government liberal
10:43 AM on 02/13/2012
I was talking with a conservative on the unfairness about the mass incarceration of blacks over crack-cocaine and the light sentencing for powder cocaine which both have the same active ingredient.

I then told him how much it costs to house a prisoner for 1 year ($23,000) and that its a waste of tax money if your goal is to reduce drug use.

His solution was "I know how to reduce the costs, buy a box of .45 ACP for $23, kill 100 of the druggo's and that has saved the government from spending $23,000,000 incarcerating them each for a year"

I was a bit taken aback, but then I said "Yea that eighth amendment must really grind your gears, I mean what were the founding fathers thinking when they put that in?"

I told him he was a fascist in that he wanted to create death camps with body burning ovens for a "final solution" to drug users in America. He was surprised I compared him to the nazi's but anyone with half a brain could easily see the link I was making since he wanted capital punishment for non-violent people committing the victimless crime of possessing crack.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
12:08 PM on 02/13/2012
All rights, huh?

How do you feel about private property? Should a landowner be forced to do what government tells him because there's an endangered newt?

How about due process? Should an American citizen be indefinitely detained because the government says it's necessary to fight terrorism?

How about cocaine? Should it be illegal because government says it knows what's best for its citizens?

Liberals and conservative both paint with the illusion of freedom, but neither is really concerned about it because both will offer exceptions to the rule.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Charin
04:07 PM on 02/13/2012
well yes, when a landowner might kill the last of a species that has an integral place in a regional ecosystem, then yes, i'd say the government, aka, the people, have the right to tell him not to bulldoze the swamp. not that that happens often.
but other than that, I agree with you. so 2 out of 3, libertarian...2 out of 3.
I'm still a liberal though, since I can still believe in a progressive income tax, a welfare system that helps the old and unfortunate,educates both white, black, brown, and yellow kids, and teaches people that they are worth more than the money they make at work...
photo
sedc72
4th Gen. Vet., DC Native
08:09 PM on 02/13/2012
Where were you during the Bush Years, because because some of your posting is exactly what we were saying at that time?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:44 AM on 02/13/2012
I agree with everything except taking them back. They have been altered for all time now. I remember after 9/11 seeing the flags everywhere, on car antennae, on store fronts, decals on windows and on cars and then suddenly, seemingly without warning, they became George W. Bush logos. They were for believers that Oil was not the reason for invading Iraq. They meant the wearer was against abortion, in favor of school vouchers, opposed to Unions, in favor of eliminating food stamps and welfare. The flag lost it's capital "F". It became the symbol for the farthest right, most extreme, most nearly Fascist attitudes since Hitler and Mussolini. Today it has not really changed. I can count on one hand the numbers of times in the last 10 years that I have felt the tears welling up for the Flag - the Stars and Stripes - because of reverence for what it used to mean. I can not count the hundreds of times that I have had to turn away because someone was using the flag to destroy the country it used to stand for.
10:51 AM on 02/13/2012
We have to take them back. The flag flies on all govt buildings. If liberals displayed the flag, the conservative/reactionary meaning would be taken out of it. I for one think it's a shirking of responsibility to concede defeat on this point. What next: Should a liberal NOT carry a constitution in his/her pocket? Will we concede that loving the constitution has become a conservative thing to say?There has to be push-back. Otherwise the reactionaries will try to appropriate every single symbol of the US, leaving liberals with nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
waujvari1274
I am not Red or Blue, I am Red White and Blue.
09:19 AM on 02/13/2012
First of all Ms Fitts, you are part of the problem and not the solution. I applaud your article for telling half of the truth but just because you believe the right is against Americans and the left is for Americans doesn't make your assertion true.
The reality is that politics in this country and corrupt and they themselves are un-American. All of them. This country was founded on by the people, for the people and from the people. None of these are true anymore. Both political parties have a monopoly on what happens in this country and both are equally to blame. They give a grand illusion of being against each other when in reality it is just to cause dissension amongst the voters; such as yourself.
Tell me, what are the votes when the Senate and House vote on a pay raise for themselves?
Tell me, what happens when (D)'s and (R)'s want to keep the political system as is? Independents don't appear on a lot of state's ballots. Other parties don't either. Enough so, where they don't make a difference.
Career politicians that have their "own" needs to meet at the expense of others are the problem. People such as yourself condemn 1/2 of them while praising the other 1/2. You want to do something to help Americans and our country? Admit the truth and stop passing 1/2 truths on as fact.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arglebargle
07:34 PM on 03/19/2012
Rubbish. She didn't say the right was against Americans; she said the right consistently paints the left as being against Americans, and that that's patently untrue? Surely you can see the difference.

