Fez's Comments (159)
Sheriff Arpaio Incites Widespread Anger for implicating Judges In Alleged Conspiracy
Commented Dec 21, 2009 at 14:03:10 in Politics
“Let me guess: The Arizona Republic has endorsed the election of Joe Arpaio on many occasions in the past. Now that this rabid, half-crazed thug from New Jersey has turned Phoenix into a lawless police state, the Arizona Republic is having buyer's remorse. Maybe the Republic will now start doing their job by reporting on the criminal behavior of their sheriff.”
judesuper replied on Dec 21, 2009 at 15:39:12
“Right on the money fez! Fanned!
This is retribution. Plan on simple. These two have an extensive "enemies" list and use their power to persecute and prosecute them.
No one with any salt ever runs against these two T00LS. We need choices. I don't know why, but the dems don't run any strong candidates against either of these guys. So the dems and indies stay home on election day. And look what you get from the repubs that show up at the polls. Two thugs.
Come on. Run a strong progressive dem or indy against these characters. They'll be history. Just like mc drool will be come the 2010 election.”
This is retribution. Plan on simple. These two have an extensive "enemies" list and use their power to persecute and prosecute them.
No one with any salt ever runs against these two T00LS. We need choices. I don't know why, but the dems don't run any strong candidates against either of these guys. So the dems and indies stay home on election day. And look what you get from the repubs that show up at the polls. Two thugs.
Come on. Run a strong progressive dem or indy against these characters. They'll be history. Just like mc drool will be come the 2010 election.”
ephoenix5 replied on Dec 21, 2009 at 15:18:45
“Actually, the Republic endorsed Arpaio's opponent, which was surprising to many since the Arizona Republic likes to pretend to be "fair & balance" even though Arpaio/Thomas' corruption is so blatant. Plus, I think a reliative of Arpaio is in a high position at the Republic. It was surely surprising that they endorsed Saban. I mean, Arpaio's reign of corruption marched on while the Republic kept its mouth shut about that -- just barely mentioning the allegations against Arpaio with the next paragraph indicating that Arpaio denies them -- the end -- wow. No input or reasoning -- no discussion as to who was really right -- kind of like Dawn's blog here -- except that the overwhelming weight of her blog does appear to cast doubt on Arpaio/Thomas' legitimate purposes.”
AZterritory replied on Dec 21, 2009 at 14:12:36
“Fanned--you got it. Only the local New Times has been exposing Arpaio for what he is (and Thomas as well) for years and years. These two would indict their dentists if they got a toothache. This time they picked the wrong people to scr3w with...all the judges involved have great records at being balanced jurists. The Feds need to grow a pair and take this on.”
The Questions Media Didn't Ask Inhofe in Copenhagen
Commented Dec 17, 2009 at 12:49:29 in Green
“I have a question: why should Inhofe not be tried for treason for attending an international meeting to undermine the official delegation from the United States? He has ample opportunity in the US Senate to express his ignorance and stupidity on this issue. But when the US sends delegations (including the President) to international meetings and the "opposition" sends its own representatives to mock and taunt both the official US delegation and the other countries involved, isn't that treason? So what would happen if the president met with Iranian officials to discuss the delicate situation in Iran and Inhofe (or Lieberman or some other traitor) decided that he would go to the meeting venue and mock, deride, and undermine the President when he was on official business? It's a slippery slope when, in the name of "free speech," bigots, morons, and fools in the Congress travel around the world to undermine US representatives because they lost the debate over an issue in Congress.”
Hirokoprof replied on Dec 18, 2009 at 03:58:44
“Wouldn't signing a treaty in Copenhagen, relinquishing US sovereignty be treason? I think Inhofe is trying to stop that from happening.”
ReedYoung replied on Dec 18, 2009 at 02:15:34
“I agree Inhofe's actions are harmful, and in the colloquial sense, absolutely, treasonous. But to find him legally guilty of giving aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States would require defining Koch Industries and Exxon-Mobil as enemies, and while I have no problem with that, it seems different from how judges are inclined to interpret the same words.
I do think that in a few years, as the popular culture evolves and the Department of Justice follows along, a RICO (Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act) investigation is probable. In as few words as possible, lobbying against clean sources of energy constitutes racketeering because it keeps us all dependent on a dwindling supply controlled by very few billionaires. We're so dependent on their product that our government gives them $70 Billion every year, just to keep gasoline prices as "low" as $2.60/Gall on. It's a protection racket: give them federal subsidies, or they'll bankrupt 80% of the citizens at the pump. Forcing this on us has been racketeering and Jimmy Inhofe is up to his eyeballs in it.”
