iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Dianne Feinstein

GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Dianne Feinstein
 

Time to Ban BPA from Food and Beverage Containers

Posted: 12/18/09 01:05 PM ET

No responsible parent would expose their infant to cigarette smoke or car exhaust. But every day in America, millions of infants are exposed to dangerous chemicals hiding in plain view. This exposure can lead to a wide range of adverse health effects later in life -- from increased cancer risk to infertility.

This chemical is called BPA -- short for bisphenol A, a key component of plastics --and it is found everywhere in modern life.

BPA lines the cans of soup on your pantry shelf, and the soft drink cans in your refrigerator. This compound is also in baby bottles, water bottles, plastic containers and countless other everyday food and beverage containers.

And that's a big problem. BPA leaches into food products and beverages, especially when heated in plastic containers. Moreover, a growing body of scientific evidence shows that exposure to this chemical, at very low levels, may be dangerous for humans - especially during prenatal development and early infancy.

Nearly 200 scientific studies show that exposures to low doses of BPA, particularly during pregnancy and early infancy, are associated with a wide range of adverse health effects later in life.

Increased risk of breast and prostate cancer. Genital abnormalities in male babies. Infertility in men. Early puberty in girls. Type-2 diabetes. Obesity. These are just some of the health problems now being linked to BPA exposure.

One survey, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, estimated that 93 percent of Americans have BPA in their urine.

Another study, published in September 2008 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found significant links between exposure to high levels of BPA and a variety of ailments and abnormalities, including diabetes, heart disease, and high liver enzyme levels.

Last year the National Toxicology Program, which is part of the National Institutes of Health, reported "some concern" that BPA may affect neural development in fetuses, infants and children at current levels of exposure.

Despite the growing evidence, the Food and Drug Administration last year claimed that BPA is safe. But an investigation by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel revealed that lobbyists for the chemical industry wrote significant parts of the FDA's assessment.

On top of that, the agency's own panel of outside scientific advisors questioned the FDA's findings, and now the agency is reassessing its position on BPA.

New findings from the FDA are expected any day now. But states, local governments and private corporations are not waiting around.

Connecticut and Minnesota, and the city of Chicago, have restricted the use of BPA. The government of Canada has banned the chemical outright in all baby bottles.

Wal-Mart and Toys "R" Us will no longer sell baby bottles containing the compound.

In March, six U.S. manufacturers of baby bottles announced they will no longer use the chemical in their products.

Also in March, Sunoco, the large American petroleum and petrochemical manufacturer, announced it would no longer sell BPA without guarantees it will not be used to manufacture baby bottles.

The writing is on the wall.

Yet despite the growing patchwork of restrictions, and the laudable moves by industry to clamp down on its use, there today are no federal curbs.

We must wait no longer. That's why earlier this year I introduced the Ban Poisonous Additives (BPA) Act of 2009, which would eliminate the use of BPA from all food and beverage containers.

This legislation would:

  • Ban the sale of reusable beverage containers (including baby bottles and thermoses) that contain BPA.
  • Prohibit the use of other food and beverage containers (including canned foods and baby formula) from being introduced into commerce.
  • Provide for renewable one-year waivers for manufacturers that can show the FDA that there is no technology allowing the manufacture of a particular product without the use of BPA.
I will do everything I can to see this legislation passed by the Senate. And I will do everything I can to ensure that other food safety legislation considered during this session of Congress includes provisions to ban BPA in food and beverage containers. We simply cannot allow Americans, especially children, to be used as guinea pigs while federal bureaucrats sift through evidence that has convinced so many other authorities of the clear fact that this chemical is harmful to health.
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 90
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
09:58 AM on 12/23/2009
Senator Feinstein,

When are you going to insist on Banning the use of High Fructose Corn Syrup in our nations food supply?
HFCS is doing far more damage to the health of our nation than BPA!
Because food manufacturers want to save a few cents on the products they make it is costing this nation BILLIONS every year with the Obesity, Diabetes and hundreds of other ailments associated with Obesity and Diabetes.
These diseases can be directly linked with the consumption of High Fructose Corn Syrup, mostly because our bodies do not know how to digest it.
03:44 PM on 12/21/2009
That second part doesn't look like it actually bans BPA from canned goods does it? That's where we get most of our exposure without even knowing it. The media caught onto BPA in baby bottles but tin cans are a much bigger problem, especially canned soups and tomatoes due to their acidity leaching more BPA into the food.
03:00 PM on 12/20/2009
Thank you Senator Feinstein.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:58 PM on 12/20/2009
Don't forget that most of the harm is done to the FETUS by the MOM being poisoned, so although it's a big symbolic gesture to ban the baby bottles, we need a TOTAL BAN to protect the moms...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
10:07 PM on 12/19/2009
BPA has been banned in hiking water bottles for some time. Go to places like REI and ALL of the water bottles say BPA free, why are other industries not following suit?
11:32 PM on 12/19/2009
People dont know about it, and its cheaper not to change. Expose the dangers about BPA and the companies will rush to put BPA free on there products as well since people will be more likely to buy them compared to those who dont have BPA free on it.
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
10:01 AM on 12/23/2009
Like how Oroweat Breads now puts "No High Fructose Corn Syrup" on the label of all their breads.
01:16 AM on 12/20/2009
It's not especially difficult for plastic container manufacturers to switch from polycarbonate, with contains BPA, to polyester or polyethylene, which don't -- especially for high-end containers like the water bottles sold at REI.

