May 21, 2014 at 00:49:33
“The original article and obvious common sense excellent point made was that RX drugging abuses are epidemic and deadly dangerous. Any comment made by you that didn't grasp the subject also doesn't understanding the meaning being conveyed. If you understood you wouldn't have introduced trivia and made it a big point. Your math standing ranking are meaningless unless trivia trumping meaning is what you value
Your comment about math totally missed the point. What does it matter if its 3rd or 5th or whatever. Deadly means deadly. The subject is RX drug abuse. Common sense is either there or it isn't.
3rd or 5th who cares and what does it matter. The point is not the rankings its the huge numbers which illustrate the point of the dangers and incompetence of RX drug damage that the article is underscoring. Your comment was out of bounds with both the subject being discussed, its logic and common sense
Did this walk through of the logic of what the article and the death ranking are communicating help with your comprehension difficulty.? If so good - if not read over the original article over and over and see how nicely it connects with the RX death evidence of drugging abuse which is the subject being discussed for most of use relating to the issue. Finally notice how your original point is unrelated to the subject, illogical and meaningless trivia.”
May 19, 2014 at 21:13:43
“What is the difference between a few teaspoons of refined sugar and a cup of oatmeal ? The difference is that the oatmeal releases a whole lot more glucose rapidly into the blood stream then the refined sugar.
Oatmeal is every bit as "unnatural' as refined sugar both being man made products. All grain products are as man made as sugar. With grains beings a good bit worse in terms of excessive release of too much glucose.
Diabetes is not a disease caused by to much sugar consumption. Diabetes is caused by the inability of the body to clear glucose out of the bloodstream and delivery into the cells caused mainly by the blockage of sugar metabolism by polyunsaturated fatty acids which act as metabolic jammers on cell insulin receptors.
Over the last 40 years diabetes has surged while sugar consumption has remained stable but PUFA's in the form or garbage metabolic blocking vegetable oils ( all man made and recent creations of the food industry , ie soy oil, canola oil, corn oil etc ) has exploded. The more PUFA consumption has increased the more sugar is unable to enter the cells the more diabetes explodes as well as most of the other diseases of modern food industrial metabolically sick and poisoned society.”
Mocho Shorter on May 20, 2014 at 01:49:37
“too much sugar consumption leads to too much insulin production, too much insulin production leads to insulin insensitivy and eventually to no insulin. Oatmeal is high in fiber so it will not digest as quickly as refine sugar. Sugar is a billion dollar industry so we expect the propaganda trolls”
May 19, 2014 at 18:34:56
“Since glucose is the prefered fuel for the cells with the brain being a glucose comsumption factory and with the body having numerous back up systems to provide glucose, the vital fuel of life, to the cells when it drops too low in the blood stream, such as liver glycogen and then the breaking down of muscle proteins to turn into glucose, nature must have made a mistake by choosing its primary fuel as being something so dangerous as glucose.
This statment is meant to show the absurdity of sugar as being unhealthy.
Or is it that nature didn't know what it was doing in chosing glucose as the main cellular fuel and providing numerous backup systems to provide glucose, not fat and not protein, as the perfered fuel for sustaining cellular energy and life.
Mocho Shorter on May 19, 2014 at 19:49:10
“Refined sugar is not nature. And with any billion dollar industry you can expect the trolls. Sugar is addictive and dangerous just ask any diabetic amputee in a wheel chair wheeling themselves to a vending machine !”
“Anyone who exercises their civil rights to protest in the Corporate occupied dictarship called America will be attrested, jailed put in prison and then probation. The probation means that a person is effectively sidelined from doing anything least they go back to jail.
Doing nothing is what is expected of the 99% who have only 2 choices - either shut up and obey corporate domination or protest and go to jail.”
May 18, 2014 at 10:52:10
“The real drug war is RX drugs being waged against the public.
The drug criminals are the collaborative gangs of drug companies, medical schools, doctors, campaign donation bribed politicans, media advertising paid off publications and TV, and industry trade group state licensing boards.
There is no real science driving this corporate quackery other than finance.
Every disease and symptoms are incurable do to the quackery that controls the politics of Allopathic medicine. The incurability is by design since natural medicines which are the only real way heal all but some acute diseases are not eligable for drug company indoctronated doctors to be prescribing. Prescribing must be FDA validated and only patentable chemicals are good investments despite the fact, or because of the fact, that chemicals don't and can never cure a chronic disease. Therefore standard of care in America is code for treating ( selling ! ) with toxic chemicals which can never heal and keeps the poor patient in a constant ill health while becoming endless paying customers. The system is therefore a profit monopoly which is designed to maintain disease and has legistated mandatory druging by allowing only quack chemical treatments to be used ensuring the highest profits and incurability of everyone who is treated.
The madness of giving children speed is but one of dozens of examples of the drug war. The medical system itself is a nightmare combining the worst elements of misinformation, exploitation and disease mongering all hidden behind PR illusions of science.”
itsacoolbreeze on May 18, 2014 at 11:04:06
“Lol. It is always someone else's fault, isn't it Ted? Not one drug company in this country ties one person down and forces drugs down their throats. This is America Ted. You can "JUST SAY NO" How hard is that?”
“The Scientists who sold themselves to do this drug marketing pretending to be research all had to suffering from a cognitive disease worse than alzheimers. They have dreaded Quackmentia.
Quackmentia is a form of brain dementia that occurs in those individuals who recieve corporate money in exchange for incompenent bogus research conclusions paid for by corporations that are trying to push dangerous drugs into new markets. The drugs are all by definition dangerous and produce real brain damage and require marketing and science that is false and immoral ( refer to Toxic Psychiatry. book and you tube by a Psychiatrist, www.Peterbreggin.com )
Quackmentia paticulary has been proven to destroy the moral centers of the brain by those who sell their souls for the money to do the junk science enabling this terrible deformed medical scam to happen. It creates human robots who will do anything that they are paid to irrespective of the corruption level of the junk science they are being bribed to invent.
The results of Quackmentia is the production of a pseudo scientific class of quacks who pretend to be doctors and research Phd's whose brain damage is constantly being demonstrated by absurd conclusions which unleash all manner of dangerous drugs on the public.
Quackmentia appears to also be the only type of dementia that is infectious. The public gets infected by believing the lies and marketing tricks of drug promotion corportate quackery masquerading as science which leads to the inevitable drug sale and patient brain damage.”
“Being brain damaged is a requirement for being president of the antidemocratic corporate racket called USA. Every president has by necessity been Sycophants and most have had serious Narcisstic personality disorders. Ronald Reagen who clearly had dementia can be considered the greatest president when the definition of the Presidency is correctly understood as being the leader of, for and by the 1%.
Hillary Clinton was always qualified to lead the 1% due to her corporate only fake democracy power complex.. She is every bit as despicable as all the other fake figure heads who qualify as possible leaders owing to their ability to serve the owners of the country and therefore recieve the muliti hundreds of millions dollars in bribes to be a leader of the best government in the world the money can buy.
Now Hillary Clinton stands above all the rest of the Sycophants with the extra added qualification that in addition to her being morally deformed she rises to the top of corporate front runner race if she also has the rare gift of quite possibly being brain damaged which lilke Reagon would be the ideal empty headed corporate stooge.
Considering the degree of moral affliction of her husband slick Willy the prior corporate selected pres of the good ole USA the question now needs to asked whether or not the Clintons intentional created the stroke to achieve organic brain damage to achieve and extra advantage in corporate appeal and hence a donation bribery advantage ?”
“Title is incorrect - should read "I Don't Believe Marco Rubio is Human"
The sole basis or this corporate courtiers position is the donations he gets from the corporatists who profit from destroying what is left of the planet.”
nh3man on May 11, 2014 at 10:05:51
“It's those corporate donations, but also Rubio has become a non-factor in the run up to the Republican presidential primaries. Rubio's announcement was a method for him to declare "I'm anti-science too!", and to see if he can get back in the headlines.”
“The real message from the corporate injustice court system in this absurd show trial is that the 99% of Americans who have lost their freedom to the corporate plunderers that owns the country and has fixed the system against the people and turned democracy into a farce better not try and protest, assemble in public, demonstrate or exercise free speech or else the iron fist of the corporate owned state protection racket state will imprison YOU - YOU means anyone who is not wealthy or mangers and administrators of the ruling class/police state. YOU means YOU.”
“The Jews historical avoidance of their 'holy land" answers your deceptive point of how do they dare live in Hebron the burial burial place of the founders of their . The Jewish population in Europe, the Middle east and North American was in the millions yet was near nothing in Palestine despite the fact that Jews can and did migrate all over the world but managed to not care much at all about migrating to the home land of their religion. Why did they stay away from their alleged beloved holy homeland and prefer anywhere else but Palestine to live in world then Adam ? Not until the discovery of free land in Palenstine in exchange for ethic cleanings and crimes against humanity did they care about returning to the birthplace of the founders of their religion. For every Jew that migrated to Palestine prior to 1930 dozens migrated to NYC. Can we find any greater hyprocrisy today than the many dishonest rationalizations that are used to justify the debacle and moral horror that is the basis of the state of Israel.?”