I do think that in a few years, as the popular culture evolves and the Department of Justice follows along, a RICO (Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act) investigation is probable. In as few words as possible, lobbying against clean sources of energy constitutes racketeering because it keeps us all dependent on a dwindling supply controlled by very few billionaires. We're so dependent on their product that our government gives them $70 Billion every year, just to keep gasoline prices as "low" as $2.60/Gall
The Afghanistan Parenthesis [Updated]
Commented Dec 02, 2009 at 14:46:13 in World
“The speech he should have given: We have missed the opportunity to capture Osama bin Laden when he was in our sights. Sadly, we have blundered into two wars for no good reason and now must find a way out. To that end, I will withdraw all US troops from Afghanistan over the next two years and we will intensify our efforts to capture or kill bi n Laden and root out the few remaining Al Qaeda terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan. We will return home to re-build our ruined economy and to protect our country by deploying our military where it is needed, on Wall Street to stop the theft of our financial resources by criminals and sociopaths. I thank the military for their brave service and apologize on behalf of the Congress and Executive Branch for providing cowardly and unwise "leadership" over the past 9 years. To the families of those who were killed in these misbegotten wars, I offer my deepest sympathies and promise to never again expose our military to needless wars of no value.”
tssent replied on Dec 02, 2009 at 16:01:24
“Now THIS is a reasonable mind.
Let me just add a Part 2 to the idea, if I may.
After he makes that speech he needs to make a short conference
call to the leaders of Afghanistan, North Korea, Iran, and another
half dozen or so and say, "Look guys, it's just going to be this
simple for the 4 or 8 years I'm in office. You're going to behave.
We have intelligence enough to know who's where meaning
all of you and your rat holes, just like the one we found Saddam
stuffed away in.
The message is short and simple. Mess with the bull, you get
the horn. Screw with us during the next 4-8 years, we're going to
do a non-stop carpet bombing number on your rat holes, and
we're not stopping until we know your name is included in the
list of casualties.
So, Michelle just made some hot chocolate and she and I and
the kids are gonna kick back now for a little Christmas cheer.
I don't need an answer or a response from any of you. Just
wanted to let you in on my personal New Years Resolution.
And hang up.”
Let me just add a Part 2 to the idea, if I may.
After he makes that speech he needs to make a short conference
call to the leaders of Afghanistan, North Korea, Iran, and another
half dozen or so and say, "Look guys, it's just going to be this
simple for the 4 or 8 years I'm in office. You're going to behave.
We have intelligence enough to know who's where meaning
all of you and your rat holes, just like the one we found Saddam
stuffed away in.
The message is short and simple. Mess with the bull, you get
the horn. Screw with us during the next 4-8 years, we're going to
do a non-stop carpet bombing number on your rat holes, and
we're not stopping until we know your name is included in the
list of casualties.
So, Michelle just made some hot chocolate and she and I and
the kids are gonna kick back now for a little Christmas cheer.
I don't need an answer or a response from any of you. Just
wanted to let you in on my personal New Years Resolution.
And hang up.”
joebftsplk replied on Dec 02, 2009 at 15:28:06
“Right on! I'm a fan of Obama, but this latest move is a big disappointment. My only question about Fez's plan is how do we root out the remaining Al Qaeda terrorists when we have fewer troops than we have now? We lack the trust and good faith of Afganis and Pakistanis to accomplish this.”
Jannsmoor replied on Dec 02, 2009 at 14:58:21
“Strong words that I agree with.”
ipv4 replied on Dec 02, 2009 at 14:53:36
“DING ..DING ..DING , WINNER!”
An Open Letter To President Obama On Afghanistan
Commented Nov 30, 2009 at 11:14:03 in World
“Big problem... the remains of Al-Qaeda are in Pakistan, not Afghanistan. Afghanistan is under the control of warlords who are simply criminals and are not political enemies. So even as President Obama ratchets up the war in Afghanistan, the war moved next door to Pakistan about 3 years ago and once again the US will be fighting the wrong people in the wrong country for the wrong reason. And sadly Michael Moore is right about this: if Obama escaltes, HE is the war president and his will be a one-term presidency.”
SeanOcali replied on Nov 30, 2009 at 11:47:08
“Let me clue you in on a little secret. Why do you think they moved from Afghanistan to Pakistan? Could it be, just maybe, because we took over Afghanistan and overthrew the Taliban? What do you think would happen if we left now and the government couldn't stay in power?
And how exactly are we supposed to carry out missions across the Pakistan border if we don't have a military presence in Afghanistan? Please, enlighten us.”
And how exactly are we supposed to carry out missions across the Pakistan border if we don't have a military presence in Afghanistan? Please, enlighten us.”
Gross Failure of the Media
Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 15:11:00 in Media
“Read Chris Hedges' "The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle" to get a clear discussion of how this country has gone off the tracks. It is unfortunately true, as Bill Maher has said repeatedly, that Americans are too stupid to be governed. The party ultimately responsible in a democracy to make educated, informed decisions is the individual. It's far past time that people started taking responsibility for getting accurate information. The media are just greedhead pimps who wouldn't even know how to ask an intelligent question. I can agree with Cenk that the media in this country are beneath contempt, but that does not change the fact that individuals are ultimately responsible to get enough education to cast their votes based on facts, truth, and good judgement, regardless of their political persuasion.”
Anym replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 20:17:52
“It's sad how often Bill Maher is right about the inability of this country to advance mentally.”
BBackSoon replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 16:46:42
“Let’s face it folks, we can’t even merge from 2 lanes down to 1 without causing a mile long backup. How can we be trusted to elect our government?”
Guitanguran replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 15:37:43
“"...indivi duals are ultimately responsible to get enough education to cast their votes based on facts, truth, and good judgement, regardless of their political persuasion ."
Given the status of public education these days, a somewhat tall order, wouldn't you say?”
Given the status of public education these days, a somewhat tall order, wouldn't you say?”
Why the Palin "Hate Affair" Will Backfire
Commented Nov 20, 2009 at 14:53:42 in Politics
“Please take a course in English. If English is your second language, I apologize. But I am not able to understand your meaning at all.”
Chauncey1186 replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 15:14:27
“I beleive that would be called a parody of Palin's "word salad' speaking style.”
richnerd replied on Nov 20, 2009 at 15:13:26
“My apologies. .....I was "in character" .....read it again and imagine me with a red jacket, black skirt, French bun, sitting on a snowmobile, and massaging my giant ambition glands.”
George Carlin: The Last Words of America's Greatest Comedian
Commented Nov 16, 2009 at 12:05:15 in Comedy
“George Carlin was a master satirist and our greatest social commentator, up there with Mark Twain, H.L. Mencken, and Gore Vidal. He was the funniest comedian I ever saw ( I recently watched 12 of his shows through Netflix) and he always educated his audience. For a guy with a 9th-grade education, he knew more about the proper use of the English language than any Ph.D. He was also courageous and brave and the fact that he never became rich is further proof that he walked the talk.”
Why It's Wrong When Wrongdoers Are Allowed to Admit No Wrongdoing
Commented Nov 09, 2009 at 14:25:05 in Business
“And there you have the reason why the law and lawyers are held in total contempt by the rest of us. Of course, if we had no laws we would have anarchy, theft, murder, mayhem, and the Republican Party. But wait... we have all of those WITH laws.”
LHoney replied on Nov 09, 2009 at 15:33:43
“Laws, like taxes, are only for the little people...”
Tragically Charismatic
Commented Nov 05, 2009 at 13:06:52 in Business
“Howard Dean, Alan Grayson, or Dennis Kucinich would all be good candidates for president. Mr. Obama threw in with thieves and cronies after being elected by independents and progressives. Although I believe that Mr. Obama is a man of high intelligence and skill, he is not the leader we need now. A leader does not stick his finger up to see which way the wind is blowing... he takes the path needed to solve problems and then lays out the case for his actions. Obama will be defined by his response to "Death Squad" McChrystal in Afghanistan. If the President does not declare victory and pull the troops out, he's done. He's already screwed the pooch on the various bailouts and his thin charm is getting thinner. What a shame and a waste of talent. We sure didn't vote to have Larry Summers, Timothy Geithner, and Rahm Emanuel calling the shots. Let's bring back Howard Dean and give Obama some competition in 2012.”
Matthew Hoh: U.S. Has Lost Track of Why It Is in Afghanistan
Commented Nov 04, 2009 at 09:35:53 in World
“Matthew Hoh has more credibility on Afghanistan than any of the chuckleheads opining from their DC armchairs. Hell, he has more credibility than Stanley "Death Squad" McChrystal who wants another 40,000 troops to....???. .. kick somebody's ass as soon as he can figure out who that might be. Hoh correctly notes that Afghanistan is made up of hundreds of tribes and that each valley in each isolated village is its own Private Idaho. There has never been a national government in Afghanistan. Never, that is, until recently when we have seen that Karzai does not even control Kabul, let alone some random village in Helmand province. Al Qaeda is a hundred guys living in Yemen and Somalia, not Afghanistan. The enemy is holed up in caves in Pakistan, not Afghanistan. The Taliban will reclaim power as soon as we leave, whether it is now or ten years from now. I would like to see the US government figure out that when they meddled here in the 1970s and created the Northern Alliance, they sowed the seeds of their own destruction. But our government is deluded, fearful, and incapable of making the right decision: declare victory, bring the troops home, and eat some humble pie.”