The problem is actually weakminded false equivalencies like your statements, pretending in the face of all the facts that both sides are equally destructive. Even the most slender acquaintance with facts shows otherwise.
08:03 AM on 02/13/2012
As I watch msnbc and most of the media I hear the same talking points from the liberal. Divide the country, penalize anyone who succeeds. Reward the people who chose not to work. America need more government. Judge making laws not enforcing laws and the liberal media supporting it. The idea of the consititution was to limit federal government not make it dictator of the people. It is not progressive and liberals place to decise what america should be. The consititution stands in the way of progressive and liberal so they dismiss it and ignore the ideas behind it in the name of progressive ideas. Give me freedom, give me the the consititution that say the power should be with state and local governments and the federal government should limited in size and scope.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Superjew
small government liberal
09:33 AM on 02/13/2012
Johnvilvens unless your last name is Walton or something, its safe to say that you vote against your own self-interest, atleast economically. No one is trying to prevent you from making 20-30 million dollars as even then you would be small potatoes. I don't know why you are so opposed to going to a taxation system similar to the boom 90's, over the lost decade of the 2000's which saw minimal GDP growth and virtually none for Job Growth. I think its safe to say that you are the one that hates America since you don't believe in policies that benefit the public.

The constitution you are thinking of is the articles of confederation, written in the late 1780's. It gave much more power to the states, it was deemed a failure and thrown out, and the constitution was written which gave the federal government much more power.

States rights, blacks would still be slaves, women couldn't vote, Jim Crow laws would still be in place. The states are not infallible bureacracy's as you like to believe, I think the current Republican party is closer to anarchy and fascism than they are freedom and democracy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 AM on 02/13/2012
The media is a group of PR Firms who say whatever gets ratings. The Media is not liberal it is contentious. Think of who owns and runs the media - Murdoch, GE! They are liberal? And the fact that neither "party" is different, that they both do exactly the same things - accept money from huge corporate interests is lost on you because the "liberal Media" wants it to be lost on you. They all want their judges, their laws for us and their exclusion from the laws for themselves. It is not having too much government (remember the "Conservatives" say they want the government to rule your sex life while the "Liberals" want to rule your investment life) it is having government that actually cares what the PEOPLE want and neither party is interested in that at all. We are in the digital version of September 1929.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
07:58 AM on 02/13/2012
So refreshing to see a liberal who believes in firearms ownership, and the legalization of drugs, and the right to due process without fear of indefinite detention, and the freedom from fear of being assassinated by a sitting president...
07:48 AM on 02/13/2012
I believe in freedom. I believe judge are not there to write law but emforce the laws that are there. I agree the office of president should be respected like you liberal did with Bush and are still doing today. I believe in the consititution as written. I believe that the two bigs problems with government are crooks and government. I believe in freedom more then taking some ones freedom and calling it giving somebody rights. I believe in a small federal government. The power from the consititution was design to be at the state and local level and I agree with that. I do not believe in a nanny state or want one.
11:00 AM on 02/13/2012
You say you're against a nanny state. Do you support limits on birth control, abortion and criminalization of gay sex? Because so-called conservative did and do. that's why catch-phrases are so useless. We are against government overreach but only in the areas we don't want it overreaching. What do you think about forfeiture laws where the govt can take property away from you even if you have not been convicted of a crime? Nevertheless conservatives were quite happy with people arrested (not convicted) of buuying drugs having their cars seized by the govt. Goes against a strict reading of the constitution AS WRITTEN.

Enough of the sloganeering!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Charin
04:10 PM on 02/13/2012
"I believe the two bigS problems with government are crooks and government." so are you against all government? or just the part you don't like, aka, the nanny state that makes sure all kids get good educations and all workers have union rights and pension plans....?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rimser
07:41 AM on 02/13/2012
Great post. I'm with you on every word.
07:11 AM on 02/13/2012
Brilliant!
07:09 AM on 02/13/2012
This is worth reading.
01:52 AM on 02/13/2012
Brilliant.This is so clear and beautifully written. I recommend everyone to pass it on. I know I have. Thank you.
11:47 PM on 02/12/2012
You can't take back the symbols if you continually burn them...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
04:52 AM on 02/13/2012
Who's burning them?
photo
sedc72
4th Gen. Vet., DC Native
09:49 AM on 02/13/2012
But WE as AMERICANS have that right, whether YOU agree with it or not.
11:11 AM on 02/13/2012
You've proven my point, thanks.
photo
chuckgoodcat
retired / disabled
10:12 PM on 02/12/2012
I agree with all that's left of my heart but I am discouraged in all respects.
07:08 AM on 02/13/2012
Me too.