More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sen. Michael Bennet

Sen. Michael Bennet

Posted: May 7, 2010 12:20 PM

Close the Revolving Door

What's Your Reaction:

In Colorado, we have a lot of mountains that are a challenge to climb. Our most challenging mountains are the ones that are more than 14,000 feet tall -- the 14ers.

Back in Washington there aren't any 14,000-foot mountains, but we do have 14,000 lobbyists who work to grind progress to a halt.

What may surprise you is that many of these lobbyists came directly from Congress. Once upon a time these former members of Congress and their staffs worked to move our country forward, but now they use their experience and behind-the-scenes knowledge just to further the agendas of their employers.

Recently, I was asked by a woman on the Western Slope, "Where's my lobbyist?" And she's right -- this broken system is allowing the voices of millions of Coloradans and people across the country to be drowned out by special interest lobbyists.

That's why I've introduced The Close the Revolving Door Act of 2010 to end lobbyist abuses, and get Congress back on track to move America forward.

Reforming Washington's K Street culture isn't going to be easy. I've already seen firsthand how hard lobbyists fought to stop health care and Wall Street reform -- and those are reforms that everyone agrees are badly needed.

Can you imagine how hard they're going to fight this?

I know it will be tough, but I've spent a career outside of politics fixing broken businesses, schools, and city budgets. That's why I'm not about to back down from this challenge -- we can't settle for this broken business-as-usual system any longer.

The Close the Revolving Door Act of 2010 will:

  • Close the revolving door by banning Members of Congress from ever becoming lobbyists,
  • Lengthen the "cooling off" period before Congressional staffers can become lobbyists from one year to six years,
  • Create new disclosure requirements so firms can't hide lobbyists by giving them titles like "advisor" or "aide,"
  • Improve transparency by creating a website where anyone can track and find information on lobbyists, and
  • Increase the fine for breaking these rules to 500,000.
  • Tackling the undue influence of lobbyists in our legislative process is a good first step towards changing the way business gets done (or too often, doesn't get done) in Washington.

We can't let these Washington insiders continue to stall the changes we need.

The corporate lobbyists are going to fight these reforms tooth and nail -- that's why I need your help. Please join me as a citizen co-sponsor of The Close the Revolving Door Act of 2010 now!

 

Follow Sen. Michael Bennet on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BennetForCO

 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Troutguy
A bad day fishing is better than a good day workin
08:20 PM on 05/11/2010
Sen. Bennet took in over $400,000 from financial and real estate interests in the last 6 months of 2009. And he sits on the banking committee as well. The only other Senators that have taken in more bribe money from these industries is Harry Reid and Chris Dodd. This is why he voted against meaningful financial reform.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
06:26 PM on 05/13/2010
Posted like a true Romanoff supporter. The guy who isn't running on any other issue, apparently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zbowling
software engineer, geek
04:30 PM on 05/16/2010
Are you saying he is factually incorrect? Your comment is totally ad hominem - an attack on the commenter without addressing the issue.
Bennet voted Nay on the on the Brown (OH) Amdt. No. 3733
Purpose: To impose leverage and liability limits on bank holding companies and financial companies.

http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00136

(End welfare for rich bankers by making them provide leverage for their risky gambling bets, and to impose limits on how much we, the people have to pay to bail them out when they lose on their bets.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ColoradoMike
09:59 AM on 05/11/2010
Senator Bennet, campaign finance reform would be a more tangible and have more lasting effect than lobbyist reform. Can you explain why you are not co-sponsoring S.752, the Fair Elections Now Act? A list of sponsors can be found on http://youstreet.org/legislation. President Obama has endorsed this legislation, and it is disappointing that you are not supporting the President on this important legislation.

I know you have received lots of corporate campaign finance support, but don't you agree with the President that this would improve our elective and legislative process?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Hanson
Skeptical of the *pseudo-skeptics*
12:11 AM on 05/11/2010
I'm glad so many have made statements against Bennet's vote in favor of the banks. I think we can all help to ensure we elect the right Senator for our state by supporting Andrew Romanoff. I just sent in a contribution to Andrew Romanoff's campaign. Won't you consider making a small contribution to his campaign? I certainly understand if you can't but wouldn't it be great if this post raised money for Bennet's Democratic opponent Andrew Romanoff? I do not work for Andrew Romanoff's campaign.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
06:29 PM on 05/13/2010
No, thanks. I was at my Democratic caucus and the Romanoff campaign rep could not talk about ANYTHING Romanoff is about except his refusal to take certain campaign donations.

