As countries in North Africa and the Middle East continue their descent into violence and chaos, crude oil prices have increased more than 20 percent. As Americans feel that pain at the pump, economists continue to express concern that the volatile oil market might plunge the U.S. back into recession.
Yet our society's dependence on oil is more than just an economic problem. The events of recent weeks have reminded us that the thirst for oil threatens global security. It hampers diplomacy. It supports petro-dictators.
The unfortunate truth is that the addiction will be difficult to break. Despite the high costs of oil, hydrocarbons remain the cheapest source of energy on the planet. The world needs a replacement; one that is sustainable, secure, and can compete on the open market.
The most promising replacement -- bio-based energy -- is more viable than many people realize.
For decades, scientists have known that organic biomass can be used to fuel our cars, trucks, and airplanes. Americans are already using simple materials, like corn kernels and sugarcane, for exactly that purpose. In 2010 alone, the U.S. produced 13.2 billion gallons of ethanol from corn. If you live in the continental United States, odds are you've used corn-based ethanol, blended with gasoline, in your car.
More complicated types of biomass -- corn cobs, wood chips, waste paper -- are far more difficult to turn into energy. But this type of biomass--known as "cellulosic biomass" -- is plentiful and renewable. It is also cheap, precisely because no one has much use for it. Today, it mostly rots in fields or sits in landfills. If we could turn it into low-cost energy, the world would have a viable, environmentally friendly alternative to oil.
For a long time, this seemed like a dream, but today it's becoming a reality. Thanks to a new enzyme, developed in laboratories, a refinery can convert cellulosic biomass into ethanol cost competitive to gasoline.
When you factor in the additional costs of distribution and marketing, cellulosic ethanol is not quite competitive with oil. Not yet. But it's getting closer. Today, the greatest challenge is not one of science, but of scale. If we can bring large amounts of cellulosic ethanol onto the market, we can indeed turn our oil-based society into a bio-based society.
This is particularly important for the United States. America has only 3 percent of the world's oil reserves, but produces more than 25 percent of the world's agricultural residues. In fact, the Department of Energy estimates the United States could produce 90 billion gallons of ethanol using only agricultural and forestry waste, and energy crops.
The bio-based society would also create American jobs. From farmers in the field to manufacturers of harvesting equipment, from operators at biorefineries to workers at biochemical plants, biofuels and bio-based products put people to work. Advanced biofuels could directly create 400,000 jobs by 2030, and indirectly create 1.5 million more.
In order to seize this opportunity -- in order to bring cellulosic ethanol production to scale -- policymakers must take three important steps.
First, the U.S. must direct research and development grants toward the next generation of bio-based products. The same ethanol that powers cars can be used to create renewable plastics and chemicals, further reducing our dependence on oil.
Second, the U.S. must build the infrastructure a bio-based society requires. For decades, the United States has funded refineries, pipelines, and ports to help the economies of oil-producing regions. Now, it's time to build biorefineries, and to create programs that help farmers collect and transport biomass.
Third, the U.S. needs to invest directly in industrial biotechnology. Over the long term, bio-based fuels, chemicals, and plastics will become hugely profitable on their own. But today, the industry faces high start-up costs, and competes with an oil industry that receives billions of dollars year after year in government funds.
To be clear, it will not take a century of subsidies to realize the vision of a bio-based society. Biotechnology holds the promise, and increasingly the certainty, of reshaping our world for the better. In the future, our cars, trucks, airplanes, and ships will run on fuels -- cheaper and environmentally friendly fuels -- derived from cellulose. Plastics will be made from plants rather than petroleum. American workers will be employed on farms and in biorefineries, making energy here rather than importing oil from Saudi Arabia or Venezuela.
All this is going to happen sooner or later. But when it comes to America's energy future, there's a big difference between sooner and later.
That's why America must act. With just a few key investments in cellulosic biofuel, the United States can bolster its national security, reduce the impact of oil price swings, and become the world leader in the energy -- and the economy -- of tomorrow.
Steen Riisgaard is the president and CEO of Novozymes, a leading developer of enzymes used in the creation of biofuels.
Brian Keane: In Massachusetts, Clean Energy From Manure
visit www.renewableenergyworld.com and check "The Brew Barons".
Cellulosic ethanol is produced from WASTE PRODUCTS. Converting these into fuel doesn't place strain on agricultural lands; it puts to use materials that are currently left to rot.
If you go to your local landfill and note just how much space is taken up by waste paper and cardboard alone, you can get a sense of the potential energy represented by the things we discard (not to mention the potential to reduce our out-of-control waste disposal crisis). And that doesn't take into account agricultural slash or waste from lumber milling and paper processing.
I do not believe cellulosic ethanol is the primary solution to our energy needs, but it represents an important, renewable energy vector for applications requiring portable liquid fuel (such as cars) with minimal alterations to existing infrastructure.
As the author states, the economic limiter is not the process, it's achieving economies of scale.
Legalize cannabis. It alone won't completely solve anything, but it is an essential piece of the puzzle.
The sad thing is it looks like this problem is going to continue with the new trend in reporting on ethanol. Finally, most news outlets are reporting that corn ethanol has problems— inefficiency, land use issues, waterway pollution, food security/inflation, etc. The new narrative is that cellulosic ethanol is the real answer and corn ethanol has been sucking up all the subsidies. If we just give cellulosic “the capital” we will have cheap “homegrown” energy for all.
Cellulosic ethanol has received subsidies and has been unsuccessful. Look at Vinod khosla’s Range Fuels and Cello Energy. Range Fuels has gotten about 162 million in tax-payer dollars and about the same in private funding, but has not produced the cellulosic ethanol it promised. WSJ reported that the Range Fuels CEO says that no one has figured out how to produce commercially viable portions of cellulosic ethanol. And Cello Energy is bankrupt. (See WSJ 2/10/11 The Range Fuels Fiasco) (enchantingethanol.blogspot.com)
See Moving Beyond Oil at www.aesopinstitute.org to learn more about this and other alternatives.
They are surfacing worldwide and it is no longer possible to stop them.
But the lack of adventure capital for what is often fringe science continues to slow them down far more than any opposition.
The Black Swans, highly improbable breakthroughs with dramatic implications are being born and a small flock of them is likely to emerge this year.
See Cold Fusion and Black Swans on the Aesop Institute website for some examples.
Biofuels are a very inefficient way to take hydrocarbons, turn them into fertilizer and fuel for tractors and combines, grow food, distill it into ethanol and pump it into cars.
Now an enzyme that can turn cellulosic plants into biofuel. Start cutting down more forests? Don't we use enough wood from Brazil (via China) to see those rain forests destroyed.
Solar and solar-generated hydrogen fuels are the REAL long term answer. I'm not even sure that biofuels are a legitimate stopgap, whether from foodstuffs, trees, or grasses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of the above statement, I can only conclude you didn't read the article.
Food is one thing, which is the primary source of ethanol. And will be for years in the future.
Even if the dream of turning sedge grass into ethanol comes true, it's an energy sink. Sun energy, to biomass energy, harvested, distilled, and distributed by machines (mechanical energy convered from biomass/petrochemical energy)...
Why not convert the sun directly into energy?