More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Simon Rosenberg

GET UPDATES FROM Simon Rosenberg

Obama Tax Deal Should Be Supported

Posted: 12/ 9/10 12:05 PM ET

At this point I don't know what is going to happen in Congress over the next few days with the new "deal" announced by the president Tuesday, but my initial take is that he got more than he is being credited for, and the GOP was exposed as having a very weak economic hand which spells trouble for them in the consequential economic debates to come.

At a macro level, very little has changed with this deal. We still don't have a national economic plan, a roughed out consensus on how to get the economy moving again and over time reduce the deficit. As long as job and wage growth remain below desirable levels, the current very intense -- and very much needed -- debate about the future of the American economy will be with us. The steps proposed this week will help provide some stimulus to the ailing American economy at a time when demand remains weak, put a little extra in everyone's paycheck for the next two years and do an awful lot for the many Americans out of work for far too long. At its core the deal is a rejection of a politics of austerity inappropriate for the economic and political moment. So on balance it is a good deal for America's middle class. In fact independent analysts have so far been upbeat about the deal, raising their estimates for American GDP growth next year.

But this deal is not enough alone to ensure "recovery" in the short term or prosperity in the long term. Much more must be done -- from radically improving how our kids and workers learn and acquire new skills, to modernizing our aging infrastructure, to adopting a new national energy strategy, to promoting regional, "place-based" economic development and innovation, to finishing the job on immigration reform, to making a sustained and powerful case for continued economic liberalization throughout the world -- all the while starting to get serious about putting our fiscal house in order. The deal needs to be seen as what it is -- a single step forward in a much longer march towards a better American economy in the 21st century.

What surprised me the most about the deal was what the Republicans thought most critical to our economic future. They fought for and won on two major points -- the temporary extension of Bush era tax rates on incomes over $200,000 a year a person and $250,000 per family, and a trimming of the inheritance tax. Both of these "victories" protected the very wealthiest among us from modest tax increases. The expiration of the individual income tax rates would have increased a wealthy person's tax bill by less than 10%, and returned to rates which were in place during the greatest economic boom in American history. Republican claims that restoring these rates would be risky for the recovery remain more political spin than sound economics.

The Republican strategy on display this week reinforces how intellectually bankrupt and ideologically enthralled with wealth but not growth and broad based prosperity the right has become. Their big "wins" were to protect the wealthy in a time of historic inequality, offer nothing concrete to help grow the economy and, and perhaps most remarkably, refusing to accept the most powerful deficit reduction tool currently available to either party -- the expiration of the high-end tax rates -- after spending 18 months attacking the Democrats for letting the deficit grow too much. The deal reminds all of us that the Republicans rhetorical commitment to deficit reduction is the big lie of American politics today.

Like many I am disappointed with aspects of the deal, but President Obama enters the next round of this debate having won some major concessions from the GOP; reinforced his position as a champion for everyday people and the overall American economy; and having had his opponents publicly and foolishly choose the interests of the wealthiest among us over the national interest or the American people at a time of great national challenge. While this may not have been a rout for President Obama, I think he enters the next and much more consequential stage of this battle in better shape than his out of touch conservative adversaries, and the American people enter 2011 also better off than they would have been otherwise. That's perhaps the best holiday present we can give to the American people in these challenging times.

Update: See this excellent piece by David Leonhardt for more on the economics of The Deal.

Cross-posted at the NDN Blog.

 

Follow Simon Rosenberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/simonwdc

 
 
  • Comments
  • 235
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
11:43 AM on 12/10/2010
The American political system is now hopeless to achieve a balance between ambition and equality. As it is, the country is headed for a monster rally that will end all rallies and sweep with the authorities and the rule of law as we now know it. The movement will evolve naturally and will take place with no legitimate head (no Jesus and no Lenin). With the destruction of the old order will come a system not necessarily better, sparking a period of introversion by people of a nation that formerly ingrained upon its citizens a standard of living sustained on theories of local and global inequality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:34 AM on 12/10/2010
I would support it if there was no other option and there was NOTHING ELSE possible.

But, I know better.

REJECT THIS MONSTROSITY.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FALCON72
You can see the truth in every mirror.
09:06 AM on 12/10/2010
The big problem with this analysis is, in 2012 when the jobs still aren't out there and our national debt is higher than ever in history, the Republicans and particularly the Republican base will not blame anyone but Obama for the failed GOP tax policies. FOX will play continually the footage of Obama standing at the podium defending the extension of the tax cuts, with his own words explaining why they will improve our economy.

