iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shannyn Moore

Shannyn Moore

Posted February 5, 2009 | 11:13 PM (EST)

Elisabeth: The Tribe Has Spoken, Ashley Judd has the View


Ashley Judd is right. Sarah Palin is wrong. Elisabeth Hasselbeck is clueless and should have a nice big cup of STFU.

How do I know? I have been fighting the Alaskan Government Policy of Aerial Wolf Hunting for much of my life. The wolves of Alaska don't know they are Alaskan...or American. Wherever you are, these wolves are part of your world. They represent the best part of the Last Frontier; its wildness, its mystery and its promise of adventure. In short, they represent hope.

Their ongoing slaughter is whittling away the wolves' urgent and important role in maintaining healthy moose and caribou populations. In addition, the extermination is having an unknown and unquantifiable impact on peripheral prey animals and ecological systems. Sarah Palin has completely ignored the scientific findings of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Faith based science doesn't make credible policy. Sarah Palin's unbridled ambition and Bush-like lack of curiosity is akin to a jet engine on a golf cart. You don't know where she's going, but if you're a passenger, you should probably wear a helmet and carry a barf bag. Elisabeth Hasselbeck was made from the same Mean Girl factory; same intel, less horsepower.

On The View, the not-so-clever Hasselbeck followed typical Republican strategy: Make stuff up, and then change the subject to something completely unrelated...like abortion! Killing wolves saves babies! Is it too late to vote her off the island? Do we have a problem with doctors performing abortions from helicopters or planes? No. SHUT UP, Elisabeth! Just because you can see Sarah Palin on your Blackberry doesn't mean either one of you are right.

The piece below was originally written and posted in October 2008:

The smell of fresh snow and the burning fuel of a Ski-Doo Olympic Snowmachine are part of my vivid childhood memories. I would hang on to my pop's snowsuit, as we rode through Alaskan muskegs, down river banks, and up power line trails. Checking our trap line was dirty work. Bait consisted of freezer burnt salmon and road kill rabbit retrieval missions. I grew up with the smell of skinned mink, beaver, muskrats, coyotes, and wolves in my garage.

We took the hides to the Fur Rendezvous in Anchorage and sold them. Staying in a hotel with plumbing and television was our decadent reward. I learned more about nature from trapping and hunting than I did from any biology class. Habits, tracking, instincts; I was in awe of the Nature around me and then I helped kill it. It wasn't easy. Mink are smart as white collar thieves. They could get bait out of a trap nine times out of ten, and defecate before departing, a not-so-subtle message to Pop and I.

I don't write these things to brag, just as fact. You may be revolted by this lifestyle, and I won't argue. I share this to provide you the reference of my horror of aerial wolf hunting. Shooting wolves from planes is to hunting, what hiring a prostitute is to dating.

Alaska has a long history of bounties and hunting-much of it controversial. Aerial wolf hunting began in 1948. In 1972, Congress passed a law that prohibited aerial wolf hunting. Problem solved? No, under the guise of "wolf control," permits were issued to "pilot gunner" teams in 1979. In 1992, under Governor Walter Hickel's Administration, the Alaska Board of Game initiated a wolf control program with the goal of reducing numbers by 80%. Under threat of a massive tourist boycott, the "land and shoot" policy was reintroduced. During Democrat Governor Tony Knowles Administration, only non-lethal measures were used against wolves. The Wolf Management Reform Coalition collected 33,000 signatures to put an aerial wolf hunting ban on the November 1996 ballot; 59% of Alaskans voted for it, with the exception being a biological emergency. A Republican Legislature introduced SB74. This bill eliminated the need for a biological emergency to justify aerial wolf control and usurped the will of the people. Governor Knowles vetoed the bill and the Republican majority overrode it. In March of 2000, SB267 was passed which allowed hunters other than the state biologists to aerially shoot wolves. That same year, Alaskans voted on another ballot initiative to ban aerial wolf hunting by a 53% majority. In 2004, then Governor Frank Murkowski reinstated aerial wolf hunting to private hunters. He opened up 60,000 square miles of Alaska for the flying cowboys. All you needed was a plane and a permit.

With all of this history, we should have been prepared to deal with a Palin Administration hell bent on killing wolves. She and I were "raised by the same wolves", and she wants to shoot them out of planes. She stacked the Alaska Board of Game with pro-aerial wolf hunters. She was successful at merging faulty science, extreme trophy hunting interests and state funded propaganda; spinning a web of lies to masquerade as conservation. I'm not sure where it started; maybe a spam email promising penis enlargement from shooting mammals out of planes went viral. Running our policy on "Faith Based Science" hasn't worked; animals you believe are here for you to rule, and exist because Noah got two of them on a boat and they managed not to eat each other is one thing. But if you refuse to use the brain God gave you for observation and noticing patterns of science, well, how good of a steward of the Earth are you? Years of classic, scientific studies by Adolph Murie and Vic Van Vallenbergh have been mocked or ignored. Their studies were in the field, observing the balance between wolves and ungulate populations. They proved what common sense verifies; wolves take the weak and the sick thereby strengthening the herds. The Alaska Board of Game lacks common sense and ignores science. The Board is loaded with Viagra starved, trigger-happy Alaska Outdoor Council agenda driven thugs.

Because of declining hunter success throughout the 1990s, residents of McGrath were vocal about the need for aerial wolf control. They complained loudly and constantly that there weren't enough legal moose to hunt. The most comprehensive moose population survey to date was done in the fall of 2001. Alaska Department of Fish & Game Biologists documented moose numbers and the bull/cow ratios within a 520 square mile area around McGrath known as the Experimental Micro Management Area or EMMA, as well as the rest of Game Management Unit (GMU) 19D East. 520 square miles is a relatively small area. It is in fact, just under 12 miles north, south, east and west of McGrath. The target ratio for a sustainable hunted population is 30 bulls/100 cows. Within the EMMA, that ratio fell to an unhealthy 18 bulls/100 cows. Outside EMMA and basically outside the range of lazy 4-wheeler hunters, that ratio was 44 bulls/100 cows-well above the healthy target. Here's the kicker direct from the Alaska Department of Fish & Games official report:

"The low bull:cow ratio in this area (EMMA) results from an imbalance between hunting and recruitment. The bull:cow ratio in the remainder of GMU 19D East remains relatively high."

In other words, the science from ADF&G's own biologists contradicted the need for any predator control. Studies conducted for the McGrath Adaptive Management Team proved that over-hunting was the reason for the lack of moose in the area, not wolves. That data was buried and wolf control was implemented.

Right before the 2006 Election, Alaskans for Wildlife submitted 57,000 signatures to get another aerial wolf hunting ban in place. Newly elected Governor Palin and the ADF&G issued even more wolf kill permits and put up a $150 bounty. A state judge ruled Palin exceeded her authority and the bounty was scrapped. At the end of the 2007 legislative session, Palin flooded the legislature with bills to ease up on wolf hunting restrictions, but the bills were held up in committee. In the spring of 2008, Palin tried to declare wildlife an "asset" of the State to make their management off limits to ballot initiatives. She covertly tried to tack a wolf hunting bill on to an animal cruelty bill, SB 273, introduced by Senator Bill Wielechowski. Pun intended: she got shot down.

In August 2008, Alaskans voted once again on Aerial Predator Control. The intent of the ballot initiative was simple enough; to prohibit the shooting of wolves and grizzly bears from aircraft. Lieutenant Governor Sean Parnell, overseer of elections, did his part to insure the proposition language was confusing enough to guarantee failure:

Ballot Measure 2

Bill Amending Same Day Airborne Shooting

BALLOT LANGUAGE

This bill amends current law banning same-day airborne shooting to include grizzly bears. The

bill permits the Board of Game to allow a predator program for wolves and grizzly bears if the

Commissioner of Fish and Game finds an emergency, where wolves or grizzly bears in an area

are causing a decline in prey. Only employees of the Department of Fish and Game could take

part in the program. Only the minimum number of wolves or grizzly bears needed to stop the

emergency could be removed.

Should this initiative become law?

___Yes

___No


Parnell was dragged into court several times for misrepresenting the intent of the initiative on the ballot. Many Alaskans were confused by the ballot language. My neighbor is a retired state engineer. He is a bright man and a conservationist. He voted no despite being an outspoken opponent of aerial wolf killing. Had I not known to vote yes, I would have voted no too. Now, aerial predator control proponents can disingenuously claim that Alaskans favor killing wolves and bears from planes as evidenced by the 2008 vote on Ballot Prop 2.

