iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Simon Johnson

Simon Johnson

Posted: November 29, 2010 09:01 AM

Congressional Republicans are apparently intent on a big showdown with Elizabeth Warren, who is currently building up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

This is very good news for the White House, if they use this opportunity wisely.

Some Republicans seem to think that Ms. Warren is about "big government" or "intrusive regulation". But this is not the case - Elizabeth Warren's approach is much more appealing and already popular with almost everyone on right and left: Transparency.

Look carefully at Ms. Warren's September speech to the Financial Services Roundtable and think about how this plays as a broader political message.

Her political principle is clear and completely compelling:

...the best way, in my view, to strengthen those middle class families is to find solutions that are deep and lasting, that strengthen the markets, and that will create a robust, competitive consumer credit industry that works for families, not against them.

Her economic approach is also right on target - the market should work for the consumer:

I come to Washington as a genuine believer in markets and a genuine believer that the purpose of regulating the consumer credit market is to make that market work for buyers and sellers alike: a level playing field where the best products at the best prices win. When it works, the market is an ally to consumers. And, when it works, the market rewards those lenders who offer the best value to their customers."


...

When I talk about functioning markets, I'm not using the word "market" as coded
language for a return to the Wild West where companies use deception to pick off every consumer they can get in their sites. A free market is one where consumers have the ability to make well‐ informed choices, where the choices are visible and the terms are clear, and where there are cops on the beat to make sure that everyone plays by the same rules.

In other words: stop already with the cheating of people. This is not good for our economy, not good for business as a whole, and definitely not good for American families.

But credit agreements have gotten long and complicated. In fact, there's a new epithet: fine print. I understand that some of you call it "mice type."Where I come from, nobody calls fine print, hidden fees and surprise penalties "negotiated contract terms" or "innovations." On a polite day, my brothers in Oklahoma call that kind of stuff "garbage."

This is the specific deliverable: Get rid of the fine print.

An AARP poll earlier this year showed that 96 percent of Americans over 50 surveyed want to put an end to the fine print in their credit agreements. Just in case you missed the point, 91 percent felt strongly about that. 96 percent? These are your customers.

And they vote. This is exactly the terrain onto which the White House should seek to shift the political debate.

Don't play the Republicans' game by agreeing to debate "big" vs. "small" government. This is a complete illusion - just watch the favors that businesses will seek from Republicans on the Hill; not all of these appear "on the government's balance sheet", to be sure, but you can talk to the anguished people of Ireland about how exactly supposedly "pro-business" (and definitely pro-big bank) policies end up costing the taxpayer a lot of money. (Or just look at how the financial disaster of 2008-09 ended up costing us 40 percentage points of GDP, measured in terms of the increase in our national debt - directly because of how the financial sector ran its customers and itself into the ground.)

The political debate should begin with documenting business practices that are misleading and duplicitous, wherever they occur.

We need transparency and accountability in the financial sector - and in all other parts of our economy. Elizabeth Warren is exactly the right person to lead this charge, in the first instance from the CFPB.

She should be nominated by President Obama to head the agency. The fight for her confirmation would make her ideas clear to millions. Let's see which senators exactly are willing to argue against greater transparency.

This post originally appeared at The Baseline Scenario.

 
 
 
Congressional Republicans are apparently intent on a big showdown with Elizabeth Warren, who is currently building up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). This is very good news for t...
Congressional Republicans are apparently intent on a big showdown with Elizabeth Warren, who is currently building up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). This is very good news for t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 772
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rafaelbolero
06:44 AM on 12/02/2010
My ticket : Warren and Andrew Bacevich ; domestic and foreign-policy reform, a D and a R.
New Party. Read some Bacevich, and encourage him politically.
03:05 AM on 12/02/2010
In a completely free market, people should have the freedom to choose to socialize the costs of public services. Sometimes it just makes the most economic sense, and sometimes it doesn't. As long as it's all transparent, you can try all different kind of things in all kinds of places, and compare to find which work best where.

