iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Alzheimer's Drug: Dimebon Is Down The Drain

Posted: 03/05/10 09:27 AM ET

The pharmaceutical company Pfizer announced today that its investigational Alzheimer's medication, Dimebon, has failed an important test of its effectiveness in the treatment of Alzheimer's Dementia. A great deal of hope and expectation had been placed in this medication. Its apparent failure has been a disappointment not only for Pfizer, but for many physicians and sufferers of Alzheimer's Dementia that were expecting Dimebon to be a breakthrough in the treatment of the illness.

Results came from an FDA approved Phase III clinical trial named CONNECTION that was being run by Pfizer and its subsidiary company, Medivation. Phase III refers to a specific stage in the clinical investigation of new medications for human use. After animal studies have shown a medication to have promise, Phase I trials establish doses and safety of the medication in human beings. Phase II trials then try the medication on small groups of patients to see if the drug shows effectiveness and safety in its use in humans. Phase III trials start after all indications are that the medication is safe and likely to have benefit for patients. Phase III trials involve large numbers of patients in several different clinics or medical centers, and their results are safeguarded by the use of placebos and so-called double blind designs that prevent both the patient and the doctor from knowing who is getting what until the results are determined.

The CONNECTION trial has been a Phase III study looking at the effects of Dimebon in about 600 patients with mild-to-moderate AD in North America, Europe, and South America. The patients in the study had an average age of 74.4 years, and met criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia of mild to moderate severity. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either Dimebon or a placebo, i.e., "sugar pill" for six months. During that time their cognitive function was regularly assessed to determine what if any changes were occurring, or if the two treatment groups differed from one another. The finding was that after six months, those patients receiving Dimebon were not at all different from those who merely received the placebo. In other words, the Phase III trial showed that Dimebon was no more effective than a sugar pill. It offered no benefits for patients suffering mild to moderate degree of Alzheimer's Dementia.

The finding of the apparent ineffectiveness of Dimebon was surprising and disappointing largely because a 2008 clinical trial published in the prestigious journal The Lancet had obtained such positive results with the medication. In that study, 183 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Dementia appeared to greatly benefit from treatment with Dimebon. I have noted comments in the press that this earlier study was suspect because it was performed in Russian clinics. However, the study was performed as a collaboration of the Russian Academy of Sciences with groups from Baylor, Mount Sinai, UC San Diego, and Georgetown University Colleges of Medicine. Moreover, as I have suggested, the study met the impeccable publication standards of The Lancet. Those remarkable first results with Dimebon were also consistent with what had been learned in animal studies about the effects of this drug on the brain. Dimebon has been found to mimic effects of both of the classes of drugs currently FDA approved to treat Alzheimer's Disease. That is, it blocks abnormal activity at NMDA receptors in the brain, as does the FDA approved memantine, and it blocks the enzymatic breakdown of the chemical messenger acetylcholine in the same fashion as drugs such as Aricept. In addition, Dimebon may help prevent build up of abnormal tau protein, which causes the neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's. There are also reports that it can block some of the neurotoxic effects of amyloid, the abnormal protein that accumulates in the brains of sufferers of Alzheimer's.

Even before any trials in human beings, Dimebon had been found to improve the cognitive function of rats genetically engineered to exhibit changes in the brain and behavior similar to those seen in humans with Alzheimer's Dementia. Thus, there were compelling reasons to predict that Dimebon would again be shown to be helpful in improving the cognitive function of patients with Alzheimer's. Sadly, this was not the case.

Some explanation may be found as to why Dimebon may work in some but not other patients with Alzheimer's Dementia. Moreover, studies are ongoing to see if Dimebon may yet be helpful as an add on to currently approved medications for Alzheimer's Dementia. Nonetheless, it is now clear that Dimebon is not a miracle cure-all. To quote the great biologist, Thomas Huxely, "A beautiful theory has been destroyed by an ugly fact."

The quest for medications that can improve the cognitive function of sufferers of Alzheimer's dementia continues. It is possible that something will be found to stop or even reverse the degenerative processes of the illness. However, at present the most effective medications only slow the progression of the illness. Some people inherit genes that make it likely they will develop Alzheimer's Dementia no matter what they do. Thankfully, this is a small minority of people. For most of us, the best approach to Alzheimer's continues to be to avoid the illness by proper diet, stress reduction, sleeping well, staying active mentally, physically and socially, and by using vitamins, herbs and nutraceuticals that can slow down the neurodegenerative processes that cause damage to the brain. It is important that these steps be initiated in your 40's and 50's, when this damage to the brain tends to begin.

