Let's get right to it, shall we: CNN fumbled the GLAAD vs. Roland S. Martin situation badly. The indefinite suspension yesterday of Martin as a commentator for the cable news network due to some of his "tweets" during Superbowl Sunday is something we should all consider carefully because the ramifications could have a severe chilling effect on journalist everywhere, who will find it hard to balance social media banter & fun with followers, as opposed to on-air, paid written commentary for networks and news outlets.
My concern about what has happened with CNN is that the cable network bowed to pressure from GLAAD that Martin's "Barbershop Talk" Man tweets were somehow a) targeted at gay men and b) that he was trying to incite violence against Gays because he used phrases like #TeamWhipdatAss and "ish" which is Roland's term for "shit." The problem with what GLAAD has done here, is that they have been able to tell the world what Martin meant, when he himself was very clear on Twitter on SuperBowl Sunday that he was talking about soccer (which he considers a lesser sport as a avid football fan), and he was poking fun at men who would wear H&M underoos (as Martin called them). Folks, if you know Roland, you know he pokes fun at everyone, regardless of race, class, gender. That is his brand.
While, Roland S. Martin is well known for his loud personality, gentlemanly ascots, flashy suits & ties, cowboy boots, big Texas belt buckles, candor, sense of humor, and his fiery political commentary, the longtime black journalist has been an outspoken advocate against violence of any kind, verbal assaults against black women (citing Jay Z's use of the "B" word in rap lyrics), hazing and physical violence on HBCU campuses by greek organizations or bands (most recently FAMU), and he has been a supporter of the fair and humane treatment of GAY Americans all of his life.
Martin is not, however, a supporter of gay marriage (as I am not), but we all support civility, tolerance and inclusion of gay Americans in our society. I know Roland well. I am both a media colleague and close personal friend to he and his wife Rev. Jacquie Hood Martin. Mrs. Martin, who is an outspoken minister of the gospel and promoter of faith, found herself the subject of personal and severe attacks by some in the gay community via Twitter to such a degree that she had to shut her account down.
Martin, who hails proudly from Houston, Texas, became a household name during the 2008 campaign season as one of CNN's premiere pundits. He is also one of the nation's most prominent African-American male TV personalities and speakers. Hosting his own Sunday Show, Washington Watch on TV One and is a regular commentator on the Tom Joyner Morning Show. To lose his voice and big presence on TV during the 2012 campaign season would be a travesty for us all. Like Martin or not, he is "straight no-chaser" as the old folks like to say, and he brings clarity, intensity, and fun to the political coverage process.
This morning, Roland S. Martin finds himself in the middle of a controversy involving GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) which is an organization that is dedicated to the fair and humane treatment of gays, lesbians, transgender and bi-sexual Americans. Martin & GLAAD have agreed to meet to discuss the matter further. All of this started with Martin's tweets during Superbowl Sunday, which were targeted at the David Beckham H&M underwear line, and men showing up at Superbowl parties dressed in pink. Anyone who knows Martin, knows he is a "man's man." He is a Texan after all, and he is unabashedly opinionated whether on air or on social media. That is his brand.
After this whole incident blew up, as a journalist, myself, I took to calling many of the black men I know, who watched the superbowl to see what they thought about Martin's comments and they all agreed that Roland was being macho, he was being a guy who loves football, and it was cultural in that this is how "Bruahs" (as Martin likes to call his fellow black men) act during sporting events. In my household, we called it "playing the dozens." Roland likes to do that fairly often. But for GLAAD to suggest he was advocating violence against gays is just stunning. It is stunning and inaccurate at best.
In the final analysis, we as journalists, writers, Americans should be concerned when advocacy groups (liberal, conservative, gay or straight) have so much power that they can take the words of an individual and turn them on their head to further their political agenda. That is exactly what GLAAD has done in this instance. Instead of meeting with Martin in private to get clarity on what he meant, they went on the attack and pushed CNN to suspend Martin. Worse, is the fact that CNN suspended Martin for comments he made as a private citizen on Super Bowl Sunday. He was not on AIR making such comments, which might have been more understandable to reprimand him for. All in all, I think Martin will be allowed back on CNN, but not until he has eaten quite a bit of GLAAD crow, apologized (some more), and cowered himself to all of their demands. It makes me wonder, will we see the same Roland S. Martin we all know and love, or will we see a lesser, muted, more cautious man who had the "ish" slapped out of him.
Follow Sophia A. Nelson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/http://www.twit
Wallace Best, Ph.D.: The 10 Best Gospel Songs: The Soul Of American Music
Debbie Hines: A Teachable Moment for CNN's Roland Martin and GLAAD
Doesn't anyone see what's wrong with this picture. When I was 4 years old, Emmett Till was beaten to death for supposedly disrespecting a white woman. This year Roland Martin "jokes" about blacks whupping a guy dressed in pink and slapping the blank out of guys who like underwear commercials. Followed by a black on black beating in Atlanta where the victim was acting "gay", and there's an article on the site showing that something like 70% of the violence against gays is directed ay gays of color.
I will say my own opinion is that Roland Martins behavior, on-air and on Twitter, has exhibited homophobia and or insensitivity to the LGBT community, and certainly his Tweets on Sunday fall into that pattern.
I also will say that, contrary to Ms. Nelson's apparent contention that Roland Martin's tweets on Subday amounted to his own personal behavior, not to be subject to sanction by his employer, the fact that he Tweets to 95,000 followers and is a major cultural figure DOES make it CNN's business and I am glad he was suspended, clearly after some consideration by CNN.
Nonetheless, its important to keep in mind that Martin did not merely opine that he didn't agree with homosexuality, but more specifically called for violence. Even if done jokingly, the fact that he made that call to such potentially huge audience is irresponsible and reprehensible. You could make the argument he should be fired for showing such poor judgement, not because he's homophobic.
You chide CNN and GLAAD for presuming to know what Roland Martin meant by his tweets, and then you go on to presume to tell us what he meant.
Do you really not have any 8 year olds on hand to point out what's wrong with that picture?
I don't give an "ish" what kind of Texan Martin purports to be, or what kind of "Man's Man" he purports to be - none of that is an excuse for his thinly veiled homophobic foolishness.
Are you not concerned when a journalist (yourself) has so so much power that they can take the words of an individual (Martin) and turn them on their head to further their political agenda (covering up for a homophobe).
That is exactly what Sophia Nelson has done in this instance.
Regimes of "gay therapy" are driven by religious dogma, not science or psychology--the practit
Anti-gay "therapy" is abuse, and in 2012 any association with it is becoming radioactive. That's the new normal.