“Help defeat these sad harmful clowns. ...and enjoy ripping ayn and romney and ryan and fox and the gop new ones!!
ALL royalties on sales of Aldus Shrugged through October 1, go directly to the Obama re-election campaign!!!”
“WOW! They truly have nothing to offer. Nothing. I cannot remmeber a pres campaign so utterly devoid of ideas, to the point where they cannot even tell the truth about what they are opposed to. literally incredible. They stand there like Pagliacci, looking sad, but acting the clown.”
“YOu obfuscare and exaggerate to stretch and attempt to make a point that you didn't come close to making. Maybe your post made you feel better, but it only served to reveal your shallow thought process on this issue.”
“Yeah, right, you actually found it hilarious. Nobody said it was the same. Can you be intellectually honest for just a moment (really, just a moment. noone is asking you to be honest all the time....dont worry), and see the stark difference in Ryan's rhetoric then v. now?
You actually believe that Ryan would've supported anything Obama did to stimulate the economy, if it was more in line with what bush did? Remember, be honest, IF YOU ARE ABLE.
The only thing hilarious here is your blatant dishonesty over this issue.”
TNR911 on Aug 23, 2012 at 10:49:13
“If obama had a pro-growth policy of tax cuts and tax incentives as Bush had announced in that video then yes the Republican caucus would have backed him. But instead obama went down a marxist path of anti-capitalism and government only solutions. His record of failure is all his own.”
“Your comment makes no logical sense and entirely misses the point. I suppose you intended it that way, as there is no logical explanation for Ryan's actions then v. now.
You cannot explain them, so you go after an Obama voting record. Do you not see how that makes no sense whatsoever, and adds nothing to the discussion?”
yvettewhite on Aug 23, 2012 at 11:42:58
“you are so right bluefloyd they (THE REPUBLICANS) make me sick about obama's record when mitt nor ryan have any record too stand on except the lie's that they have stole over-over-over untill they come up with a new one.”
Le Roi Sans Sa Reine on Aug 23, 2012 at 11:31:42
“"... there is no logical explanation for Ryan's actions then v. now."
Sure there is. The stimulus plans were vastly different approaches to how to stimulate the economy. Obama's is heavy government spending and W's was heavy tax cuts. Government spending may result in some jobs, but at an exhorbitant cost to the tax payer. Tax cuts result in jobs at a vast savings to the tax payer not to mention having resulted in increased revenue to the treasury.
It is only because the left errantly insists that tax cuts are expenditures that they errantly see no difference between the 2002 aproach and Obama's current disaster. The fact that the approches are indeed vastly different would be reason enough to justify Ryan's juxtaposition.
romney basically disputed that there are truths and facts. he stated that facts are different depending on one's point of view. so there is no actual factr or truth? wow, though not surprising, as romney seems to live his entire life according to this premise.”
“so then you agree with the idea of ginning things up just to get libs all spun up and continue your prejudiced sweeping generalizations??? ....or you agree with inaccurate representation of data?? which is it? BOTH??”
“So then having the authority to gut reforms and actually gutting them are the same thing? In other words, I am assuming you have the authority to drive your car. Are you driving now? You own your property and thus could theoretically burn your house down if you want? Should I make a factual statement that you have, in fact, burned your house down?
Tip: don't make excuses and explanations for a serial liar. You will only make yourself look terribly foolish. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!”
kenmcc2 on Aug 20, 2012 at 15:45:19
“You are a legend in your own mind. I suggest you take some night school classes on debating skills.
The point that Romney and others are making is, there is no such authority granted under the law AT ALL. So to claim the authority is to gut the law. The law, they say, was written specifically to dis allow different interpretations of work that could then be used to gut the law.”