Governor Palin did her part to defeat the initiative as well. She approved the use of public money and ordered the Alaska Department of Fish and Game to publish a 26-page full color pamphlet called "Understanding Intensive Management and Predator Control in Alaska." It circulated through newspapers statewide and was mailed to tens of thousands of Alaskans just days before the election. The pamphlet emphasized "how well the current system is working." Jim Marcotte, Director of Support for the Board of Game, said the pamphlet was not meant to influence voters-Really? Spending public money to tell Alaskans that the Aerial Wolf Control Program is necessary to protect our moose and caribou populations just before a statewide election wasn't an attempt to influence the outcome? The fear machine was in full force. The message was clear: wolves threaten hunters' ability to put food on the table. But the truth was more about putting pelts on a wall.
2008-10-05-wolfkillfromchannel2.jpg


In addition to the pamphlet and mailers, the state paid for Board of Game members to fly all over Alaska to "educate" the public on the benefits of predator control-again just before the election. This entire predator control program is about turning Alaska into a wild game farm. In response to the allegation that she signed off on a "propaganda campaign to justify the state's barbaric wolf slaughter from the skies," Palin said, "My understanding is this program was funded by the Legislature to factually explain game management practices to Alaskans, and I don't have a problem with that." The total bill for the "education" was $400,000. Nearly the same amount of money she vetoed for high school drop out prevention.

It's shameful she spent almost half a million dollars on pamphlets to compensate for Alaska's prohibition on Cialis. Hey, if you've been shooting wolves out of planes, and you have an erection lasting for more than four hours, check the Boone & Crocket stats, you may have a trophy!

In June of 2008, the ADF&G broke their own predator control regulations with the slaughter of 14 wolf pups near Point Moeller. Under the ADF&G Wolf Control Regulations (5AAC 92.110(i)), "Denning, the killing of wolf young in the den, is prohibited." On site at the scene of the crime were Deputy ADF&G Commissioner for Wildlife, Ken Taylor, and The Director of ADF&G's Division of Wildlife Conservation, Doug Larsen. Why were suits from Juneau involved in a routine field operation? Why do we pay them salaries to enforce laws they are either unaware of, or choose to break? Perhaps they knew they were breaking their own law and were there to support the cover-up and clean up crew.

ADF&G Biologists want to "maintain" caribou herd numbers between 3,000-4,000 animals on the Alaska Peninsula near Port Moeller. According to former ADF&G Commissioner Ron Skoog, the caribou populations on the Alaska Peninsula have fluctuated many times over the last several decades. Indeed, the caribou population on the Alaska Peninsula has dropped to 500 or fewer at least 3 times over 132 years. ADF&G Biologists obtained emergency permission to kill wolves by misleading the Board of Game and Alaskans to think the current decline is unprecedented. This is clearly NOT the case.

Sarah Palin has been in a position to do the right thing for the wildlife of Alaska. Independent Alaskan Biologists have been begging for her ear. Faith based science is not science, yet it is what she has used in her policy making; mocking legitimate studies, and embracing big game hunters. The Rapture is not an environmental policy nor is it a game management policy.

It's been a long time since I set or checked a trap. I've spent hours behind a camera, camping in bear refuges, in awe of the nature of Alaska. When I was a child, I had no idea how big the world was, or how tamed parts had become. Looking at the world, I know Alaska is precious in its wildness. Why can't we just let Nature run wild?


 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KayJay90
What in the world...?
11:57 PM on 02/09/2009
Very well written exposition of The Palin Way of Doing Things, Shannyn Moore.

(I'm still wondering who sent me an e-mail a couple of months ago from Anchorage masquerading as you, asking me to call them)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:02 PM on 02/06/2009
Thanks for shedding some light on this issue from an Alaskan viewpoint Ms. Moore. I enjoyed the well-deserved ribbing you gave Hasselbeck as well.
06:37 PM on 02/06/2009
thoughtful and accurate.

people may get an impression that ADF&G isn't doing good science when they are. it's how the administration implements policy contrarily to results of good science.
07:25 PM on 02/06/2009
But ADF&G are NOT doing good science - the formula for designating certain wildlife populations is antiquated - and it does not work! In essence, you can't an area, let's say, the size of Denali and use those numbers across the grid to quantify the rest of the wildlife population - it's like using a sliding scale, and it does not reflect accurate numbers. Maybe you'd better do some more research on how these numbers are obtained, really obtained - even ADF&G doesn't like it.
11:05 AM on 02/07/2009
do you know adf&g obtains their numbers?
06:13 PM on 02/06/2009
I consider myself a liberal and environmentalist but can see the need to control the wolf population in a careful, selective way. It is not so simplistic to say let nature do it's thing. The predators, including bears, have the capacity to wipe out ungulates. Dogs caught running down moose and deer will also be killed. If you've ever raised chickens, you know that a dog will break in and kill every bird, just as wolves will kill every moose or caribou.
05:56 PM on 02/06/2009
Interesting: Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund President Rodger Schlickeisen will appear on Larry King Live tonight (Friday: Feb 6)with Ashley Judd to talk about Eye On Palin -- our campaign to expose Governor Sarah Palin’s anti-conservation record.

