iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Seth Engel

GET UPDATES FROM Seth Engel
 

Graduation, or Biking on Thin Air

Posted: 12/30/11 10:35 AM ET

Having a bike in the Netherlands is as essential as having a car in Los Angeles, an iPhone in New York, or a lover in Paris. So you can imagine my dismay when my bike fell apart beneath me one rainy morning while I was living in The Hague.

I extracted my bike from its parking spot as I did every other morning. Yes, Clifford had been making some creaking sounds. Yes, Clifford was my big red bike that I had bought myself on sale, two sizes too big and a few gears too rusty. Yet I was still surprised when I pulled out of the bike parking lot to make a left turn, only to be looking down at thin air. I was still holding the handlebars, mind you, and probably even pedaled a few times while hanging there, suspended before gravity took its toll. But Clifford had quite simply crumbled beneath me, his gears and sprockets strewn about the Central Station entryway like so much dust. Then, like Wile E. Coyote sprinting off a cliff, I fell in a heap.

A few months after dusting myself off and repairing my broken watch, I have officially finished my graduating semester from Georgetown Law (if I pass all my exams -- knock on wood!). It feels good to be done with my schooling. It feels good to have achieved this high a level of education, and done so while volunteering my time to the less-fortunate, making lifelong friends and accomplishing as much as I could squeeze into the workweek (while still having time to saber a champagne bottle or two on weekends). I know that this is a tremendous accomplishment. But, then, why does it feel so...empty?

Teaching to the Test

I will never forget my high school physics teacher 's education method. Whenever one of us asked an insightful (read: time-killing) question, or wanted to know why we were learning a certain subject or how we would be using the skills procured in her classroom, her answer was always the same. We were preparing for the New York State Regents Exam. This is the New York standardized exam that all students took in certain subjects and needed to pass in order to obtain their high school diplomas.

Her answer in itself was not what bothered me. All teachers are burdened with strict regional and federal standardized tests that leave little wiggle room for creativity, dialogue, or critical thinking. But, come on -- do they have to admit it so resignedly?

To me, it was like this teacher was confessing the dismal fact that she was only teaching us for one reason -- helping us to pass the test. The answer is laden with so many implications, too. She wasn't teaching us because she loved the subject matter, or cared that we understood it, or cared about us at all. Implied in her answer was the following: finish high school, and then you can do all the creative thinking you want. The fact that professors continued this tradition into law school, and students maintained the test-first attitude far into adulthood, belies my physics teacher's assertion.

Schooling Versus Education?

I take issue with this method of teaching, and with this view of education as drudgery that one has to slog through to get to the next level. I went to public schools my whole life until college, and they provided me with many amazing opportunities. Nonetheless I distinctly remember the pressure of competing against other students even in the 2nd grade.

Academic competition isn't inherently bad, but the earlier the pressure to outdo one's classmates begins, the more damage it can potentially cause. The education rat race, which can begin as early as preschool, pushes kids to compete in elementary school so they'll be prepared for middle school. In middle school, they're spooked by stories of high school and how colleges might even look at their middle school record in making a decision. High school is when, of course, the pressure piles on, and college applications overbear even the most school-savvy. In college, there is limitless pressure on accomplishing enough to get into a good graduate school, be it law, medical, or any other higher education. At every step of the way, an annoying little voice in the back of the student's mind says that if she fails just one test or makes just one screw-up, her life is over.

In a way, students in our current education system bike on their Cliffords since childhood. With the lashes of teachers, parents and peers at our backs, we lose sight of our education in search of improving our schooling. Here I am, graduating from law school, and I fear that so many of my classmates are now pedaling on empty air, waiting for the jarring descent, grasping nothing but their handlebars. Their behavior in class might be despicable, ingratiating, or just plain annoying, and outside of class they might be unbearable. But they have a top-tier JD, right?

To me, this view of schooling is unacceptable. Especially today, in the age of ruthless budget cuts and disparity between socio-economic groups in the classroom, there is something wrong with the way students are shaped by the education system.

My high school philosophy teacher's constant refrain was the following Mark Twain quote: "Don't let your schooling get in the way of your education." I have repeated this to myself over the years, and on the eve of my law school graduation, I couldn't agree more. Getting your degrees opens the doors, but it's your personality and life experience that will get you in them.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
f0rTyLeGz
Everything is falling.
08:23 PM on 12/31/2011
Federal money in public schools has been a tragic failure. By trying to be fair to everyone we ruined a pretty good thing. The States should deal with education... the Feds just muck things up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sporty1
being me
03:36 PM on 12/31/2011
That was very unusual that a woman was teaching physics. Of course everything advertised to the mass media now has to be the exception rather than the rule. But it is presented as being the rule. Especially where women are involved, to further flog the fallacy that women are the same or (preferably) better than men in every area except those where assuming so would be to women's disadvantage.
03:32 PM on 12/31/2011
Do what you love. Risk following the dream. Inhabit the one life you have. Stop focusing on all the fear that is being peddled as analysis.

