iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Sec. Kathleen Sebelius
GET UPDATES FROM Sec. Arne Duncan

A Graduation Gift

Posted: 04/26/11 06:04 PM ET

With graduation just around the corner, many of you are preparing to start a new chapter in your lives. With anticipation and perhaps a hint of nervousness, you are deciding where to live and what to do. But some of you also have a third question on your mind: where am I going to get health insurance? And the good news is you may not have to worry any longer. An important new provision in last year's health care law means that most young adults can now stay on their parents' health plan until age 26.

Up until now, many of you have probably been covered by your parent's health insurance. But in the past, when the caps and gown disappeared after graduation day, so did health care coverage. That's when graduates quickly learned what millions of Americans experience painfully every day: health insurance can be incredibly expensive, especially when you have to purchase it on your own.

Historically, many young people whose jobs didn't provide health insurance decided to go without it. As a result, young adults are almost twice as likely to be uninsured as older Americans.

This can be tempting when you're still young and feeling strong and healthy. But accidents happen and disease can strike unexpectedly. Going without health coverage leave you just a setback away from a lifetime of medical debt or worse. And it can keep you from getting the checkups and preventive care that can help keep you healthy.

Just as bad are the compromises some young adults make to obtain health insurance. Over the years, too many talented young people, especially those with preexisting conditions, have been forced to choose the job with health insurance over their real dream, whether it was working for a small non-profit, going to grad school, or even starting their own business.

This wasn't just bad for young people. It was bad for our economy, stifling innovation and entrepreneurship and keeping people locked in jobs they didn't want to do.

Under the health care law, this is changing. Now, as young adults begin their careers, they can stay on their parents' plan up until age 26 as long as they meet two conditions: First, your parents' plan must cover dependents, as most plans do. Second, you must be unable to obtain coverage from your employer.

The class of 2011 will be the first to graduate with this new option in place, and as many as 1.2 million young Americans could gain insurance coverage this year as a result. What this means for new graduates is that you will have the freedom to make career choices based on what you want to do, not on where you can get health insurance.

This provision will make a particularly big difference for young people like Emily Schlichting. At age 19, Emily was diagnosed with a rare autoimmune disease. She was devastated to learn that she would require regular treatment for the rest of her life. And she was scared of what would happen after she graduated from college and lost her health coverage. With a pre-existing condition as serious as hers, Emily would have found it nearly impossible to find a policy that she could afford.

Now, thanks to the health care law she can stay on her parents' plan after she graduates and continue to get the medicine and care that she needs. And because the new law will end discrimination based on pre-existing health conditions for all Americans in 2014, Emily knows that no matter what she decides to do, she'll be able to get health insurance. "I can't tell you how much that peace of mind means," she says. "It sounds like it's an intangible. But in my life, it's very real."

To learn more about this new benefit, visit facebook.com/youngadultcoverage. And tell your friends. In the months and years ahead, college graduates will face plenty of big decisions. The question of whether or not you will be able to get health insurance should not be one of them.

Kathleen Sebelius is the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services; Arne Duncan is the U.S. Secretary of Education.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
04:50 PM on 04/29/2011
The Weiner Waiver Wormhole
Michelle Malkin

New York Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner (how apt is his name?) toasted the one-year anniversary of Obamacare this week -- and accidentally spilled his champagne glass all over the disastrous, one-size-fits-all mandate. Ostensibly one of the federal health care law's staunchest defenders, Weiner exposed its ultimate folly by pushing for a special cost-saving regulatory exemption for New York City.
If it's good for the city Weiner wants to be mayor of, why not for each and every individual American and American business that wants to be free of Obamacare's shackles?

Weiner joins a bevy of the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's" loudest cheerleaders -- unions, foundations and left-leaning corporations -- in clamoring for more waivers for favors. (The list of federal waiver recipients now tops 1,000, covering more than 2.6 million workers.) And he follows a gaggle of health care takeover-promoting Democrats maneuvering on Capitol Hill for get-out-of-Obamacare loopholes.

At a speech before the George Soros' Center for American Progress (least apt name of all), as reported by Politico.com, Weiner revealed that he's "in the process now of trying to see if we can take (Obama) up on" a favor waiver and is "taking a look at all of the money we spend in Medicaid and Medicare and maybe New York City can come up with a better plan.
http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2011/03/25/the_weiner_waiver_wormhole
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romaine Chritton
02:22 AM on 04/28/2011
I enjoyed the simplistic explanation to a complicated subject. I hope both the graduates and their parents have a better understanding of the health care reform bill. Some employers are paying low wages to workers of all ages because they offer health care benefits. Other employers are exploiting graduates by paying low wages because of the tough job market. Unfortunately, I have little hope that things will change in the foreseeable future. Hope a public option becomes a reality.
04:29 PM on 04/27/2011
A gift.... to the insurance industry. 50 milion uninsured, college grads severely in debt and unable to find well paying jobs, people dying due to lack of health care access (a last ditch effort to go to the emergency room is not health care.) The 'health care' system of the USA is a disgrace. All other civilized countries provide health care for all people. Many countries such as Germany also provide free university education. Yet, in the USA, there is plenty of $$ (read working class people's money) for the banksters, insurance corps, big oil, and of course war! Let's face it, the corporations own this country. The people are just serfs.
researcher
researcher
04:27 PM on 04/27/2011
any nation that cares for its citizens would have universal health coverage for all of its citizens.

we do not.

