iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shannyn Moore

Shannyn Moore

Posted April 7, 2009 | 07:27 PM (EST)

The LIEonization of Alaska Senator Ted Stevens


I was at Ted Stevens' Girdwood home when the FBI was raiding it. While agents were removing large black bags of evidence, I asked if they'd found the bodies of Begich and Boggs. For years, I followed legislation that legalized the white collar theft of our fisheries. I watched Ted Stevens vote to confirm Supreme Court Judges who would fall on the fascist side of the inevitable Exxon v. Baker case.

I was astonished when Stevens, then chairman of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, had a complete meltdown and refused Senator Maria Cantwell's righteous and reasonable request that oil executives testify about their record profits and potential energy price fixing under oath. I interviewed him about the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) of returning soldiers. Stevens said that when he was a soldier, they didn't have PTSD...it was a condition created by a weaker generation.

At the time, I wondered who in the Bush administration did Ted forget to take fishing...Cheney? Bush's Dad? How could his own party go after one of their own? One theory is the White House asked Stevens not to run in 2007 due to the cloud of corruption that would surround his campaign after the FBI raided his Alaska residence -- Stevens refused and crossed the Bush administration. This theory makes some sense given President Bush denied a pardon request from Senator Lisa Murkowski.

Senator Stevens was indicted last July. After reading the indictment, I was shocked. Imagine following a bank robber in a stolen getaway car. The criminal is fleeing at a high rate of speed, tossing tons of shredded hundred dollar bills out of the window. He's swerving dangerously all over the road for miles and miles. Suddenly, the State Patrol appears out of nowhere and pulls the bank robber over. You'd be relieved he was finally off the road, yes? How would you feel if he were only charged with littering? That's how I felt about Senator Steven's indictment.

The prosecution was corrupt -- a legacy of the George W Bush Department of Justice. They were overconfident in the knowledge of Stevens' true crimes and wanted to insure victory by illegally and unnecessarily stacking the deck; a trademark of Republican strategy -- whether caging voters and manipulating Diebold machines to affect the outcome of an election or blatantly and deliberately NOT sharing contradictory witness statements from Bill Allen. The case was promptly and justly thrown out. However, that doesn't mean Ted Stevens is innocent and it doesn't mean Ted Stevens was exonerated! Stop lionizing him. Or a more appropriately...stop LIEonizing him!

Senator Lisa Murkowski asked George W. Bush to pardon Stevens. She believed in his guilt and wanted a "get out of jail free" card for her colleague. Now she waxes poetic about the "Rule of Law". How ironic-Murkowski touting the same Rule of Law she opposed with her vote on the Military Commissions Act of 2006. That dark anti-American bill legalized torture and suspended habeas corpus. Murkowski voted to suspend the fundamental right to challenge your detention. Habeas corpus is as old as the 1215 Magna Carta and was a cornerstone of the Constitution.

Murkowski, in the statement she issued yesterday on Ted Stevens' behalf, said, "...violations of our civil liberties cannot be tolerated..." Excuse me? Really? Is that why Murkowski voted for the FISA legislation last year? The FISA bill granted retroactive immunity to law breaking telecoms. Those telecoms illegally wiretapped American citizens and violated their civil liberties! The great thing about the Rule of Law is its lack of selectiveness; in other words, the Rule of Law applies to everyone regardless of race, gender, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation. It applies to Ted Stevens just as it should have applied to the Telecoms.

Last year, Sarah Palin, while on the campaign trail, called for Stevens' resignation. "He needs to step aside and allow our state to elect someone who will be supportive of those ideals of America - the free enterprise, the missions that we're on to win the war, those things that have got to take place in order to progress this country. Ted Stevens has got to play a very statesmanlike role in this now."

TALK ABOUT A FLIP-FLOP! Now she is calling for Begich to resign. Sarah's newest pandering position is: "Senator Stevens deserves to be very happy today. What a horrible thing he has endured. The blatant attempts by adversaries to destroy one's reputation, career and finances are an abuse of our well-guarded process and violate our God-given rights afforded in the Constitution. It is a frightening thing to contemplate what we may be witnessing here - the undermining of the political process through unscrupulous ploys and professional misconduct. Senator Stevens and I had lunch together recently at my home and he reiterated the faith he held for vindication; he never gave up hope. It is unfortunate that, as a result of the questionable proceedings which led to Senator Stevens' conviction days before the election, Alaskans lost an esteemed statesman on Capitol Hill. His presence is missed."

REALLY? She never mentions it was the BUSH DOJ who broke the law. She doesn't commend the OBAMA DOJ for enforcing JUSTICE FOR ALL. I guess Stevens doesn't remember being thrown under Sarah's bus in her vice-presidency quest. Bus Sarah must damn near be high centered for all of the casualties under there. As much as I have been disappointed by Mark Begich's Blue Dog alignment with the Judas Joe Lieberman, Palin's statement that we "...lost an esteemed statesman on Capitol Hill..." is a slam on our newly elected Senator. By her own words, Palin disqualified Ted Stevens from the "statesman" moniker because he didn't do last fall what she demanded-Resign!

Ted Stevens' claim to fame has always been how many federal dollars he brought back to Alaska. Senator Begich worked hard for Alaska federal stimulus money and Palin has turned a portion down. Oh, Wait! She hasn't rejected it...she just hasn't accepted it....she HAS called it a "BRIBE." So, is she going to accept the "bribe"? Would it still be a bribe had Ted Steven's brought it home?

By the way, Senator Murkowski voted against the federal stimulus dollars for Alaska. Though you wouldn't know it based upon her recent press releases. Ironically, the Republican campaign cry was "We won't get any federal money! Waaa Waa!" Mark Begich brought home nearly a BILLION dollars for Alaska's fair share of the stimulus package. Both of Alaska's Republicans voted against the stimulus package and the Republican Governor is grandstanding by not "accepting" it.

The head of the Alaska Republican Party, Chairman Randy Ruedrich, called for Senator Begich to step down. That's rich. In June 2004, Ruedrich admitted to three violations of the state Ethics Act and has been fined $12,000-believed to be the largest civil penalty ever imposed in a state ethics case, according to the attorney general's office. He admitted to:

• Misuse of official position by engaging in partisan political activity in his Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission office.

• Improper disclosure of confidential information to a third party without authority. Ruedrich forwarded a confidential attorney-client privileged e-mail and attachment to attorney Kyle Parker, who represented Evergreen Resources on matters pertaining to methane gas development in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough.

• Incompatible outside voluntary service for the Republican Party of Alaska by acting contrary to the manner he said he would in his Ethics Act Disclosure Statement.

It is no wonder the Alaska Republican Party is well represented at the Sheridan Federal Penitentiary with leadership like this.

Senator Mark Begich will not step down. He said, "It's clear there was misconduct by the prosecutors in Senator Stevens' felony trial. I'm pleased President Obama's Justice Department has brought a new sense of ethics to their responsibilities....I got into the Senate race long before Senator Stevens' legal troubles began because Alaskans were looking for a change and a senator as independent as Alaska. Today, with our country in a severe recession, it's more important than ever that we have a senator focused on fixing our economy so Alaskans have the jobs they need to support their families. That is my job in the Senate, and I'm honored to serve Alaskans for the next six years."

Begich shouldn't resign. He won the election. Attorney General Michael Mukasey could have thrown the case out before the election and did not. The evidence of extreme prosecutorial misconduct was available for Mukasey. Justice for all? Oh, wait, not under the Bush administration, not even for one of their own.

Eric Holder's decision to throw out Stevens' case for blatant prosecutorial misconduct was absolutely correct. Two wrongs don't make EITHER one right. The wrongs of the Bush DOJ DO NOT make Ted Stevens innocent nor do they exonerate him. The attempts to make him a martyr by local right wing apologist talkers and writers are pathetic and demonstrate their complete lack of knowledge of Stevens' true crimes.

Rumor has it Congressman Don Young is ready to get tanked by the Feds. Will the same blowhards call for Young's resignation and try to seat Ethan Berkowitz? Short Answer: No.

Justice for all...from Guantanamo to Girdwood.

I was at Ted Stevens' Girdwood home when the FBI was raiding it. While agents were removing large black bags of evidence, I asked if they'd found the bodies of Begich and Boggs. For years, I followed ...
I was at Ted Stevens' Girdwood home when the FBI was raiding it. While agents were removing large black bags of evidence, I asked if they'd found the bodies of Begich and Boggs. For years, I followed ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:11 PM on 04/07/2009
Thanks for an informative and objective article.
09:21 PM on 04/07/2009
I dont know why its even worth mentioning what palin has to say. shes probably more ignorant of the facts in this case than the average huffpost reader, and shes the gov. of alaska ( imaginge that!) I think they found a way to keep an old senator out of prison ( didnt think he was going to jail did you?) but i havent heard many republicans gloating besides stevens, who has an obvious motive, and palin, who cant think past her next stupid media gimmick. I think thats becuase they fear the investigations of other bush DOJ prosecutions, like that of the gov of alabama. someone get karl roves statement on this little happy accident, id like to hear it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheRubberRoomHotel
09:04 PM on 04/07/2009
Shannon, thanks for a great article.
This behavior by the Alaska GOP, is just sad,and scary.
What scares me more is Alaskans attitude about Uncle Ted and about Sarah Palins behavior.
It seems sometimes that Alaskans are just plane blind. Everyone I know griped about the Baker vs. Exxon SCotUS decision, but not one of them seem to be able to connect the dots with who sits on the SCotUS and how those judges got there.
And many of them are ready to forgive Palin for anything no matter how bad her actions and the harm she does to Alaska. And how they win doesn't matter so long as they win. But the other guy is always the cheat and bad guy.
And the news papers in this state are pretty sad with there bias.
Thank You Shannon for your voice.
A Rural Alaskan
02:40 AM on 04/04/2009
Excellent post, Shannyn!

Your following comment should be shouted from the rooftops:

"The wrongs of the Bush DOJ DO NOT make Ted Stevens innocent nor do they exonerate him. The attempts to make him a martyr by local right wing apologist talkers and writers are pathetic and demonstrate their complete lack of knowledge of Stevens' true crimes."

Yep...It's interesting how often it comes down to a "complete lack of knowledge" by the apologists, especially the ones who don't know a thimble-full about local Alaskan politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fedupwiththis
08:26 PM on 04/07/2009
Oh, I don't think it's a lack of knowledge. It is more likely a complete lack of any moral grounding. These right-wingers seem to believe that they can lie cheat and steal all week long but once the walk into church on Sunday (or just say they go to church) and all is forgiven. Ready for another week of corruption and sapping the moral fiber of our nation. All the while blaming "liberals" for it all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheRubberRoomHotel
09:08 PM on 04/07/2009
Amen
05:12 PM on 04/03/2009
More Soap Opera news from the Palin Clan. Todds half-Sister arrested for Burglary Thursday.
You just can't make this stuff up. You would think they would keep a low-profile. They love attention.

http://community.adn.com/adn/blog/24417
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffreygeez
10:15 PM on 04/07/2009
Soap opera,and reality tv show. America, where people have more than they deserve in life and feel sorry for themselves.This thing with this dysfunctional family of Sarah Palins ? what is it but reality Tv / Tacky stuff.

This old creep Ted Stevens and many more like him running our country??? Why?

The average American must be dumb dumb dumb . And to top it off we tell the rest of the world how to behave!!! What a joke!!! Ha Ha ?
05:07 PM on 04/03/2009
Shanny Moore writes the most informative updates on Alaska. We look forward to her insightful and intelligent articles. Congratulations on this fine reporting, well said!

The Bush Justice Dept. inept and highly political did not care to make any REPUBLICAN have a guilty verdict. This certainly needs an investigation. Politcs are toxic and need a good cleansing. We need more truth & objectivity. I cannot believe that all the elected Republicans think so much alike that they all vote against the President every time. What a group of sheeple! Brains are for thought processing and decision making, is there not one among the Republican's that can think for him/her self A sorry bunch, I'd rather see Democrats disagree because it promotes discussion and new ideas. At least they think.
DoTheMath
We're outspent, but they're outnumbered
04:23 PM on 04/03/2009
Great article. This is an example of taking lemons and making lemonade.

It's too bad the prosecution (for whatever reasons and with whatever levels of intent and/or negligence) mishandled the case. It's too bad some short-sighted, self-serving politicians are using prosecutorial misconduct as an excuse to advocate overturning an election. Most of all, it's too bad the good people of Alaska have been taken advantage of all these years by a senator who was more interested in serving Bill Allen's interests and, therefore, his own, than in representing the rest of his constituents.

We can't change any of that, but if Sarah Palin, Randy Ruedrich, and others want to announce their support for a man who is just as politically toxic today as he was last fall when they crossed the street to avoid him, we can sure as heck quote them. Alaskans, Americans, this is how these people really feel about corruption. They know just as much about Stevens as you do, probably more, and this is what they're saying.
02:45 PM on 04/03/2009
Stevens is guilty as sin. The GOP need to tell people like Sarah Palin to shut their stupid mouths and just let the old man sail off into the sunset. He's as guilty as sin. It took a new DOJ and new President to right a wrong done by THE RIGHT on one of its own.
01:40 PM on 04/03/2009
I appreciate the article and the insight you bring to this situation. Stevens was and is a mean and corrupt person. Just because the Bush DOJ blew this so badly (as they did with most things they touched) doesn't mean Stevens didn't all he was accused of and more. Let's not forget that famous earmark of Sen. Stevens, the Bridge to Nowhere, which by the way came out of defense department funds at a time when our troops in Iraq didn't have armor plating on their vehicles and were being killed in droves by roadside bombs as a result. Stevens is an egomaniacal politician who always put his interests first. Not only did he get what he deserved but things are not going to go well for him on the true day of reckoning.
12:21 PM on 04/03/2009
Thank you. I couldn't understand why I was not hearing the outrage. And, thank you for detailing the corruption.
12:01 PM on 04/03/2009
Thank you so much for calling this situation exactly what it is, and what it is not. What it is NOT is an exoneration of Stevens. This glaring fact seems to be completely missing in the main stream media.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
larmarch5
11:58 AM on 04/03/2009
I think there will follow a review of all Boosh's DOJ politically motivated prosecutions including Don Seigleman's. By righting the wrongs in Steven's case, they will have the bipartisan label in place when they do the same in the other cases. Then look for a similar review of all Boosh's surviving US attorneys with justifications for their resignations or terminations. Now that Holder has served notice, look for a bunch of those attorneys to tender their resignations.
11:14 AM on 04/03/2009
Excellent job Shannyn for putting things in the proper perspective.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:35 AM on 04/03/2009
Great post.
Having said that, holder should start the prosecution anew. Age my ass.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dagdavid
08:44 AM on 04/03/2009
Excellent post,Shannyn. Even the leftist media is defending Stevens simply because it was the Bush DOJ that prosecuted him. The case may have been tainted, but that does not mean Stevens is innocent.
12:00 PM on 04/03/2009
And what "leftist media" would that be? There is no "leftist" media in this country other than on the Internet. The entire MSM is owned by conservative corporations who tell their minions what to say and how to report the "news".