Richard Dawkins Exposes God's Greatest Secret

Fact plus proof does not equal reality. Science should better be aware of this. The reality of the universe presented to us by science based on the proof collected is not the greatest reality of the universe.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

We are in the 21st century and yet there are millions and millions of people who demand proof about the existence of God. Ronald Regan, the former U.S. president, once said, "Sometimes when I'm faced with an atheist, I am tempted to invite him to the greatest gourmet dinner that one could ever serve, and when we have finished eating that magnificent dinner, to ask him if he believes there's a cook."

Then there are others who do stupid things in the name of religion and faith. What a shame it is! We are talking of 7 billion people and more with conflicts in their mind and the impact this negative energy has on the human race. How many people on earth exist who have found unity in their religion and faith and discovered that same unity amongst all religions? Which fool told you that religious scriptures prove the existence of god? All religions are representations of that great truth called God. Religions exist to help you remember truth not become one. The proof of God is in realisation of that great teachings handed out to us. That realisation is your responsibility not someone else's. You own the right to prove or disprove God. Not a scientist not a religious teacher.

I am about to reveal to you one of the many secrets from my latest book: "The Danger of Proof: How Science Influences Your Thinking, Limits Your Potential and Kills the God Within." This secret makes the argument of god delusion by Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and many other others redundant.

The Closely Guarded Secret: Two Important Words That Science Can Learn From Ramakrishna

Ramakrishna, Paramahansa one of India's greatest religious teachers used to say that everything in this world -- the sun, the moon, the stars, the nature of human beings, events in the world, everything that we see, touch, hear or feel -- is a fact not a reality. Reality is what happens inside of you in relation to the facts of the external world.

Let us understand this more clearly with an example.

If someone close to you dies you feel sad however chances are your neighbour might not feel anything bad about the event.

Fact: Someone close to you died.

Reality: You felt sad.

However your neighbour did not feel sad. He could not feel the connection which you felt toward the person who died and so the event of death was a fact for him not a reality.

So now we have two realities for one fact. You got sad however your neighbour did not feel the same towards the event. He could see the dead body before him but no tears flowed from his eyes. Why is that so?

Lets take another example. If you and your neighbour were walking in the forest and a tiger appears before you, how would both of you react. Obviously both of you would be terrified, right?

Fact: Tiger appearing before you.

Reality: Both of you felt the fear of death.

So in this case we have one fact and one reality. Why is that so?

When there are no conflicts in the mind between two or more people over the facts, reality is the same for everyone. However when there are conflicts over the facts reality no longer is the same for everyone.

Let's take another interesting example from the life of the great Ramakrishna.

When a cow was beaten, Ramakrishna felt the pain in his own body as if someone was beating him. He would jump with pain but others close to him would not feel the pain.

Fact: A cow was being hit.

Reality: Ramakrishna felt the pain in his body whilst others did not.

There are so many such examples in the lifes of great men and women like Jesus Christ, Buddha, Muhammad, Adi Shankaracharya, Ramana Maharishi and many others. They owned the pain of the world. They embraced the sorrow of humanity.

Science uses proof to bridge the gap between facts and reality.

Facts + Proof = Reality for science

That is the lowest definition of reality...

Ramakrishna gave a new definition to reality one that science should take note of.

Facts+ Level of consciousness = Reality

This is the greatest definition you can ever have of reality.

When a cow was beaten others did not feel the pain. However the consciousness of Ramakrishna was very broad. He was not holed up in his tiny little body. The pain of the world was the pain of Ramkrishna.

Science does not take into account the subjective development of human character. This is the biggest mistake science has been making and the reason why it has still not found unity whilst great teachers have.

A wise teacher once said, "To a nail everything is a hammer. To a frog everything is a snake. To a scientist everything is proof."

Scientists cannot think beyond proof. Fact plus proof does not equal reality. Science should better be aware of this. The reality of the universe presented to us by science based on the proof collected is not the greatest reality of the universe. There are higher realities in existence and these can be known and observed only when the level of consciousness changes. When the level of consciousness changes the proof collected by the scientists at a lower level of consciousness becomes redundant.

Reality is always what happens inside of you. Whatever happens outside is always a fact -- always. What happens outside is called a objective world and what happens inside your being is called a subjective world.

Great teachers like Krishna, Buddha, Christ and many others focussed on the growth of human character. The level of consciousness of a being -- the subjective growth. As the level of consciousness increases your reality changes. It is very important to understand this phenomena. We are not atoms and molecules. The discovery of the Higgs boson field, the black hole, the big bang helps you in understanding the evolution of the world but a scientist who feels it has got any co-relation to the non-existence of god has only to be sympathised with for his level of consciousness is at a lower level. If that same scientist improves his character, loves himself more, loves others more, is at peace with himself, is at peace with the outside world chances are he would not relate his discovery to the non-existence of God. The level of consciousness is the single most important factor in determining reality.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot