More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Shasta Nelson, M.Div.

GET UPDATES FROM Shasta Nelson, M.Div.
 

Feminism: How I Finally Came Out as an Advocate for Women

Posted: 02/ 7/2012 7:06 pm

I won a $1,000 ticket to a Ms. magazine fundraiser luncheon featuring Gloria Steinem. With only thirty women in attendance it was a coveted win.
2012-01-31-images-steinem_6868.jpg
Photo: Shasta Nelson with Gloria Steinem and Ayesha Mathews-Wadwha

Feminism: A Word I Didn't Like

I'm slowly waking up to feminism.

Half of my readers will be appalled that I feel a need to use the word feminism at all, and the other half of you are probably rolling your eyes that I ever had any hesitation around word.

I was raised in the eighties when the women's movement experienced its backlash after all the progress of the sixties and seventies. To say the least, the word "feminist" didn't hold positive associations for me for most of my life -- it wasn't something you wanted to be. I'd repeatedly heard women start sentences with "I'm not a feminist, but ...," modeling for me that we wanted to distance ourselves from some scary picture of women burning bras, hating men and causing a ruckus.

Adding to the distance I created between myself and feminism was the fact that being a girl often proved to be an advantage to me. I liked being female (shows how much I misunderstood the feminist message!). I didn't feel a sense of oppression about my sex -- I actually felt singled out, rewarded and applauded. Running as one of the first female candidates for Student Association president in college was an honor, attending seminary with less than ten women in my program felt pioneering, and serving as many people's first female pastor felt like a privilege. It wasn't without gratitude that I recognized that I had those opportunities because of women who had fought the good fight before me, but I didn't see the need to keep fighting. I wasn't one of them. I thought we had made it. Or, at least that there was enough momentum to keep us on our way.

I look back now with a twinge of regret that I cared more about being likable, agreeable and your all-around-good-girl than I did about being an advocate for women. But I either didn't see the need or assumed the cause was doing fine without me having to wave its banner.

My Own Feminist Awakening

Feminism is a loaded word. A word that few of us would disagree with in definition: "The advocacy of supporting women's rights as equal to men." In words alone, who among us isn't a feminist?

But as soon as the word is uttered, we sometimes back away, either because we don't sense the urgency of its message, don't relate to those in the media who represent the word to us or don't necessarily feel like there is anything we can do, or want to do -- or some combination of all of these factors. I've spent an entire career distancing myself from a word while still believing in the concept it represents. Being a naturally positive person has more or less allowed me to look away from numbers as I argue that change takes time. I chose instead to feel encouraged by how many amazing women I knew who were doing so much.

And yet positivity shouldn't include denial.

Women still make up only 3 percent of creative directors, less than 5 percent of movie directors (that number dropped in 2011!), only 14 percent of Hollywood writers, and are shown as protagonists in only 17 percent of films. These numbers aren't all that different from a decade ago. Only 6 of our 50 state governors are women, and of the 535 seats of Congress, only 90 of them are women. While we celebrate that we hold 22.1 percent of all statewide elected offices, that number was 22.2 percent in 1993 so the last twenty years hasn't shown tremendous strides there either. I can keep going ... reminding you that only 3 percent of Fortune 500 CEO's are women, that we are still earning double-digits less than our male counterparts and that even though we own somewhere around 30 percent of businesses we still receive somewhere between 3-10 percent of the funding.

So this last year I'd say I'm having a bit of an awakening.

An awakening where I realize that we women still need to consciously play bigger games, speak out more, and offer our best in this world. This has nothing to do with what choices you make -- to get married or not, stay home with kids or work outside the home, wear stilettos or reject fashion -- it has to do with being honored completely in whatever choice we do make. Not just for our sakes, but because the problems in our world need us. The ways we engage, make decisions and nurture those around us is being called out. The challenges around us need us.

Feminism in Friendship

I've always wanted to live up to my best. And I was always told I could. In that sense I have always been a feminist.

But it hasn't been until this last year that I'm getting more comfortable with the word and my belief that I need to contribute to what that word stands for. I'd say that one of the forces that has transitioned me into the passion I feel for the cause were my relationships with other women.

When you experience women cheering for you -- supporting you, believing in you, thanking you, and helping you -- you realize how much more powerful you feel. And you want everyone else to have that.

Whether it was Ayesha Mathews-Wadhwa (Founder of PixInk Design who helps companies market to women, pictured with me and Gloria Steinem) or Christine Bronstein from A Band of Wives who gifted me the ticket to attend the luncheon-- these two women are fabulous examples of women who have modeled their willingness to promote other women.

And when you have been given to, you want to give back.