But the plastic lining on the inside of metal cans and bottle caps is a more difficult transition, since epoxy, which contains BPA, is uniquely well-suited to that application compared to possible alternative plastic coatings.

Again, it's less difficult for high-end products, such as the metal bottles made by SIGG, which now come with a new "EcoCare" liner made of polyester. But such thermoplastic coatings cannot be applied in a water-based form as with epoxy. They have to be applied using a pressurized powder coating process, which is more complicated.

Canning is a vast industry, and if there is no drop-in replacement for epoxy, the conversion to thermoplastic powder coating will be quite expensive. As with many government regulations, the cost of compliance unfortunately weighs most heavily on the smallest businesses.
08:12 PM on 12/20/2009
Thank you for the info
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
benji85
07:10 PM on 12/19/2009
About time we have legislators talking about this.
07:05 PM on 12/19/2009
As a 6th generation Nor Cal Native I must say I am again pleased with the Senior Senator from California. I am a dinosaur who remembers when all beverages were in returnable g;ass bottles. We should return to that standard.
Today the only coke that is the real thing is hecho in mexico. It has taken me years to convince friends and loved ones that water in plastic bottles is not better than filtered tap water. While i'm at it, kudos to u lady senator for your strong support of our troops and our national security. Stand with the President in the reasonable middle, don't allow the left or right and their hotheads to screw things up. I have admired you since the day you dealt with the tragic Moscone Milk Assasinations. Gods Speed Lady Senator.
photo
sloppybear16
"Dare we live, without molds"
06:58 PM on 12/19/2009
we also need to ban GMO
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
abbeyroad
Does this rag smell like chloroform to you ?
05:56 PM on 12/19/2009
Thank you Sen. Feinstein for bringing this to everyone's attention !

The only other person i've heard talk about this lately is Thom Hartmann.

BPA is extremely dangerous, and MUST be banned immediately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kendraro
deadhead echelon peacenik mom to Marley the awesom
01:10 PM on 12/19/2009
As a person with multiple health problems that no one really know the cause of, I am very interested in seeing chemicals like BPA removed from our everyday environment. A safe and healthy environs for the citizens should be the first order of business for government.
photo
Hiphopcrates
Kicking the money lenders out of the Temple
12:46 PM on 12/19/2009
As a California Democrat I find it hard to believe that the Senator wouldn't want to increase the need for future medical care. After all, won't you let the market prevail?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
11:49 AM on 12/19/2009
NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR REELECTION WAR MONGER!!!
We need hemp legalized so we can export hempoil based plastics.
Canola oil 133 gallons per acre
Hemp oil 1,000 gallons per acre.
05:59 PM on 12/19/2009
Totally agree...

But epoxy and other hard, rigid plastics aren't made from oils, natural or petrochemical.
photo
deepintheheartoftejas
Middle o/t Road = Yellow stripes & dead armadillos
09:34 PM on 12/19/2009
Your figures are grossly reversed. Hemp seed does have a high oil count, about 80% of that of rapeseed, but hemp seed has a very low yield per acre compared to rapeseed, so the oil yield is only around 25% per acre compared to rapeseed. Hemp is legal in Canada, China, and many other places, but it has never proven an economically viable competitor for vegetable oil production.
12:52 AM on 12/20/2009
Link?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xena
11:25 AM on 12/19/2009
Yeah, this is great. I won't hold my breath though because most in Congress will get fat checks from the producers of this poison and then you'll set it on the shelf.

It won't really matter because most of us couldn't afford the treatments needed from the effects of BPA because after all these months the only people that will benefit from your latest healthcare reform slight of hand is the really really poor uninsured and the really really wealthy who can pay out of pocket expenses upfront literally out of their pocket. The rest of us will just die so you won't have to bother with us.
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
10:43 AM on 12/19/2009
good thing that it is, eliminating bpa from use, there are more important things she could brag about, if she only would. single payer/medicare for all for starters, there's something that would make all californians proud of senator.
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
10:38 AM on 12/19/2009
good going senator feinstein. a senator actually doing something FOR the citizens of this country. this is exactly what a senator should be doing.