I'm not disagreeing that the "Obama" tax deal is nothing more than kicking the can down the road. The only difference between now and then is, the problems will be much worse and Obama will be the owner of them all.

The Republicans are already planning how to play this against the Democrats in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevinbr38
Forward
08:58 AM on 12/10/2010
Thank you Mr/ Rosenberg for that. Finally a level-headed analysis of what is transpiring coming from someone with no political ax to grind. Both the dems and repubs are grandstanding, posturing around this. They are trying to make Obama Scapegoat in Chief, rather than give the man respect for thinking to the future without regard of all of the partisan white noise that surrounds him. I find him to be a quite excellent executive at this moment. His job is not to please his so-called base, rather it is their job to bolster him and stop with the snarky behavior. Even if there remains much to be desired in this deal, Obama has shown both sides the backbone that people insist on saying he lacks.
08:49 AM on 12/10/2010
Anyone who believes these tax cuts for the wealthy are "temporary" obviously hasn't been paying attention. Since when during the course of the last two years has Obama stood steadfast and insisted his adversaries back down?

No -- NOW is the time to allow those cuts to expire, even with the middle class cuts along for the ride. Then in 2011, force the Republicans to oppose a freshly designed round of cuts -- the OBAMA TAX CUTS -- designed specifically for the middle class and working poor. Make them take a stand against passing those cuts. They'll cave -- Boehner already said so.

If this passes and conditions in Congress list more to the right, believe me, these cuts are permanent for all practical purposes.
08:40 AM on 12/10/2010
sounds like an argument against the deal only to conclude that it was a good deal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randolph Greer
I am a Poet .
08:35 AM on 12/10/2010
I love this article for its defense of this heinous . For awhile there , I was beginning to think I may be wrong because the Washington crowd was being mostly silent about this deal Lawrence O'Donnell was the only Washington guy who came out publicly and forcefully for this deal . Then Chris Matthews joined in and I felt a lot better about my opposition . Now , with this article , I can breathe a lot easier knowing for certain that I am right in opposing this deal . When the people who helped give us the current state of affairs which exist support a deal , you know that the deal is sufficiently
harmful to the nation that it must be opposed .
05:45 AM on 12/10/2010
Sorry I don't agree with your assessment. It's time we stop voteing on these package deals. We should only vote on stand alone bills. This tacking on or ear mark legislation is a farce. Nothing good has been done for the country in the last 10 years. Many, many of us workers would have been dismissed long ago from our postions if we had produced these kind of results.
I have an earmark for our representatives. We will accept your tax reduction for the rich if you give up all your salary, withdraw from your public mandate health insurance, and don't ask and tell anyone about it. I almost forgot. The next time you need help from a first responder you need to show your voting record on the 911 bill. I am plain disgusted with all of Congress, how about you.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
01:40 AM on 12/10/2010
Yes, it was a good deal! The Dems in Congress blew it, for not taking care of this before the election, now the President had to step in. Now, they are whining and complaining about their feelings, who cares? Soon the President may have to step in again for the Dream act, DADT and 911 responder.
05:46 AM on 12/10/2010
"NOT"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Osmona
Its GREAT to be alive and SANE.
09:03 AM on 12/10/2010
True.

Faved
01:01 AM on 12/10/2010
Me thinks there's a foul smell about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:41 AM on 12/10/2010
OK, now give us a reason to support this debacle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
winwithoutrwar
12:24 AM on 12/10/2010
Nonesense, you mean more deficits and more $ printing machines?
11:30 PM on 12/09/2010
Well... Americans voted Republicans back into a majority in the House, and then blame Obama for having his hands tied. It's like shooting yourself in the foot and getting mad at being unable to walk faster. Yet, the pundits don't seem to be blaming the voting that happened in November. Helloooo
10:01 PM on 12/09/2010
Considering that the last job you had is the same one that Harold Ford has now, and that you run a conservative think tank
I'm not surprised at all that you favor this deal
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
09:10 PM on 12/09/2010
I pray that by some miracle your positive take on the tax battle pans out. If not, Obama and the Democrats are going to be crushed worse than McGovern and the Dems in '72, and we'll never see another black president.
10:32 PM on 12/09/2010
I thought it was a miracle that Obama was elected in the first place. However, it wasn't prayer that got him elected, but hard work. If people aren't willing to work for his reelection you can bet that inaction will translate into positive gains for the Republican candidate (my money's on Romney right now).
02:18 AM on 12/18/2010
hopefully not