Harry M replied on Nov 04, 2009 at 12:31:20
“Why does Matthew Ho have so much credibiltiy?”
GOP to Protest Mom and Apple Pie
Commented Oct 30, 2009 at 09:30:32 in Politics
“Love your screen name. I miss Molly too. She warned the world about Shrub long before he destroyed the American government and told us that a compassionate conservative was someone who robbed widows and orphans with a smile on his face. We need her sense of humor now more than ever.”
HuffPost Reporter Sam Stein: Lot Of People 'Kicking Themselves' For Being Nice To Lieberman (VIDEO)
Commented Oct 28, 2009 at 09:12:31 in Politics
“Unfortunately, the Democrats have shown over and over again that they can be "this stupid." Congress, especially the Senate, functions like some jerkwater social club with the emphasis on comity and collegiality above all else. Lieberman has been a member of the Senate for a long time and his butt-buddies will never kick him to the curb despite his numerous betrayals of Democratic principles. Harry Reid has proven to be the weakest Majority Leader in the past 100 years. And President Obama should be ashamed of himself for having campaigned for Lieberman in 2006 and for allowing him to remain a "player" in the Senate. Contempt of Congress.. . it's not just a good idea, it should be the law.”
Media's Credibility (Not Public Option) Is What Is Dead
Commented Oct 27, 2009 at 14:14:12 in Media
“Unlike a stopped clock, the media is not even right twice a day. Or twice a year for that matter. One can literally have a very good life in this country by doing the EXACT OPPOSITE of what the conventional "wisdom" advises. They say "buy?" Then most assuredly you should sell. They say "invade?" By all means, retreat. They say "black?' Then white it is. If the media were to tell me that the sun would rise in the east tomorrow, I would look out my west window. Think about this folks... when has the media been right (or even close) about ANY major topic in the past 50 years? Crickets.”
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Wall Street and the Tolling of the Bell For America's Meritocracy
Commented Oct 22, 2009 at 10:40:33 in Business
“Meritocracy? Try "kleptocracy" or "kakiocrac y." That is, a government (and associated commercial class) of thieves and a government (and commercial class) of the worst among us. Mr. Learsy's comment (Capitalism is rotten to the core) is and has been true for decades. Read Chris Hedges' "Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle" to see how we have created a "meritocracy" of amoral thieves who are such sociopaths that they have managed to destroy the financial system in this country without the slightest hint of guilt or responsibility.”
The 2012 Presidential Race According to Numerologist Cheryl Lee Terry...
Commented Oct 21, 2009 at 14:31:19 in Politics
“This is not the prediction I'm getting from my tea leaves, chicken entrails, and ouija board. Maybe Obama will serve only one full term because there will be nothing left to govern in 2012, except smoking ruins and a foul odor.”
War Fever at the Times: A Five-Day Log
Commented Oct 20, 2009 at 13:53:26 in Media
“Once, just once, I would like a President and Congress and the media to look at the opportunity to escalate ANY war and say, "Not this time. It didn't work the last 27 times, it won't work now. Not this time." Why is it that every single President we have had in the past 120 years thinks he can always call for more troops, ignoring the FACT that more troops never results in "victory?" This knee-jerk reaction to war by calling for more war and more troops is truly insane and will be the destruction of the United States. If Mr. Obama wants to be genuinely courageous, he will announce that there will be no "surge" and that the US will withdraw its current forces. Just once let's see the US government get it right. After all, even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.”
alex61 replied on Oct 20, 2009 at 14:02:35
“We have won a number of wars that benefited many nations-including our own-by putting sufficient resources in the field. Evil empires have been destroyed and their own people given democracy.
We have the right to have this debate today because of "more troops." Of course war is terrible, but the failure to fight can often be worse. It is the hoped for outcome that can make the terrible investment worth it.”
We have the right to have this debate today because of "more troops." Of course war is terrible, but the failure to fight can often be worse. It is the hoped for outcome that can make the terrible investment worth it.”