 
The pharmaceutical company Pfizer announced today that its investigational Alzheimer's medication, Dimebon, has failed an important test of its effectiveness in the treatment of Alzheimer's Dementia.
The pharmaceutical company Pfizer announced today that its investigational Alzheimer's medication, Dimebon, has failed an important test of its effectiveness in the treatment of Alzheimer's Dementia.
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:51 PM on 03/06/2010
I thought it went like this:

Phase I - Animals
Phase II - Human beings without the disease being tested (safety)
Phase III - Human beings with the disease being tested (efficacy)

Did I miss something in my training?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson, M.D.
10:01 PM on 03/06/2010
Dear Stevie, I believe my definitions of the FDA clincal trial Phases are correct. The following website offers a good explanation, not only for you but for the less scientifically minded readers as well.

http://www.marrow.org/PATIENT/Undrstnd_Disease_Treat/Undrstnd_Treat_Opt/Lrn_Clinical_Trials/What_is_a_Clinical_Trial/index.html

Best wishes,
Scott
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
08:13 AM on 03/06/2010
Do I have this right: Alzheimer's Disease is a brain disease in which a plaque accumulates around the neurons/receptors and the plaque is a byproduct of brain chemical processing? So the potential for everyone to develop this condition is 100% because it is a result of natural processing or do other factors come in to play that would ramp up the accumulation or decrease it (i.e. diet, brain excercise, meditation)?

I would think prevention would be the key to this disease, as you say in the last paragraph. Not a magic bullet pill. However, the people who already have developed the symptoms need something. Here's to hoping they get something.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson, M.D.
10:08 AM on 03/06/2010
Dear Stephen, You have put your finger on a controversy that has existed for years about the degree to which Alzheimer's is simply a variation of normal aging. As I noted in my book, Beyond Alzheimer's, there at least two forms of Alzheimer's, an early onset strongly driven by abnormal genes, and a late onset form that is due to poor diet, stress, sleep apnea, diabetes, heart disese, and other medical risk factors. There are also "in between cases" where there are genes that contribute to but do not entail Alzheimer's. In the early form, abnormal genes cause accumulation of amyloid at an early age, with severe dementia appearing well before the age of 65. Almost every one in their 80's or 90's will show some evidence of amyloid plaque accumulation and neurofibrillary tangles that are the hallmarks of Alzheimer's Disease. However, many retain fairly good cognitive function, and die of illnesses that have nothing to with Alzheimer's. Thus, while some accumulation of plaque is normal, dementia is not. Interestingly, there was a case reported in the journal, Neurobiology of Aging, in which the brain of a 115 year old woman was relatively free of amyloid.
Best to you, Scott Mendelson, M.D., Ph.D.
02:11 PM on 03/06/2010
Dear Scott,

Thanks for the excellent article. So, I guess I'll just go back to my Cup of tea with some Ginkgo Biloba -- with a little honey and lemon. That marvelous old herb not only increases my brain functions, but it also acts as a powerful antioxidant, knocks out oxidation of free radicals which were probably causing me to act a little batty in my old age. It also helps to protect my aging eyes, cardiovascular system, and central nervous system.

For every new medicine BigPharma tries to cram down our throats, you can often find either an Ayurvedic, Chinese, American herbal, or other natural remedy which can help without exposure to the dangers of the crap the manufacturers want us to buy at great expense.

And, our physicians have the option to have "compounding pharmacists" make a custom medicine for us and our particular conditions under their order and control.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
08:25 AM on 03/07/2010
Thanks for the schooling, Doc. We all need to know the preventative measures we need to be taking in order to minimize this inevitable condition. At least to avoid the dementia aspect.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
09:56 PM on 03/05/2010
Did a pharmaceutical company perform some honest science here?

Weird.
03:03 PM on 03/05/2010
I'm not terribly familiar with this particular trial, but it seems like six months is an awfully short window of time to be expecting significant changes in the brain. It takes decades for AD to develop. Expecting it to be cured in six months seems a bit over-optimistic. If there was no harm associated with the drug, why not extend the study another six months?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson, M.D.
05:51 PM on 03/05/2010
Dear kscincotta, Yours is a very good question. One reason that the study was deemed a failure after only 6 months is that the medications already approved by the FDA to treat mild to moderate dementia are effective within this relatively short period of time. Thus, there would appear to be little advantage in this new medication. Furthermore, when some one already has mild to moderate Alzheiemr's Dementia, time is of the essence. They simply do not have time to wait a year or more to see results.

An interesting point related to your question is that many herbs, vitamins, and nutraceuticals are tried in such studies and found to be ineffective. However, in many cases the treatment is too little, too late. If tried much earlier in life, before the illness progresses to the mild, moderate or even severe stage, they might be more effective. This could be the case with Dimebon. However, I see the use of natural substances to be far more reasonable than to use a drug like Dimebon earlier in life, perhaps even before the appearence of Alzheimer's in hope of preventing it.

Best wishes to you,
Scott D. Mendelson, M.D., Ph.D.