The word feminism is still an awkward word on my tongue. But the concept has taken root in my heart. I hope that those of us reading this can keep living it out in our interactions with each other -- being constant reminders of each others value and potential. That as women who value friends -- we know that we are empowering each other in ways no one else can do. We can hold up mirrors to each other that remind us of our inherent worth.

On the surface, it's easy to think that what we do on GirlFriendCircles.com, a women's friendship matching site, is just networking and social events. But it's women showing up ready to commit to each other, willing to invest in the forming of bonds, honoring the fact that friendships with others are important enough to us to do something about it.

That's feminism. Saying we matter. Putting actions behind our words. We're ensuring that we don't do this journey of life without a local community, cheerleaders, allies and friends.

When I met Gloria Steinem, I thanked her for the path she helped pave for so many of us. Her response was "the hardest part is still ahead."

Good thing we have each other.

p.s.: A shout-out also to all the men who have been feminists long before I was ready to claim the title! Thank you for the voices you've lent the cause!

---------------
This posting was originally posted on Shasta's Friendship Blog where Shasta Nelson posts weekly articles on women's issues as connected to our need of meaningful friendships.

 

Follow Shasta Nelson, M.Div. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/girlfrndcircles

 
 
  • Comments
  • 95
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
06:17 AM on 02/15/2012
The real key to being a modern feminist is demanding the rights of adults with the responsibility and accountability of children.

THEN, when someone points it out...pretend like they want to reverse women's suffrage instead of providing any kind of cogent explanation for why women cannot be held to the same standards as men.

After that, it's mostly about getting men to do more dishes...
01:34 AM on 02/13/2012
The fact is the reason "woman's rights" switch to the word "feminism" is because bitter and angry women knew that they would still have men on their side if they used the term "women's rights". So in order to reap havoc on men (and draw a line down the middle of the sexes) they created feminism.

Ironically I see more women are beginning to speak up against the madness caused by feminism. Unhappines­s in women is at an all time high and to make matters worse studies are showing a continual increase in mental disorders in women. Personally I don't see what good can come from a group that thinks the world would be a better place if no men were in the world and says, "ALL men are (insert insult)!"

I wonder why they haven't done any articles on the women on Youtube or female authors on Amazon who are speaking out against the damage caused by feminism? It seems to me that if feminism was all it was cracked up to be there wouldn't be such a divide in how women view it.
01:27 PM on 02/13/2012
You are confused. Feminism is the belief that women are fully and wholely human, apart from and transcende­nt to their sexual utility to men. No damage has been caused by this idea, neither could any damage possibly be attributed to it.

"Unhappines­­s in women is at an all time high and to make matters worse studies are showing a continual increase in mental disorders in women"

This kind of nonsense was also a commonly held opinion of male supremacists two and three centuries ago. Come on up into the 21st century.

There is no divide in how women view it, apart from a few paid conservative hacks. Virtually ALL women are feminist today, as are most men. It is entirely mainstream. Whiny males will never get their unearned privilege back, no matter how much they misinterpret that loss as discrimination.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:40 PM on 02/13/2012
"The word feminism is still an awkward word on my tongue."

So, you are calling the author a liar?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
05:13 PM on 02/12/2012
Sad, how EVERY article on feminism on HP is trashed by the same small cadre of MRAs, over and over again, each using at least two of their own socks to fave their ignorant, sexist rants full of deliberate misinformation, misleading propaganda, and flat-out LIES.

"The advocacy of supporting women's rights as equal to men."

This is what feminism is. It's being fully human, with full dignity for the whole person - women stepping out of the shadows of being seen only as a reflection of the sexual and breeding expectations of males. And MRAs don't like that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:53 PM on 02/12/2012
Actually, most people see the fact that the word "rights" appears WITHOUT the word "responsibility" in your definition.

And THAT is why so few respect modern feminism.

But instead of acknowledging it, understanding it, learning from it and growing from it...

Just call everyone else a misogynist...whatever....that's helpful, too.
11:15 AM on 02/13/2012
"The advocacy of supporting women's rights as equal to men." I'll ask it again, since no feminists on this board seemed willing to take a stab at an answer the first time around: what *rights* in modern America are denied to women but not men? In what areas is modern feminism working towards equal *rights* in America? There are none that I've been able to discern. Modern feminism in the western world is about forcing equal outcomes and special rules for women, both of which automatically create inequalities for other groups (mainly men) to the degree that they succeed. Feminism, as defined as "supporting women's rights as equal to men," has accomplished it's goal and is no longer needed here. The actual modern feminism that is being practiced here is devisive and harmful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:30 PM on 02/13/2012
They will never answer.

They don't have to be accountable, so they won't.

But, you'd better pay them as if they were...
11:42 AM on 02/12/2012
Feminism: "The advocacy of supporting women's rights as equal to men." What rights in modern America are denied to women but not men? Please don't hammer me with statistics, I'm not talking about outcomes, I'm talking about opportunities (which are guaranteed by rights). We will *always* see differing outcomes among different individuals and groups, because we are not all clones and robots. Women earners as a group make less than men; men as a group have shorter lives than women. Most single parents are female; most homeless are male. On it goes. Feminism stopped being about equal rights long ago - it's now about equal outcomes and entitlements. Let's at least be honest about that.
01:24 PM on 02/13/2012
Feminism is the belief that women are fully and wholely human, apart from and transcendent to their sexual utility to men.

There. Now you know what it is. Now try and understand that virtually ALL women today are feminists, and almost all men. The ideas are entirely mainstream. Only a few dinosaurs are still whining about something that has been a fait accompli for many decades now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:31 PM on 02/13/2012
You, of course, utterly failed to answer his question.
06:40 PM on 02/13/2012
Nice try at a dodge, avoiding the question - by which of course you answered it anyway.
07:58 PM on 02/13/2012
I was not dodging your question. I was correcting your definition of feminism.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Larry Motuz
Lawless markets lead ill-gotten gains.
09:21 AM on 02/12/2012
Thank you, Shasta Nelson.

Feminism was born, long before the word was coined, out of the inequities in opportunities women faced in all facets of life from owning property, having an education, being able to vote, as well as a slew of other impediments which constrained or simply eliminated women's abilities to make responsible choices for themselves through their lives.

To be a feminist, neither more nor less, is to hold firmly to the idea that a person's opportunities :: and their exercise of abilities and responsibilities throughout their lives :: must not--solely--be circumscribed, defined or limited by that person's sex.

To be a feminist is to want what liberty offers all people.

I wish everyone understood that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:48 PM on 02/12/2012
I wish everyone understood that a misandrist organization CANNOT admit that advantaging women was their sole goal...so they need window dressing.

Modern feminism relies on the reputation of it's predecessors to achieve it's self serving ends.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Larry Motuz
Lawless markets lead ill-gotten gains.
11:30 AM on 02/13/2012
That some 'feminists' have also been misandrists doesn't mean all have. For a short while--about two decades--many academic and influential ones were. Some were also what are called postmodernists.

But these hardly described the broader political scope or history of feminism.
08:52 AM on 02/12/2012
The irony is that, even though the word feminism was successfully demonized (similar to the way the word "liberal" was demonized), the concept is entirely mainstream now. ALL young women are feminists, and so are most young men. They don't even think about it. They assume that women will be educated in their field of choice, will work and have the chance to excel in their field of choice, and that they will be entirely free to determine the course of their own lives. Not only that but it's assumed that they will pay their own way and fund their own dreams and support their own families.

What we're seeing now is the adjustment - primarily of older, rejected males - to this new and inevitable social order that young people are moving into effortlessly. Older men feel the loss of privilege and interpret it as discrimination. Most younger men dont' have this problem - unless, it seems, they experience too much sexual rejection. Then feminism becomes a handy boogey man for them as well. When of course young men experiencing sexual rejection has no relationship to feminism. It's as old as time and sadly, has often been an instigator of displaced misogyny.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:50 PM on 02/12/2012
Unsurprisingly, your definition paints ANYONE and EVERYONE who doesn't agree with you as a misogynist.

Feminism 101.

This allows modern feminists to avoid ever looking in the mirror and asking why they receive such derision from so many...
01:20 PM on 02/13/2012
No, the only reference I made to misogyny in that post was to note that it's an easily aroused emotion in young men who aren't wanted.

As for "derision", you seem to have not noticed that virtually ALL women today are feminists, as are most men. Feminist ideas are entirely mainstream and completely accepted. The only ones still howling in the wilderness are the older rejected men who continue to need an external enemy to blame for the sorry condition of their lives. I wouldn't characterize their behavior as derison. More like desperation. Some of them even resort to female impersonation online, believe it or not. :)
photo
The Corporate Champion
Conservative, because someone's got to do the work
09:39 PM on 02/10/2012
You chose a wrong period of time to embrace feminism to be honest. To be a feminist by today's standard, you have to be pro-abortion, pro-promiscuity, and anti-male.
08:30 AM on 02/12/2012
That's a misconception. While there are feminists that are prochoice, being a feminist doesn't require any of what you claim. Being a feminist simply means believing in, and work towards, equality for women. It means acknowledging that women's lives and choices are equally valid to men's. Nothing more, nothing less.

It doesn't dimish men in any way to acknowledge that women are equal. It doens't lessen a man's importance in the world to acknowledge a woman's importance.
08:38 AM on 02/12/2012
Not true on all points.

In point of fact, all women today are feminists, whether they use the word or not. Feminism means quite simply the belief that women are complete and total human beings, apart from and transcendant to their sexual utility to men. Period.
06:10 PM on 02/10/2012
The important thing here, and what I believe Shasta is saying, is that we need women voices, their opinions, and their point of views in order to balance out our society, our world for that matter. When women are not present to make important societal decisions then we all are truly missing valuable input that can only come from a female's perspective. When women are not present in the board room discussing the portrayal of women in the media, the role insurance companies have on their health care, not to mention the shocking lack of women in top leadership positions in religious institutions, we have one half making important decisions for the whole. It's like a scale, we need men and women together to make an equal and fair decisions which will result in the best interest of everyone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
04:09 AM on 02/11/2012
There are many men whose thoughts, feelings and ideas are best represented by Elizabeth Warren.

There are many women whose thoughts, feelings and ideas match those of Rick Santorum.

What we NEED...is to stop judging and grouping people along gender lines. Period.
01:42 PM on 02/10/2012
My brother's marks kept him out of law school because of quotas for women and minorities, he had the same or higher marks than my sister, who got accepted easily two years later, now he's a computer programmer and he hates it, but he feels trapped. That's what feminism's mark on my family is. He tells me now that even though he hates programming java, its based on merit and merit alone, and that is why their are almost no females who do it, because they don't need to.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
11:36 AM on 02/10/2012
Feminists oppose the idea of gender labeling.

A policeman has to become a police officer.

A manhole cover became a peoplehole cover and so on.

It was UNACCEPTABLE to just call it a manhole cover and understand that it referred to any "huMAN" who might open it...it had to be gender neutral because anything less conveyed the idea that men were the "normal" or the "default", etc. etc. etc.

But we are ALL supposed to unite behind the idea of FEMIN-ism as equality for all humans?

How does that work?
08:35 AM on 02/12/2012
Um, peoplehole cover? Never heard of that one.

No one is asking you to unite behind fanaticism, which happens in every organization from politics to social causes to feminism. The majority of feminists are not asking to have the name of manhole covers changed, what they are saying is that women's contribution to our nation, society and families is of equal value to that of a man's. It does not diminish my husband's role in our family or our society to equally acknowledge my role. It does not diminish a man's rights to acknowledge equal rights for women.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:56 PM on 02/12/2012
Given the feminist opposition to words which connote only one gender...fireman, for example, it is ______ of "feminists" to expect the word "feminism" to speak for all?

A. hypocritical.

B. Very hypocritical.

C. Very, very hypocritical.
08:40 AM on 02/12/2012
No one ever said peoplehole cover. You're making things up again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:46 PM on 02/12/2012
"The American public doesn't respond to the bra burners, the fighters, the women who insist on calling manhole covers peoplehole covers,' he continued."

http://www.bookmice.net/darkchilde/sharon/gless27.html

Meanwhile, you cannot deny the rest of what I said.

The ABSOLUTELY UTTERLY STAGGERING HYPOCRISY of demanding the DE-genderization of words that convey the superiority of men while SIMULTANEOUSLY demanding that "feminism" refers to equality for all...

So, you try to nitpick.

Typical.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tizzie Cregan
07:40 AM on 02/10/2012
I think I prefer, since I am not JUST for equality for women, it just so happens that women a HUGE example of INequality, that I am not so much a feminist as I am an "equalist". As a woman, I celebrate my uniqueness as a woman and prefer (in my personal life) to force myself not to compare me to any man, or ever use a male standard on which to measure myself, my abilities, my accomplishments or my value. Unfortunately, once I leave my little world and walk about the door into the bigger world, there is a HIGE measuring stick called man attacked to my every step. Still, I prefer "equalist" because I know I am not the only member of society being unfairly measured against a standard which is not me
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missy123
05:55 AM on 02/10/2012
I believe that the decline in the family unit began with feminism.
Women in the workforce would have evolved eventually; but, the breakdown of the family started to occur when women wanted to become the "Supermom" that feminism declared every women could become.
We could do it all and have it all; and yet,how many of our kids were raised by strangers in a day care?
Being a mom has to be the hardest job in the world because it's the only job where you have to work yourself into a fenzy working 16 waking hours a day, then you're oncall for the next 8 hours.
Maybe if we would quit trying to keep up with the Joneses and live within our means, maybe ADD and ADHD wouldn't be so prevalent.
Just think about it. We abandon our kids every day when we drop them off at daycare then they vie for attention all day long, then that carries over when they get home. They are just trying to get your attention and you're too busy to listen or too busy to play or too busy to help with homework.
Just sayin'.
08:42 AM on 02/12/2012
Actually, it wasn't women in the workforce that created the decline of the family unit that you speak of. It was industrialism. Women have always worked, generally in the family business. Industrialism moved families out of their hometowns and away from extended family, which was the daycare before, and moved them into cities in which the family business was no longer the dominant business.