I just wish we could get away from using the word "consumer". It makes us all sound like mental patients.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smartdoc
09:23 PM on 12/01/2010
I hope I can vote Liz Warren for president someday.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TheOuroborus
It's NOT paranoia if they really R out to get U.
12:36 AM on 12/02/2010
Truth!
03:54 PM on 12/02/2010
I'll be right there beside you if I live long enough to see that happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:44 PM on 12/01/2010
She has no power.
She's just a feel-good front, for the financial industry.
Unfortunately, Warren will remain in the background, a tantalizing reminder, of what might have been.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baileywick
07:34 PM on 12/01/2010
You are trying to turn people against her. The 7 fans you have accumulated is testimony to the righties and baggers who are trying to give you some cred.
02:44 PM on 12/01/2010
Hell, let's make her Secretary of the Treasury! Elizabeth Warren is exactly what this administration - and this country needs. If we want to "Restore Honor" our dealings with our banks and credit companies are a good place to start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spiritgirl2
02:39 PM on 12/01/2010
I love Elizabeth Warren, she's been my hero for years!!! You go girl!!! The public will hear you and back you up!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baileywick
07:45 PM on 12/01/2010
Yes.
03:55 PM on 12/02/2010
yes
08:13 PM on 12/01/2010
I totally agree. She is the smart, no-nonesense kind of person we should elect as president one day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SWalkerTTU
11:22 PM on 12/01/2010
Which is precisely why she'd never win...or likely ever run.
02:17 PM on 12/01/2010
I think you need another Elizabeth Warren, nobody talks about but need to, to oversee, root out, and hold financial criminals accountable. It's simple, if you broke laws you must pay the penalties, because it's not a trivial matter -- the whole population and nation really suffered and is suffering from financial/economic crimes!
01:44 PM on 12/01/2010
Liz Warren's da bomb.
Pirate Prentice
dream surrogate
11:57 AM on 12/01/2010
"This is very good news for the White House, if they use this opportunity wisely."

The suspense is killing me. I'm still waiting for the White House to use an opportunity wisely. I don't think this is it though. It's too far away from the election.
04:23 AM on 12/01/2010
Here are reasons why Elizabeth Warren is the right person for the right job at the right time:

"In the years leading up to the worst financial crisis since the Depression, as gambling fever seized Wall Street, one of the primary forces encouraging greater risk was the way that executives at major banks were compensated:

Nothing has changed. The banking institutions are the delivery systems which are inextricably tied Wall Street.

"Bethany McLean and Joe Nocera (in their book entitled, 'All The Devils Are There') have done an impressive reporting and synthesizing job, and they provide the most complete, serious and sophisticated description of the genesis of the real estate bubble we now have."

The lack of regulatory oversight that fueled the real estate crisis via the banks must now shift to credit cards because the gambling continues...

"So too is the deleterious effect of regulatory competition, which opened the door to regulatory arbitrage, and nudged regulators from being overseers of banks to seeking bank "customers." This eventually produced a pernicious form of regulatory capture that mimicked the belief that someone "else" -- credit raters, the market -- would take care of business: a systemic forfeiture of responsibility."

In Ms. Warren's words: "...the best way, in my view, to strengthen those middle class families is to find solutions that are deep and lasting, that strengthen the markets, and that will create a robust, competitive consumer credit industry that works for families, not against them."
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:07 PM on 11/30/2010
time will tell if what she says is what she really means....this admistration has had issues with that.
Pirate Prentice
dream surrogate
12:02 PM on 12/01/2010
Time has all ready told about her. She's been around and she means it. She's not part of the administration. The question is whether Obama will stand behind her, whether he really means it, and clearly he doesn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GENERATIONaleX
05:47 PM on 11/30/2010
There are a lot of things I like about Elizabeth Warren.

The thing is, as long as giant Fortune 500 companies get corporate welfare, tax breaks, government subsidies, and unfair advantages over small and medium size business, things will never change. Too big to fail is absurd.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yougg
just a citizen
04:08 PM on 11/30/2010
I would love to see Elizabeth Warren replace that weasel Geithner. Definately not answer to Geithner. The Fed needs to be democratized. Transparency is a very scary word. Insist upon it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Spurgeon Bullock
09:48 AM on 11/30/2010
Ahhh transparency, the scariest word to the GOP.
12:36 PM on 11/30/2010
Lisa
 
Agreed. Transparency is not a good thing if you are used to making your vast fortunes scheming, manipulating and scamming the public - which is exactly what bankers and wall st have relied heavily on.
 
Elizabeth Warren is not part of the Govt Sachs teamplayers - they don't believe she has any business intruding into what has been their less-than-honest, anyhting goes free for all in the market.
 
    
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
09:20 AM on 11/30/2010
Warren should not have to answer to Geightner, he is part of the PROBLEM,The Federal Reserve: The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.

When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."

Revealed by Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. to the U.S. Congress sometime between 1907 and 1917.

THE BANKERS’ MANIFESTO OF 1934

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/07jul/bankersmanifesto.html
12:40 PM on 11/30/2010
muck
 
another great post!
 
Not until every American comes to the conclusion that DEMS/GOP are two sides of the same corporate coin will we ever make any headway against the criminal bankers who have been manipulating and scamming the world for decades.
 
Way too many transplants from Goldman Sachs have position of power in the govt  - Geithner and Bernanke and Volker - and many others need to be flushed out. Until then we have GOVT SACHS - and the fleecing of America contiinues...