More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Fritz Hollings

GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Fritz Hollings
 

Lazy Is Not Our Problem

Posted: 11/23/11 09:48 AM ET

Robert E. Lee stated: "Duty is the sublimest word in the English language." The duty of Corporate America is to make a profit. To make a profit, Corporate America plays the economy any way it's fashioned by a free or a communist government. But the government; i.e. the president and Congress, are charged to develop a strong economy for the United States. To a question in Honolulu about China investing in the United States, President Obama responded: "But you know we've been a little lazy... We aren't out there hungry selling America and trying to attract new business into America." The president is completely oblivious to our predicament. He can create jobs with federal aid, but he can't build a strong economy. It takes private investment. Globalization is nothing more than an economy war with private investment looking for a cheaper country to produce. In order to retain a strong economy in globalization, the nation's tax laws must be competitive and its trade laws must be enforced. Governors are working around the clock to attract investment, domestic and foreign. But domestic industry is off-shoring like gangbusters. The president is the principal reason.

Instead of making our tax laws competitive, President Obama continues the tax benefit to off-shore or get rid of jobs. Instead of enforcing our trade laws, like he is sworn to do, the president ignores them. Instead of paying for government, President Obama continues to run deficits in excess of a trillion dollars, telling Corporate America it's taxes will be increased. Corporate America sits on a $2 trillion surplus waiting for the president and Congress to determine the increase.

The solution is easy. All the president and Congress have to do is to take the tax benefit to off-shore jobs and give it to Corporate America to on-shore jobs; i.e. replace the corporate income tax with a 6% value added tax. Last year the corporate tax produced revenues of $194.1 billion. A 6% VAT for 2010 would have produced $700 billion. Exemptions for the poor leaves billions to pay down the debt. 141 countries compete in globalization with a VAT that's rebated on exports. Germany uses its 19% VAT to create green jobs in the U. S. Manufacturing the parts at high cost in Germany to avoid any tax, shipping the parts at 3% cost, and assembling the parts at 3% cost, Germany produces windmills in Charleston, S. C., 13% cheaper than any domestic production.

There are no loopholes in a VAT -- instant tax reform! The VAT eliminates tax lawyers and half of the lobbyists in Washington. Grover Norquist will howl, but, since the corporate tax at 35% is replaced with a 6% VAT, this is a tax cut. Since the VAT is self-enforcing, much of the IRS can be eliminated, cutting the size of government. Now $1.2 trillion in off-shore profits can be repatriated tax free to create millions of jobs. This tax cut produces billions to pay down the debt and millions of jobs. Lazy is not our problem.

Admiral William Crowe, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, warned us in Congress in 1991 that we were becoming too dependant upon foreign favor to defend the country. We were off-shoring our defense industry. Twenty years later, we're begging Russia for helicopters in Afghanistan, having defeated Russia in Afghanistan. It's embarrassing. If President Obama would enforce the Defense Production Act of 1950 like President Kennedy did in 1961, it would create millions of jobs. If President Obama would enforce our trade laws like President Reagan did to protect steel, motor vehicles, computers, and machine tools in 1984, we wouldn't have had to import eight miles of steel for the Bay Bridge in San Francisco. Rather than a bailout for Detroit, President Obama should have imposed a tariff or import surcharge on motor vehicles like President Nixon imposed in 1971. Safeguard provisions in Article XII of the WTO permits this. Enforcing our trade laws not only protects established industry but attracts new investments. When the Court found a dumping violation of over 300% against Fuji Film, Fuji located in Greenwood, S. C. Lazy is not our problem.

The president says we are "not trying to attract new business in America." Today, the Obama Administration gives Boeing a tax benefit to invest in China or Japan, but the Obama Administration sues Boeing if it invests in America. Lazy is not our problem.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:13 PM on 11/23/2011
"...since the corporate tax at 35% is replaced with a 6% VAT, this is a tax cut.." Wrong, this is a tax increase on everybody who purchase a product or a service in USA. Furthermore, VAT, as demonstrated in other countries that use it, is subject to increase that can be fairly high. In European countries the VAT rate is between 15% and 25%.
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
06:37 PM on 11/23/2011
Whether or not this is doable, it is refreshing to read something that has at least potential.

Perhaps at some point Mr. Obama will start LEADING the country and not spend his time "stepping back" as ther White House calls it to let the party's resolve things in DC..that is not a strategy...
frank1946
Tell the Truth
05:22 PM on 11/23/2011
Firtz Hollings is a excellent Observer, his insight is appreciated by this
Whitehouse ?

Someone should invite him on "Face the Nation", FoxNews, Meet the Press, etc.

His point about incentives for going "Offshore" seems Valid and a Flaw in current Policy !

Europeon VAT started out at just 3 %..........................Watch Out !

It is now 22 %
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artanis71
Colbert Super PAC unleashed in 2012
04:45 PM on 11/23/2011
Links? Any actual data to back up the claims? Here is one fact, repatriation was just tried under Bush and his own administration acknowledged it was an utter failure, all the companies did was perform massive stock by backs and executive bonuses, it seems the trendy thing to do now is just post wild statements without any facts to back it up.

Here is an actual researched paper that uses facts and provides every link to back it up. If it is to long to read just jump to page 10, to many politicians just look at the immediate gain and totally ignore long term impacts:

http://www.cbpp.org/files/4-8-11tax.pdf
photo
LeftCoastEng
Obsessed with failed trade
04:00 PM on 11/23/2011
Senator, I don't agree with everything in this article, but I firmly support your efforts to bring about trade reform. This non-reciprocal, so-called "free trade" is ruining our economy and the President is talking about more free trade agreements. Sounds like big business is firmly in charge.
03:17 PM on 11/23/2011
Obviously, you know that only Congress can change the tax laws. Yet you choose to pin the blame on Obama. Interesting.
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Show respect to all people and grovel to none.
02:19 PM on 11/23/2011
Didn't Obama make the GE CEO his "jobs czar?" Isn't that sort of funny? Immelt has created jobs in China, where GE is investing $2B, and with the $5B they profited last year, paid zero tax.

WHEN will the Occubaggers go to 1600 Penn Avenue?
02:12 PM on 11/23/2011
@SenHollings : "Now $1.2 trillion in off-shore profits can be repatriated tax free to create millions of jobs. This tax cut produces billions to pay down the debt and millions of jobs."

This is the same tripe that was espoused the last time we gave businesses a repatriation holiday. It failed miserably then, and it would fail miserably today.

The businesses, for the most part, do not use the "savings" to create jobs. They use the funds for stock buy-backs. That may be great for stockholders, but does nothing to help the economy.
01:09 PM on 11/23/2011
President Obama is either clueless, impotent, or indifferent to the plight of American workers. "Chane you can believe in" is no change. Unfortunately the Republican nominee is going to be about the same or worse (with the possible exception of Paul).

Populists that voted for Obama expecting a Roosevelt instead got a Carter. A guy way over his head.
Hollings is right about the corporate tax.
01:05 PM on 11/23/2011
x