The show will air live tonight on CNN at 9 p.m. Eastern/6 p.m. Pacific time, and replayed at midnight Eastern/9 p.m. Pacific.
03:08 PM on 02/06/2009
Shyanne, you should really go visit an Alaska village and see how they live. They need the moose and caribou. If we let the wolves run rampant, like they have, we will no longer have moose or caribou. Then the lower 48 will be crying about how we didnt save them. Do some reaseacher before you start judging people.
04:21 PM on 02/06/2009
I think Shannyn knows plenty about Alaska and Alaska villages and how people live in the villages. Before you judge her, why don't you do a little research yourself?
Aside - Shannyn, "Just a Girl From Homer," we love you.
05:32 PM on 02/06/2009
Villagers have survived for thousands of years without predator control, living side by side with Wolves. Trophy hunters and poachers must be controlled before blaming native wildlife.
02:01 PM on 02/06/2009
Considering that we in Alaska seem to be the only state that is able to manage its wildlife skillfully, I would say that Ashley Judd should just stick to making medicore movies and let Alaskans deal with Alaskan issues including game management.
01:44 PM on 02/06/2009
Being from Alaska I am astounded at how much interest the nation is taking in Alaskan issues. Now, I have no problem with people from the lower 48 taking an interest in what is happening in our great State, but all of you seem to fall for the hypnotic chant of the national media. This issue on wolf hunting is so much more about an attempt to deface Gov. Palin then it is about wolves. Where was your concern about this six months ago? Why now that Gov Palin in in the national spotlight do all of you choose to pretend you care about Alaska or Alaskans. Believe it or not, Alaskans do not live in igloos and ride snowmachines everywhere. We do have some functioning brain cells and think we are intelligent enough to elect a Governor that speaks for the people. What is being done regarding wolf hunting is not an a choice that was come to lightly and is not an optimum solution, but the devestation of our caribou herds and moose population demands attention. Ask yourself how much information you have received about this issue is accurate, then ask yourself why this is such a "hot topic" all of the sudden. You would think the political jabs would stop after the election, but it appears that certain political parties still weild enough influence over the media to contiue to push their agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KayJay90
What in the world...?
12:16 AM on 02/10/2009
Why do we care, NOW? Your Governor made a mistake getting involved in politics beyond the borders of Alaska. I'd say a majority of people down here decided they never wanted Sarah Palin EVER to get anywhere near Washington D.C. again unless she's there to hobnob with the "elites" as a guest, like she did a week ago.

So, the media YOU abhor seems to still be fascinated by her -- WE'RE subjected to The Chronicles of Palin at least 2-3 times a week.

It's neither the media's fault nor any of ours that her foibles seem to be serially backfiring on her. It merely reveals to the world that the insulated far-away world up in Alaska ain't so far away for us lower-48ers any more, and your Governor isn't going to be able to do things, like she said, "... whatever I want until the courts tell me I can't..."

She doesn't speak for ALL of the people of Alaska. We lower-48ers have found that out already. There's a significant number of you who think like she does, probably because you share the same belief systems she does -- which doesn't reflect well on either of you. I sure wouldn't brag about it if I were you.

And there's an even more significant number of people in Alaska who are getting sick of her theocratic, domineering, threatening, vengeful, patronizing (in the second meaning of that word, like a Godmother), hypocritical, hyperbolic, pandering method of leadership.
01:24 PM on 02/06/2009
There is a lot of confusion about Sarah Palin and her support of aerial wolf hunting. We are former 20+ year Alaska residents, and my husband, a hunter, was appointed to the Board of Game by former Alaska Governor Tony Knowles in 2000. The 7 member Board of Game makes wildlife management decisions for the state. The current Board has approved aerial wolf control. http://www.boards.adfg.state.ak.us/gameinfo/index.php

We made the 10 minute video, End Aerial Wolf Hunting, in Jan of 2008 using testimony from Alaska Department of Fish & Game staff, a master hunting guide, and Board of Game members. http://current.com/items/88811075/end_aerial_wolf_hunting.htm

A 4 1/2 minute version of the video can be seen here: http://current.com/items/88816799/end_aerial_wolf_hunting_short_version.htm

The video also references a study done by the National Research Council and the American Society of Mammalogists. http://www.alaskawolfkill.com/Palin_Letter.html

This video exposes the fallacy behind Governor Sarah Palin's claim that predator control is based on sound science. Declarations that the program is for the benefit of subsistence hunters are shattered with documentation showing that sport and trophy hunters take up to 73% of prey in areas where aerial wolf hunting has taken place.