“The science that Jenny McCarthy and Suzanne Summers are aware of not the same as the junk science that the corporate business obedient medical industries no thinking yes men playing their shallow roles of expert who are doing the one and only thing their profession requires of them to keep their jobs - which is conforming and mimicing whatever bad science and misinformation is necessary to keeps the system thriving. No amount of junk science and human damage matters for corporate medical hacks. The one an only issue is protect the system and obey dogma.”
“There's one problem with complaining or even mentioning corporate racketeering - its really the way things are supposed to be once the BS of democracy for and by the people is exposed for the deception it is. Government for Corporate/ Special interests is fascism, which is what America is all about. What's good for Intuit is what the goverment will make into its practice. What bad for the citizens and good for corporations is what the US governent is there for. What else is a democracy that's for sale and owned by the 1% supposed to be doing anyway.”
“Poisoning the people is of no real consequence for the psychopathic driven corporate value system that defines the most sociopathic society in the world which is America. If its good for profits then nothing else matters.”
“A vivid description of why the conventional medical monoply must be brought down. Incompetent doctors who act as obedient corporate robots and only prescibe terrible chemicals that should never every have been called medicine in the first place. The listing of the lunactic RX drugs given to this poor child and the next approved money making high tech form of insanity being suggested by the quack doctors of brain surgery should be read again and again by anyone who doesn't understand what medicine is in American - its a business of the lowest moral level not a science.
The real reason why cannibas was made illegal is to protect the synthetic medical rackets for corporate blundering. The issue is nature which heals verus chemicals which don't work except as a scam to work as wealth production.
How about taking the medical debacle behind the history of lying about what cannibas does in order to sanction awful chemicals ( which are the real dangerous treatments ) as approved medicine while eliminating the competetion of the far superior alternative natural medicines which are not corporate controlable to the logical conclusion of establishing a medical democracy in America in which medicines will be approved based on their therapeautic effects not on the financal business rewards of thriving by keeping patients sick with failed profitable toxins . When that happens most current RX treatments and conventional procedures would become illegal and the health of the public would be transformed for the better.”
Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:25
“And the worse brain damage that effects the largest number of people is the mass herd ignorance infection that turns people into non thinking sheep who repeat what their told without examining the evidence.”
KellyMBray on Jan 11, 2014 at 17:02:11
“So what you are saying is..
1. You have no real science to bring to the table.
2. You would not be able define or identify a *neurotoxin* if it was sitting on your lap.
3. Do not understand the dose vs toxicity concept.
4. Have only cliches and slogans.
5. Call others sheep while blindly repeating antivax talking points you don't understand.
6. Must be a Ron Paul voter.
Dec 9, 2013 at 20:29:28
“Your example is absurd. What would be your advise to the parents of girls who have had strokes after receiving the neurotoxic cocktail of poisons in this horrendous chemical cocktail.”
NadineColbert on Dec 10, 2013 at 03:40:49
“Nobody had a stroke after a vaccine but plenty of people got brain damage without certain vaccines.
Pertussis vaccine, meningitis vaccine, varicella, measles for starters all prevent brain damage. And polio prevents catastrophic nerve damage and paralysis.
Rubella prevents brain damage in the fetus.”
Dec 9, 2013 at 11:03:38
“It hard to know what is worse. The quack science profit driven incompetence and corruption of the doctors or the stupidy of the parents who allow their children to be poisoned by dangerous vaccine junk science vodoo.”
NadineColbert on Dec 9, 2013 at 19:10:19
“My advice to you is. Don't have the tetanus vaccine and take up gardening, especially planting roses, without gloves. Then decide if vaccination is useful or not.”
OverseasVet on Dec 9, 2013 at 11:23:10
“Maybe stop going to a witch doctor and see a medical doctor. They are trained in real science and thus know the benefits of vaccination. Its the parents who do not vaccinate who must be judged for their competency.”
“The Insurmontable cancer treatment obstacle that is a taboo subject to discuss in the corporate and politically controlled world of big money / big treatment failure junk science based conventional medicine is that using chemo poisoning to treat cancer is fundamentally hopeless for healing but wonderful for disease mongering economics. Chemo poisoning, which is cytotoxic to ALL cells, and is therefore the main cause of death in the millions of people it killled, rather than the cancer that provided the excuse to sell these horrific absurd proven failed treatments which exist solely for the sake of an incredibley lucrative business monopoly scam.In terms of sound science chemo poisoning is a scientific oxymoron. Chemo hasn't worked and can not work. Poison as medicine always was and always will be a near certain failure that exists only because of the profits derived from the horrendous disease mongering business it generates. After 50 years of unmitagated failure and many millions of cytotoxic induced treatment deaths and hundreds of billions in quack corporate profits and corporate welfare research dollars wasted there should be no doubt that cyto toxic poisons are proven incapable of adequately treating cancer and no amount of repackaging and reinventing tactics and next generation products or latest investment scheme illusions within the forever hopeless failed medical model of toxic chemicals as medicine can ever deliver good medicine. What to reinvent health care ? - start with abandoning the myth that poison and corporate racketering can ever be science or real medicine.”
“The distinction is that individuals are their own agent in speaking up and decide for themselves. When it comes to established organizions the decisions are always hyper conservative and non confrontational. So while the threat to careers was a factor in the engineers blowing the whistle ( there are now thousands of them speaking up, they have there own group - if you haven't seen the youtubes you would be impressed ) so was their individual conscience and their ability to exercise personal choice as opposed to organizationally controlled self recognition. No such moral constrains and freedoms or ethics exist with any established professional groups. They follow the principle of self protection and do not take on power. Isn't this however just reality 101 of human behavior which explains so much of the problems in the world being an outcome of systemic corruption and incompetence and the willful ignorance of any adult who trusts authority rather than their own conscious abilities to examine issues on their own.”
“Chomsky primary point that if the engineers and pilots who have signed a statement proving inside demolition not planes as causing 9/11, and absolutely building # 7, were really scientific they would have gone ahead and taken their dissdence into professional journals and meeting to prove the 9/11 government myth is false. The taboo on the truth and consequence of career destruction that it is structually impossible for a building like # 7 to collapse in 7 seconds unless there is a preset demolition is such a professionally suicidal act that no professional already formal existing groups or journals would dare touch it. Chomsky, whose brillant career exposed the way power frames reality by omssion of evidence and using the existing systems to silence dissent with the implied certain threat of career death has failed to apply his own laws of the system to the demolitions that happened on 9/11 and the demolition of the existence of any organized whistle blowing in the US in the obdient and or perish professional conformist classes. - Big disappointment in Chomsky for forgetting how power and propaganda work to silence discussion by the threat of professional destruction for those who are foolish enough to risk practice free speech.”
Erin84 on Nov 27, 2013 at 13:36:01
“I thought this as well. This was his only explanation for why 9/11 skeptics aren't taken seriously. They didn't take their concerns to Academia. He knows darn well exactly what you just said about how well that would have gone over. I remember trying to search articles on building 7 in my University's database. The only thing I found was a review of the Popular Science article, and the author was very neutral. He didn't take a stance about building 7, only spoke to how well the information was presented in the article, and he mentioned NIST, and pointed out how both Popular Science and NIST failed to counter the concerns of 9/11 skeptics, and how NIST even admitted after their initial report that they didn't have a full explanation, and more research was needed. It is no secret that when the 9/11 widows pushed for the 9/11 commission that building 7 was pretty much brushed aside as part of a greater pattern of lots of unanswered questions that day. Even the mainstream media noted how it was deemed the 9/11 Omission Report. I'm not one of those people who believes every conspiracy theory or parrots narratives about major events as if the alternative explanations are perfectly correct, but I know when something doesn't add up, and there are mutliple things about the official 9/11 story that just don't, and I wonder why there is a need to lie about such things if there is no cover-up taking place.”
Buller on Nov 27, 2013 at 13:25:20
“The building had already been evacuated after officials realized that it was too dangerous for firemen to remain inside. It had massive cracks in the walls and floors and bent girders everywhere. When the last remaining strength member weakened enough the building collapsed in 7 seconds.
If you had evidence to prove your ideas, they would have been believed, and investigated. But none of your evidence holds up to close scrutiny, so everyone thinks you're a nut as a result.”
Patient Zero on Nov 27, 2013 at 13:17:48
“So, space aliens. You think we've got any of them on ice in area 51, too?”
skillfullmeans on Nov 27, 2013 at 12:58:06
“If these engineers are so afraid of career suicide, why even risk signing a statement? There's at least some clout to a report in a peer-reviewed journal. If you're going to risk signing your name to something controversial, why not have some substance behind it?”
“This hogwash as your foolish confusion misunderstands is what happens to all bodies when the fuel supply from their foods is unable to supply their tissues with energy. The body will use back up systems and if the first line of backup which is liver glycogen stores are depleted, as is the case in vegan self cannibalism damaged bodies, then the body uses adrenaline and cortisol to breakdown tissues to get glucose into the cells. These stess hormones are seriously inflammatory as highly toxic when they becomne the primary source of energy as is the case in vegan starvation which requires self cannibalism for the energy deficient in the diet. If you think survival mechanisms designed by nature are hogwash then you need to review your confusion rather than explaining as you did what you don't understand.”
“There is no need to switch devils here in an attempt to misrepresent the gruesome and documented factaul evidence of the shocking past and yes current failure of conventional medicine with logical fallacies. Your tactic is switching the issue to alternative medicine by misrepresenting the work of 2 single doctors and then misrepresenting the treatment outcomes of hundreds of orthodox quacks that you correctly acknowledge used to achieve nothing but mutulation with horrible big profit death cocktails and continue to do the same now with new and improved marketing deceptions that you pretend are are the true. Dear victim of the cult of medicine - save your faith for religion, any attempts to make religion out of medicine will be exposed as the absurd propaganda of the current transparant scamming trend of the war against humanity by the medicine racketeers as they try to appeal to the endless well of public ignorance by bait and switch trickery with the packaging of treatment slaughter and quackery in the religious jargon of stactistical sleight of hand and the tried and true despicable marketing deceptions based on lying with false language magic smoke screens. The support groups for survivors need to know that before medicine kills its deceived patients with its deadly defective products everyone is a survivor irrespective of smoke and mirror semantic tricks. ”
lunchstealer on Sep 30, 2013 at 15:38:02
“"Dear victim of the cult of medicine - save your faith for religion, any attempts to make religion out of medicine will be exposed as the absurd propaganda of the current transparant scamming trend of the war against humanity by the medicine racketeers as they try to appeal to the endless well of public ignorance by bait and switch trickery with the packaging of treatment slaughter and quackery in the religious jargon of stactistical sleight of hand and the tried and true despicable marketing deceptions based on lying with false language magic smoke screens."
“Taking these proven failure terrible chemicals marketed via monopoly junk science, fear mongering and greed to a decieved public is much worse that not using them. Most deaths labeled cancer are in fact deaths from drug treatment induced wasting syndrome, organ failure and infections.
The premise of the article is a regular repeated lie that there is a "chance" that using this drug could "potentially be life saving " - that potential in fact is less than the potential of winning a lottery. The only potential that matters is the potential to successfully mislead the public in route to a treatment bonaza profit rip off where curing is outlawed in exchange for the cash grap of continued hoplessness of the patent chemical marketplace racket. 50 years of racketeering under the guise of cancer research has proven that the whole approach of chemotherapy is nothing but a junk science corporate profit scam. -”
lunchstealer on Sep 27, 2013 at 14:42:09
“The problem is that the alternatives are often harmless (but not always, some natural alternatives are actually quite dangerous) and are peddled by people with just as voracious a profit motive. The Mercola Institute posts articles proposing the dangers of vaccines while advertising Joe Mercola's 'natural' 'remedies' (separate scare-quotes are necessary because both terms are, in Mercola's case, fictions in their own right), based on science that is orders of magnitude 'junkier' than that which justifies the use of chemotherapy. Burzynski charges hundreds of thousands of dollars for treatments for which there's never been peer-reviewed research. No one else can replicate his claims. Yet he's not 'big pharma' so he gets a pass from anti-science types.
I'm an active supporter of the survivor community, with many of my closest friends being survivors. Modern chemotherapies are significantly less dangerous than those of the past. I know people who are permanently disabled, basically slowly dying, due to older forms of chemotherapies, while many survivors of the same cancers who were treated after new therapies came on the market have as good a quality of life as I do. That's where your so-called 'junk' science is taking us. It's giving us better treatments all the time. Hopefully one day chemotherapy will never be necessary. But in the meantime, it's the best we've got.
Mercola/Burzynski and their ilk are just as profit-hungry as 'big pharma' but without the science backing them up.”