HuffPost Editor Roy Sekoff Talks Being Featured In Liz Cheney's New "Why Are They Afraid Of Us?" Ad (VIDEO)
Commented Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01:35 in Politics
“This country was settled (o.k., stolen) by people who were NOT AFRAID. So where did all this FEAR come from? Americans used to be courageous, even intrepid. Now they are weak, fearful, and insipid. People like Liz Cheney appeal to the worst elements in human beings: fear, ignorance, and intolerance. Her father is a coward and a bully and he spends his time hiding from the truth. No fear, no Republicans, and no Cheneys.”
How General McChrystal May Have Hurt Himself
Commented Oct 08, 2009 at 14:35:57 in Politics
“General McChrystal is not yet ready for prime time. His evil coverup of the murder of Pat Tillman by his own troops was the first Epic Fail for McChrystal. Trying to do an end run around the Presidet is his second Major Mistake. Any bets that his third, and final, Serious SNAFU will be to undercut whatever decision the President makes by going Back Door with the press?”
Editing the Bible
Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 10:11:47 in Politics
“Your first sentence says it all: which is it... unerring word of God or flawed document in need of revision?”
Obama Is "Incompetent" and the U.S. Is a "Madhouse": An Exclusive Interview With Gore Vidal
Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 10:03:00 in Entertainment
“When Gore Vidal is gone, only Noam Chomsky will be left to articulate the final collapse of the American "republic. " Now that Vidal has sunk into the curmudgeonly swamp with Jonathan Swift and Mark Twain, we can only thank him for his creative efforts and try to forgive his deluded fantasies about the virtue of Timothy McVeigh. He did good work, but it was always pearls before swine.”
Oldtimer replied on Oct 08, 2009 at 00:24:00
“I agree Fez. Where you been?”
A War of Absurdity
Commented Oct 07, 2009 at 09:14:13 in World
“If Obama ends up increasing troop numbers in Afghanistan and locking in the US for another 10-15 years, he will lose the support of ALL progressive voters. I sent him $500 last year but any future campaign donations will go to a leader who has the courage to stand up to the Advisors Who Have Never Been Right Yet. I have a bad feeling that all of the deliberation" and "consultation" that the President is doing now will result in the same Epic Fail that plagued the Viet Nam and Iraq Wars. Mr. Obama needs to remember that he was able to beat Hillary Clinton primarily because he had opposed the Iraq War and she had supported it. He has shown that he is too smart by half in the way he is handling the financial crisis and health care reform. If he caves on Afghanistan and sends another 40,000 US troops, he will be a one-term President.”
Howard Dean vs. Rahm Emanuel
Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 09:36:06 in Politics
“Dr. Howard Dean has proven to be prescient about many things and his opinions on health care carry extra weight because he is a doctor who has been inside the belly of the beast. He cleared the way for Candidate Obama in the primaries and has been out in front in leading the pack toward change. Emmanuel is just another hack, a quotidian fixer with bad manners and a foul mouth. In a functioning political system, Dean would be making policy and Emmanuel would be taking out the trash.”
Why Would Anyone Call Their Book "Going Rogue"? Answer Below.
Commented Sep 30, 2009 at 09:14:40 in Politics
“Let's go to the dictionary, shall we? Rogue n. An unprincipled person; a scoundrel or rascal. 2. A person who is playfully mischievous, a scamp. 3. (Archaic) A wandering beggar; vagrant or vagabond. 4. A vicious and solitary animal, especially an elephant that has separated itself from the herd (BINGO!!!! We have a winner). v. rogued, roguing. To defraud (Double BINGO!!!). If Palin were able to read, she might have chosen another title for her "book." Can we assume that it was written in crayon on butcher paper?”
McChrystal's "Ground Truth": Need Half a Million Boots on the Ground
Commented Sep 25, 2009 at 16:43:44 in World
“Well, we can now say that General Eric Shinseki was right when he told George W. Bush that we needed 500,000 troops in Iraq and was fired for his efforts.”
Do We Still Have a 'Civil' Society?
Commented Sep 14, 2009 at 15:29:46 in Politics
“Civil behavior would require that everyone shares the same basic values and ethical standards and is mature enough to listen when someone else is speaking. Clearly, Americans are no longer bound by the same values. If someone is shouting at a public meeting and refusing to sit down, what exactly is the "civil" response to that behavior? And if a Congressman shouts out, "You lie!" to the President in a joint session of Congress, what is the civil response to that? When good order and decorum have broken down (and they have), which of our "better angels" do we appeal to to restore civility? I am trying to control my own demons when I see poorly educated sociopaths insult deceny, intelligence, and common sense as they hijack every issue with hysteria, lies, and fear. God help us all if this anarchy ends in the assassination of the President or members of Congress.”


