iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stephanie Woodard

Stephanie Woodard

Posted: October 12, 2010 12:25 PM

"If you're having problems, they'll take your kids anytime they want," said Robert Wabasha, of the Santee Sioux Nation, whose granddaughter and grandniece both died after being adopted out of his family. The granddaughter died at the hands of her adoptive father while a baby, and the grandniece recently drowned at age 5. Wabasha (shown below) and other Native people testified about experiences with Iowa's child-welfare system before the Iowa Commission on Native American Affairs during a two-day meeting at Four Directions Community Center in Sioux City, Iowa.

2010-10-11-RWabasha.JPGFear and outrage permeated stories heard by ICNAA and other attendees, including attorneys, ICWA (Indian Child Welfare Act) specialists from the Ponca and Santee nations, and representatives of the governor, Siouxland Human Investment Partnership, and the Native American Unit of Iowa's human services department. "There's a feeling you're never safe," said commissioner and Four Directions program manager Judy Yellowbank, who's from the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. "Even people who have, for example, legally adopted a grandchild, can't be sure the child won't be taken away."

Preston Daniels, director of Iowa's human rights department, under whose umbrella ICNAA operates, addressed Native parents' sense of dread, saying, "Helplessness is terrifying." He also commended ICNAA's proposed solutions, including a bill to be introduced in the state legislature's 2011 spring session to restore parental rights to those who have lost them -- currently a permanent loss -- and to ensure grandparents' rights.

Daniels called the bill vital: "The relatively small Native population is in danger of losing its next generation, and therefore its heritage. Many are losing parental rights at a young age. However, every study shows that people generally mature out of youthful indiscretions at around age 25." They should have a second chance, Daniels said. "Children need their parents."

And parents need their children, said Four Directions' executive director Frank LaMere, from the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. He recounted the suicide of a young woman who'd lost custody of her child and added, "Our Anishinabe relatives tell us children choose their parents when they come into this world. A parental-rights bill would sustain those relationships."

In an afternoon of testimonials, speakers described leaping through what Rosalie Two Bulls, from Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin, called "hoops of fire" to prove they were competent. Two Bulls, a mental-health professional working on a Ph.D., reported being told she is too old to adopt her grandchildren.

2010-10-12-AntIbarra.jpgAntonia Ybarra (shown right), also a Nebraska Winnebago, got certified as a foster parent to prove she was qualified to adopt her young relatives. Ybarra, who spoke at a 2009 Congressional briefing arranged by The Alliance for Racial Equity in Child Welfare, teared up as she explained that she had to divorce her husband of 23 years so his legal problems wouldn't prevent her from having the kids. "Even though the kids are legally adopted now, we're afraid to remarry until they turn 18," she said.

Though the child-welfare system appears efficient at removing Native children, it seems ineffective when help may be needed. Reginald White, from the Red Lake Band of Chippewa, testified to the commission about roadblocks and hostility he was experiencing as he attempted to gain custody of his young son. "He's such a great, outgoing kid, but I'm seeing changes in him," White said. "He keeps asking me, 'Dad, when am I going home?'"

2010-10-11-TonyWood.JPGTony Wood (shown left), who's Yankton/Winnebago, held up a photograph of his 3½-year-old twins. "My children have been missing for 34 days, and I'm barely holding on," he said. "I believe they are in danger, and I believe I have fathers' rights, but no agency will help me. In recent months, I have been totally responsible for their needs. Now I don't know where they are or even if they're eating. I have a good job and supervise a staff, and my wife's lawyer is saying I can't see my kids because I'll take them and 'run to the reservation'."

Misinformation, such as the idea that reservations are beyond the law, poor understanding of Native cultures, and uncooperative court officials complicate matters in overburdened child-welfare systems. An area newspaper's investigative report and anecdotal evidence from Sioux City attorneys have also suggested that adoptions may be a lucrative business there. And some officials may not realize how aggressively they must pursue ICWA requirements, using "active efforts" to keep Native families together, to find a child's tribe, and more.

Moving forward, ICNAA will develop cultural-competency training, work to ensure better home studies, and encourage recruitment of Native foster families. Commission chair Judy Allen, from the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska, was adamant: "In working with the system, we don't want to turn our Native families into white families and our kids into white kids."

Photos by Stephanie Woodard.

 
"If you're having problems, they'll take your kids anytime they want," said Robert Wabasha, of the Santee Sioux Nation, whose granddaughter and grandniece both died after being adopted out of his fami...
"If you're having problems, they'll take your kids anytime they want," said Robert Wabasha, of the Santee Sioux Nation, whose granddaughter and grandniece both died after being adopted out of his fami...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:59 PM on 10/16/2010
In Iowa, the only reason we have a native american settlement - is because the Sac and Fox people had to buy back their own land. They had to march up the steps of the Iowa capital, and ask to buy their land back. After removal to another state they missed home so much, they figured out how to work with a system that completely worked against them from the beginning. Now, that system is still working against them, unjustly ignoring that native children need to stay in their own culture. Iowa can learn from states that co-operate with the tribal communities in placing native children. How can workers and legislators who do not understand the depth and extent of the native tiyospaye "family system," protect the best interests of the child's welfare? "A mere thin layer of understanding" will only perpetuate the U.S. history in thinking that "indians need to be turned into white people." You have no idea the impact on a native child that is taken from their culture. Placement must include a foremost effort to find a home within the family or the community. There is no greater time for a child to need their culture and community. United States policy for many years was designed to destroy the native family culture (see boarding school history and U.S. policy to destroy the indian culture). We can work with these families/communities to retain their children. Let's stop taking from them what is most important.
12:53 PM on 10/17/2010
This article is indicative of whats happening across the country, it feels like our native communities are under attack. In Minnesota there are eleven tribes/communities and a large urban Indian community in the twin cities of Minneapolis and St.Paul. Though the State of Minnesota is deemed as "progressive" in working with tribes on child welfare, American Indian Children are still the highest in out of home placement as compared with White, African American, Hispanic and Asian Pacific children. One huge concern that tribes have is the "ignorance or at the blatant disregard for the Indian Child Welfare Act, a Federal law passed in 1978. This law was passed to remedy to unwarranted removal of American Indian Children from their homes and communities/ families. I know you are probably already aware of these "protections". I just wanted you to know I appreciate your perspective of the impact of revmoval from the communities, also the policies that disconnected families from a value system that is rich with purpose and strong family traditions. The current child protection system as it is only considers the physical safety of the child, while considerations for the emotional, mental and spiritual areas are usually not addressed, therefore only perpetuating the issues that we continue to deal with generation after generation.
12:49 PM on 10/13/2010
Thank you for this important reminder of the enormous harm that Child Protective Services can do to the Native American children it is supposed to “protect.” The assault on Native American communities is one reason both Iowa and Nebraska tear apart families at among the highest rates in the nation – doing enormous harm to the children needlessly taken, and overloading caseworkers so they have less time to find children in real danger.

You can get a sense of how deep the bias runs from a 2003 series in the Des Moines Register. In one of those stories, the chief juvenile prosecutor in the Sioux City area, Dewey Sloan says: “I don’t think there’s anything in any of these [termination of parental rights] cases that points to something positive about Indian culture, except the culture of drugs and the culture of poverty and the culture of abuse.” Mr. Sloan also explains that the poor have different “family values” from the rest of us.

In other words, the bias runs so deep and is so pervasive that a top official doesn’t even feel the need to hide it.

Richard Wexler
Executive Director
National Coalition for Child Protection Reform
http://www.nccpr.org
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:55 PM on 10/12/2010
It's racist that Whites are still in charge of Native's programs.