Five years in the making, this video exposes the truth about the stranglehold the hunting lobby has on wildlife management in Alaska.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929
03:00 PM on 02/06/2009
I've read that Alaskans have twice voted to abolish aerial hunting, and yet the practice continues. Does Palin have the executive power to over-ride the decision by Alaskan voters?
04:31 PM on 02/06/2009
2) what will happen to the orphaned pups of those wolves who are aerial hunted. Alaska Wildlife Alliance has some very interesting information: http://www.akwildlife.org/content/view/123/61/ about these practices in Alaska and how we (public) are not informed. Take a look and judge for yourself.

3) denning of wolf pups: http://www.wolfsongnews.org/news/Alaska_current_events_2925.html The state Department of Fish and Game clarified how biologists will deal with wolf pups orphaned by predator control programs. "Killing pups in dens will still be allowed - but only if the department has no other options. Pups found outside dens will be treated as adults." ...and you thought it was "just" an aerial wolf hunt problem -- think again! This is gets worse and worse!!

4) Most disturbing is the issue of “fair chase” and ethics. Fair chase is whether a given hunt is ethical and sportsmanlike, or if a hunter exploits an unfair advantage over the prey, as defined by hunters’ organizations. Alaska abides by this definition...or at least it did.
04:31 PM on 02/06/2009
1) We need to know predator populations before killing them Ron Arno, Alaska Outdoor Council, recently criticized those who oppose extreme predator control targeting wolves and bears ("Emotional drumbeat is no basis for setting policy on predators," Sept. 6). He accused them of having "no knowledge of the subject. Emotions rule the day." The AOC represents sport hunters and trappers and those who provide services to them. Arno implies only they have the truth. This is a great disservice to Alaska voters who twice voted against aerial killing of wolves, and also an insult to wildlife professionals. The American Society of Mammalogists unanimously passed a resolution (August 2006), stating "predator control cannot be considered sound or wise in the absence of adequate data. Alaska's current harvest guidelines are based on historical population estimates that almost certainly are not accurate. Harvest goals should be based on reliable current data on populations and the carrying capacities of their habitats." (ASM letter to Gov. Frank Murkowski, Aug. 4, 2006) These professional wildlife scientists certainly can't be dismissed by Arno -- or anyone else -- as "animal rights advocates"! The recent announcement to use $400,000 from state funds for an education campaign about predator control is timed to influence a citizens ballot initiative addressing this subject. The state should not use public funds to influence an election! We urge Gov. Sarah Palin to stop this inappropriate use of public money, and to respect the views of Alaskans expressed through the ballot measure process.
11:20 AM on 02/06/2009
take a moment to thoughtfully consider the dynamics of this mini-debacle of morality, ethics and common sense

now substitute Barack Obama (for Ashley Judd) and the Republican party (for Sarah Palin) and you will begin to get a glimpse of the irrational disconnection-from-reality Republican mindset that President Obama is up against as he tries to rescue this country from the Republican Mega-debacle which is now affecting lives and nations the world over

the Audacity of Hope has come face to face with the Audacity of Arrogance and Deceit .........
07:09 AM on 02/06/2009
I am sick to death to continue to learn about Palin's environmental policies toward Alaskan wildlife. Her most recent lawsuit against the Beluga Whale's listing as endangered when there are less than 350 whales counted, her lawsuit against keeping the Polar Bear on the endangered list and her continued, persistent determination to allow aerial hunting of wolves. Can no one stop her???? Shannyn thank you so much for your informative article, you have performed a great service by alerting us of the complete fallicies of her wildlife policies. As a nation, we should all speak out against her, and stop her insanity from continuing. What can we do? Who can we write? How can these animals be saved from her onslaught? Clearly, this woman can not remain in office, and must be voted out. She is a wound on the your beloved state of Alaska.. Enough is enough.
07:09 AM on 02/06/2009
Good job as always Shannyn... Glad to see you back.. hope your trip and your adventure was successful.

Keep shining the light.. the roaches are running...
12:35 AM on 02/06/2009
Great Article, Shannyn. I am glad that you and Ashley Judd are shedding some light on this subject. i am a fan of the wolf. I feel they are greatly misunderstood what with "Goldilocks", "the 3 Little Pigs" and "Peter and the Wolf". Wovles get a bad rap while they rarely attack humans and they usually go after the weak or wounded prey They are a vital part of the wildlife plan and I get upset when we humans go messing around with the delicate balance of nature.
12:09 AM on 02/06/2009
Thanks for your work. keep it up.
12:09 AM on 02/06/2009
Great article.

What an egocentric specie we are, taking it upon ourselves to calibrate the number of their species, and alter it to our own specifications and needs.

She's a disgusting person, this prom queen, and dangerous as well. The only reason she doesn't like wolves is because they appear as villains in the only literature she's ever read.