iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stacie Nevadomski Berdan

Stacie Nevadomski Berdan

Posted: March 2, 2011 12:10 PM

Call your members of Congress TODAY and tell them to Stop Cutting Into Our Kids' Future.
I'm a working mother of two and I'm sick and tired of the U.S. Congress cutting programs that help make our kids more competitive.

The global marketplace is huge. Dynamic. And yes, even a bit scary because it's different. But none of this excuses the U.S. Members of Congress if they vote on cuts to the federal budget that will eliminate the only federal funding for foreign language and culture education for K-12.

The amount is $25 million -- a drop in the bucket comparable to the equivalent cost of just one nuclear-armed submarine -- yet the Foreign Language Assistance Program (FLAP) in the Department of Education budget is the only seed money for the only research and development in the entire K-12 field of education in the United States.

Our college graduates need these skills to succeed today in the global marketplace; only -- two-thirds of 2010 graduates have "college labor market jobs", i.e., professional jobs in their field, not bartending or landscaping -- while growth in China continues at a strong clip with only 4 percent unemployment across the board. Other developing nations are on a similar economic rebound. Yet increasingly, if an American wants to work in China, she better speak Mandarin. The same is true throughout much of Latin America and will soon be true for Brazil.
Why do members of Congress continue to be penny wise and pound foolish (like my mother-in-law was fond of saying)?

They know states can't pick up the tab; most are broke or nearing bankruptcy. Unlike language arts, math, science and even music and art, funding for foreign language research and development is almost nonexistent in local districts and states.

In my search, I couldn't find out how many members of Congress are bilingual. But I've got to believe it's higher than the national statistic of 9 percent. More people in the world are bilingual than monolingual -- except in the United States. Something's wrong with this picture.

Most of our fearless leaders don't seem to understand that in order for American children to have a chance of leading a comparably comfortable existence that Members of Congress do today, they will need second language skills to keep pace with globalization and the competition rising from the super economies of China, India, Brazil. Our kids must learn cross-cultural skills, and they must understand foreign currencies, history, politics and religion. If not in our public schools, then where? When? We comfort ourselves with the unrealistic expectation that students will learn in college. But that's unlikely to happen due to the increased difficulty in language learning as we get older. Why?

Because studies show that language learning comes more easily to those whose brains are still in the development phase -- up until roughly 13 or 14 years of age -- which is usually about the time when we start language programs in high school. We are inhibiting bilingualism in future adults. Arguably, bold and innovative new methods of teaching foreign language are needed now more than ever -- and instituted in schools as early as kindergarten.

I've said this before but I'm going to say it again: The stakes for our children are high, and rising. Americans must fight for the need to keep foreign language in the budget as a critical component to our children's success. Knowledge of and appreciation for another language and culture will help our children grow up ready for a complex and multi-cultural global economy. If we are to continue to prosper as a country, our children must become global citizens: open-minded, bilingual kids ready to see global interconnectedness as both opportunity and welcome challenge. Learning a second language is an integral part of this cross-cultural sophistication.

Take action, now! I've called my Members of Congress and so should YOU -- before Friday. We've got to do what's right for our kids.
Stacie Berdan's next book Go Global! A Student's Guide to Launching an International Career is due out this spring, followed by Raising Global Children in the fall.

 

Follow Stacie Nevadomski Berdan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/stacieberdan

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:59 PM on 03/06/2011
Actually, the sad thing is not that we spend this much money on foreign language education, or even that it is targeted to be cut. The sad, adn crazy part s that we spend so much more on so many more pointless things, and what are we cutting? Education? That's the crazy part of this.
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
02:04 PM on 03/05/2011
Doesn't Berdan realize? The Tea Partiers whom, we, the people, elected to Congress last November barely know their mother tongue. They have absolutely NO interest in encouraging bilingualism or multiculturalism.

On the contrary: they believe any sign of multiculturalism is weakness and anti-American.
08:30 PM on 03/03/2011
American exceptionalism only holds viability with the population because it emphasizes American culture, history and language all else. But when children learn intimately about other nations, America becomes less of the centre of their world. Moving to that nation becomes a more viable option for a child that knows the culture, language, etc. That is why we must not allow children to be told any other story but the American one: brain drain must always be to us and never the other way around.

Companies must be American, not French not Spanish and not Chinese, so that we can tax and control them. Anything else is against American interest. Case closed.

Congress is acting correctly in voting against this bill.
08:19 PM on 03/03/2011
Speaking another language other than English purely for semantic reasons is NOT necessary:

Warren Buffet speaks English.