I'm curious if you also equate school with the abandonment of daycare, or is there some age at which it's acceptable to put your kids into someone else's care? My kids went to preschool even though I was, and still am, an at-home mom. They went because I felt it important that they socialize, that they have a more structured environment, and so on. So, is preschool also abandonment? Preschool only lasts 3 hours, instead of 8. It was run by the church instead of as a business. What's the distinguishing line between abandonment and informed choice?
08:44 AM on 02/12/2012
The question is, if moms being home was so great for the family, why were women in such a rush to leave that job? Because it was grossly disrespected, left them vulnerable to abuse, made them powerless to help their families economically and left them exposed to poverty in their old age, when the men left them - either through death or divorce. Powerlessness is a terrifying thing. You can't blame women for trying to save themselves from the fate all their helpless forebears went through.

I am a military veteran and I've also been a stay at home mom. I can say that while the military was mainly a fun adventure of my youth, the stay at home motherhood was the hardest and most productive work I ever did. Yet which one of those things do you think I STILL get respect from society for? The 4 years of fun I had in the military. That's considered something the whole world will always respect me for. The part where I was a mom is considered a blight on my resume that I should try to hide by pointing out the volunteer or part time work I was doing, so that it won't look like I was just sitting home eating bonbons.

Women left the home because they were never respected for the work they did there.
05:59 PM on 02/13/2012
I totally agree. Being a stay at home mother is something a woman has to struggle to hide on her resume. I worked from home for the first year of my daughter's life. I never mention that I have a child when I'm in an interview. My husband is a stay at home dad (temporarily) and he complains about doing dishes/cleaning the house. (I help quite a bit over the weekends, and I'm the only one that cooks.) It blows my mind when I consider that I worked from home part-time, cooked all our meals, took care of our infant daughter, cleaned the house, etc. without complaint while he worked. He barely had to change a diaper that first year and now he complains.
Some things never change.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
05:12 AM on 02/10/2012
"Feminism is a loaded word. A word that few of us would disagree with in definition: "The advocacy of supporting women's rights as equal to men." In words alone, who among us isn't a feminist?"

I certainly wouldn't. I think that is an EXCELLENT definition of feminism...because the words that are left out speak volumes.

Feminism - The advocacy of supporting women's rights as equal to men (and then sometimes more) WHILE ignoring the idea of equalizing RESPONSIBILITY.

I couldn't agree more with that statement.

And that is why feminism is carrier pigeon of equality...it was useful, served it's purpose and now it just gets in the way of further progress.

Modern feminism is a cesspool of narcissism and misandry.

It is an obstacle to egalitarianism and must be replaced for true equality to occur.
08:45 AM on 02/12/2012
Replaced with what? Men who pretend to be women online are probably not the best people to opine on these matters.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
05:06 PM on 02/12/2012
Faved and long ago fanned
11:38 PM on 02/09/2012
...

Always talk about females making "double digits" less than men which isn't even true if you do a fair comparison based on skill level, experience, hours worked, and overall benefits that get used. And never any talk about how much wealth gets transferred from men to women via our biased family courts that work to punish fathers rather than to try to protect families.

Always talk about phony abstract concepts such as "glass ceilings" but never any talk about how men are treated unfairly at every level of the criminal justice system starting from how they are viewed and treated by police during investigations to how they are punished more severely than women even when the same crimes are committed... and how they are punished more severely even if the judgement is the same based simply on the condition of male vs female prison systems.

Now having said all of that I think equality is a worthwhile goal but the feminist movement itself is long outdated and is at this point simply ridiculous. Men and women have different advantages and disadvantages in society but if the goal is to look at everyone as an equal individual then it doesn't make sense anymore to only look at the problem through a feminist perspective and focus on only the stuff that seems to hurt women.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
06:26 AM on 02/10/2012
Feminism must die for true equality to exist.

It is an obstacle to egalitarianism.

Team Pink vs. Team Blue helps no one...except a narrow self serving interest group.
02:55 PM on 02/10/2012
Well said.