HuffPost Review - Trick 'R Treat (2009)

Trick 'R Treat
2009
82 minutes
Rated R (for horror violence, some sexuality/nudity and language)
Available on DVD, Blu Ray, On Demand, and iTunes download October 6th from Warner Bros.

by Scott Mendelson

An old film professor of mine used to talk about something called the 'uh-oh moment'. It was that moment, usually at the end of a foreign and/or artsy-fartsy film, when the credits started to roll and you realized that the movie was over and you really had no idea what it was thematically about. That in itself is not necessarily a criticism of the movie. Some films like John Huston's The Dead require either a second viewing or a familiarity with the original source material to really get it, since the movie only really reveals itself at the climax. But it is absolutely a problem for a movie when you realize that not only did you have an 'uh-oh moment', but that the filmmakers probably had one of their own upon viewing the final cut.

Trick 'R Treat is a stunningly lifeless and seemingly aimless would-be horror comedy. It is a muted and rushed affair, seemingly edited without discipline and constructed without purpose. It relies solely on the talents of Brian Cox and Dylan Baker to give the material more worth than it deserves. The picture is basically a horror-anthology, mixing four brief tales of terror that take place over a single Halloween night. Alas, it is not scary and it is not funny. And its anthology structure is undone by the needlessly non-linear narrative that spends much of the middle act bouncing between the two least interesting of the four stories (an urban legend involving a doomed school bus and a would-be twist on "Little Red Riding Hood"). At 82 minutes, it has little time to give weight and character to any of its tales, yet it there is so little to chew on that the film drags despite the slim running time. The film also runs afoul of narrative logic in its strained attempts at interlocking each of the four stories, which theoretically happen within about the same two-hour period.

I have no idea where the geek-love for this film comes from. There are plenty of worthwhile horror films that tragically end up going straight-to-DVD, but this is not one of them. The film is above all else dreadfully dull because it lacks anything even approaching substance and fails to deliver even the cheapest of thrills. This was not a case of Warner Bros cruelly regulating the film to a home-video debut out of some evil motives. Trick 'R Treat is just not good enough to justify a theatrical release. Even with a few moments of cleverness from Dylan Baker as the world's least competent serial killer or Brian Cox stuck in his own Trilogy of Terror rip-off (you can guess which story), the picture has no weight and is of no consequence. It even falls well short of the standard set by such cult horror films as Midnight Movie or Murder Party. Do not believe the hype. Trick 'R Treat is all trick and no treat.

Grade: 1.5/5

PS - for a truly terrifying horror film, rent or buy The Children instead. It's truly one of the best direct-to-DVD horror films ever made, if not THE best.

Follow Scott Mendelson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ScottMendelson

Comments

[HotheadPaisen]

Awww, man- I've been waiting for this for a year! I'll see it anyway, but I guess I'll wait on Netflix and not buy it. The trailer was great and it had such good reviews from the HorrorCons. Oh well... You guys who like 'scary'... opinions on High Tension or Vacancy? Those were the first movies to freak me out in a long time. Midnight Meat Train was a jolt too...

[AfroLatina21]

I just watched the movie last week...I couldn't even finish the whole thing because of the ridiculousness of some parts of the movie. For those who've seen the movie, you already know what I'm talking about.

But the movie started off okay, as time went on the movie got worse. I honestly wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone. Save your money.

The best compliment I can give the movie is that it doesn't go down the same beaten path, it is very creative and unique.

[tweck]

Thanks for the recommendations. I've been passing up The Children, now I'll go out and rent it. Also, I don't think I've ever seen The Dead, and will look out for that too.

[SILVANUS]

Unfortunately, these are the easiest type of films to finance, which says so much about our culture. Oh for the day when "Carrie" was a little horror flick that crept out of the shadows, or even the original "Chainsaw."

It's all MBA-managed crap now.

[Isis N]

Hmmm... I think I'll continue to agree with Harry Knowles over you. I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, and it was fun to watch. It wasn't stupid like the current collection of horror movie "reduxes" and "series" are.

I think I'm not the only one to choose a NEW, ORIGINAL horror flick over something like another "Friday the 13th" remake or another "Halloween" remake or even yet another boring "Saw" movie.

[Scott Mendelson - Huffpost Blogger]

Nope, it was stupid in an entirely different way. As far as original, only the first story really had an original spark to it. The other three were just reworked variations of old stories.

[cygnus525]

This was a great movie for all those who enjoy the holiday. All of these stories did have something original which tied them together and that was Sam! He is in all of these stories as a reminder of the rules of the holiday and the consequences to those who break them. Christmas has Santa Claus. Easter has the Easter Bunny and now Halloween has Sam. If you had done your research you would have found this out. This certainly does it make it Oscar worthy but certainly not the bomb your obtuse review tries to convey.