I've written about this before (
and
), but box office pundits and film bloggers generally seem to want it both ways. They whine about the onslaught of remakes, reboots, sequels, and kid-centric animated films, yet they also DEMAND that the total weekend box office stay at a level that necessitates such a steady diet. So when Paramount's
was tracking in the $25-30 million range over the last couple weeks, the various pundits were up in arms about how this original, star-less, $50 million period-set thriller was somehow an automatic flop because it wasn't going to open to $50 million over its first three days. But now that it HAS opened to a relatively solid $37 million, the line is that total box office is down from
last year. Well,
the release of a remake of
The Karate Kid
and a movie-adaptation of
The A-Team
, which opened with a combined take of $80 million. Surprising quality of the
Karate Kid
remake aside, isn't that the kind of slate we all say we don't want?
Anyway, J.J. Abrams's ode to the 1970s/1980s films of Steven Spielberg (which also banked on 80s nostalgia, natch) indeed earned a rock-solid $37 million over its debut weekend, with $38 million since sneaking on Thursday in about 300 IMAX theaters (IMAX made up 12% of the weekend figures). More importantly for the long term, it actually had that rarest of rare things: an over 3x weekend multiplier. It opened with $12.2 million on Friday and increased to $14 million on Saturday (a 14% increase) and pulled in a solid $10.8 million on Sunday. That's a weekend multiplier of 3.03x, which is frankly how it was supposed to work in the olden days. Super 8 made me nostalgic for a lot of things this weekend. It made me nostalgic for the days when $50 million was a big budget, when $25 million was a lot to spend on marketing, when a $35 million weekend was a massive success, and when movies actually had their biggest single night on Saturday of their opening weekend instead of Friday. The film played 71% over-25, which is encouraging as the film may have real legs if word of mouth spreads to the younger audiences. It played 56% male.
Where it goes from here is an open question. The high weekend multiplier would indicate strong word of mouth and probable legs, but the film received a B+ from Cinemascore, which is good but not spectacular. It received a B from those over 25 and an A- from those under. It got a B+ from both males and females. I think the score is less from general pleasure than from sharply divisive reactions. For a large swath of the population, it very well may be a love it or hate it movie. There may have also been some backlash from the allegedly secretive marketing campaign, which actually was secretive only in terms of what the core threat looked like (once you see the movie, you realize that there was nothing really to spoil). Me? I'm merely in the 'dislike it' club. It's overly reliant on nostalgia and the third act is an absolute mess (here's a spoiler-filled rundown of what I merely hinted at in my review). Long term prospects may be slightly harmed by the fact that it's not the savior of the summer, but merely a well-liked film in a summer filled with solid pictures thus far. Or it could ride sentiment and end up with $200 million. As always, next weekend will tell the tale. Anyway, it's still encouraging for an original property that wasn't oversold to have relative success in the marketplace. With a mere $50 million budget and an alleged mere $25 million marketing campaign Super 8 is already a huge win for Paramount.
The only other national debut was
Judy Moody and the Not-Bummer Summer
. The Relativity release grossed just $6.2 million over the weekend, coming in below even the $7.8 million debut of
Ramona and Beezus
last summer. The poorly-reviewed kid-lit adaptation (which my three-year old had no interest in) cost just $20 million, so the damage should be minimal once kids decide to sample the DVD. The rest of the news is of the holdover variety.
X-Men: First Class
dropped just 55% in weekend two, for a $25 million weekend. For the second weekend in a row, the fifth X-Men picture is performing almost identically to the first. Like the first picture back in 2000, this reboot/prequel ended its tenth day just under $100 million ($98 million). So if it can avoid screen bleed, it should end its domestic run with $150-160 million. As
,
crossed the $200 million mark yesterday, and with a third weekend of $18 million, it now sits with $216.6 million after 22 days. That makes the film already the sixth-biggest R-rated film of all time. And it's also, just two films in the can, pretty much the second-biggest biggest R-rated franchise of all time, behind the $592 million-grossing
Matrix
trilogy. Oh, and
The Hangover part II
is also the highest-grossing film of 2011, a title it will keep for at least the next few weeks.
Kung Fu Panda 2 grossed $16.6 million in its third weekend, a far better hold (-30%) than last weekend, which gave it a new total of $126 million. It's still playing EXACTLY like Madagascar ($17m third weekend, $128 million after three weekends). So $170-180 million still seems plausible. Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides also crossed $200 million on Friday, and it now sits with $208 million. Worldwide, it's speeding towards $900 million, meaning (as I discussed in detail yesterday) it will become one of the highest-grossing films of all time without even matching its production budget ($250 million) in the US. Bridesmaids had another small drop (-15%) ending its fifth weekend with $123 million. The Judd Apatow-produced Kristen Wiig vehicle is now the third-biggest grossing film that Judd Apatow was in any way involved with (writing, producing, or directing), with the $148 million gross of Knocked Up and Talladega Nights well within reach.
Fast Five sits with $205 million and Thor is at $173 million. Tree of Life expanded to 47 screens and pulled in another $18,000 per screen for an $800,000 weekend and a $2.4 million total. The big art house news was the continued successful wide-release of Woody Allen's Midnight In Paris, which expanded to 944 screens and grossed a whopping $6.2 million. To put that in perspective, 1/3 of Woody Allen's 40 films haven't even grossed $6.2 million total. Midnight In Paris has grossed $14.2 million, making it Allen's 12th biggest film and putting it on track to be one of his very biggest grossers ever. All of which makes me wish I didn't truly dislike the film (sorry fans, I love the 'great artists' bits, but found the rest to be contrived and obnoxious in a way more common with the likes of Bride Wars or Confessions of a Shopaholic).
And that's it for this weekend. Join us next weekend for Martin Campbell's much anticipated and much-feared Green Lantern (review Wednesday night or Thursday morning), which goes head to head with Jim Carrey's Mr. Popper's Penguins. If next weekend's write up is a little late, forgive me. My wife is giving birth on Saturday so I may just post baby pictures in lieu of a timely box office report.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.