“If all Scripture is in fact profitable for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness then teaching Hell is valid. Both from Scripture and a great many of the Ant-Nicaean Fathers we find a plethora of proof-texts that support an eternal Hell, Chan following Jesus, Apostle Paul, Apostle John, and a great many Early Church Father's believes it is both important and edifying to teach Hell. I do not understand what the beef is with the doctrine.”
“His purpose and his intent are not the same however. If his intent is not to lead people away from the meat that feeds the spirit, and thus starving the readers then he really needs to think before he writes anything.”
“The gist of the article. It is about impermanence and centering ourselves in the present..
The author refers to impermanence as death. These words are written in the moment and for the moment. They are read by you dear reader in the moment. This is the article's focus and the author's personal meaning of resurrection which is as he states, "personal inner transformation.".”
“So this article is really about, "Do you have to believe that Scripture is true?" because Scripture tells us that Jesus' resurrection was physical. Even Jesus said "destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up."
The author states that believing in a spiritual resurrection is more believable because of what he has seen in life, but do we not know that "Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." and that we are instructed to "live by faith and not by sight".
I agree, it is very important to analyze and question our beliefs, but do not strain out sound Biblical doctrine and replace it with a lie. I hope and pray that the readers of this article flee from unsound teachings and devote themselves to true and wholesome Words that lead to life and peace! In the name of Jesus Christ, our risen Lord!”