quit telling us how great it is with this new coverage. every person in congress and works for congress needs to have their coverage taken away from them until all americans are covered and all pre existing conditions are eliminated. it is a national shame to not have every american covered for medical care. a national disgrace.

this nation is by its very actions a nation that does not care for its poor or its middle class. quit trying to make it look like they do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romaine Chritton
02:30 AM on 04/28/2011
I agree, and I am happy that at least there is some help available to the recent graduates. I have a son graduating from college and going on to grad school. He now has health insurance through his parents policy. I feel better that he is insured and I'll take this bit of help. I only hope that a public option becomes available by the time he turns 26.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kadeed
03:52 PM on 04/27/2011
Yes just want parents want to do is carry their adult children on their policies. I won't be doing it unless of course my grown child plans on paying the premium.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:14 PM on 04/27/2011
According to the Constitution a person only needs to be 25 to be elected to Congress. Under Obamacare we can have Congressmen that still have their parents pay their health insurance. No nanny govt here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romaine Chritton
02:34 AM on 04/28/2011
Think how much money the government can save by not having to offer the golden parachute insurance offered to members of Congress! Maybe we should elect all 25 year old as a solution to reducing the deficit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PolitiConservative
reasoned debate welcomed here
02:38 PM on 04/27/2011
"A Graduation Gift."

Aw, you shouldn't have! Thank you so much national government!



Wait, you want what in return?
01:56 PM on 04/27/2011
Lots of great comments ...

This was done ONLY because Obama knows he needs the college kid votes to win again in 2012. He puts off their wrath for a few more years, but Mom and Dad are not particularly pleased to stay on the hook for 4 or 5 more years.
photo
Rhubarbarian
Some of my best friends are corporations.
06:16 PM on 04/27/2011
Are you a parent? Mom and Dad would rather see junior suffer the consequences of having a major illness and not having insurance than paying premiums on them for a few more years? Who are you people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Watters
If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal
01:24 PM on 04/27/2011
What if your parents can't afford health insurance?
11:54 AM on 04/27/2011
This is kind of sad.
iridium53
Semper Fi
11:28 AM on 04/27/2011
The biggest single achievement, so far, of the Obama Administration is to allow freshly graduated students to be covered by their parents healthcare insurance.

Of course, if they could find jobs that wouldn't be quite as big a deal.

But, since Obama is more worried about getting his birth certificate out and transferring money to big corporations, and not at all worried about creating jobs, that is just an Obama pipe dream.


Perhaps if Obama wasn't so interested in getting failures like Petraeus and Panetta into jobs he might do something more about the American economy - instead of building Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and now, Libya. When will American jobs get attention from the American President?
11:14 AM on 04/27/2011
keep selling........yeah see its good your parents can oay your way until your 26
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joe zoe
11:02 AM on 04/27/2011
"where am I going to get health insurance?" huh?

Almost all universities offer their graduates the option to purchase health care...., and if not from them you could still purchase it yourself from an insurance company.

Its not like its free because your on your parents plan.
Vinkaye
science matters
09:29 AM on 04/27/2011
It's sort of strange to read this article as a "rah-rah... look how great Healtcare Reform Act was"... when the reason that this provision is necessary is because the job prospects and economic outlook for our 20 somethings is so profoundly bad! Don't get me wrong, I'm happy that my nieces and nephews have this coverage option, but I know that they would much rather have full time employment!
08:34 PM on 04/27/2011
I had that thought as well. I'm sure folks would like both. Right on.
09:19 AM on 04/27/2011
Very nice-but now that we've got the students all fixed up, how about the adjunct and contingent faculty who taught them? The adjunct and contingent faculty who do most of the teaching in higher education, usually with no health care or very little, at very low wages and with little or no job security? Particularly, Secretary Duncan, what are your thoughts? You're very good at putting forth the notion that a good education helps people realize their dreams—there are a lot of dreams in education rhetoric—for a decent, middle class life. But you know what? in order to maintain faith with higher education, you have to be able to confront the idea that a high proportion of the most educated portion of the population is having trouble making ends meet—those are the folks who taught the students who got the education who need the insurance who need the jobs—get it?
11:57 AM on 04/27/2011
Alan,
He's just mouthing platitudes.Frankly,it's silly to think your 'writing' him on HP can reverse the over supply of teachers ,or the fact so many recent grads find their degrees in the liberal Atts/Hums to be of meager value
08:31 PM on 04/27/2011
Well, you're certainly correct about the platitudes. As to silly-well, actually the problem may have something to do with oversupply, but that is a bad explanation for the whole problem. The bigger problem is that full-time and well-paid jobs have been replaced with PT adjunct and contingent jobs so that 3/4 of sections are now taught by non-traditional faculty. Of course, in a way that is a general problem in the economy-the replacement of good full-time jobs with bad part-time jobs. Also, it's not at all just libArts/Humanities positions that have disappeared in FT categories and reappeared in degraded PT form. I met a guy the other day, for instance, who is teaching a med tech section for 1000 bucks. Libarts/hum people are just canaries in in the old coal mine. All the rhetoric about education and advancement, in the face of the restructuring of the labor force is platitudinous, sure, but also actually misleading. I think of it as plain exploitation, but if you don't t like that idea, okay—whatever it is it's a lousy ad for higher education. I am working to bring it to people's attention, and also with New Faculty Majority to advocate for improved conditions. Part of that is just getting the message out, and HP is a good outlet. Don't find it silly at all. Cheers, Alan t.