As always, for background and historical context for all the weekend's new movies, check out John Gosling's obscenely detailed weekend preview
HERE.
It wasn't so much a "something for everyone" weekend as it was "multiple things for the same general audience," as four wide releases aimed at thrill-hungry moviegoers and/or adults debuted on the same day, creating a clear case of mutually assured destruction. The top three movies are basically tied, but as always, rank is irrelevant next to the actual hard numbers (why rank doesn't matter). For the moment, the top debut of the weekend may be End of Watch, a "found footage"-style LA cop drama, parlayed strong reviews into a solid $13 million opening, which is the second-biggest debut for Open Roads outside of The Grey ($20 million) back in January. The $7 million film (purchased for $2 million) had a marketing and distribution cost of around $20 million, so even a $40 million final total will get this film in the black before home video. It also proves that Jake Gyllenhaal is a decent mid-range opener. He's useful when the film you're selling doesn't cost $200 million ala Prince of Persia. End of Watch is yet another installment in writer David Ayers' "two volatile men in a car" sub-genre, which includes the likes of The Fast and the Furious, Training Day and Harsh Times (an underrated Christian Bale vehicle that he also directed). He wrote but did not direct the the LA Riots-set cop melodrama Dark Blue while directing but not writing the frankly mediocre Keanu Reeves cop melodrama Street Kings. Among films he directed, End of Watch should easily top the $26 million gross of Street Kings while it will be fifth (out of seven) if it can merely surpass the $9 million gross of Kurt Russell's Dark Blue. Fourth place is the $76 million-grossing Training Day, which is too far a bridge to cross at this point.
In a somewhat surprising turn, considering it felt like a dump, Open Road's
The House at the End of the Street
may also be the top film of the weekend, earning a halfway decent $13 million, which means the Jennifer Lawrence thriller (filmed a couple of years ago and held back arguably until Lawrence's profile was high enough) has earned back its $10 million budget. The film may be terrible (there was a single press screening right before opening day), but cheap horror is one of the more reliable standbys in the industry and no harm in Relativity for exploiting it (they purchased the film for just $2.5 million). Considering the film looked like crap on rye, it does give ammunition to the idea that Jennifer Lawrence may soon be an "open by yourself" movie star coming off
The Hunger Games
. Her next film, the David O'Russell drama
The Silver Linings Playbook
will tell more (and possibly net her another Oscar nomination. Still, the opening could very well merely be the $10 to $15 million that seems to attends PG-13 horror out of habit, although films like
The Apparition
proves that's not an automatic win. Point being, the core audience for this kind of thing doesn't care about reviews or bad buzz, they just wanted to see the same thing these movies always offer: an attractive girl/young woman in seemingly supernatural peril from malevolent forces unrelieved in the trailers. The film played 61 percent female and 70 percent under-25, meaning that this was pretty big with the stereotypical teen girl horror demo.
Clint Eastwood's
Trouble With the Curve
opened with $12.7 million, although it, too, may be the weekend's top film when finals are released. As the first film has acted in since 2008's
Gran Torino
and the first Eastwood film that he did not direct since
In the Line of Fire
back in 1993, the baseball-centered father/daughter drama actually ranks up in the upper rankings of Clint Eastwood vehicles in terms of opening weekends (it's actually his sixth-best opening as an actor).
Gran Torino
, which opened to a stunning $30 million in early 2009 (after an Oscar-qualifying platform release), is an anomaly as Eastwood's next biggest opening is
Space Cowboys.
That "old dudes go into space" epic opened with $18 million back in 2000 before ending with $90 million. Eastwood's films are hit-or-miss in terms of legs. It could go somewhat leggy and end up with $50 million a la
Absolute Power
in 1996 or it could perform like many of director Eastwood's less-than-break-out films (think
The Changeling
or
J. Edgar
) and top out around between $32 million and $37 million. It all depends on A) how much of an effect Eastwood's speech to an empty chair at the RNC Convention had on his fan base (minimal, I'd presume) and whether or not the older-skewing moviegoers who generally don't rush out to the movies right away sample this one as opposed to the likes of
Taken 2
in the coming weeks.
The last new wide release was Lionsgate's
Dredd
, which was frankly dead-on-arrival with just $6.3 million. It will not be the No. 1 film of the weekend. The hardcore geek set may say it's superior to the Sylvester Stallone version of the same comic book (which opened with $12 million in June 1995), but no one else cared about the film at all. This is frankly a classic case of online interest not translating into mainstream interest. The Karl Urban-starrer had no high-profile cast members to lure general moviegoers into the futuristic 3D variation on
The Raid: Redemption
(the films accidentally share a very similar story). Lionsgate, which acquired the $50 million-budgeted film from Reliance Entertainment and is only on the hook for marketing and distribution, sold this one almost exclusively to the committed faithful, which led to a predictably disastrous debut. The film played 75 percent male and 60 percent under-25. Of all the films opening this weekend, this is the one that would have benefited from opening mostly unopposed on September 4th after Warner Bros. moved
The Gangster Squad
into January 2013 (
). Why Lionsgate instead chose to dump
The Cold Light of Day
into 1,500 theaters with no marketing support instead of transplanting this far more important investment I cannot say, but it was a costly error on their part. The general moviegoer crowd who wanted an R-rated action fix, especially couples, found it with
End of Watch
instead, as a star-driven cop drama is a much easier sell to a general audience member than a 3D sci-fi action comp based on a British comic book they've probably never heard of. Even surprisingly good reviews didn't matter. Oh well, judgment is indeed served.
There was one major expansion and one big story in limited release. First, Paul Thomas Anderson's
The Master
(
) expanded to 788 screens and didn't exactly set the world on fire. It's second weekend of play brought in $5 million, giving the film $6 million so far. It's above the $4.8 million expansion (on 885 screens) of
There Will Be Blood.
The Daniel Day Lewis vehicle was in its fifth weekend of release but also had Oscar nominations to boast about. Come what may,
The Master
was never going to be a mainstream hit and anything near or above $26 million gross of
Boogie Nights
(Anderson's second biggest grosser behind the $40 million finish of
There Will be Blood
) should be considered a win, especially if it can maintain awards momentum as the rest of the Oscar bait rolls into theaters over the next three months. The big limited-release story was the eye-popping debut of
The Perks of Being a Wallflower.
Based on an allegedly beloved novel by Stephen Chbosky (who wrote and directed his own film adaptation) about teenagers finding themselves in high school, Summit debuted the film on four screens and snagged an astonishing $61,000 per screen. The film was relatively well reviewed and had the added bonus of being Emma Watson's first major role after the end of the
Harry Potter
series. Anecdotal evidence (for what it's worth, I do get "on the ground reports" from time to time) informs me that this thing was sold out in the evening for much of the weekend, with a rather large middle-school audience treating this as their
The Master
. This is the fourth-biggest per-screen average of the year and Summit's biggest ever. It played 70 percent female and 60 percent under-25. Obviously a massive per-screen debut for a limited release doesn't always guarantee equally mainstream success, but expect Summit to expand this one much faster than they perhaps intended to.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
