Simon Woods

Simon Woods

Posted: October 3, 2008 10:28 AM

Why Palin Won - Even Though She Lost

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

I give the debate to Sarah Palin. Not because she was better than Joe Biden - of course she wasn't - but because she looked like the woman people liked when they first saw her at the convention back in August.

The flailing Sarah Palin of the Katie Couric interview was gone. The lurching, panic-stricken rabbit in the headlights was back in the hutch.

Those interviews had set the bar so low for the Governor of Alaska that her ability to string a sentence together, and to make it through the debate without a complete semantic melt down seemed like a victory.

The differences between the two candidates were clear: Joe Biden is experienced, knowledgeable, and impressive. He is the kind of person you would want as Vice President. When asked what he saw as the role of VP, he replied: "I would be the point person for the legislative initiatives in the United States Congress for our administration." Watching Senator Biden last night, Americans saw a man who would be brilliant at that job. He was persuasive, powerful, and pragmatic.

Meanwhile, it seemed genuinely unimaginable that John McCain would ever want Sarah Palin to be the "point person" for his legislative initiatives. Even her most ardent admirers did not watch that debate last night and imagine that Vice President Palin would be sent out to negotiate a complex Social Security bill with Senate leaders by a Republican White House.

For that reason, Governor Palin repeatedly attempted to re-frame the terms of this debate, and to redefine the Vice Presidency. In her version of events, she has been picked to be John McCain's running mate not to fulfill the role of legislative go-between, or chief advisor, but to bring "a little bit of reality from Wasilla Main Street" to Washington.

I watched that debate and thought the McCain campaign would probably offer her four years of maternity leave if they got into power. Her usefulness, as she admitted last night, was her ability to connect with "average" Americans, and to convince the electorate that she is taking their problems, and their frustrations to Washington. That ability is an electoral asset, but it is not a strategy for government.

If Americans sat on their sofas at 9pm last night thinking of that debate as an interview for the job Joe Biden described, then there was only one conceivable winner.

If, however, they sat down to watch a political demolition derby, then Sarah Palin came out on top.


Read more reactions to the Biden-Palin Vice Presidential debate from HuffPost bloggers

I give the debate to Sarah Palin. Not because she was better than Joe Biden - of course she wasn't - but because she looked like the woman people liked when they first saw her at the convention back ...
I give the debate to Sarah Palin. Not because she was better than Joe Biden - of course she wasn't - but because she looked like the woman people liked when they first saw her at the convention back ...
 
Comments
2
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

nice work, looking forward to new bloggs of yours

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 10/31/2008
- nazcalito I'm a Fan of nazcalito 2 fans permalink

I don't agree. Palin looked to me like she'd lost ten pounds since the RNC speech and was turning into an intense, nervous, weird, nerdy sort of person, sort of an ex beauty queen turning into a conservative female version of Woody Allen without most of Allen's humor. I'll bet a lot of average americans who watched the debate will find Sarah Palin too much of an oddball to connect with.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 10/03/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect