iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Scott Morgan

GET UPDATES FROM Scott Morgan
 

5 Reasons You Should Never Agree to a Police Search (Even if You Have Nothing to Hide)

Posted: 02/21/2012 10:52 pm

Do you know what your rights are when a police officer asks to search you? If you're like most people I've met in my eight years working to educate the public on this topic, then you probably don't.

It's a subject that a lot of people think they understand, but too often our perception of police power is distorted by fictional TV dramas, sensational media stories, silly urban myths, and the unfortunate fact that police themselves are legally allowed to lie to us.

It wouldn't even be such a big deal, I suppose, if our laws all made sense and our public servants always treated us as citizens first and suspects second. But thanks to the War on Drugs, nothing is ever that easy. When something as stupid as stopping people from possessing marijuana came to be considered a critical law enforcement function, innocence ceased to protect people against police harassment. From the streets of the Bronx to the suburbs of the Nation's Capital, you never have to look hard to find victims of the bias, incompetence, and corruption that the drug war delivers on a daily basis.

Whether or not you ever break the law, you should be prepared to protect yourself and your property just in case police become suspicious of you. Let's take a look at one of the most commonly misunderstood legal situations a citizen can encounter: a police officer asking to search your belongings. Most people automatically give consent when police ask to perform a search. However, I recommend saying "no" to police searches, and here are some reasons why:

1. It's your constitutional right.

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects us against unreasonable searches and seizures. Unless police have strong evidence (probable cause) to believe you're involved in criminal activity, they need your permission to perform a search of you or your property.

You have the right to refuse random police searches anywhere and anytime, so long as you aren't crossing a border checkpoint or entering a secure facility like an airport. Don't be shy about standing up for your own privacy rights, especially when police are looking for evidence that could put you behind bars.

2. Refusing a search protects you if you end up in court.

It's always possible that police might search you anyway when you refuse to give consent, but that's no reason to say "yes" to the search. Basically, if there's any chance of evidence being found, agreeing to a search is like committing legal suicide, because it kills your case before you even get to court.

If you refuse a search, however, the officer will have to prove in court that there was probable cause to do a warrantless search. This will give your lawyer a good chance to win your case, but this only works if you said "no" to the search.

3. Saying "no" can prevent a search altogether.

Data on police searches are interesting, but they don't show how many searches didn't happen because a citizen said no. A non-search is a non-event that goes unrecorded, giving rise to a widespread misconception that police will always search with or without permission.

I know refusing searches works because I've been collecting stories from real police encounters. The reality is that police routinely ask for permission to search when they have absolutely no evidence of an actual crime. If you remain calm and say no, there's a good chance they'll back down, because it's a waste of time to do searches that won't hold up in court anyway.

4. Searches can waste your time and damage your property.

Do you have time to sit around while police rifle through your belongings? Police often spend 30 minutes or more on vehicle searches and even longer searching homes. You certainly can't count on officers to be careful with valuables or to put everything back where they found it. If you waive your 4th Amendment rights by agreeing to be searched, you will have few legal options if any property is damaged or missing after the search.

5. You never know what they'll find.

Are you 100 percent certain there's nothing illegal in your home or vehicle? You can never be too sure. A joint roach could stick to your shoe on the street and wind up on the floorboard. A careless acquaintance could have dropped a baggie behind the seat. Try telling a cop it isn't yours, and they'll just laugh and tell you to put your hands behind your back. If you agreed to the search, you can't challenge the evidence. But if you're innocent and you refused the search, your lawyer has a winnable case.

Remember that knowing your rights will help you protect yourself, but no amount of preparation can guarantee a good outcome in a bad situation. Your attitude and your choices before, during, and after the encounter will usually matter more than your knowledge of the law. Stay calm no matter what happens, and remember that you can always report misconduct after things settle down.

Finally, please don't be shy about sharing this information with your friends and family. Understanding and asserting your rights isn't about getting away with anything, and it isn't about disrespecting police either. These rights are the foundation of freedom in America, and they get weaker whenever we fail to exercise them.

Scott Morgan is Associate Director of FlexYourRights.org and co-creator of the film 10 Rules for Dealing with Police.

