More

Sheldon Drobny

Sheldon Drobny

Posted: November 21, 2007 02:50 PM

Fitzgerald Must Indict Cheney Or Resign


Yesterday former White House press secretary Scott McClellan took the sand out of Fitzgerald's face. When Fitz indicted Scooter Libby, he used that famous sports metaphor of "kicking sand in his face" and obstructing the investigation. Fitz has not released any grand jury testimony because that would show that there was no sand in his face despite Libby's perjury and obstruction.

The only conclusion one can make about McClellan's disclosure is that he had already told that to the grand jury. And Fitz's failure to release McClellan's grand jury testimony seals the deal. Furthermore, Fitz did not put either Bush or Cheney under oath. In 2004, Fitz may have owed them some loyalty. Given the recent U.S. Attorney firings, he needs to "come up to the plate" to save his reputation. For his own professional integrity, he should not run out the clock. He must either resign or indict Cheney.

The statute of limitaions is 5 years for federal crimes. I believe that a sitting VP does not have the sovereign immunity that Presidents have. At a minimum, Cheney should be an unindicted coconspirator because there is no doubt that Bush is going to pardon him and many in his administration.

Ex-Press Secretary Blames Bush in Leak By MATT APUZZO, AP Posted: 2007-11-21 11:18:37 Filed Under: Politics News WASHINGTON (Nov. 20) - Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan blames President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for efforts to mislead the public about the role of White House aides in leaking the identity of a CIA operative.

In an excerpt from his forthcoming book, McClellan recounts the 2003 news conference in which he told reporters that aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby were "not involved" in the leak involving operative Valerie Plame.

"There was one problem. It was not true," McClellan writes, according to a brief excerpt released Tuesday. "I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest-ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice president, the president's chief of staff and the president himself."


 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
03:30 AM on 11/22/2007
I think I remember hearing one of these TV lawyers saying when Libby's jail time was commuted that the only time the president can't pardon or commute a sentence is when the president has been implicated in the crime.

Well now the president has been implicated.

Would that be frog-marched out of Newsweak Mr Rove?
10:57 PM on 11/21/2007
WHAT? Another leak? How could that be?

You're preaching to the choir here, Sheldon. How hard can that be?

It will all come out in the wash of time. History has a way of washing away the stains of corruption and confusion.

"The sun will come out tomorrow, tomorrow.."
06:15 PM on 11/21/2007
Sooo, another Bush conspirator in crime, knowingly or after the fact, having a "Hallelujah moment", bares his soul of the deed. Even though he says he didn't know, would he have done anything if he HAD known at the time of the 2003 press conference? At what point did he know? Would he EVER have told the truth, if the Libby investigation had not heated up? McClellan had to have given grand jury testimony about this and yet, having this knowledge doesn't necessarily mean he could the connect the dots needed for Fitzgerald to go forward with indictments, alas! He may have discovered this during the pre-trial Libby machinations. Still, it would seem Fitzgerald had some information & one has to wonder why, indeed, he agreed not to put Bush or Cheney under oath.
So, OK, he can't get them for lying under oath. One can only hope they did lie to him; he knows that from McClellan's testimony; he is still investigating, while we wait for the other shoe to drop? Perhaps, this will give him the incentive to act sooner than later. I can't imagine that he is NOT feeling pressured with his place in history..either by his own complicity in not seeking those indictments or conversely, a sense of futility in going forward in an election year..will he let it fade away into that history?

As for McClellan, while I give him credit for resigning his position & speaking out, it just seems like the whole bunch waits until they can make a buck or 2 or 1000$$ on books, before being truthful about things that the American public has a right to know, without paying for it! And, they all do it with some kind of caveat.."I didn't know" or "I was misled"..Jeez, talk about rats deserting the sinking ship, now that it doesn't really matter if the ship sinks. It's done..we'll be searching for survivors & continuing rescue efforts for years to come!

Thanks Sheldon, for "kicking the sand" back into all of their faces for "kicking the sand" into ours!
04:53 PM on 11/21/2007
Ari Fliesher was involved to some extent.
04:37 PM on 11/21/2007
I'll never understand why Cheney's handwriten, scratched out "this Pres" wasn't enough to get them both to testify under oath. Reminds you of 9/11 when Cheney had to hold GW's hand witch also wasn't under oath. Hmmmmmmm
04:31 PM on 11/21/2007
Regardless of Gerald Ford's unfortunate precedent, You can't pardon somebody for crimes they haven't been charged with. The next president should issue an executive order stating that no pre-emptive blanket pardons issued by George Bush will be recognized, and all of the vermin who were complicit in the destruction of America can be rounded up and face the justice of the world.
04:18 PM on 11/21/2007
This revelation does seem to beg for Mr. Fitzgerald to resume his investigation -- which he has not closed to date. That resumption could and hopefully would result in the indictment of Darth and MC Rove as well as others, which would lead to a day in court for the American people. As to impeachment, that is up to the Congress, and one would hope that the Articles of Impeachment offered up by Rep. Kucinich would be approved and investigations would begin. That stink coming out of the WH is palpable and EVERYONE outside the Beltway can smell it!
03:57 PM on 11/21/2007
Our whole system is rigged. No truth, no justice, and no democracy.
03:57 PM on 11/21/2007
Mr. Drobny, I agree with you. Fitzgerald needs to begin impeachment procedures or resign. You are right on the mark. Thanks for your post.
03:48 PM on 11/21/2007
Dear Mr. Drobny,

I understand you are upset by all of this, as am I, BUT!

I believe you have jumped the gun, so to say.

If you examine Mr. McClellan's recent statement:
"I had unknowingly passed along false information."
He is now speaking after the fact, he may have not known anything at the time of his testimony before the Grand Jury.

It may be that now he has come upon information that he was kept out of the loop or directly been given misinformation.

Mr. Fitzgerald may have been in the dark at the time with the information he had.

Futher investigation is warrented, one can only hope justice will be served. Agape.
03:46 PM on 11/21/2007
It was pretty obvious that Scott was lying at the time. Finally -- the truth! The White House will find some way to discredit him and claim he was incompetent.

The big question is: what will Fitzgerald do now?

Impeachment of one and all is the only way forward.
03:09 PM on 11/21/2007
You must be right that McClellan testified about Bush's "involvement" in covering up the Plame leak to the grand jury in more or less the same terms as disclosed in the excerpt from his book. Had he not, then his publication would lead to his own indictment for perjury, and he could join Barry Bonds in the dock, since lying to a grand jury is what Bonds allegedly did. What is mystifying is that if McClellan did so testify, then his testimony would necessarily have involved Bush in an obstruction of justice. If Bush knew the actual facts but was feigning ignorance between July 2003 and the end of September 2003, when he stated numerous times that he intended to get to the "bottom" of the scandal, then a conscious effort to mislead investigators is apparent. It may explain why he never ordered the head of White House security, James Knodell, to conduct an internal probe - there was no need. He also said at one point early in the affair that "we may never know" who leaked Plame's name. These statements, if Bush in fact knew about the coverup from the beginning, are designed to confuse the investigation and constitute obstruction of justice. Yet Fitzgeral let it all go. Why?