Bill Gates speaks English.

Jamie Dimon speaks English.

The US Congress speaks English.

The list goes on.
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
02:08 PM on 03/05/2011
Spoken like a true Tea partier!

The real truth is that when a person learns a second language, say, Spanish, they learn a lot more than just to speak another language. They learn to think differently about even their own language as well. That is why my high school Russian teacher was fond of saying, "He who knows only his first language, his first language does not even know". (Note the Russian word order of the final clause).

Speaking of knowing your own, what on earth did you think you were really saying when you wrote "for semantic reasons"?
08:15 PM on 03/03/2011
The United States has spoken English for the last hundred years, and in that time we have ceated one of the most prosperous and successful nation in human history. In England as well, the English have no second language. Most people in Canada speak English, with a smattering of French speakers in Quebec. Australia speaks English.
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
02:13 PM on 03/05/2011
You do not know what you are talking about. In England, lots of native born citizens have a second language. Usually Welsh, Scot's Gaelic, Irish Gaelic, Scots or Scottish English (the Scottish variation of English). Then there are, of course, the immigrants.
04:03 PM on 03/06/2011
So, what's you're point? Does that make being monlingual better? more capable?
02:33 PM on 03/03/2011
Stacie, thank you for your post. I agree with you wholeheartedly. I work with public schools and manage a global non-profit organization that educates kids across the world about different cultures and the value of global collaboration. It astounding (although honestly, not surprising) that our government is choosing to cut foreign language and cultural enrichment services to our youth. I am a firm believer that if you follow the money, you will see what people truly value.

Sadly, this issue is not limited to educating children...but adults too. Its the educated, "know what's best for the kids" adults that control the purse strings. At this point, their decisions and actions create or remove opportunities for the masses to have an even brighter future. I'm calling my congressman too.

Looking forward to reading your new book. ~ Julye Augustine, www.gyconnect.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Rollins
11:54 AM on 03/03/2011
You are deeply correct: the vast majority of citizens in other countries in the world all grow up learning 2,3, sometimes 4 different languages. This is the only country I know of that insists on English-only education. So far, we've been coddled--typically, one of the 2, 3 or 4 other languages other countries learn is English. Because for many, many years the USA was a powerhouse. This is changing, and our leaders are refusing to recognize this, many because they cling to this arrogant idea of American "exceptionalism."

I've called, emailed, and written my members of Congress about other, similar, educational aid issues. I always get either a form letter back or a computer-generated response that tells me the individual never even saw my letter and/or if he did, he completely ignored what I said in it. What I said and what his party idealogues tell him to push/believe don't jive.

I see what's up the road for us, so I know what I'll do in my house to prepare my child for it. I just don't know what will happen to the rest of the country in so many generations. (I hate to be such a Debbie Downer Pessimisst, but I work in education....sorry :-).
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
02:20 PM on 03/05/2011
No, she is not "deeply correct" -- whatever that is supposed to mean. Neither are you. I have to doubt, for example, and doubt strongly, your claim that " the vast majority of citizens in other countries in the world all grow up learning 2,3, sometimes 4 different languages"?

Don't forget: the Han Chinese outnumber us all, and as Berdan says, if you want to do business there, you had better be ready to do it in Mandarin. There just is not much studying of second languages going on in China. The level of English covered in high school over there is incredibly low -- like in Japan. So that really does not count as "learning another language". The same goes for most of the FSU (except for bilingual regions like Ukraine).

It sounds rather like you are thinking of what is mainly a Continental European experience, where people really do learn 2 or even 4 languages well in school.

BTW: it the reason for widespread study of English really is that it is the "USA that is the powerhouse", then WHY are they mostly studying British English in these other countries?

Finally, "American exceptionalism" arrogant as it is, pervades even the Left, not just the Right. Even President Obama is allowing his thinking to be skewed by it.
10:02 PM on 03/05/2011
Great comments throughout, Syllogizer, and I thank you for your perspective. One point of clarification: In China, they DO require English beginning as early as first grade and continue through college. Many more Chinese speak English than we realize and, in fact, it will soon become the country where there are the most English speakers in the world (due to population but still an alarming statistic).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Rollins
06:58 PM on 03/06/2011
The comment I made here comes from both an English as a Second Language teacher, a 2nd language speaker, and someone who has befriended and worked with numerous people from numerous areas around the world, specifically the European continent.

What is happening in America is backward thinking. I work in an area of a state where everyone would benefit from bilingual education yet the anger from the general citizenry whenever it's brought up is amazing to me.

Calm down.