 

Follow Scott Morgan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/drugblogger

 
 
  • Comments
  • 365
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
09:47 PM on 04/11/2012
Cut, paste and print this, keep a copy attached to your insurance in your glove box, and in your wallet or purse:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE That I do not waive and hereby invoke my rights under the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution.
I object to ANY search of ANY kind whatsoever. I will NOT consent to a search of my person, things, car, or home.
I choose to remain SILENT. I will NOT say anything without my lawyer. I will NOT answer any questions or provide any explanations until I have spoken to my lawyer. I will NOT talk about my case with anyone other than my lawyer. Make this wrtten statement/card a part of the report concerning this contact.
03:01 PM on 03/23/2012
i used to have dreds and i got pulled over ALL the time. i was told if i didn't agree to the search i would be taken down to the police station and my car would be search there. i never had a thing to hide but i didn't want to piss the police off. they would always call for back up and take at least an hour searching for drugs.i felt violated and helpless.needless to say i cut my hair only to avoid the hassle and threat of jail.
01:19 PM on 03/02/2012
Once we were on a trip (Hungary) and the police stopped us to search our wan. They were looking for people who made a bank robbery. Since it was the easiest way to prove that the people are not hiding in the wan, we let them do the search. Well, i don't think it was a bad decision, but i can't see how we could say no to that.
photo
Decorina
Hypocrisy means your karma ran over your dogma
04:51 PM on 03/13/2012
Completely irrelevant to the subject at hand.
08:08 PM on 03/01/2012
What I've been wondering:

Isn't there precedent saying that if you're in your car the police can search because 1. there might be a weapon that poses a threat to them, and 2. you might hide or destroy evidence?

But:

1. Once you're out of your car and they're searching, those threats no longer exists.

and

2. Cops *always* tell you to get back in your car when you get out. Which tells me: they're not worried about threats, they're worried about *not being able to search your car!*
12:05 PM on 02/28/2012
A right is a right. Why does the author offer exceptions?

"so long as you aren't crossing a border checkpoint or entering a secure facility like an airport"

Unreasonable and warrantless are still unreasonable and warrantless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cassandra Holly
07:55 PM on 02/28/2012
Being searched before getting onto an airplane is not unreasonable nor does it require a warrant. Same goes for crossing the border.
08:48 PM on 02/28/2012
We're talking about a right that the Constitution guarantees to protect against the government, aren't we? If a TSA agent or a Border Patrol agent can decide what's reasonable and what requires a warrant then we are a nation of men, not law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Powerslave Six Six Six
11:05 AM on 03/01/2012
The Constitution provides for Customs to have an exception at the border.(Article I Section 8)
11:43 PM on 03/03/2012
Obviously, you have not read Article 1 Section 8 of the constitution.
08:51 AM on 02/28/2012
this is all well and good but it kind of depends on how much time you have to spend it with the cops. being retired i got all the time in the world and i dont mind makin the sob's earn their money
08:27 AM on 02/28/2012
I got pulled over on my way to visit family about 3 hour drive, and i got pulled over for going 5 over by a state trooper and I told him he could not search my car because he had no reason too. He said he did because it smelled like weed. (and I don't smoke) so I was just like umm No it does not. so He said fine if you will not consent to a search he would call k9 unit and I would have to wait till they got there.
What am I supposed to say then? huh?
03:15 PM on 02/29/2012
If he said he'd call the K9 unit and that you'd have to wait, you could have asked him: "officer, am I being detained?" If he says yes, ask him "are you charging me with a crime?". He's likely to respond "no", at which point you excuse yourself from the encounter, by saying: "may I go now?"

This process may require several iterations, as he'll try to talk circles around making you accept a search.

Since you were technically speeding, he might say "you are being detained until this ticket is written up". But if you stick to your guns, once he gives you the ticket you'll be able to go.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JStading
"Shall NOT be infringed" means what it says.
05:57 PM on 02/29/2012
"Am I free to go, if not, I do not consent to being detained for the time it takes to get your K-9 here. I would like to take my ticket and leave."  The 4th Amd. protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.  This includes a seizure of you!
09:42 PM on 02/27/2012
I got pulled over in Sonora, Texas on I10 West. I had a baggie in the truck and was trying to think of who to call when the sheriff found my pot. He climbed in the truck cab and KNEELED ON THE DOPE, which was under the floormat on the driver side. He went through my duffel bag, questioned why I had 500 .22 caliber shells and sent me on my way!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony060460
07:15 PM on 02/27/2012
Okay, everybody all together, "just say no".
photo
Jerome Cleary
CEO of PublicityandMarketing.com
07:33 AM on 02/27/2012
great info
08:47 PM on 02/26/2012
The organization that the author works for provides educational knowledge on how to ecercise their rights during police encounters, it is called Flexyourrights.org. I have watched their videos on the internet and found them to be very informative and valuable and I reccomend them for everyone. Whether some would say a person who has drugs in their possesion even has rights, I would totally deny the police to search me (not that I have any.) I live at a homeless shelter and there are drugs all around me... people will stash drugs in other people's belongings... I have a obligation to keep myself out of the system.
01:48 PM on 02/26/2012
Recently a business in D.C. that sells " tobacco ' accesories and such removed LITERATURE from it's store because the local thug cops are assuming that selling,certain books links the store to the knowledge of drug use by it's customers! Books discussing legal protections for citizens are condemned by the cops because " "The typical citizen would not need to know detailed information as to US Supreme Court case law regarding search and seizure because they are not transporting illegal substances in fear of being caught," it stated."

://mobile.dcist.com/2012/02/if_you_walked_into_capitol.php

Imagine that! If you read about your Constitutional rights, you are suspect! According to the cops, people who do not violate the law have no need to know what their rights are...we are supposed to just trust the cops! The store affected has already been raided once and they removed the books to avoid another raid..the bongs and paraphenalia are still there, but the books are gone. No doubt the police would love to stage a book burning to show their contempt for knowledge by the commoners...if this is not a sickening reminder of Gestapo tactics, what is? Unreal...just unreal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuspiciousMinds3
04:23 AM on 02/26/2012
This is what our rights used ot be, now we can be arrested without any charges and put in a fema camp indefinately, forever if they want to , without your family even being told. Once those FEMA camps went up I knew our rights were gone and no one said a word, what happened to "never again"?, we are living in Auschwitz, do you think we could tell anyone we refuse to answer questions, they search your home and help themselves, if they find a large amount of money on your person while you are traveling they confiscate it, too bad about you. What shalll a person do, fight them? Spout the constitution which is being ignored by our Government and our President who seems ot think he is his cousin Ondinga, next he will be burning down our churches with women and children inside. Thsi is all madness and we can't refuse to be searched or anything else. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Steaphens
It's all about liberty.
12:15 AM on 02/26/2012
When I was much younger,we used to build "rail jobs"-nothing but a bunch of tubing welded together with four wheels and a Volkswagen motor and not much else.No trunks,glove compartment,nothing but tubing and air under the seats.Cops would want to search these vehicles and we'd all laugh at them.
In Germany,I had a 1976 Corvette.Some computers were stolen on base,so they had an MP at the gate searching every car coming and going.This one Sergeant was being gruff,said he was going to search my trunk and there's nothing I could do about it.He walked around looking for the trunk release.After several minutes he finally asked me how to open the trunk,and I was laughing as I told him Corvettes don't have trunks.
We also built chopper motorcycles,and like rail jobs there isn't much to those,either.Always fun to watch the cops look for any hiding place on basically two wheel,a frame,and a motor.
Gotta love building vehicles that confuse cops!
06:26 PM on 02/25/2012
Nobody is mentioning 'QUOTAS'. Cops got Arrest Quotas. I lived in New Orleans and used to get arrested during my lunch 1/2 hour all the time. That meant I would disappear after about 11:30-12:00 during the day for a stay at the OPP (Orleans Parish Prison). They had quotas and in my work clothes I looked 'Homeless'. an Easy Target. Eventually I got fired from my job as a Carpenter because my boss thought I was running off and getting drunk at lunchtime and just not coming back. That's sort of funny because the always arrested me for 'Drunk in Public', even though I hadn't had a drop. They. the New Orleans Po Po don't Breath Test and there is NO WAY to prove your sober without seeming Drunk. I lost my job which included my housing accomodation and was rendered 'Homeless' myself. Each time it cost me 36 hours in the OPP. They had quotas and who is easier to arrest than people just walking down the street on the way to a meal because the worl has fallen out from under him or her. I was in New Orleans for 1 1/2 years and was arrested no fewer tha 20 times, and NEVER for an actual Crime. But apparently I was DRUNK a whole lotta times. Shame I missed the fun of actually having had someting to drink besides WATER.