La-de-friggin'-dah. Pending real campaign finance reform, I see no reason to let the Rethugs reap the largesse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Hanson
Skeptical of the *pseudo-skeptics*
12:04 AM on 05/11/2010
Appointed never-been-elected Senator Bennet, I would also like to know why you voted no on the cramdown legislation. Will you continue to vote in favor of the banks and against tax payers? Why don't you stop taking contributions from the banks after all banking reform legislation is before you and it would be the right thing to do?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
08:44 AM on 05/10/2010
Odd, when one loses or his/her job is in jeopardy they all know what is right all of a sudden. Amazing.
The only time the politicians come to their senses when it is election time, then, and then only they
remember the voter. Disgusting!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
08:29 PM on 05/09/2010
Politics is about money. If there were no money involved, a lot less people would be concerned about it. Since there IS money involved, and whining and wheedling is a time-tested method of getting more out of Uncle Sugar, there's LOTS of people involved, some people, 'lobbyists', have created professional organizations and that is their stock-in-trade, gaining advantage, favor, and money for their supporters.

I think that GS and 'doing God's work' or whatever is a great example of the power of the dollar bill over the course of human events. When you've got $10, you're just a face in the crowd, when you've got $10 billion, people are lining up around the block to kiss your hiney. Money, power, influence, that's what politics is really all about...pesky things like laws and voters just get in the way...
10:53 PM on 05/08/2010
Senator Bennet: Speaking as one of your constituents, I must say that it is my philosophy that actions speak louder than words (more honestly as well).

As others have pointed out in previous letters on this article, your name is conspicuous by being listed as one of those that voted against the Kaufman-Brown SAFE amendment.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dylan-ratigan/is-your-senator-a-bankste_b_567907.html

Would you care to explain your actions? It will determine what actions I will take in November..
hellinahandcart
Your silence will not protect you.
08:34 PM on 05/09/2010
x2

you're fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:25 PM on 05/08/2010
Senator:
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dwillisno1
Learning to Butt Heads Without Being Buttheads
04:57 PM on 05/08/2010
Many years ago one of my friends said, "I'm not going to vote for Congressman Smith, because he's a crook." A wiser observer replied, "yeah, but he's our crook." "Where's my lobbyist" is a variation on the same theme. It's the activity and behavior, the principle of lobbying that should be opposed, not the idea for which or the group for whom the lobbyist lobbies. My lobbyist is not the answer to your lobbyist, no lobbyist is the answer. Or better yet, no one in office listening to or paying attention to all lobbyists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
01:13 PM on 05/08/2010
GOP Rep Steve King is looking out for lobbyists. See this article and video in which he says someone has to look out for the lobbyists.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/26/gop-rep-steve-king-defend_n_478493.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
11:51 AM on 05/08/2010
"Where's my lobbyist?"

Well, what organizations have you donated to? If you gave to the NRA or AIPAC, you probably have plenty of lobbyists speaking for you on their issues. If you donate to NARAL, you're probably helping hire a few too, although the left generally doesn't do as well.
11:38 AM on 05/08/2010
You're absolutely right about this, and yet you show your spots as a member of the Bankster party with your vote to sustain the Too Big To Fail dynamic. All this column tells me, then, is that you don't intend to go into lobbying after it turns out that banks don't have as many votes as your real constituents.

Sorry, Sen. Bennett, but I'll be finding someone else to vote for over that betrayal. Unless you'd care to devote another column to telling us your reasons for stabbing the majority of your constituents in the back in favor of a few more big-donor contributions. Or am I misreading it?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
06:32 PM on 05/13/2010
What bilge. Anyone who doesn't know much about how poisonous the banking tentacles were should stop whining about what it took to pull 'em out without sending this economy over the edge.

All Romanoff has offered is that he doesn't take "corporate contributions." Big whoop.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:53 PM on 05/07/2010
i guess my opinion isn't important if I don't have a badge.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
06:32 PM on 05/13/2010
Then you're in good company, kiddo. Fanned.
07:02 PM on 05/07/2010
Yeah, I agree with you, Senator Bennet!! The close of "the revolving door" should begin by voting you out in November. With this piece, are you trying to cover up your tracks----voting against the American people and for the banks?? If that's the reason of penning this piece, then I think you haven't succeeded.

I used to like you as a senator, but yesterday's vote scuttle it all when I wasn't able to find your name among the "yeahs" to that amendment. I guess it's time for Coloradans to try Romanoff out by sending him to Washington in your place.

I sincerely pray that the jobs market in the US would have recovered by January 21, 2011 because you are gonna need a new job. Straighten out your resume----it's always advisable to do that.
04:33 PM on 05/07/2010
Reading all of the posts below tells me we have lots of folks who will NOT be voting for McInnis, our lobbyist/lawyer candidate for governor.

Yipppeeee

Go Mayor Hick!