Those are the pithy bits of advice this mom has for anyone getting out of High School and embarking on a college degree.

I'll also add: work part time, go to school part time if you have to. Don't get sucked into the "top tier" trap. Stay focused on what you love (which implies that you have taken the time to know what that is).

Do something good for someone else.
01:18 PM on 12/31/2011
I was lucky. I graduated High School before the full force of NCLB and in a state where the standardized tests were important to the school and teacher but didn't affect graduation or progress. Also, interestingly enough, the content for such exams in Kansas was strict, but a lot of it required that you actually teach children how to reason (like an essay) or think creatively (like in 7th grade where they had us try to map out how we would solve a High School Geometry problem long form and graded us on effort) I wish we all had that luck.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Seth Engel
06:05 AM on 01/03/2012
That geometry test sounds like a great idea - thanks for sharing.
11:42 AM on 01/03/2012
yeah. when I took it I was struck by how little we knew about how to solve the problem, but the incentive to work hard, at least for me, came from that sheer akwardness. Others didn't try at all, I assume, but you want your students to be motivated by challenges and not upset by them.
01:07 PM on 12/31/2011
Perhaps so, counselor to be, but since passing the bar exam requires that you acquire specific knowledge and show that you are able to properly apply it before you can "operate" on clients, upon what basis should the bar committee determine whether or not you are at least minimally qualified to practice law?
02:41 AM on 01/03/2012
Passing the bar is not the same as knowing how to practice law. Neither law school nor the bar teaches such niggling things as (for example): how to find clients, how to file a complaint, how, when, and which court to appear in, how to draft a will, contract, trust, motion, pleading, or brief, how to take a deposition, how to incorporate or set up a partnership, how to run a business (law office), how to bill clients, how to ensure you will be paid, the basic accounting needed to run an office, how to differentiate yourself from the 6,000 other new, unexperienced attorneys in your state all desperate to buy food and shelter, etc etc etc. A bar license simply means one has memorized enough to pass a multi-day exam that tests one's grasp of theory, history, and Barbri materials, but precious little on HOW to practice law.
07:51 AM on 01/03/2012
Your reply is to an issue not addressed.

The fact is that anyone who wants to practice law must pass the bar exam. Since the bar exam is a test the author's premise is fatuous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gateking
10:55 AM on 12/31/2011
That analogy is quite a reach. Don't give up your day job, if you get one.
photo
somewhatodd
micro-bio undetectable to the naked eye
09:37 AM on 12/31/2011
Winning gives birth to hostility.
Losing, one lies down in pain.
The calmed lie down with ease,
having set
winning & losing
aside.
12:21 AM on 12/31/2011
I think they should ban all Law colleges in the country for the next 25 years. we have too many lawyers , so many for the next 50 years we have lawyers.
here is an example of a useless lawyer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sporty1
being me
03:46 PM on 12/31/2011
I think lawyers are great, we should have more of them.
10:52 PM on 12/31/2011
I are counter productive, wasteful and by definition adversarial profession.
They are complete waste of intelligent mind.
Do you know India has more honor students studying science and maths (aiming to be scientists, engineers, doctors, and teacher) than USA has total students ?
We here in US wasting whaterver intelligent people left into becoming Lawyers? for what? to become ACLU thugs?
11:36 AM on 01/02/2012
Everyone hates lawyers until he needs one.
12:06 PM on 12/30/2011
I am probably one of the outliers, but competition has never driven me. It annoyed bosses no end, as I frustrated those who tried to set us up to compete with one-another to make us slave harder for our position on the stack rank scale. Rather, I have always looked to master an area and see what made sense. It was clear that my last employer was going to fire me for not playing their fool games - despite my productivity. So I quit and joined a consultancy. The next day I was back at that employer as a consulting expert doing what I did well (and getting paid well for it) rather than playing corporate politics.

The competitive approach to running an organization may appeal to many managers (who were selected for their aggressiveness and competitiveness) but it does not build stable, productive long-term teams.

My daughter is the same. Competition does not drive her. Like me, she is an INTP/INTJ (Briggs Myers). She goes for subject mastery, and is doing quite well at it. I expect she will find an appropriate niche in the technology area - she will be 15 this summer and will be off to college next year heading into Engineering.