iOS app Android app
Clicking Follow Back will add user to your friends list and may allow access to your Social News timeline..

HuffPost Social News

Badges:
Your Badges and the Badge Module will be removed from your profile

okelley2nd's Comments

View Comments:   Sort:
Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Commented Nov 15, 2012 at 09:04:29 in Politics

“Well Win4U, maybe I am not fooling myself and am trying to fool you! But if I have to live in an all inclusive society or live in a cave after you give me an "I told you so," I'll adapt and survive. Can't live in fear of what may or may not come around the corner. If they need 16,000 new IRS agents, then I'm applying. I need an upgrade.”
Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Commented Nov 14, 2012 at 18:55:25 in Politics

“In reply to your last post, I have been thinking independently for many years. As best I can tell, your accusations have no basis in fact or reality. My research does not entail a full on belief in obscure and partisan blogs nor require me to be "all in" in radical conspiracy theories. Maybe you should starting thinking a little for yourself. It might hurt a little at first, but you might get use to it and the anxiety from all those fears you have may just abate.”

Win4U on Nov 14, 2012 at 23:16:14

“I am only going by the information you provided. Most LibDems claim they are "independent thinkers', but they are just fooling themselves....NOBODY else!

No basis for reality? Really? TELL us all about the need for 16,000 IRS Agents. That will be a good independent start.

BTW, what did President Obama's re-election mean for you regarding FREEDOM? Did you know that in the last 90 days OBAMA's administration has issued, directed, installed, etc...over 6,300 new directives, orders, guidelines, etc...?

HOW does that make you feel about your FREEDOMS? More LACK of Freedoms is coming over the next four years! Get ready independent thinker!”
Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Commented Nov 13, 2012 at 20:01:51 in Politics

“Geez Win4U, you sure set me straight with your "knowledge." Looks like we're both drinking the Kool Aid but I think your bladder is about to burst.”

Win4U on Nov 14, 2012 at 16:00:37

“So, those "readers" voted for President Obama and The "Obama Does Not Care" Bill. I'd say that's why they thought this raid on our economy was a good idea!

And the 16,000 IRS Agents? Why do we need them again?

And, why are so many businesses up in arms about The ODNC Bill?

And, why have all the bills/costs been put off until this piece of trash goes into law?

I hope you are ready to pay and PAY BIG when ODNC takes hold of you and your wallet!

BTW, what has Obama's re-election done for your freedom? NOTHING!

IN the last 90 days, OBAMA's administration has put in to affect over 6,300 new rules, regulations, guidelines, etc.... AGAINST your FREEDOMS!

ARE you happy with this limiting of YOUR freedoms?

Don't let me be your "knowledge", but go out and learn for yourself what is going on.

LIBDEMS love voters who don't think for themselves, but are really good at following the party line and simple instructions!”
Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Fate of Obamacare After Obama's Reelection

Commented Nov 13, 2012 at 08:22:15 in Politics

“They read the bill. I live near DC and know several people that work for government that read the bill. They knew what was in the bill. If your elected official voted yeah or nay and didn't know what was in the bill, then I hope you voted them out of office.”

Win4U on Nov 13, 2012 at 17:41:36

“Who did these "readers" vote for? That will tell all.

Think for yourself.

Tell us why the IRS needs 16,000 new agents? That should tell you something!

From what I've learned and seen by his actions (the best way to determine how a person will act), President Obama is NOT our friend and only wants to make America into a third world country. Are good with that? I hope not!

GET your water (knowledge) UP Stream in fresh/clean water, not down stream after the cows have played in the water. Get my drift?”
Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Commented Oct 19, 2011 at 15:05:37 in Politics

“You mean such as the inhumanity of leaving the healthcare system the way it is and letting the millions of Americans without health insurance go without treatment? Just because the Dr. is unwilling to accept less payment? So profit margin is the determining factor in health care? Last I saw, there was no Dr. in my area trading medical help for chickens. There are a few who live modestly but most seem to do quite well, as they complain about not making enough money. Any Dr. who would deny care to someone because there is not enough in it for them has checked their humanity at the door to begin with.”
Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Commented Oct 19, 2011 at 09:15:02 in Politics

“Again, all I am asking is to see the text of legislation that says this is so. So far all I have seen is a rehash of proven false accusations from the mouths of politicians like Palin and Gingrich. I may be wrong, but I would like some proof of it. So far I can find many things proving statements false (some I have posted) but nothing but a re-spewing of the same, old falsehoods to counter my statements. I am not a big fan of all of the Healthcare overhaul, but I also think that using fear mongering and lies to sway people against something is very dangerous. Wake up and think for yourselves. LEFT and RIGHT!”
Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Commented Oct 18, 2011 at 16:50:22 in Politics

“So what does the IPAB have to do with personal healthcare decisions? It's purpose is to make recommendations to lower the cost of Medicare. Again, just curious, as it seems the things I am reading run contrary to what some politicians are saying. Read below.

IPAB is tasked with developing specific proposals to bring the net growth in Medicare spending back to target levels if the Medicare Actuary determines that net spending is forecast to exceed target levels, beginning in 2015.

The proposals made by IPAB must not include any recommendation to ration health care, raise revenues or increase Medicare beneficiary premiums, increase Medicare beneficiary cost sharing (deductibles, coinsurance, or co-payments), or otherwise restrict benefits or modify eligibility criteria. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) must implement these proposals unless Congress adopts equally effective alternatives. The board is also required to submit to Congress annual reports on health care costs, access, quality, and utilization. IPAB must submit to Congress recommendations on how to slow the growth in total private health care expenditures.”

syllable on Oct 19, 2011 at 13:48:42

“Problem is: Doctors are already refusing to serve Medicare patients. As is, there's not enough money in it for them. More cutbacks will mean even less health care for our elderly and anyone who applauds such inhumanity is, in my opinion, an exception to being a compassionate person.”
Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Commented Oct 18, 2011 at 16:36:30 in Politics

“I still would like to see the text of it because I cannot believe it would be any different than what your for-profit, health insurance does now.”

rawlf33 on Oct 18, 2011 at 20:33:37

“The only difference i see between the two is that the for-profit system may refuse to pay for something, but it does nor forbid the Doctor from performing the service if you choose to pay for it yourself. The Government run plan actually makes it a crime for a Doctor to perform an unauthorized procedure.”
Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Newt Gingrich Displays Hypocrisy On 'Death Panels'

Commented Oct 18, 2011 at 14:00:20 in Politics

“Please show me the language in the legislation that allows the government to make end of life decisions for you against your will. I am curious about this.”

rawlf33 on Oct 18, 2011 at 15:35:52

“It's in the 20,000 plus pages very few people have read yet. Starting with the idiots who voted for it before reading it. It allows for a government administrator to decide if something is too costly versus the liklihood of its effectiveness. Essentially it allows someone else besides you or your family to decide if a procedure can be performed even if you were to opt to pay for it yourself. Another one of those sneaky things in the bill like making it so only the government can make student loans. What does that have to do with healthcare?”